Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo

Top 10 KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Alternatives

Vendor: Quest Software
4.4 out of 5
Leave a review

Top KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Intune, Fortinet FortiClient, and Microsoft Configuration Manager. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive inventory management, automated patching, and streamlined deployment processes, ensuring efficient IT asset management and reducing operational complexity for organizations through its intuitive interface.

Quest Software Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Quest Software, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Microsoft Intune
4.1 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Microsoft Intune
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels with seamless integration into the Microsoft ecosystem, streamlining management across devices. In comparison, KACE SMA offers robust package deployment and asset management, appealing to organizations needing detailed control. Intune is cost-effective with Microsoft 365, while KACE provides flexible licensing.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune's setup costs are cost-effective for businesses prioritizing cloud solutions, while KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) requires a higher initial investment, appealing more to organizations needing extensive on-premises management capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune's setup costs are cost-effective for businesses prioritizing cloud solutions, while KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) requires a higher initial investment, appealing more to organizations needing extensive on-premises management capabilities.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in endpoint management with extensive deployment and asset tools, ideal for environments needing seamless device integration. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient's robust VPN capabilities and integration with Fortinet products make it suitable for security-focused remote connectivity.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) involves a higher initial setup cost, while Fortinet FortiClient offers a more economical setup, allowing organizations to integrate security features at a lower entry price point.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) involves a higher initial setup cost, while Fortinet FortiClient offers a more economical setup, allowing organizations to integrate security features at a lower entry price point.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Configuration Manager excels in integration with WSUS, OS deployment, and detailed reporting, suitable for environments heavily reliant on Microsoft. In comparison, KACE Systems Management Appliance is valued for its asset management and ease of customization, appealing to organizations seeking versatile deployment solutions.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report
Microsoft Configuration Manager often incurs higher setup costs due to its complexity, whereas KACE Systems Management Appliance offers a simpler, lower-cost setup process, highlighting a distinct contrast in initial financial commitment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Configuration Manager often incurs higher setup costs due to its complexity, whereas KACE Systems Management Appliance offers a simpler, lower-cost setup process, highlighting a distinct contrast in initial financial commitment between the two solutions.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business focuses on protection with antivirus and centralized management, ideal for comprehensive security needs. In comparison, KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in mass software deployment and asset management, offering strong ROI and efficiency in device management for organizations.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has a lower setup cost compared to KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), highlighting a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business has a lower setup cost compared to KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), highlighting a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix offers extensive patch management and customization, appealing to needs requiring scalability and PCI compliance. In comparison, KACE SMA excels in software deployment and inventory management, ideal for efficient mass deployments and ease of asset management across IT infrastructures.
Download BigFix vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
BigFix's setup cost is higher, emphasizing advanced features, while KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers lower initial expenses, making it more budget-friendly.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix's setup cost is higher, emphasizing advanced features, while KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers lower initial expenses, making it more budget-friendly.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Forescout Platform excels in network visibility and security management, offering robust device control and integration. In comparison, KACE Systems Management Appliance emphasizes endpoint management efficiency, with strong asset management and deployment capabilities, catering to streamlined IT service operations across diverse device environments.
Download Forescout Platform vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Forescout Platform involves a significant setup cost, whereas KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Forescout Platform involves a significant setup cost, whereas KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
KACE excels in endpoint management, offering mass deployment and asset management, suitable for large environments. In comparison, NinjaOne provides robust monitoring and remote access, ideal for small to medium-sized businesses. KACE fits enterprises needing comprehensive IT management, while NinjaOne offers agile solutions for smaller teams.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. NinjaOne Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost compared to NinjaOne, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost compared to NinjaOne, highlighting a significant difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Kaseya VSA
3.8 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Kaseya VSA
3.8 out of 5
Kaseya VSA is ideal for robust remote management and automation. In comparison, KACE SMA excels in asset management and intuitive software deployment, appealing to those focused on endpoint management.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Kaseya VSA Report
Kaseya VSA has a lower setup cost, offering an economical choice, while KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its robust feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaseya VSA has a lower setup cost, offering an economical choice, while KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its robust feature set.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
4.1 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance offers comprehensive endpoint management with strong device visibility and asset management. In comparison, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus excels in patch management, integrating well with security tools and providing automated remote patching, appealing to buyers prioritizing efficient updates across platforms.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) involves a higher setup cost compared to ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus. This difference highlights a key pricing contrast between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) involves a higher setup cost compared to ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus. This difference highlights a key pricing contrast between the two solutions.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Atera
4.6 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Atera
