We performed a comparison between IBM Business Automation Workflow and OpenText MBPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."No matter what somebody's technical experience level is, the tool can start adding value immediately. Even if that is just an analyst who doesn't have any technical background, they can use some of these no quote accelerators to get things from ideation to deployment in a matter of minutes."
"It provides a solution for integration orchestration. This solution is for any organization in the banking, telecommunications, healthcare, manufacturing, and all domains and industries."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow is useful for helping us design custom user interfaces and processes we require."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow is stable because the different infrastructure elements, such as the OS and middleware have been used for a long time."
"It gives us the ability to create toolkits and use them across many different applications. It allows us to write things one time, instead of having to write a diary for every single different application. We can write at once and reuse it."
"It has integrated UI and deployment models, and it has a deep set of consultant and service provider ecosystem features."
"The most valuable feature of IBM Business Automation Workflow is cost management."
"The business process modeling is the most valuable feature."
"Not just the solution's automation capabilities, but we like everything about it since we are more of a system integrator."
"From what I understand, in the next release they're actually going to combine all of this together as one integrated solution... If we could have one unified way to build a solution, that would really help."
"One significant challenge is the lack of accessible forums or resources to seek help or information when problems arise."
"Requires a lot of customization code writing which could be reduced."
"I would like to see more streamlined install and provisioning; preferably containerized IBM BPM would be helpful."
"Integrating the solution with existing systems can be complicated and it needs careful planning and execution."
"Sometimes, we feel like we are not getting the full features of the content management capabilities."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow is not a very user-friendly solution."
"In terms of improvement, it could be less complex."
"The user interface could be better in OpenText MBPM."
"There are shortcomings in the solution's support and documentation part."
More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while OpenText MBPM is ranked 41st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 7.6, while OpenText MBPM is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "Good for case management, integration capabilities but lacks stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText MBPM writes " A solution offering good automation capabilities while needing to improve its support and documentation". IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Camunda, Apache Airflow, AWS Step Functions and IBM Case Foundation, whereas OpenText MBPM is most compared with Camunda. See our IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. OpenText MBPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.