No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo

Top 10 KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Alternatives

Vendor: Quest Software
4.4 out of 5
Leave a review

Top KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Configuration Manager, and NinjaOne. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive asset management, efficient software deployment, and seamless patch management, ensuring streamlined IT operations and enhanced security for organizations of all sizes.

Quest Software Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Quest Software, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Microsoft Intune
4.1 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Microsoft Intune
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Intune excels in Windows management within the Microsoft ecosystem, offering automation capabilities. In comparison, KACE Systems Management Appliance focuses on endpoint management across diverse operating systems. Tech buyers might choose Intune for Microsoft integration or KACE for cross-platform flexibility.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Microsoft Intune Report
Microsoft Intune has a lower initial setup cost, making it economical for businesses with tight budgets, while KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) involves higher upfront expenses, ideal for those seeking advanced features and robust management capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Intune has a lower initial setup cost, making it economical for businesses with tight budgets, while KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) involves higher upfront expenses, ideal for those seeking advanced features and robust management capabilities.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Microsoft Configuration Manager
4.1 out of 5
Microsoft Configuration Manager offers efficient patch management, deployment control, and comprehensive software inventory, appealing for seamless integration with other Microsoft services. In comparison, KACE Systems Management Appliance attracts with its scripting capabilities and user-friendly asset management, beneficial for straightforward endpoint management and cost-effective licensing.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Microsoft Configuration Manager Report
Microsoft Configuration Manager typically requires lower initial setup costs compared to KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), while KACE SMA offers a potentially more straightforward setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Configuration Manager typically requires lower initial setup costs compared to KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), while KACE SMA offers a potentially more straightforward setup process.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
KACE SMA offers superior integration and automation for those needing robust on-premises control. In comparison, NinjaOne emphasizes remote management and ease of use for fast problem-solving. Scalability and user-friendly design are key differentiators, while pricing varies based on deployment needs.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. NinjaOne Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a complex setup cost compared to NinjaOne, which offers a straightforward pricing structure. NinjaOne’s simplicity contrasts with SMA's more involved and potentially costly setup.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a complex setup cost compared to NinjaOne, which offers a straightforward pricing structure. NinjaOne’s simplicity contrasts with SMA's more involved and potentially costly setup.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in integrating tools for comprehensive endpoint management, while Fortinet FortiClient emphasizes robust security features like VPN integration. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient remains competitive for security-focused needs, whereas KACE SMA provides efficient device and IT operations management.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) setup costs are generally higher, reflecting its comprehensive management features, while Fortinet FortiClient offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing for budget-conscious organizations seeking essential endpoint security.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) setup costs are generally higher, reflecting its comprehensive management features, while Fortinet FortiClient offers a more cost-effective setup, appealing for budget-conscious organizations seeking essential endpoint security.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix excels in patch management automation and scalability across large networks. In comparison, KACE SMA is preferred for ease of use and mass package deployment. BigFix offers on-premises deployment, whereas KACE provides flexible options including cloud environments. Both are recognized for delivering significant ROI.
Download BigFix vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
BigFix has a higher setup cost compared to KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which offers a more cost-effective solution for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix has a higher setup cost compared to KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which offers a more cost-effective solution for initial deployment.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security excels in threat detection, anti-malware features, and endpoint protection. In comparison, KACE Systems Management Appliance offers superior asset and patch management. Kaspersky is appealing for budget-conscious buyers; in contrast, KACE SMA provides efficiency and long-term cost savings through comprehensive management.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business features a competitive setup cost, while KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) presents a higher initial outlay, highlighting a significant cost difference in the setup phase between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business features a competitive setup cost, while KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) presents a higher initial outlay, highlighting a significant cost difference in the setup phase between the two solutions.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Forescout Platform
4.2 out of 5
Forescout excels in network visibility and policy control, ideal for complex environments requiring robust threat detection. In comparison, KACE SMA focuses on endpoint management with strengths in inventory and service desk integration, appealing to broader IT management and asset monitoring needs.
Download Forescout Platform vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Forescout Platform setup cost is typically higher due to its extensive feature set, while KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, aimed at organizations with basic needs and simpler management requisites.
View comparison
Pricing
Forescout Platform setup cost is typically higher due to its extensive feature set, while KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, aimed at organizations with basic needs and simpler management requisites.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
ManageEngine Endpoint Central
4.1 out of 5
ManageEngine Endpoint Central offers cost-effective pricing but may incur extra charges for add-ons. In comparison, KACE Systems Management Appliance provides predictable licensing and integrates additional features without escalating costs, making it appealing for those who value comprehensive functionality and consistent budgeting.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. ManageEngine Endpoint Central Report
ManageEngine Endpoint Central features a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly compared to KACE Systems Management Appliance, which requires a higher initial investment. This cost difference is a notable factor when choosing between these management solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Endpoint Central features a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly compared to KACE Systems Management Appliance, which requires a higher initial investment. This cost difference is a notable factor when choosing between these management solutions.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Atera
