IBM Business Automation Workflow vs OpenText Process Automation comparison

IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. OpenText Process Automation

Download the complete report

Helped 900,838 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM Business Automation Wor...

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

13th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

OpenText Process Automation

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

26th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of IBM Business Automation Workflow is 1.2%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Process Automation is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
IBM Business Automation Workflow	1.2%
OpenText Process Automation	1.1%
Other	97.7%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

IsmailEl Dahshan

CEO at Exact Holding NV

Automation has transformed financial workflows and has improved revenue tracking and compliance

Regarding Watsonx, I am uncertain whether it is fully complied and fully integrated with IBM Business Automation Workflow yet. Currently, we use some AI in Enterprise Content Management, particularly when searching documents. Archiving snapshots would be very beneficial. It would be good to reduce the administration effort required to archive snapshots, as this is a main issue with the product. I would also recommend that IBM engage with customers more deeply. Rather than sending URLs or documentation for customers to solve problems independently, the support team should be more involved in addressing the client's specific issues in a targeted manner, providing clear guidance on what actions need to be taken.

Read full review

Senthil Natarajan

Chief Operating Officer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

The solution enables automation of supply chain and invoice processing with comprehensive integration and workflow capabilities

The main valuable features of OpenText AppWorks are the BPM modules. There is the standard BPM modeler and a case modeler. These are two strong features from the workflow layer. Additionally, the integration capability of the solution is beneficial. With these features, we are able to use OpenText AppWorks for automating supply-chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have built almost twenty-plus types of solutions and implemented around three hundred fifty-plus implementations. The solution also allows us to integrate it with our ERP system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"IBM provides long-term support and maintains a traditionally good customer-vendor relationship."

"After being acquired from Lombardi by IBM, BPA was only workflow-related, and over a period of time it evolved with a lot of capabilities added to the product, like rules, business decision-making, and now a more enhanced toolkit to build applications very rapidly."

"It gives us the ability to create toolkits and use them across many different applications. It allows us to write things one time, instead of having to write a diary for every single different application. We can write at once and reuse it."

"IBM Business Automation Workflow has a flexible pricing mode, but the price is expensive, and the price of the solution reflects the quality of the solution which is very high."

"It helps develop applications very quickly. Once clients get used to it and familiar with the methodology, then they don't feel so locked in. It is able to add this element of agility to our clients' software development lifecycle. That is my favorite thing about it: You're not so locked in as you used to be when developing applications."

"The workflow of BAW's automation is handled inside of BPM, so we can see what state it is at and how things are processing through."

"This is a stable solution that we have been able to use as a distributed system."

"The integration capabilities are excellent, as IBM Business Automation Workflow integrates seamlessly with other IBM products, such as Enterprise Content Management, FileNet, Case Manager, and Operational Decision Management, with many adapters available so we can communicate everything through the same business process management scenario."

More IBM Business Automation Workflow pros

"One of the most useful features is the code is customizable, we can make it our own."

"In terms of the scalability and the handling of complexity, the customers are satisfied, and we also have confidence in the solution to achieve whatever implementations are required."

"AppWorks is a very quick development platform with low-coding capability and strong integration with third-party systems."

"Its customer support is reliable and easy to approach."

"From a business perspective, the most valuable aspect lies in the optimization of processes."

"The stability has been perfect over the years; there are no bugs or glitches, it doesn't crash or freeze, it's reliable, and the performance is good."

"The good part of OpenText AppWorks is that all of its components are together in one platform, including integration capability, UI capability, and workflow capability."

"OpenText AppWorks has standard features such as system-to-system and human-to-human integrations, but what I find most valuable in the solution is its monitoring feature that tells you more about your processes, how to restart and how to stop each process, etc."

More OpenText Process Automation pros

Cons

"The setup and installation process could be made easier."

"The monitoring features must be improved."

"IBM Business Automation Workflow can improve UI flexibility and integration. Additionally, the solutions from IBM have to provide a paperless solution, allowing for digital versions of documents."

"Sometimes, we feel like we are not getting the full features of the content management capabilities."

"The initial setup is actually a really complicated process."

