Top 10 IBM Business Automation Workflow Alternatives

Vendor: IBM

3.9 out of 5

26 reviews
80% willing to recommend

187 followers

Top IBM Business Automation Workflow Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to IBM Business Automation Workflow based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Camunda, Appian, and Pega Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

IBM Business Automation Workflow surpasses its competitors by integrating robust process management and case management capabilities, providing a user-friendly platform that enhances productivity, flexibility, and scalability for enterprises to automate complex workflows efficiently.

IBM Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with IBM, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Camunda

4.1 out of 5

Camunda

4.1 out of 5

Camunda attracts tech buyers with its open-source model and Java integration flexibility. In comparison, IBM Business Automation Workflow caters to businesses needing integrated RPA and AI. Both offer distinct BPM advantages, with Camunda favoring simplicity and IBM providing comprehensive features for extensive automation.

Download Camunda vs. IBM Business Automation Workflow Report

Pricing

Camunda is praised for its straightforward setup process with lower costs, while IBM Business Automation Workflow is noted for its higher initial setup expense but offers extensive advanced features.

View comparison

Pricing

Camunda is praised for its straightforward setup process with lower costs, while IBM Business Automation Workflow is noted for its higher initial setup expense but offers extensive advanced features.

Appian

4.2 out of 5

Appian

4.2 out of 5

Appian's features capitalize on rapid development with low-code, while IBM Business Automation Workflow excels in integrating RPA for complex processes. In comparison, tech buyers benefit from Appian's cloud flexibility and affordability, whereas IBM's comprehensive functionality appeals to enterprises prioritizing extensive infrastructure.

Download Appian vs. IBM Business Automation Workflow Report

Pricing

Appian's setup cost is lower, offering straightforward installation, while IBM Business Automation Workflow features a more complex and costly setup.

View comparison

Pricing

Appian's setup cost is lower, offering straightforward installation, while IBM Business Automation Workflow features a more complex and costly setup.

Pega Platform

4.1 out of 5

Pega Platform

4.1 out of 5

Pega Platform offers robust case management with low-code capabilities, ideal for enterprise-level needs and cloud deployment. In comparison, IBM Business Automation Workflow excels in integration and flexible workflows, providing strong reusability and support across platforms.

Download IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. Pega Platform Report

Pricing

Pega Platform has higher setup costs, often requiring specialized configuration, while IBM Business Automation Workflow offers a more straightforward setup at a lower initial expense.

View comparison

Pricing

Pega Platform has higher setup costs, often requiring specialized configuration, while IBM Business Automation Workflow offers a more straightforward setup at a lower initial expense.

SAP Signavio Process Manager

4.1 out of 5

SAP Signavio Process Manager

4.1 out of 5

SAP Signavio Process Manager is favored for its intuitive usability and wide system integration, making it ideal for collaborative and intelligence-driven process mapping. In comparison, IBM Business Automation Workflow's robust automation and control over workflows appeal to tech buyers seeking comprehensive process management.

Download IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report

Pricing

SAP Signavio Process Manager offers a competitive setup cost compared to IBM Business Automation Workflow, which provides more advanced initial investment features.

View comparison

Pricing

SAP Signavio Process Manager offers a competitive setup cost compared to IBM Business Automation Workflow, which provides more advanced initial investment features.

ARIS BPA

4.1 out of 5

ARIS BPA

4.1 out of 5

ARIS BPA offers comprehensive process modeling with a focus on flexibility and governance, appealing to enterprises seeking detailed process insights. In comparison, IBM Business Automation Workflow highlights integration and automation strengths, suiting businesses prioritizing seamless workflow connectivity and streamlined execution.

Download ARIS BPA vs. IBM Business Automation Workflow Report

Pricing

ARIS BPA involves higher initial setup costs, whereas IBM Business Automation Workflow offers a more economical setup. The distinct pricing highlights ARIS's comprehensive functionalities compared to IBM’s cost-effective solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Apache Airflow

4.0 out of 5

Apache Airflow

4.0 out of 5

Apache Airflow is ideal for data science due to its flexibility and Python-based customization, excelling in workflow integrations. In comparison, IBM Business Automation Workflow focuses on process automation, offering robust configuration for enterprises seeking in-depth business process modeling and integration with BPM and RPA.

Download Apache Airflow vs. IBM Business Automation Workflow Report

Pricing

Apache Airflow is a free solution that can be downloaded and ready for use at any moment.

The pricing for the product is reasonable.

View comparison

Pricing

Apache Airflow is a free solution that can be downloaded and ready for use at any moment.

The pricing for the product is reasonable.

Nintex Process Platform

3.9 out of 5

Nintex Process Platform

3.9 out of 5

Nintex Process Platform offers scalability, ease of use, and strong SharePoint integration. In comparison, IBM Business Automation Workflow emphasizes configurability, AI integration, and robust process modeling, with a focus on complex business automation needs. Each is chosen based on specific organizational requirements.

Download IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. Nintex Process Platform Report

Pricing

Nintex Process Platform is noted for its low setup cost, whereas IBM Business Automation Workflow has higher initial expenses. These differences highlight Nintex's cost-effectiveness compared to IBM's more significant upfront investment.

View comparison

Pricing

AWS Step Functions

4.1 out of 5

AWS Step Functions

4.1 out of 5

IBM Business Automation Workflow excels in integrating content management, automation, and process efficiency, appealing to advanced technical needs. In comparison, AWS Step Functions offers seamless AWS integration and efficiency in task parallelization, attracting those prioritizing quick cloud-based solutions.

Download AWS Step Functions vs. IBM Business Automation Workflow Report

Pricing

IBM Business Automation Workflow has a higher initial setup cost, while AWS Step Functions offers a more budget-friendly setup. The cost difference may significantly impact initial budgets, making AWS Step Functions more attractive for cost-sensitive projects.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle BPM

3.7 out of 5

Oracle BPM

3.7 out of 5

Oracle BPM is favored for process modeling, BPMN 2.0 support, and workflow engines, while facing challenges with interface complexity and customization. In comparison, IBM Business Automation Workflow highlights AI integration and configurability but struggles with integration complexity and user-friendliness, despite a strong focus on connecting processes.

Download IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. Oracle BPM Report

Pricing

Oracle BPM has a higher setup cost, demanding a significant initial investment, while IBM Business Automation Workflow offers a more competitive pricing structure, making it more accessible for organizations with limited budgets.

View comparison

Pricing

Newgen OmniFlow

3.9 out of 5

Newgen OmniFlow

3.9 out of 5

Newgen OmniFlow offers competitive pricing and easy deployment, appealing to businesses with tight budgets seeking rapid ROI. In comparison, IBM Business Automation Workflow excels in advanced analytics and integration, making it suitable for organizations requiring comprehensive features and scalability, despite higher initial costs.

Download IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. Newgen OmniFlow Report

Pricing

Newgen OmniFlow typically has lower setup costs, while IBM Business Automation Workflow presents higher initial expenditures, highlighting a significant cost difference in implementation investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Newgen OmniFlow typically has lower setup costs, while IBM Business Automation Workflow presents higher initial expenditures, highlighting a significant cost difference in implementation investment.

Show 2 more products

Related categories

Business Process Management (BPM)

Business Process Design

Process Automation