4.7 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Atera
4.7 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance impressively integrates remote management with centralized software deployment. In comparison, Atera focuses on automated patching and intuitive ticketing systems. KACE handles complex environments, while Atera's cloud-centric approach and pricing model offer flexibility and cost-effectiveness for tech buyers.
Download Atera vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) involves high setup costs, while Atera offers lower setup costs, highlighting Atera's cost-effectiveness.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) involves high setup costs, while Atera offers lower setup costs, highlighting Atera's cost-effectiveness.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
4.1 out of 5
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager excels in security features like multi-factor authentication and advanced threat analytics. In comparison, KACE Systems Management Appliance offers strong asset management and helpdesk functionality, ideal for organizations seeking comprehensive system management with a user-friendly interface.
Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager typically incurs higher setup costs compared to KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager typically incurs higher setup costs compared to KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Kaseya VSA
3.8 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Kaseya VSA
3.8 out of 5
Kaseya VSA provides robust remote management and impressive automation, appealing to those valuing integration with existing Kaseya products. In comparison, KACE SMA excels in comprehensive asset management and software deployment, ideal for buyers seeking efficient mass deployment and robust endpoint management capabilities.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Kaseya VSA Report
Kaseya VSA offers lower setup costs compared to KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which tends to have higher initial expenses, making budget considerations a key factor when evaluating these systems.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaseya VSA offers lower setup costs compared to KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which tends to have higher initial expenses, making budget considerations a key factor when evaluating these systems.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
ConnectWise RMM
4.1 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
ConnectWise RMM
4.1 out of 5
KACE SMA offers cost-effectiveness and strong support with comprehensive management tools. In comparison, ConnectWise RMM excels with advanced features, automated monitoring, and seamless integrations. Tech buyers might choose KACE SMA for budget constraints, while ConnectWise RMM attracts those prioritizing feature-rich automation.
Download ConnectWise RMM vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost compared to ConnectWise RMM, which offers a more budget-friendly option for users seeking cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost compared to ConnectWise RMM, which offers a more budget-friendly option for users seeking cost-effective solutions.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Vicarius vRx
4.0 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Vicarius vRx
4.0 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance offers comprehensive integration and endpoint features for centralized IT operations. In comparison, Vicarius vRx focuses on advanced vulnerability management with automated solutions. KACE is ideal for those needing robust asset management, while Vicarius suits security-focused environments seeking streamlined vulnerability handling.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Vicarius vRx Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) typically carries significant setup costs, while Vicarius vRx offers a more cost-effective setup solution. The financial disparity in initial setup costs highlights a key difference between these two management tools.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) typically carries significant setup costs, while Vicarius vRx offers a more cost-effective setup solution. The financial disparity in initial setup costs highlights a key difference between these two management tools.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Automox
4.5 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Automox
4.5 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance offers extensive features like asset management and deployment automation for complex environments, appealing to buyers needing customization for large-scale deployments. In comparison, Automox's simplicity and cloud-native design attract those seeking user-friendly solutions for managing cross-platform environments efficiently.
Download Automox vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost compared to Automox, making Automox more appealing for budget-conscious organizations seeking cost-effective solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost compared to Automox, making Automox more appealing for budget-conscious organizations seeking cost-effective solutions.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus
4.1 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in remote device management and system integration. In comparison, ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus is recognized for affordability and effective patch management, appealing to budget-focused tech buyers for both Microsoft and non-Microsoft environments.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has higher setup costs, while ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus offers a more cost-effective implementation, highlighting a key difference in initial investment for IT management needs.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has higher setup costs, while ManageEngine Patch Manager Plus offers a more cost-effective implementation, highlighting a key difference in initial investment for IT management needs.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager
4.2 out of 5
Ivanti Endpoint Security offers seamless integration with Ivanti tools and robust patch management, appealing to those within its ecosystem. In comparison, KACE Systems Management Appliance provides flexible asset management and extensive compatibility, attracting buyers seeking comprehensive features and diverse system adaptability.
Download Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has a higher setup cost compared to KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has a higher setup cost compared to KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA), which offers a more budget-friendly option.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Microsoft Windows Server Update Services
3.9 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in integration and comprehensive endpoint management, ideal for varied setups. In comparison, Microsoft Windows Server Update Services offers core Windows patch management and is cost-effective, integrated with Windows platforms, and suited for users seeking straightforward update functionalities.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Microsoft Windows Server Update Services Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) features a straightforward setup process with no significant upfront costs, unlike Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, which may involve variable setup costs depending on the infrastructure requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) features a straightforward setup process with no significant upfront costs, unlike Microsoft Windows Server Update Services, which may involve variable setup costs depending on the infrastructure requirements.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Scalefusion