"However, on Windows, I believe considerable administration tasks are required to maintain environment stability."

"The solution's technical support could use improvement. The IBM BPM platform, at least from a cloud perspective, still requires using IBM support, which is not very responsive."

"Code management lacks merging capabilities. If parallel development requires merging, improvements in this area would be beneficial."

More IBM Business Automation Workflow cons

"AppWorks could be improved by including BPM simulation."

"A room for improvement in OpenText AppWorks is its user interface. It should have mobile compatibility because right now, you still have to make two applications with a user interface for Android and a user interface for iOS, so if OpenText AppWorks can provide one UI that can be used across all devices, that would make the solution better. An additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of OpenText AppWorks is a better UI in terms of the look and feel. Another feature I'd like to see in the next version of the solution is mobile compatibility because, at the moment, you have to make your application mobile-ready or compatible with mobile devices because there's no provision for it in OpenText AppWorks."

"OpenText AppWork's low-code capabilities can be enhanced by integrating them with AI offerings like Aviator."

"There is room for improvement in the pricing structure."

"AppWorks is pretty expensive."

"The solution needs to continue to enhance the low-coding feature within the product itself."

"From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model."

"There could be some improvements with the low code design part. It could be more customizable and more user friendly."

More OpenText Process Automation cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"IBM Business Automation Workflow has a flexible pricing mode, but the price is expensive. The price of the solution reflects the quality of the solution which is very high. The technical support is an additional cost."

"Our license is on a three-year term."

"When you compare with Laserfiche and M-Files, IBM is expensive."

"It is on the expensive side, but it provides excellent supportability and an ecosystem that is proven to be a great fit for our organization."

"Nowadays, clients are looking at pricing as one of the major factors. For IBM products, they always think it is expensive for them. We are still educating our clients on the IBM FlexPoints licensing."

"While it can be quite costly, it offers significant benefits for users."

"The solution has saved us time."

"Licensing varies by use-case."

More IBM Business Automation Workflow pricing and cost advice

"The price is on the higher side."

"The licensing cost varies based on several factors, such as the size of the customer and the domain URL."

"AppWorks is pretty expensive."

"Pricing for OpenText AppWorks, specifically in the Indian market, is reasonable, but I'm not aware if it's still reasonable outside of India. The licensing cost is based on the number of licenses and the number of users. OpenText AppWorks has different licensing options."

"There is a user-based perpetual license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,838 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Construction Company

Insurance Company

Healthcare Company

Insurance Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	17

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

Which is better, IBM BPM or IBM Business Automation Workflow?

We researched both IBM solutions and in the end, we chose Business Automation Workflow. IBM BPM has a good user interface and the BPM coach is a helpful tool. The API is very useful in providing en...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for IBM Business Automation Workflow?

The price of IBM Business Automation Workflow is on the higher side compared to the features it offers.

What needs improvement with IBM Business Automation Workflow?

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText AppWorks?

From an enterprise point, their pricing is a little bit crazy because they don't have a SaaS model. They have to go with a perpetual model, which makes it look crazy initially. But over a period, i...

What needs improvement with OpenText AppWorks?

They can improve the UI capability. Recently, they launched a low-code platform, called entity modeling, which they can enhance further. It would be beneficial if OpenText ( /products/data-express-...

What is your primary use case for OpenText AppWorks?

We primarily use OpenText AppWorks ( /products/opentext-appworks-reviews ) for automating supply chain-related problems, vendor process automations, and invoice automations. We have our own product...

IBM BPM vs IBM Business Automation Workflow

Comparisons

Compared 13% of the time

Camunda vs IBM Business Automation Workflow

Compared 13% of the time

Pega Platform vs IBM Business Automation Workflow

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Case Foundation vs IBM Business Automation Workflow

Compared 7% of the time

Apache Airflow vs IBM Business Automation Workflow

Compared 5% of the time

More IBM Business Automation Workflow Competitors

Appian vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 8% of the time

Pega Platform vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 7% of the time

Camunda vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 5% of the time

Automation Anywhere vs OpenText Process Automation

Compared 5% of the time

More OpenText Process Automation Competitors

Product Reports

IBM Business Automation Workflow

Download IBM Business Automation Workflow product report

OpenText Process Automation

Download OpenText Process Automation product report

Also Known As

Business Automation Workflow

No data available

Overview

IBM Business Automation Workflow enhances customer experiences with strong automation and AI integration, offering robust customization and integration capabilities. It provides a low-code interface for rapid app development and seamless workflows.

