KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) and Tenable Vulnerability Management compete in IT management and security. SMA is more favorable for internal management efficiency due to its comprehensive asset and endpoint management abilities, while Tenable has the upper hand in vulnerability detection and security assessments.
Features: SMA offers seamless integration with Bomgar and the flexibility to deploy software remotely, enhancing operational efficiency and providing an overview of device management. Its scripting capabilities streamline security patch deployment across organizations. In contrast, Tenable excels with its comprehensive vulnerability scanning, stability, scalability, and integration across various infrastructures, making it a strong security management tool.
Room for Improvement: SMA users report scalability issues when managing over 10,000 devices and seek improved patch management and license compliance integration. Improved tech support responsiveness and Microsoft update integration are also noted. Tenable users desire a more intuitive interface for smaller enterprises as well as improvements in reporting, mitigation lifecycle, and a more affordable pricing model for broader appeal.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SMA is usually deployed on-premises, helping IT teams maintain control, and its customer service is praised for high responsiveness and technical support. Despite an initial learning curve, premier support aids in management complexity. Tenable offers a hybrid cloud and on-premises deployment, praised for swift technology assistance but could benefit from improved third-party integration support.
Pricing and ROI: SMA is competitively priced, with users noting a positive ROI through efficient asset management without hidden costs, proving attractive to cost-sensitive institutions like universities. Tenable, although pricier, justifies the cost with its robust scanning capabilities. Users suggest better pricing options to benefit small and medium enterprises in need of budget-friendly security solutions.
The return on investment is seen in the quick access to information, good inventory management, and efficient systems management.
I would rate the customer support for Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) as a 10.
The customer service is very good, providing quick customer support in Spanish.
It needs improvement in response time and addressing feature requests promptly.
I would evaluate Tenable Vulnerability Management's customer service and technical support as average.
We have outgrown the size of one KACE appliance and are now running two.
The product is very scalable as it supports 10,000 thousand endpoints with just one appliance.
They can seamlessly scale the number of endpoints from 100 to 1,000,000 in a day.
The stability is commendable, and I would rate Tenable ten out of ten.
I have faced no stability issues with Tenable.
Currently, we have to go into each org to deploy applications when we need them all across the university.
The user interface needs improvement as customers have mentioned they do not like the interface since it is not an SMA-based interface.
I would suggest HP WebInspect as a better option than Tenable.io.
They should also accelerate the process of implementing new features upon request.
The pricing is in the middle range of the market, not too expensive but not the cheapest either.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Quest KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) is that, hands down, it beat all of the others in simplicity and pricing.
Tenable charges around $40 per device, while Rapid7 costs $10 to $15 per device.
Scripting has saved us hundreds of hours over the years when patching these vulnerabilities compared to how we did it before.
The most valuable features include simplicity, which makes systems management easier and faster, especially for device management.
Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.
The best features of Tenable Vulnerability Management are flexibility, breadth and scope, and the fact that their current vulnerabilities come out, and they have tests for them within a day or two.
It provides survivability benefits. It helps me understand if the system is capable of withstanding certain levels of stress.
KACE Systems Management Appliance offers integration capabilities, efficient image deployment, and comprehensive asset management. It supports centralized management across diverse devices and locations, simplifying IT processes and enhancing security.
KACE Systems Management Appliance provides single-pane visibility for endpoint management, mass software deployment, automated patch management, robust scripting, and detailed inventory tracking. It streamlines IT management and improves cyber-security compliance through remote software updates and centralized IT request handling. Despite struggles with scalability and the need for interface improvements, it enables efficient device imaging, script automation, and network management through detailed reporting. Organizations find it effective for software deployment, asset management, and endpoint monitoring, serving thousands of IoT devices and desktops.
What are the key features of KACE Systems Management Appliance?In healthcare, KACE Systems Management Appliance is used for maintaining device compliance and security standards. Educational institutions benefit from its capabilities to manage large numbers of endpoints across campuses. In finance, it aids in strict compliance requirements through automated patch management and detailed reporting. Retail sectors leverage its asset management features to streamline operations across numerous locations.
Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.
We monitor all Patch Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.