If budget allows using the per socket license and not the agent based with per GB counter for Dedup is the way to go.
New licensing is easy and affordable.
If budget allows using the per socket license and not the agent based with per GB counter for Dedup is the way to go.
New licensing is easy and affordable.
It’s simple, straightforward, and we were able to see 50% hard savings.
The setup cost is a bit high, but the solution is an all-in-one solution.
It’s simple, straightforward, and we were able to see 50% hard savings.
The setup cost is a bit high, but the solution is an all-in-one solution.
Doing what this is capable of doing, the cost of it is in line.
It has already paid off itself in the first few months that we implemented it.
Doing what this is capable of doing, the cost of it is in line.
It has already paid off itself in the first few months that we implemented it.
Licensing is per node and per protected terabyte. You will also pay 10-15% annually for support.
The ROI is huge. Not really measurable at this point, but the price of the unit was a fraction of what a couple hours of downtime could result in.
Licensing is per node and per protected terabyte. You will also pay 10-15% annually for support.
The ROI is huge. Not really measurable at this point, but the price of the unit was a fraction of what a couple hours of downtime could result in.
Licensing was very expensive and did not scale well if needed to move between license models.
So far I can only say that the license structure could be looked at to be aligned as either capacity-based or traditional.
Licensing was very expensive and did not scale well if needed to move between license models.
So far I can only say that the license structure could be looked at to be aligned as either capacity-based or traditional.
The pricing of SolarWinds seems to be fair compared to the rest of the industry.
The price isn't extreme, but I'd love to pay less.
The pricing of SolarWinds seems to be fair compared to the rest of the industry.
The price isn't extreme, but I'd love to pay less.
The pricing of this solution is ok, but I'm expecting that the price will decrease in the future.
The pricing of this solution is good, and it is one of the easiest things that you can sell Azure with.
The pricing of this solution is ok, but I'm expecting that the price will decrease in the future.
The pricing of this solution is good, and it is one of the easiest things that you can sell Azure with.
NAKIVO Backup & Replication offers cost-effective, user-friendly solutions with notable encryption and platform integration. In comparison, Dell PowerProtect Data Manager excels in enterprise features and complex environments. NAKIVO suits small businesses, while Dell is ideal for enterprises needing comprehensive backup capabilities.
CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is a critical solution for organizations aiming to ensure business continuity through real-time replication and rapid recovery of key systems. It serves multiple purposes: rapidly enabling failover during IT disruptions, facilitating seamless cloud migrations without business impacts, maintaining high service availability across various locations to reduce downtime, and supporting compliance with disaster data integrity and availability requirements.
Users value its real-time, block-level data replication that minimizes downtime and data loss, alongside its user-friendly setup that requires minimal technical knowledge for quick deployment. Additionally, its cost-effectiveness and automated orchestration for accurate recovery processes enhance organizational efficiency, increase operational effectiveness, and improve data management and decision-making capabilities, thereby boosting overall productivity and business outcomes.
We were happy with the pricing that they gave us.
They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed.
We were happy with the pricing that they gave us.
They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed.
Pricing is similar, but they don´t offer the same options/technology.
If your company can afford it, go for it.
Pricing is similar, but they don´t offer the same options/technology.
If your company can afford it, go for it.
It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup.
We have a very good return on investment.
It provides a good cost savings compared to our previous cloud backup.
We have a very good return on investment.
I do not work with the pricing or licensing issues of the solution for our organization.
Normally our customers purchase the premium plus license, rather than the standard one, which provides more options.
I do not work with the pricing or licensing issues of the solution for our organization.
Normally our customers purchase the premium plus license, rather than the standard one, which provides more options.
Synology DSM is a cheap solution.
The licensing part of the solution is free. The hardware is more expensive than the other solutions in the market, but it's okay in the long run.
Synology DSM is a cheap solution.
The licensing part of the solution is free. The hardware is more expensive than the other solutions in the market, but it's okay in the long run.