4.2 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Scalefusion
4.2 out of 5
KACE SMA offers comprehensive management tools, making it ideal for complex IT environments. In comparison, Scalefusion provides streamlined management across diverse devices, appealing to businesses needing adaptability. KACE's robust features cater to IT depth, while Scalefusion's flexibility suits broader device management needs.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. Scalefusion Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) involves a moderate setup cost, while Scalefusion offers a lower cost of setup, highlighting a significant pricing differentiation in the initial expenses for implementing these systems.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) involves a moderate setup cost, while Scalefusion offers a lower cost of setup, highlighting a significant pricing differentiation in the initial expenses for implementing these systems.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
BMC Helix Client Management
4.3 out of 5
KACE is ideal for organizations seeking ease of use, automation, and cost-effective asset management. In comparison, BMC Helix offers comprehensive remote control and IT asset management, particularly excelling in cloud environments, despite its higher price.
Download BMC Helix Client Management vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a straightforward setup process with clear cost structures, whereas BMC Helix Client Management can involve more complex initial setup and associated higher costs, highlighting distinct financial and logistical differences between the two s...
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a straightforward setup process with clear cost structures, whereas BMC Helix Client Management can involve more complex initial setup and associated higher costs, highlighting distinct financial and logistical differences between the two s...
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
GFI LanGuard
4.0 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
GFI LanGuard
4.0 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in automation, scalability, and a comprehensive feature set including software distribution and asset management. In comparison, GFI LanGuard focuses on vulnerability assessment and patch management, appealing to tech buyers seeking strong security insights with competitive pricing.
Download GFI LanGuard vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance has a higher setup cost compared to GFI LanGuard. GFI LanGuard's lower setup cost positions it as a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance has a higher setup cost compared to GFI LanGuard. GFI LanGuard's lower setup cost positions it as a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune
3.9 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance excels with comprehensive endpoint management and flexible deployment, offering notable ROI and accessible support. In comparison, Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune provides seamless patch management despite higher costs, complemented by effective support and hybrid deployment options, achieving efficiency across systems.
Download Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) typically involves a higher initial setup cost than Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, which presents a more budget-friendly option with its lower initial setup requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) typically involves a higher initial setup cost than Ivanti Neurons Patch for Intune, which presents a more budget-friendly option with its lower initial setup requirements.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager
3.8 out of 5
KACE SMA offers cost-effective endpoint management with easy deployment and user-friendly support, appealing to businesses seeking simplicity. In comparison, Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager provides robust security features and extensive support, attracting enterprises prioritizing advanced patch management despite higher costs.
Download Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a lower setup cost compared to Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager, which tends to be higher, marking a significant price difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a lower setup cost compared to Ivanti Patch for Endpoint Manager, which tends to be higher, marking a significant price difference between the two solutions.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
TeamViewer ONE
4.2 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
TeamViewer ONE
4.2 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance excels in integration and time-saving automation for endpoint management. In comparison, TeamViewer ONE is praised for remote management and security features, offering deployment flexibility and effective customer support in hybrid and cloud environments.
Download KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) vs. TeamViewer ONE Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost than TeamViewer ONE, making TeamViewer ONE a more budget-friendly initial option.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost than TeamViewer ONE, making TeamViewer ONE a more budget-friendly initial option.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Comodo RMM
4.0 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Comodo RMM
4.0 out of 5
KACE SMA excels in ease of use and comprehensive management capabilities. In comparison, Comodo RMM focuses on automation and strong security features. KACE SMA facilitates straightforward deployment, while Comodo RMM emphasizes flexibility and scalability, catering to diverse organizational needs.
Download Comodo RMM vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost compared to Comodo RMM, highlighting a significant price difference in initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) has a higher setup cost compared to Comodo RMM, highlighting a significant price difference in initial expenses.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac
4.5 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance offers robust support and quick ROI with its comprehensive management features. In comparison, Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac provides advanced patching for non-Windows systems, appealing to tech buyers seeking specialized solutions despite higher costs.
Download Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac vs. KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Report
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) generally involves a moderate setup cost compared to Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac, which requires a more significant investment. Ivanti offers more comprehensive features, making it a suitable choice for diverse environments.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) generally involves a moderate setup cost compared to Ivanti Patch for Linux, UNIX, Mac, which requires a more significant investment. Ivanti offers more comprehensive features, making it a suitable choice for diverse environments.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) Logo
SolarWinds Patch Manager
1 out of 5
KACE Systems Management Appliance offers extensive asset management and software distribution, appealing to those seeking broader system management. In comparison, SolarWinds Patch Manager excels in specialized patch management with robust third-party patching and compliance reporting, ideal for organizations prioritizing efficient and economical patch management.
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a lower setup cost compared to SolarWinds Patch Manager, which provides a more comprehensive and complex installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
KACE Systems Management Appliance (SMA) offers a lower setup cost compared to SolarWinds Patch Manager, which provides a more comprehensive and complex installation process.

Related categories

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)
Client Desktop Management
Endpoint Compliance