We performed a comparison between IBM Business Automation Workflow and Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."IBM has spent a lot of time on the connections between the rules engine and its other product, the core BPM platform. They've really centralized the suite as one offering now."
"It has had a positive effect on decision-making in my organization. It helps us with our dispute process."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is the fact it is highly configurable. We can do configurations very easily."
"It gives us the ability to create toolkits and use them across many different applications. It allows us to write things one time, instead of having to write a diary for every single different application. We can write at once and reuse it."
"The workflow of BAW's automation is handled inside of BPM, so we can see what state it is at and how things are processing through."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow is stable because the different infrastructure elements, such as the OS and middleware have been used for a long time."
"It has integrated UI and deployment models, and it has a deep set of consultant and service provider ecosystem features."
"The most valuable feature is automation, which is quite strong and we are quite happy with it."
"Development is easy on the Ultimus platform."
"Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management has good integration with all the other tools we have been using in our company. We use the data that other tools provide in our implementation."
"Improvements could be made in debugging and troubleshooting."
"The main areas which need improvement are specifically around reporting and analytics."
"Sometimes, we feel like we are not getting the full features of the content management capabilities."
"The setup and installation process could be made easier."
"The development UI is sometimes a little slow."
"Every client is moving to the cloud. We are still a little behind with IBM, but we are catching up from my point of view."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow is not a very user-friendly solution."
"The main improvement would be to make it easier to implement and deploy so that customers can kick it off and run quickly."
"We are looking for a feature that can resign and move the process from one step to another step."
"Ultimus is not good at handling cash transactions. They should add a mobile application in the next release."
More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is ranked 52nd in Business Process Management (BPM). IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 7.6, while Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "Good for case management, integration capabilities but lacks stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management writes "Integrates well and helpful support". IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Camunda, Apache Airflow, IBM Case Foundation and AWS Step Functions, whereas Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management is most compared with Appian. See our IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. Ultimus Adaptive Business Process Management report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.