Bosch inubit vs IBM Business Automation Workflow comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Bosch Logo
345 views|224 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
3,770 views|2,668 comparisons
76% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Bosch inubit and IBM Business Automation Workflow based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM).
To learn more, read our detailed Business Process Management (BPM) Report (Updated: March 2024).
768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"We contact their customer support often. They are very good and reliable."

More Bosch inubit Pros →

"It has had a positive effect on decision-making in my organization. It helps us with our dispute process.""The most valuable feature of IBM Business Automation Workflow is cost management.""IBM Business Automation Workflow is stable because the different infrastructure elements, such as the OS and middleware have been used for a long time.""It's a flexible solution.""The dashboards are helpful because you can display reports directly on your screen.""The solution's most valuable aspect is the fact it is highly configurable. We can do configurations very easily.""The workflow of BAW's automation is handled inside of BPM, so we can see what state it is at and how things are processing through.""It performs the basic tasks that are required for the BBM solution as part of the overall integration with ECM or enterprise contact management."

More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pros →

Cons
"There are better solutions on the market. To make it a perfect ten, they should improve the price. There is a learning curve and sometimes there are issues from the software."

More Bosch inubit Cons →

"The main improvement would be to make it easier to implement and deploy so that customers can kick it off and run quickly.""The SCADA Systems are very sophisticated and have a hard time integrating with our older scales. The technical support in regards to the partner side needs some improvement.""Every client is moving to the cloud. We are still a little behind with IBM, but we are catching up from my point of view.""Integrating the solution with existing systems can be complicated and it needs careful planning and execution.""IBM Business Automation Workflow can improve UI flexibility and integration. Additionally, the solutions from IBM have to provide a paperless solution, allowing for digital versions of documents.""I would like to see more streamlined install and provisioning; preferably containerized IBM BPM would be helpful.""The initial setup is actually a really complicated process.""The UI of the solution is not good. They should work to update the solution and make it better and fresher."

More IBM Business Automation Workflow Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "The solution has saved us time."
  • "There is still a relatively high total cost of ownership to actually implement, support, and stand up solutions."
  • "Nowadays, clients are looking at pricing as one of the major factors. For IBM products, they always think it is expensive for them. We are still educating our clients on the IBM FlexPoints licensing."
  • "When you compare with Laserfiche and M-Files, IBM is expensive."
  • "Licensing varies by use-case."
  • "IBM Business Automation Workflow has a flexible pricing mode, but the price is expensive. The price of the solution reflects the quality of the solution which is very high. The technical support is an additional cost."
  • "Our license is on a three-year term."
  • "It is on the expensive side, but it provides excellent supportability and an ecosystem that is proven to be a great fit for our organization."
  • More IBM Business Automation Workflow Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:We researched both IBM solutions and in the end, we chose Business Automation Workflow IBM BPM has a good user interface and the BPM coach is a helpful tool. The API is very useful in providing… more »
    Top Answer:The most valuable feature of IBM Business Automation Workflow is cost management.
    Ranking
    Views
    345
    Comparisons
    224
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    3,770
    Comparisons
    2,668
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    442
    Rating
    7.6
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    inubit
    Business Automation Workflow
    Learn More
    Overview
    BPM+ expands classical Business Process Management that so far had a strong focus on the process management perspective. The new inubit Suite 6 reconciles data and process management and supports all process types such as Human Workslows, integration centric and document centric processes.

    IBM Business Automation Workflow combines business process management and case management capabilities in one workflow solution. It integrates the capabilities of business process and case management into a single workflow offering. It unites information, process, and users to provide a 360-degree view of work to drive more successful optimized business outcomes. IBM Business Automation Workflow on Cloud provides the same capabilities that are offered in the IBM Business Automation Workflow offering, all within a ready-to-use, cloud-based environment that is hosted in IBM Cloud data centers and managed by IBM.

    Sample Customers
    BAFzA
    Key Bank, Barclays, Control€xpert, MIR Insurance Brokers, Conqord Oil
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm64%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Engineering Company7%
    Government7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm34%
    Computer Software Company12%
    Insurance Company7%
    Government7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise62%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise75%
    Buyer's Guide
    Business Process Management (BPM)
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Apache, Pega and others in Business Process Management (BPM). Updated: March 2024.
    768,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Bosch inubit is ranked 42nd in Business Process Management (BPM) while IBM Business Automation Workflow is ranked 13th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 21 reviews. Bosch inubit is rated 8.0, while IBM Business Automation Workflow is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Bosch inubit writes "First Look – Bosch Software Innovations inubit Suite 6". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Business Automation Workflow writes "Good for case management, integration capabilities but lacks stability". Bosch inubit is most compared with IBM BPM and Camunda, whereas IBM Business Automation Workflow is most compared with IBM BPM, Camunda, Apache Airflow, AWS Step Functions and IBM Case Foundation.

    See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

    We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.