AWS Step Functions vs IBM Business Automation Workflow comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Amazon Web Services (AWS) Logo
4,271 views|3,608 comparisons
71% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
3,770 views|2,668 comparisons
76% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between AWS Step Functions and IBM Business Automation Workflow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed AWS Step Functions vs. IBM Business Automation Workflow Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"It is a scalable solution.""It's Amazon, it's scalable.""It's a general solution that you can adapt to your own needs and is simple to use. We like that it can be integrated with everything in the AWS suite, and that the creation of the pipeline can be done using the graphical user interface.""What I like the most about Amazon Step Functions is how easy it is to use.""The solution is stable...The solution is easy to scale.""AWS Step Functions acts as a high-level layer, allowing us to seamlessly integrate with microservices.""One can rate all the calls and that is a good feature.""The number of historical events is great."

More AWS Step Functions Pros →

"The business process modeling is the most valuable feature.""No matter what somebody's technical experience level is, the tool can start adding value immediately. Even if that is just an analyst who doesn't have any technical background, they can use some of these no quote accelerators to get things from ideation to deployment in a matter of minutes.""The most valuable feature of IBM Business Automation Workflow is cost management.""The solution reduces the time to the resolution which is essential for businesses.""This is a low-code software where you can just drag and drop on the user interface. There are also a lot of quality integrations such as TMS.""It has integrated UI and deployment models, and it has a deep set of consultant and service provider ecosystem features.""IBM Business Automation Workflow is useful for helping us design custom user interfaces and processes we require.""This product is tightly integrated with the RPA automation process."

More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pros →

Cons
"The price and support are areas with shortcomings where the solution needs to improve.""I would like to see more data transformation features in Amazon Step Functions like additional operators and logic.""Setup took about one day. We had some errors to understand in the beginning, but now everything is working good.""It is hard to coordinate the declaratory language.""The solution's data size limit can be improved.""The pricing of the solution can be improved.""It wasn't easy to understand the licensing model. It's like if you use just a little, it's cheap, but it becomes more expensive as you use more. It's like a hook that ties you inside the Amazon ecosystem. So, it creates a dependency.""The interface can sometimes feel limited, as we're unable to see what AWS is running behind the scenes."

More AWS Step Functions Cons →

"I feel that the features are not user-friendly.""The UI of the solution is not good. They should work to update the solution and make it better and fresher.""Sometimes, we feel like we are not getting the full features of the content management capabilities.""Requires a lot of customization code writing which could be reduced.""I would like to see more streamlined install and provisioning; preferably containerized IBM BPM would be helpful.""In terms of improvement, it could be less complex.""One significant challenge is the lack of accessible forums or resources to seek help or information when problems arise.""The main areas which need improvement are specifically around reporting and analytics."

More IBM Business Automation Workflow Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The solution's price is reasonable."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • More AWS Step Functions Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The solution has saved us time."
  • "There is still a relatively high total cost of ownership to actually implement, support, and stand up solutions."
  • "Nowadays, clients are looking at pricing as one of the major factors. For IBM products, they always think it is expensive for them. We are still educating our clients on the IBM FlexPoints licensing."
  • "When you compare with Laserfiche and M-Files, IBM is expensive."
  • "Licensing varies by use-case."
  • "IBM Business Automation Workflow has a flexible pricing mode, but the price is expensive. The price of the solution reflects the quality of the solution which is very high. The technical support is an additional cost."
  • "Our license is on a three-year term."
  • "It is on the expensive side, but it provides excellent supportability and an ecosystem that is proven to be a great fit for our organization."
  • More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:AWS Step Functions acts as a high-level layer, allowing us to seamlessly integrate with microservices.
    Top Answer:I was the second member to join a team tasked with creating a proof of concept. My responsibility was to demonstrate how to orchestrate microservices effectively using AWS Step Functions. Essentially… more »
    Top Answer:Orchestrating microservices with Step Functions provides a high-level abstraction for organizing entire workflows. This approach addresses the challenges that arise when working with multiple… more »
    Top Answer:We researched both IBM solutions and in the end, we chose Business Automation Workflow IBM BPM has a good user interface and the BPM coach is a helpful tool. The API is very useful in providing… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of IBM Business Automation Workflow is cost management.
    Ranking
    Views
    4,271
    Comparisons
    3,608
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    501
    Rating
    7.9
    Views
    3,770
    Comparisons
    2,668
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    442
    Rating
    7.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Amazon Step Functions, Step Functions
    Business Automation Workflow
    Learn More
    Overview

    AWS Step Functions lets you coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows so you can build and update apps quickly. Using Step Functions, you can design and run workflows that stitch together services such as AWS Lambda and Amazon ECS into feature-rich applications. Workflows are made up of a series of steps, with the output of one step acting as input into the next. Application development is simpler and more intuitive using Step Functions, because it translates your workflow into a state machine diagram that is easy to understand, easy to explain to others, and easy to change. You can monitor each step of execution as it happens, which means you can identify and fix problems quickly. Step Functions automatically triggers and tracks each step, and retries when there are errors, so your application executes in order and as expected.

    IBM Business Automation Workflow combines business process management and case management capabilities in one workflow solution. It integrates the capabilities of business process and case management into a single workflow offering. It unites information, process, and users to provide a 360-degree view of work to drive more successful optimized business outcomes. IBM Business Automation Workflow on Cloud provides the same capabilities that are offered in the IBM Business Automation Workflow offering, all within a ready-to-use, cloud-based environment that is hosted in IBM Cloud data centers and managed by IBM.

    Sample Customers
    Alpha Apps, The Guardian, SGK, Bigfinite
    Key Bank, Barclays, Control€xpert, MIR Insurance Brokers, Conqord Oil
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Insurance Company5%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm64%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Engineering Company7%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm34%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company7%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business67%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise22%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise76%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    AWS Step Functions vs. IBM Business Automation Workflow
    April 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about AWS Step Functions vs. IBM Business Automation Workflow and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    AWS Step Functions is ranked 12th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 8 reviews while IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. AWS Step Functions is rated 7.8, while IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of AWS Step Functions writes "Simplifies complex task automation and enhances development workflows while offering user-friendly interface, seamless scalability and efficient workflow orchestration". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "Good for case management, integration capabilities but lacks stability". AWS Step Functions is most compared with Camunda, IBM BPM, Apache Airflow, Pega BPM and Boomi AtomSphere Flow, whereas IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Camunda, Apache Airflow, IBM Case Foundation and Aurea CX Process. See our AWS Step Functions vs. IBM Business Automation Workflow report.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.