We performed a comparison between IBM Business Automation Workflow and SoftExpert BPM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The workflow of BAW's automation is handled inside of BPM, so we can see what state it is at and how things are processing through."
"IBM has spent a lot of time on the connections between the rules engine and its other product, the core BPM platform. They've really centralized the suite as one offering now."
"The dashboards are helpful because you can display reports directly on your screen."
"The solution's most valuable aspect is the fact it is highly configurable. We can do configurations very easily."
"One of the most valuable features is the way that they are adapting to the market. Initially, it was doing only workflow. Now it has started bringing all the other components like rules within the workflow and then the integration with RPA."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow is stable because the different infrastructure elements, such as the OS and middleware have been used for a long time."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow is useful for helping us design custom user interfaces and processes we require."
"No matter what somebody's technical experience level is, the tool can start adding value immediately. Even if that is just an analyst who doesn't have any technical background, they can use some of these no quote accelerators to get things from ideation to deployment in a matter of minutes."
"The most valuable feature of SoftExpert BPM is its ease of use."
"A complete project management suite in one integrated package."
"The main areas which need improvement are specifically around reporting and analytics."
"One significant challenge is the lack of accessible forums or resources to seek help or information when problems arise."
"Improvements could be made in debugging and troubleshooting."
"The setup and installation process could be made easier."
"The main improvement would be to make it easier to implement and deploy so that customers can kick it off and run quickly."
"IBM Business Automation Workflow could improve the integration."
"I feel that the features are not user-friendly."
"Sometimes, we feel like we are not getting the full features of the content management capabilities."
"The form in SoftExpert BPM should improve."
"It could do more to use all the data it collects to intelligently manage the user experience."
More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews while SoftExpert BPM is ranked 22nd in Business Process Management (BPM) with 2 reviews. IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 7.6, while SoftExpert BPM is rated 10.0. The top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "Good for case management, integration capabilities but lacks stability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SoftExpert BPM writes "Quick deployment, high availability, and easy to use". IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Camunda, Apache Airflow, IBM Case Foundation and AWS Step Functions, whereas SoftExpert BPM is most compared with . See our IBM Business Automation Workflow vs. SoftExpert BPM report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
