No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo

Top 10 VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Alternatives

Vendor: Broadcom
3.9 out of 5
Leave a review

Top VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, and Microsoft Defender for Endpoint. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat intelligence, comprehensive visibility, real-time monitoring, and automated response capabilities, empowering organizations to effectively prevent, detect, and respond to evolving cybersecurity threats.

Broadcom Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Broadcom, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon provides comprehensive visibility and AI-driven security with minimal performance impact. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers robust data analysis and customizable alerts. CrowdStrike excels in remote capabilities, while VMware Carbon Black emphasizes cloud integration and alert customization.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint presents a more complex and potentially higher setup expense, highlighting a significant difference in ease and financial requirement in the initial phase.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial costs, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint presents a more complex and potentially higher setup expense, highlighting a significant difference in ease and financial requirement in the initial phase.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers strong threat hunting, real-time monitoring, and automatic remediation, appealing to those with budget constraints and requiring robust customer support. In comparison, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks excels with comprehensive threat intelligence and high-fidelity alerts, attracting buyers seeking advanced features and deeper incident analysis.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a straightforward and moderately priced setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks tends to have a higher initial setup cost but offers extensive support.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a straightforward and moderately priced setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks tends to have a higher initial setup cost but offers extensive support.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in real-time visibility and competitive pricing, making it suitable for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers advanced threat intelligence and seamless integration with Microsoft services, making it appealing despite its higher cost.
Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which offers a more streamlined and cost-effective initial deployment.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which offers a more streamlined and cost-effective initial deployment.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers centralized endpoint management with AI-driven threat prioritization. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels with strong EDR features and real-time threat detection, appealing to those seeking advanced threat investigation. Pricing and deployment differ, fitting distinct organizational needs.
Download SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete's setup cost is notably higher, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers a more economical setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete's setup cost is notably higher, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers a more economical setup option.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Varonis Platform
4.2 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Varonis Platform
4.2 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint provides robust threat detection and management for enhanced security. In comparison, Varonis Platform excels in data access governance and compliance. Each offers unique capabilities appealing to tech buyers prioritizing either endpoint protection or data security.
Download VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs. Varonis Platform Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint setup cost is often reported as lower, providing a cost-effective solution, whereas Varonis Platform's setup cost can be higher, reflecting its comprehensive feature set and extensive security capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint setup cost is often reported as lower, providing a cost-effective solution, whereas Varonis Platform's setup cost can be higher, reflecting its comprehensive feature set and extensive security capabilities.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Elastic Security
3.9 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in comprehensive threat detection and real-time response, making it cost-effective with a robust ROI. In comparison, Elastic Security offers extensive logging and search capabilities for deep forensic analysis, justifying its higher initial cost with advanced features.
Download Elastic Security vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint's setup cost is noted for being higher than Elastic Security's, making Elastic Security a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint's setup cost is noted for being higher than Elastic Security's, making Elastic Security a more budget-friendly option.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Huntress Managed EDR
4.7 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in threat detection with strong cloud deployment and behavioral analysis, but faces challenges in on-premise support and compatibility. In comparison, Huntress Managed EDR offers 24/7 monitoring with SOC involvement, excelling in ease of deployment and competitive pricing.
Download Huntress Managed EDR vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, while Huntress Managed EDR offers a more budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost, while Huntress Managed EDR offers a more budget-friendly option.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Tanium
3.9 out of 5
Tanium excels in scalability and endpoint management, appealing to large operations. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint stands out with advanced threat detection, attracting security-focused organizations. Tanium's robust deployment contrasts with VMware's user-friendly setup, offering options for varied organizational needs.
Download Tanium vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Tanium incurs a higher setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint. This may impact initial budgeting decisions for organizations weighing their endpoint security solution options.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium incurs a higher setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint. This may impact initial budgeting decisions for organizations weighing their endpoint security solution options.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in threat containment and intuitive management. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers advanced threat detection and response. HP Wolf Security has competitive pricing, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint justifies higher costs with comprehensive features and detailed analytics, appealing to tech buyers with different needs.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
The setup cost for HP Wolf Security is significantly lower, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher initial investment. HP Wolf Security offers a budget-friendly option, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint emphasizes premium features justifying its higher cost.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for HP Wolf Security is significantly lower, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher initial investment. HP Wolf Security offers a budget-friendly option, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint emphasizes premium features justifying its higher cost.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform excels in advanced threat prevention and SIEM integration, ideal for customized security management. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers real-time monitoring and threat prediction. Both face challenges in support and deployment, though Trellix is more cost-effective for enterprises.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers advanced features with a higher setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security Platform has a lower setup cost, making it more budget-friendly, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers advanced features with a higher setup investment.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
