Splunk AppDynamics and Sentry are competitors in the application monitoring space. AppDynamics seems to have the upper hand with its comprehensive monitoring features, though Sentry is praised for its ease of use and cost-effectiveness.
Features: Splunk AppDynamics offers detailed stack traces, JVM monitoring, and transactional awareness, empowering users to analyze application performance and tackle complex issues. Its business transaction tracking gives a complete picture for diagnosing problems. Sentry focuses on capturing application errors and performance metrics, with integrations for both frontend and backend issues, ensuring comprehensive error tracking and efficient log management.
Room for Improvement: Splunk AppDynamics users face challenges with complexity in navigation and high licensing costs. There's a demand for improved network monitoring and integration with emerging technologies. Sentry lacks in-depth analytics and could enhance its debugging capabilities and integration options.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk AppDynamics supports versatile deployments across public, private, and hybrid clouds, and on-premise setups, though complexity is an issue. Its customer service is well-rated despite delays in response times. Sentry offers simplicity in deployment supporting public and on-premises setups, with flexible and accessible support.
Pricing and ROI: Splunk AppDynamics comes with a complex licensing model and higher costs, which can be justified by significant ROI in complex environments. Sentry provides a flexible pricing structure, including an open-source option and pay-as-you-grow model, making it a cost-effective choice with swift ROI for startups and small teams.
The customer service and support are helpful and responsive.
It has been easy to use and configure across multiple systems, each having several environments.
We have reached maximum capacity in our tier, and extending capacity has not been cost-effective from Splunk's perspective.
I did not find any Docker solution available with it, and a separate instance has to be installed.
It is necessary to conduct appropriate testing before deploying them in production to prevent potential outages.
I can rate it nine out of ten.
Integrations or single sign-on capability with Microsoft would be beneficial for securing all assets.
Splunk AppDynamics provides an end-to-end view of the application but misses the infrastructure part, which is crucial.
If AppDynamics could develop a means to monitor without an agent, it could significantly improve application performance and reduce potential problems.
Compared to New Relic, it provides the necessary features at a cheaper cost, especially since we moved infrastructure monitoring to Azure.
Customers have to pay a premium price, however, they receive considerable value from the product.
All these solutions at the moment are cheap, but it is like paying for insurance; you pay insurance to avoid major damage.
Real-time error tracking helps our Quality Assurance team easily identify the root causes of problems or bugs and promptly inform the developers about specific issues.
At this time, I focus on finding and fixing bugs.
What I like the most about Splunk AppDynamics is the end-to-end observability for the application, along with traces.
The feature that I appreciate in AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is the intuitive and user-friendly dynamic mapping it creates for workflows.
The real-time feature provides me with insights into what's happening.
Sentry is a tool for monitoring web and application performance, tracking errors, processing request times, and managing user data access.
Developers integrate Sentry with web and application environments to capture front-end and back-end errors, utilize error logs, trace requests, and observe metrics without real-time production access. Sentry's use extends to monitoring internal applications, leveraging CyberArk PAM integration, deploying notifications, and detecting silent failures. Users benefit from detailed error and performance reports, contextual cause-stack information, and real-time breakdowns. There is room for improvement, as users desire refined integration and administrative settings, enhanced alert policies, and more customization in event metrics.
What are Sentry's most important features?Sentry is implemented across industries ranging from tech startups to large enterprises. These organizations use Sentry to enhance application reliability, track performance, and secure user data within protected environments. Integration with CyberArk PAM ensures secure deployment. Organizations find Sentry useful for monitoring internal applications, efficiently processing request times, and tracing changes in production without direct access.
Splunk AppDynamics enhances application performance monitoring with advanced diagnostics and real-time insights, offering seamless end-to-end transaction tracking and infrastructure visibility.
AppDynamics provides critical tools for businesses to analyze application behavior and performance. Through innovative features like transaction snapshot analysis and adaptable dashboards, users can quickly identify and address issues, ensuring high levels of system uptime and efficiency. It is designed to support complex environments including Kubernetes and AWS, enhancing user experience by detecting performance issues early. Despite needing improvements in network monitoring and integration, it remains a robust option for tracking application health.
What are the key features of AppDynamics?In industries like financial services and e-commerce, AppDynamics facilitates performance tracking across distributed systems, optimizing infrastructure to meet consumer demands. It excels in environments needing precise transaction monitoring and is pivotal in delivering high value and satisfaction.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
