Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo

Top 10 ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Alternatives

Vendor: ESET
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

Top ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ESET Endpoint Protection Platform based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and Microsoft Defender for Office 365. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat detection, real-time data protection, and a seamless user interface that ensures minimal system impact while providing comprehensive security for businesses of all sizes.

ESET Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with ESET, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
ESET offers comprehensive endpoint protection with antivirus, HIPS, and centralized management, ideal for budget-conscious SMBs. In comparison, CrowdStrike Falcon provides advanced AI-driven threat detection and EDR, appealing to enterprises seeking robust cloud-native security despite higher costs. Pricing and deployment differ significantly.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers a lower setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which requires a more substantial initial investment. This cost difference highlights ESET's emphasis on affordability, contrasting with CrowdStrike's focus on comprehensive, higher-end solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers a lower setup cost compared to CrowdStrike Falcon, which requires a more substantial initial investment. This cost difference highlights ESET's emphasis on affordability, contrasting with CrowdStrike's focus on comprehensive, higher-end solutions.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is valued for its lightweight resource usage and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers advanced threat detection and seamless integration with Microsoft's ecosystem, justifying its higher price with extensive features and improved productivity.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers more budget-friendly setup options, making it a more economical choice for businesses.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers more budget-friendly setup options, making it a more economical choice for businesses.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender for Office 365
4.2 out of 5
ESET offers comprehensive threat protection with low resource usage, ideal for environments requiring detailed management. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Office 365 excels in email threat protection and integration with Microsoft 365, benefiting users relying on cloud environments and Office applications.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Microsoft Defender for Office 365 Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform incurs minimal setup costs, while Microsoft Defender for Office 365 also offers low initial expenses, highlighting ESET as a more budget-friendly choice for enterprises prioritizing cost-effective security solutions over Microsoft’s offerings.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform incurs minimal setup costs, while Microsoft Defender for Office 365 also offers low initial expenses, highlighting ESET as a more budget-friendly choice for enterprises prioritizing cost-effective security solutions over Microsoft’s offerings.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.4 out of 5
Both ESET Endpoint Protection Platform and SentinelOne Singularity Complete offer strong endpoint security solutions. ESET provides comprehensive malware protection with an affordable setup. In comparison, SentinelOne excels with advanced autonomous response and real-time forensics, making it ideal for users needing advanced functionalities.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. SentinelOne Singularity Complete Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost, while SentinelOne Singularity Complete has a higher setup investment.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers comprehensive threat detection and strong anti-malware tools with lightweight system impact. In comparison, HP Wolf Security excels with isolation technology, running tasks in micro-VMs. ESET is ideal for broad security needs, while HP Wolf provides enhanced isolation.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. HP Wolf Security Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is known for its higher initial setup costs, while HP Wolf Security offers a more budget-friendly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is known for its higher initial setup costs, while HP Wolf Security offers a more budget-friendly setup.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform excels in ease of use, deployment, and support, making it suitable for straightforward security needs. In comparison, Cortex XDR offers advanced threat detection and prevention, ideal for complex environments requiring superior threat intelligence and automation features, despite a steeper setup learning curve.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher initial setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks offers a more cost-effective setup option. ESET users reported a more complex installation process compared to the simpler setup of Cortex XDR.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher initial setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks offers a more cost-effective setup option. ESET users reported a more complex installation process compared to the simpler setup of Cortex XDR.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
ESET offers comprehensive protection with low resource impact, appealing to small to medium businesses with cost-effective pricing. In comparison, Tanium provides advanced threat hunting and real-time queries, suiting large organizations needing intricate endpoint management despite its higher cost.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Tanium Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers a more affordable setup cost, while Tanium involves a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers a more affordable setup cost, while Tanium involves a higher initial investment.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection offers efficient resource usage and comprehensive security, appealing to businesses needing flexibility and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox provides robust integration capabilities and centralized management, attracting businesses prioritizing ease of implementation and richer security features.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a low setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox involves higher initial fees making it a pricier option.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a low setup cost, while WatchGuard Firebox involves higher initial fees making it a pricier option.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers effective malware protection and user-friendly management, making it cost-effective. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient features advanced threat protection and integrates with Fortinet's security suite, providing strong ROI despite higher setup costs. Choose ESET for simpler deployment, Fortinet for comprehensive features and support.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Fortinet FortiClient Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a slightly higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, emphasizing a contrast in initial investment requirements for deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a slightly higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, emphasizing a contrast in initial investment requirements for deployment.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
3.9 out of 5
ESET offers a lightweight solution ideal for resource-limited environments. In comparison, Trellix provides comprehensive security features like DLP. ESET is more affordable and easy to deploy, while Trellix, despite higher costs, offers extensive features that may justify the investment.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Trellix Endpoint Security Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers lower initial setup costs compared to Trellix Endpoint Security Platform. Despite this, Trellix provides more comprehensive security features that could justify its higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers lower initial setup costs compared to Trellix Endpoint Security Platform. Despite this, Trellix provides more comprehensive security features that could justify its higher setup cost.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is praised for affordability, simple management, and minimal system impact. In comparison, Symantec Endpoint Security stands out for advanced threat protection and detailed reporting, justifying its higher cost for those requiring comprehensive features and proactive security measures. ESET's smooth deployment contrasts Symantec's complex configuration yet strong support.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Symantec Endpoint Security Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform features a low setup cost and straightforward installation, while Symantec Endpoint Security has higher initial expenses and a more complex setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform features a low setup cost and straightforward installation, while Symantec Endpoint Security has higher initial expenses and a more complex setup process.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers resource-efficient security with features like ThreatSense and parental controls, ideal for cost-conscious businesses. In comparison, Check Point Harmony Endpoint provides comprehensive protection with advanced features such as Anti-Ransomware, making it suitable for organizations needing extensive security integration and control.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
