We performed a comparison between IBM Business Automation Workflow and WorkflowGen based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Its interface is well-designed and user-friendly"
"IBM Business Automation Workflow is useful for helping us design custom user interfaces and processes we require."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is the fact it is highly configurable. We can do configurations very easily."
"The business process modeling is the most valuable feature."
"The dashboards are helpful because you can display reports directly on your screen."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow is stable because the different infrastructure elements, such as the OS and middleware have been used for a long time."
"It helps develop applications very quickly. Once clients get used to it and familiar with the methodology, then they don't feel so locked in. It is able to add this element of agility to our clients' software development lifecycle. That is my favorite thing about it: You're not so locked in as you used to be when developing applications."
"The solution reduces the time to the resolution which is essential for businesses."
"We use it a lot for creating workflows to transfer materials between plants, which is a signature part of what we do."
"I would like to see more streamlined install and provisioning; preferably containerized IBM BPM would be helpful."
"The SCADA Systems are very sophisticated and have a hard time integrating with our older scales. The technical support in regards to the partner side needs some improvement."
"The main improvement would be to make it easier to implement and deploy so that customers can kick it off and run quickly."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow could improve the integration."
"The development UI is sometimes a little slow."
"I would definitely like to see a unified interface between the BPM side of the house and the case side of the house. Something that just seems a bit more cohesive, because right now there is sort of a disconnect between the BPM and the case side of the house. That makes it a bit of a hard sell sometimes. That is definitely first and foremost on my wish list."
"Every client is moving to the cloud. We are still a little behind with IBM, but we are catching up from my point of view."
"Improvements could be made in debugging and troubleshooting."
"This solution needs to be more customizable."
More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while WorkflowGen is ranked 56th in Business Process Management (BPM). IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 7.6, while WorkflowGen is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "Good for case management, integration capabilities but lacks stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of WorkflowGen writes "Good for automatically triggering workflows, but needs to be more customizable". IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Camunda, Apache Airflow, AWS Step Functions and IBM Case Foundation, whereas WorkflowGen is most compared with . See our IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. WorkflowGen report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.