4.6 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in automation and comprehensive management for large environments. In comparison, Atera provides a user-friendly, cloud-based solution with flexible licensing. KACE is ideal for tech-heavy operations, while Atera suits small enterprises seeking scalability and efficient IT service management.
Download Atera vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
The setup cost for KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) is higher than Atera, which offers a more budget-friendly initiation with simpler setup processes.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) is higher than Atera, which offers a more budget-friendly initiation with simpler setup processes.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Automox
4.5 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Automox
4.5 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance appeals to cost-conscious buyers with its lower setup costs and robust on-premise management tools. In comparison, Automox offers a cloud-native approach with advanced automation features, attracting buyers seeking fast deployment and dynamic management environments.
Download Automox vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) involves a significant upfront setup cost, while Automox offers a more cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) involves a significant upfront setup cost, while Automox offers a more cost-effective setup option.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services
3.9 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in integration flexibility, offering comprehensive asset management and deployment features. In comparison, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services focuses on centralized updates, providing cost-effective solutions within Windows environments, but lacks extensive management functionality across different IT tasks.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) often involves higher setup costs compared to the usually lower setup costs associated with Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, highlighting a notable difference in their initial financial investment requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) often involves higher setup costs compared to the usually lower setup costs associated with Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, highlighting a notable difference in their initial financial investment requirements.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager
4.2 out of 5
Ivanti Endpoint Security offers strong integration, efficient threat detection, and competitive pricing. In comparison, KACE SMA excels in asset management and automation, appealing to buyers seeking a robust feature set despite higher costs, with substantial ROI justifying its extensive capabilities.
Download Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager typically has a lower setup cost compared to KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), highlighting a key financial difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager typically has a lower setup cost compared to KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), highlighting a key financial difference between the two solutions.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Scalefusion
4.2 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Scalefusion
4.2 out of 5
KACE SMA excels in ease of deployment and support, making it appealing for straightforward asset management. In comparison, Scalefusion leads with its feature-rich offerings and advanced customization, attracting tech buyers seeking robust device management and security.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Scalefusion Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) presents variable setup costs compared to Scalefusion, which offers a more fixed and streamlined pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) presents variable setup costs compared to Scalefusion, which offers a more fixed and streamlined pricing structure.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
BMC Client Management
4.3 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in integration and asset management, simplifying deployment and automation. In comparison, BMC Client Management offers strong device support, including mobile management. KACE is scalable with diverse deployment options, while BMC provides comprehensive support despite higher costs.
Download BMC Client Management vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) often incurs higher setup costs compared to BMC Client Management, which offers a more budget-friendly installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) often incurs higher setup costs compared to BMC Client Management, which offers a more budget-friendly installation process.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune
3.9 out of 5
KACE SMA offers robust endpoint management with features like remote imaging and integration with tools, suitable for large-scale deployments. In comparison, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune excels in patch management, particularly third-party applications, providing valuable insights for streamlined patch management across diverse environments.
Download Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) often reflects a higher setup cost compared to Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, making Ivanti a more budget-friendly choice for initial investment considerations.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) often reflects a higher setup cost compared to Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, making Ivanti a more budget-friendly choice for initial investment considerations.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
SolarWinds Patch Manager
1 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance offers cost-effective asset management and inventory features, while SolarWinds Patch Manager excels in automated patching. In comparison, SolarWinds provides seamless deployment and integration, whereas KACE appeals with its reasonable pricing and comprehensive IT asset management tools.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) incurs higher initial setup costs compared to SolarWinds Patch Manager, which offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) incurs higher initial setup costs compared to SolarWinds Patch Manager, which offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
RemoteExec
1 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
RemoteExec
1 out of 5
RemoteExec excels in affordable task automation and remote management across endpoints. In comparison, KACE SMA offers a holistic approach with extensive systems and asset management capabilities. RemoteExec suits budget-conscious buyers, while KACE SMA appeals to those seeking comprehensive functionality despite higher costs.
RemoteExec's setup costs are higher, reflecting its enterprise focus, while KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) presents a more budget-friendly option suitable for a range of businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
RemoteExec's setup costs are higher, reflecting its enterprise focus, while KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) presents a more budget-friendly option suitable for a range of businesses.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac
4.5 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in offering comprehensive systems management, making it attractive for its cost-efficiency. In comparison, Ivanti Patch delivers strong multi-platform patch management, appealing for its robust security capabilities despite potentially higher setup complexity.
Download Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost, while Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a key financial difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost, while Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac offers a more budget-friendly setup option, highlighting a key financial difference between the two solutions.

Related categories

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)
Endpoint Compliance
Patch Management