The setup cost for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is generally considered affordable, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is seen as higher. This highlights a price difference that could influence budget-conscious decisions.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is generally considered affordable, while Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is seen as higher. This highlights a price difference that could influence budget-conscious decisions.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers comprehensive security, light footprint, and ease of use. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business excels in advanced threat detection and integration capabilities. ESET focuses on simplicity and efficiency, while Kaspersky provides extensive protection features worth the higher price.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business incurs higher initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business incurs higher initial costs.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers lower cost, comprehensive threat detection, and responsive customer service. In comparison, BigFix excels in powerful patch management and detailed reporting capabilities. ESET is easier to deploy, whereas BigFix provides more configuration options despite higher complexity.
Download BigFix vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost according to user reviews, whereas BigFix reviewers mention higher setup costs. This difference in initial investment is a key consideration for companies with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost according to user reviews, whereas BigFix reviewers mention higher setup costs. This difference in initial investment is a key consideration for companies with budget constraints.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform excels in antivirus capabilities and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Trend Vision One Endpoint Security impresses with advanced threat intelligence and integration. ESET has easier deployment, while Trend Vision One requires a larger initial investment but offers long-term benefits through extensive features.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Trend Vision One Endpoint Security Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while Trend Vision One Endpoint Security requires a higher initial investment.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform excels in virus detection and low system impact, offering robust endpoint management and affordability. In comparison, Cynet's automated threat detection and advanced analytics provide comprehensive protection. Cynet's features justify its higher cost for those needing advanced security and AI-driven insights.
Download Cynet vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
The setup cost for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is lower compared to Cynet, which has a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is lower compared to Cynet, which has a higher initial investment.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender for Identity
4.4 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers comprehensive security with features like ThreatSense, Cloud-Enhanced Whitelisting, and host-based intrusion prevention, suitable for resource-conscious environments. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Identity excels in advanced threat detection, integrating identity security seamlessly within Microsoft 365 for behavior-focused protection.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Microsoft Defender for Identity Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Identity, which offers a lower setup cost. This price difference is a key consideration for businesses evaluating budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Identity, which offers a lower setup cost. This price difference is a key consideration for businesses evaluating budget constraints.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is favored for its ease of deployment, competitive pricing, and strong threat protection. In comparison, Intercept X Endpoint’s advanced security features, such as anti-ransomware and machine learning, appeal to those needing superior protection despite higher costs and complexity.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Intercept X Endpoint Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher initial setup cost compared to Intercept X Endpoint, which offers a more budget-friendly setup solution.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher initial setup cost compared to Intercept X Endpoint, which offers a more budget-friendly setup solution.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Bitdefender Total Security
4.4 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is praised for strong security protocols and effectiveness against malware. In comparison, Bitdefender Total Security excels with advanced features including multi-layer ransomware protection and VPN. ESET offers cost-efficiency, while Bitdefender provides superior long-term value with additional functionalities.
Download Bitdefender Total Security vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers an affordable setup cost, while Bitdefender Total Security presents a higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers an affordable setup cost, while Bitdefender Total Security presents a higher initial expense.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform appeals with its affordability and robust support, ideal for enterprise environments needing quick deployment and ease of use. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR excels with superior advanced features and granular control, fitting enterprises prioritizing long-term ROI over initial cost.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has lower setup costs, while WatchGuard EPDR offers more affordable long-term pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has lower setup costs, while WatchGuard EPDR offers more affordable long-term pricing.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.9 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers comprehensive security with minimal resource impact and supports multiple PCs per license. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Business provides strong integration within Microsoft's ecosystem. Each is appealing based on existing infrastructure and desired integration capabilities.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Microsoft Defender for Business Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has higher setup costs, while Microsoft Defender for Business offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has higher setup costs, while Microsoft Defender for Business offers a more budget-friendly option.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint
3.9 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers comprehensive malware detection and user-friendly configuration, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in advanced threat detection and robust incident response, attracting those prioritizing superior security features despite higher costs.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has minimal initial setup costs, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has minimal initial setup costs, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher initial investment.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform appeals to those seeking affordability and reliable support, excelling in malware detection and low system resource usage. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint's advanced threat intelligence and integration with other Cisco products justify its higher cost, benefiting large enterprises with detailed reporting.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, making it a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Endpoint, making it a more budget-friendly option.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Norton Small Business
4.3 out of 5
ESET is favored for its pricing and straightforward deployment, enhanced by strong anti-malware features. In comparison, Norton Small Business, though pricier, offers a comprehensive feature set including strong identity protection and cloud backup, with superior customer service and perceived value justifying its cost.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Norton Small Business Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher setup cost, whereas Norton Small Business offers a more affordable setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher setup cost, whereas Norton Small Business offers a more affordable setup option.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers comprehensive threat protection with minimal system impact. In comparison, Malwarebytes Teams excels in straightforward malware scanning and removal, making ESET suitable for advanced functionalities and Malwarebytes ideal for straightforward, reliable, budget-focused security.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Malwarebytes Teams Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform generally incurs higher setup costs compared to Malwarebytes Teams, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. However, ESET provides a comprehensive security suite that may justify the investment for some businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform generally incurs higher setup costs compared to Malwarebytes Teams, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. However, ESET provides a comprehensive security suite that may justify the investment for some businesses.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
3.9 out of 5