IBM Business Automation Workflow offers a low-code interface for rapid application development, tailored for enhancing operational efficiency. With its seamless workflows and robust customization, it supports decision-making across industries such as finance and insurance. Its adaptability to market needs and comprehensive integration with IBM products streamline business processes, facilitating end-to-end process management and organizational collaboration. Impressive usability across user levels significantly enhances operational efficiency.

What are the key features of IBM Business Automation Workflow?

Automation and AI Integration: Boosts efficiency with strong AI capabilities.
Low-code Interface: Simplifies app development rapidly and intuitively.
Customization and Integration: Offers robust capabilities for tailored solutions.
End-to-End Process Management: Streamlines workflows for complete oversight.
Case Management: Supports business rules and compliance mandates effectively.

What should be considered in the reviews regarding benefits and ROI?

Operational Efficiency: Significantly improves with automation and streamlined processes.
Enhanced Productivity: Drives productivity for digital transformations and workflow automation.
Compliance Assurance: Ensures adherence to industry standards and regulations.
Seamless Application Integration: Facilitates integration with existing systems for cohesive operation.

Organizations leverage IBM Business Automation Workflow in industries like finance and insurance for business process management, automating approvals, and workflow management. It is particularly effective in handling complex processes such as document management, insurance claims, loan management, asset management, and banking applications. By automating workflows and enhancing operational efficiency, IBM Business Automation Workflow plays a vital role in digital transformations and compliance in sectors that require stringent process management.

IBM

OpenText Process Automation offers a low-code environment for efficient development, enhanced by strong integration, dynamic case management, and OCR technology to streamline business processes across industries.

OpenText Process Automation provides a comprehensive platform for improving business processes with features that allow for significant time reduction through a low-code development environment. It integrates seamlessly with third-party systems, enabling dynamic case management and effective monitoring capabilities. By incorporating OCR technology, it enhances efficiency and lowers costs. Users benefit from its centralized architecture, which brings together diverse tools to streamline operations. Its BPM modules support automation in supply chain and vendor processes, leading to widespread implementation. Known for its stability and scalability, it also receives positive feedback for its reliable support. However, there are areas needing enhancement, such as improved low-code features, better integration, and a desire for a unified UI with better mobile compatibility. There is a call for an archival function to address database growth and concerns about pricing and performance related to the BPMN 2.0 model. Potential improvements include AI integration and enhanced modeling in the low-code platform.

What are the key features?

Low-Code Development: Enables user-friendly development and faster deployment.
Third-Party Integration: Works well with systems like SAP and Salesforce.
OCR Technology: Streamlines processes by enhancing efficiency and reducing costs.
Dynamic Case Management: Adapts to complex workflows and changing conditions.
Centralized Architecture: Integrates multiple tools, streamlining operations.

What benefits and ROI should be evaluated?

Efficiency: Significantly reduces development time.
Cost-Effectiveness: Lowers operational costs through process optimization.
Scalability: Grows alongside organizational demands without performance loss.
Reliability: Offers stable operations with robust support.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly links with existing systems to enhance functionality.

OpenText Process Automation is implemented in industries like insurance, banking, and manufacturing for tasks such as invoice processing, accounts payable, cash management, and supply chain automation. It enables integration with systems like SAP and Salesforce, offering on-premises or cloud deployment, enhancing workflows and document orchestration.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Key Bank, Barclays, Control€xpert, MIR Insurance Brokers, Conqord Oil

Red Deer County, DHFL Pramerica Life Insurance, Bangkok Airways, PBS, CIZ (Netherlands Ministry of Health), The Dutch Ministry of Defence, Mercer

IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. OpenText Process Automation