Competing products sometimes use deceptive marketing to make their products seem a lot cheaper. Comparing apples-to-apples, DataPlatform wins out.
It's priced properly for the market.
Competing products sometimes use deceptive marketing to make their products seem a lot cheaper. Comparing apples-to-apples, DataPlatform wins out.
It's priced properly for the market.
The licensing costs are approximately 150,00 Saudi Riyals.
The licensing costs for this solution are very high.
The licensing costs are approximately 150,00 Saudi Riyals.
The licensing costs for this solution are very high.
Organizations utilize Carbonite Server for cloud backups and disaster recovery, protecting VMware, vSphere, and vSAN. Managed services offer it as backup-as-a-service for off-site backups. It provides features like Bare Metal Recovery and SQL Granular Restore, known for efficiency. Needs improvement in SSO integration and dashboard design.
We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license.
The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year.
We pay 9,000 dollars per year for our license.
The pricing is between $120 and $150 per year.
Organizations use Barracuda Backup for data protection and recovery due to ease of use, reliability, and comprehensive support. It automates backups, ensures data availability, and integrates seamlessly. Users value quick restoration, real-time backups, ransomware protection, scalable storage, but report issues with slow recovery, limited customization, integration challenges, and tech support responsiveness.
It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great.
The licensing structure provides cost savings to business.
It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great.
The licensing structure provides cost savings to business.
The licensing is based on how many nodes I want to be able to run as a virtualized recovery.
The total for our current solution's licensing is about $14,000 for 12 servers for three years.
The licensing is based on how many nodes I want to be able to run as a virtualized recovery.
The total for our current solution's licensing is about $14,000 for 12 servers for three years.
If you need to extend it, it can be extended acting like a normal Spectrum Protect with a long archive.
The licensing model of Spectrum Protect Plus is more efficient and cheaper compared to the original.
If you need to extend it, it can be extended acting like a normal Spectrum Protect with a long archive.
The licensing model of Spectrum Protect Plus is more efficient and cheaper compared to the original.
It's quite cost-effective.
The pricing is not too bad, but could be a little better.
It's quite cost-effective.
The pricing is not too bad, but could be a little better.
Cost could be lower.
NetApp Cloud Backup has a subscription-based model and it is paid annually.
Cost could be lower.
NetApp Cloud Backup has a subscription-based model and it is paid annually.
Oracle Data Guard is a feature available only in Oracle Database Enterprise Edition, and is available for extra cost.
It saves money and is cost-effective.
Oracle Data Guard is a feature available only in Oracle Database Enterprise Edition, and is available for extra cost.
It saves money and is cost-effective.
Salesforce Backup and Restore safeguards data integrity and ensures disaster recovery, praised for effective data retrieval, regulatory compliance, and automated schedules. Users commend its automation, data recovery speed, granular restoration options, and seamless integration. Areas for improvement include performance speed, intuitive navigation, error reporting, integration process, and documentation depth.
This solution is very expensive.
IBM ProtectTIER is an expensive solution.
This solution is very expensive.
IBM ProtectTIER is an expensive solution.
Pricing is on a case by case basis.
Support is very good. They send out a VM link and help you fix any issues.
Pricing is on a case by case basis.
Support is very good. They send out a VM link and help you fix any issues.
There's a yearly licensing cost. The costs might be around $2000 USD annually.
The product pricing here in Zimbabwe is good, I cannot complain.
There's a yearly licensing cost. The costs might be around $2000 USD annually.
The product pricing here in Zimbabwe is good, I cannot complain.
Vinchin Backup & Recovery efficiently handles data backup and disaster recovery with its intuitive design and reliable performance. Users appreciate its seamless integration with multiple platforms. However, there is room for improvement in customer support responsiveness and additional advanced features would enhance its versatility.
ExaGrid is a one-time investment.
ExaGrid is a one-time investment.