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust antivirus and low system impact, making it cost-effective and easy to deploy, with excellent customer service. In comparison, Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response promises advanced threat detection and remediation, justifying higher costs for larger enterprises seeking comprehensive, customizable security.

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform setup cost is generally lower compared to Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response, making ESET more cost-effective for initial deployment. Cybereason, however, might offer advanced features that justify its higher setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform setup cost is generally lower compared to Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response, making ESET more cost-effective for initial deployment. Cybereason, however, might offer advanced features that justify its higher setup cost.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
4.6 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform excels in resource-efficient management with antivirus and HIPS features. In comparison, ThreatLocker focuses on application control with allowlisting and ring-fencing. Tech buyers might choose ESET for cost-effectiveness or ThreatLocker for advanced security integration and application control.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers a straightforward setup cost, while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform involves a more complex pricing structure that reflects their different approaches to endpoint protection.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers a straightforward setup cost, while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform involves a more complex pricing structure that reflects their different approaches to endpoint protection.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites
4.2 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is recognized for its user-friendly interface, effective malware detection, cost-effective pricing, and solid ROI. In comparison, Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites offers advanced threat protection and data loss prevention, making it ideal for those prioritizing comprehensive features and long-term value.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a cost-effective initial setup, while Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites involve a higher upfront expense. ESET's competitive pricing highlights its affordability compared to Trend Micro’s more premium offering.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a cost-effective initial setup, while Trend Micro Worry-Free Services Suites involve a higher upfront expense. ESET's competitive pricing highlights its affordability compared to Trend Micro’s more premium offering.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
F-Secure Total
4.5 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
F-Secure Total
4.5 out of 5
Total peace of mind onlineOur lives are filled with digital moments. F‑Secure Total makes securing those moments brilliantly simple.
We can easily scale and improve security, but the cost is high for us.
View comparison
Pricing
We can easily scale and improve security, but the cost is high for us.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
4.0 out of 5
ESET offers affordable solutions with minimal resource requirements, ideal for small businesses. In comparison, BlackBerry Cylance, with a focus on AI-driven protection and zero-day threat prevention, suits those prioritizing advanced capabilities over cost, making it a powerful choice for robust security.
Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher initial setup cost than BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity. However, ESET offers extensive features that some users may find justify the price difference compared to the more budget-friendly Cylance.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a higher initial setup cost than BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity. However, ESET offers extensive features that some users may find justify the price difference compared to the more budget-friendly Cylance.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Seqrite Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform excels in threat detection and system efficiency, making it a strong choice for organizations prioritizing security performance. In comparison, Seqrite Endpoint Security offers extensive features like asset management and advanced device control, appealing to those needing a broader range of functionalities.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Seqrite Endpoint Security Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform features straightforward setup costs, while Seqrite Endpoint Security offers a more affordable initial setup, highlighting a significant cost difference.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform features straightforward setup costs, while Seqrite Endpoint Security offers a more affordable initial setup, highlighting a significant cost difference.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
GravityZone Business Security
4.3 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform excels in pricing and customer support, making it an attractive choice for those prioritizing affordability and superior service. In comparison, GravityZone Business Security offers extensive features and robust performance, appealing to those needing comprehensive and advanced security capabilities.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. GravityZone Business Security Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers a cost-effective setup, while GravityZone Business Security has a higher initial setup cost. ESET's affordability contrasts with GravityZone's premium pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers a cost-effective setup, while GravityZone Business Security has a higher initial setup cost. ESET's affordability contrasts with GravityZone's premium pricing structure.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers comprehensive threat detection and centralized management, emphasizing user-friendliness and competitive pricing. In comparison, Morphisec excels in proactive defense and malware prevention, delivering significant ROI despite higher costs. ESET focuses on operational speed, while Morphisec seeks better system integration.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Morphisec Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a one-time setup cost, while Morphisec requires a subscription-based setup fee. ESET's setup is often cited as more straightforward, whereas Morphisec's setup is praised for flexibility in various environments.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a one-time setup cost, while Morphisec requires a subscription-based setup fee. ESET's setup is often cited as more straightforward, whereas Morphisec's setup is praised for flexibility in various environments.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform
4.3 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers comprehensive protection and real-time monitoring, making it ideal for those seeking straightforward deployment and competitive pricing. In comparison, Deep Instinct Prevention Platform excels with advanced AI-driven threat detection and minimal false positives, suitable for those valuing superior technology and long-term benefits despite higher costs.
Download Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform requires a lower initial setup cost compared to the Deep Instinct Prevention Platform, which involves higher upfront fees.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform requires a lower initial setup cost compared to the Deep Instinct Prevention Platform, which involves higher upfront fees.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
3.9 out of 5
ESET offers extensive malware protection with minimal CPU and RAM impact, ideal for diverse environments. In comparison, OpenText Core focuses on lightweight design and cloud integration, beneficial for those prioritizing low system strain. ESET suits users needing broader protection features.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers a simpler setup cost structure, while OpenText Core Endpoint Protection features a more customizable setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers a simpler setup cost structure, while OpenText Core Endpoint Protection features a more customizable setup cost.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Fortinet FortiSandbox
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform provides comprehensive threat protection with low resource impact, ideal for cost-effective security. In comparison, Fortinet FortiSandbox excels in dynamic behavior analysis and zero-day detection, making it suitable for those seeking advanced threat detection and integration within Fortinet solutions.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Fortinet FortiSandbox Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers competitive setup costs, while Fortinet FortiSandbox is known for higher initial expenses, making ESET more attractive for budget-conscious buyers.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers competitive setup costs, while Fortinet FortiSandbox is known for higher initial expenses, making ESET more attractive for budget-conscious buyers.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Kaspersky Total Security
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust support and favorable pricing, making it a cost-effective option desired for straight-forward security management. In comparison, Kaspersky Total Security excels in comprehensive features and advanced protection, appealing to those valuing extensive security tools and versatile functionalities.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Kaspersky Total Security Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform's setup cost is generally described as moderate, while Kaspersky Total Security tends to have a higher initial setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform's setup cost is generally described as moderate, while Kaspersky Total Security tends to have a higher initial setup cost.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
AVG Internet Security Business Edition
1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers advanced threat detection and low system impact, appealing to businesses prioritizing operational continuity. In comparison, AVG Internet Security Business Edition provides comprehensive web protection. ESET is often more cost-effective while AVG’s extensive features may justify higher costs.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup with minimal cost, while AVG Internet Security Business Edition may incur higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup with minimal cost, while AVG Internet Security Business Edition may incur higher setup expenses.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ZoneAlarm
4.0 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ZoneAlarm
4.0 out of 5
ESET offers advanced features like ThreatSense, HIPS, and Parental Controls, appealing to those prioritizing resource efficiency. In comparison, ZoneAlarm provides comprehensive security with Antivirus/Antispyware and two-way firewall, suitable for basic protection at a lower cost with simple upgrades.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. ZoneAlarm Report
The setup cost for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is reported to be higher than that of ZoneAlarm, highlighting a price difference in initial investment between the two cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is reported to be higher than that of ZoneAlarm, highlighting a price difference in initial investment between the two cybersecurity solutions.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
SonicWall Capture Client
4.0 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is appreciated for comprehensive threat detection and ease of managing devices. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client is praised for advanced threat protection and seamless integration. ESET emphasizes user-friendly management, while SonicWall focuses on advanced security protocols, justifying its higher cost.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. SonicWall Capture Client Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform features a straightforward and cost-effective setup, while SonicWall Capture Client's setup may involve higher initial costs and complexity.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform features a straightforward and cost-effective setup, while SonicWall Capture Client's setup may involve higher initial costs and complexity.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform appeals for its strong malware detection, minimal system impact, and straightforward deployment, making it a cost-effective choice. In comparison, Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security offers superior threat intelligence and centralized management, justifying its higher cost with advanced features.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security vs. ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Report
The setup cost for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is relatively low, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost. ESET offers a cost-effective solution compared to Bitdefender's higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for ESET Endpoint Protection Platform is relatively low, while Bitdefender GravityZone Enterprise Security has a higher setup cost. ESET offers a cost-effective solution compared to Bitdefender's higher initial investment.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum
4.2 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust malware protection and is cost-effective with straightforward deployment. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum provides advanced threat detection and detailed analytics. ESET meets budget-friendly needs, while Kaspersky caters to complex security requirements.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum, which typically involves a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum, which typically involves a higher initial investment.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager
4.2 out of 5
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager excels in endpoint management with competitive pricing and straightforward deployment. In comparison, ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers superior malware detection with high ROI despite its complex setup. Tech buyers might choose Ivanti for cost-effectiveness or ESET for advanced security.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager Report
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager incurs a higher initial setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly setup costs of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager incurs a higher initial setup cost compared to the more budget-friendly setup costs of ESET Endpoint Protection Platform.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Jamf Protect
4.7 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Jamf Protect
4.7 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection offers comprehensive threat detection and ease of use, suitable for diverse systems. In comparison, Jamf Protect excels in macOS integration and proactive monitoring. ESET's affordability appeals to budget-conscious buyers, while Jamf Protect attracts those needing specialized macOS security.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. Jamf Protect Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Jamf Protect, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. In contrast, Jamf Protect's setup cost is higher, reflecting its extensive feature set and capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a lower setup cost compared to Jamf Protect, making it more budget-friendly for initial deployment. In contrast, Jamf Protect's setup cost is higher, reflecting its extensive feature set and capabilities.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection
4.0 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers robust antivirus protection and responsive support, ideal for efficient deployment. In comparison, WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection excels in advanced threat intelligence and comprehensive security management. Users may prefer ESET for lower costs and reliable performance or WithSecure for advanced features despite higher expenses.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is known for a more complex installation process and higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has a straightforward setup with moderate costs, while WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is known for a more complex installation process and higher setup expenses.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Quick Heal Total Security
1 out of 5
Quick Heal Total Security is ideal for protecting against malware, viruses, and online threats. It offers a user-friendly interface, parental controls, and secure online banking features. Some users feel improvements are needed in system performance impact and real-time protection updates.
View comparison
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Avira Antivirus
4.5 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Avira Antivirus
4.5 out of 5

Avira Antivirus Server offers web protection, traffic filtering and a powerful engine. These services protect your business files and customer data from 30 million daily threats.

It offers an annual license that is relatively cheap.
View comparison
Pricing
It offers an annual license that is relatively cheap.
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
Advanced SystemCare Ultimate
1 out of 5
Advanced SystemCare Ultimate offers comprehensive PC optimization and robust security features. Users find its scanning efficiency and real-time protection valuable. Some seek improvements in system resource usage and more seamless integration with third-party applications.
View comparison
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform Logo
IObit Malware Fighter 10 PRO
1 out of 5
IObit Malware Fighter 10 PRO is used for enhancing cybersecurity with real-time protection and ransomware security features, making it suitable for personal and business use. Users appreciate its easy installation but note that its scanning speed could be quicker. Some find custom settings lacking in flexibility.
View comparison

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)
Anti-Malware Tools