WatchGuard Firebox
4.2 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint provides advanced threat detection and detailed security analysis. In comparison, WatchGuard Firebox offers comprehensive protection with a user-friendly interface. Carbon Black targets deep dive analysis, while WatchGuard focuses on affordability and ease for small to midsize enterprises.
Download VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs. WatchGuard Firebox Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a lower initial setup cost compared to WatchGuard Firebox, whose setup costs are higher, offering advanced network security features.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a lower initial setup cost compared to WatchGuard Firebox, whose setup costs are higher, offering advanced network security features.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
TrendAI Vision One
4.3 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
TrendAI Vision One
4.3 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers advanced threat detection and is noted for strong endpoint insights. In comparison, TrendAI Vision One excels in comprehensive integration capabilities, offering extensive network visibility and competitive market pricing, making it an appealing choice for those seeking integrated security solutions.
Download TrendAI Vision One vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint often reports a moderate setup cost, whereas TrendAI Vision One users frequently highlight a higher initial expense.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint often reports a moderate setup cost, whereas TrendAI Vision One users frequently highlight a higher initial expense.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Microsoft Defender XDR
4.2 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in advanced threat detection and integration with security tools. In comparison, Microsoft Defender XDR provides extensive threat intelligence and seamless integration with Microsoft 365. VMware's straightforward setup requires significant configuration, while Microsoft Defender XDR simplifies deployment within its ecosystem.
Download Microsoft Defender XDR vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender XDR, highlighting a significant cost difference in initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has higher setup costs compared to Microsoft Defender XDR, highlighting a significant cost difference in initial deployment.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Fortinet FortiEDR
4.0 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in pricing and support. In comparison, Fortinet FortiEDR stands out with its features and real-time detection. VMware impresses with a straightforward deployment process, while Fortinet's customer service is favored. VMware offers competitive costs, whereas Fortinet justifies higher pricing with added value.
Download Fortinet FortiEDR vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has higher setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, which offers a more economical initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has higher setup costs compared to Fortinet FortiEDR, which offers a more economical initial investment.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint excels in anti-ransomware and centralized management. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint focuses on behavioral analysis and forensic insights. Check Point offers seamless deployment, while VMware addresses real-time threat hunting, making both suitable for distinct organizational needs.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a notable initial setup cost, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers a more budget-friendly initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint has a notable initial setup cost, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers a more budget-friendly initial deployment.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in advanced threat detection with predictive analytics and real-time monitoring. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient impresses with comprehensive features, including robust malware protection and an integrated VPN. VMware's deployment is straightforward; Fortinet's customer service is highly responsive.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which is more budget-friendly. This price difference highlights Fortinet FortiClient's competitive edge in affordability.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which is more budget-friendly. This price difference highlights Fortinet FortiClient's competitive edge in affordability.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix is valued for efficient patch management, robust support, and cost-effective pricing. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in threat detection, behavioral monitoring, and advanced analytics. A tech buyer prioritizing endpoint management might choose BigFix, whereas security intelligence advocates might prefer VMware Carbon Black Endpoint.
Download BigFix vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
BigFix setup cost is higher but includes comprehensive features, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint setup is more affordable with a focus on essential security tools.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix setup cost is higher but includes comprehensive features, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint setup is more affordable with a focus on essential security tools.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum is preferred for its user-friendly interface, affordable pricing, and comprehensive endpoint features suitable for SMBs. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers advanced security with real-time monitoring and machine learning, making it ideal for feature-rich enterprise needs.
Download Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum has a straightforward setup process, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint may entail a higher initial setup cost, highlighting a significant cost difference for businesses choosing between these endpoint security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Next XDR Optimum has a straightforward setup process, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint may entail a higher initial setup cost, highlighting a significant cost difference for businesses choosing between these endpoint security solutions.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers comprehensive malware detection and user-friendly configuration, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in advanced threat detection and robust incident response, attracting those prioritizing superior security features despite higher costs.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has minimal initial setup costs, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has minimal initial setup costs, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher initial investment.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security impresses with its intuitive setup and comprehensive features for behavior monitoring. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint provides advanced threat detection with detailed analytics. Trend Vision One offers cost-effective solutions, while VMware Carbon Black's premium pricing reflects its robust security capabilities.
Download TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security incurs a higher setup cost, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers a more affordable initial expense, highlighting a significant difference in their cost structures.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security incurs a higher setup cost, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers a more affordable initial expense, highlighting a significant difference in their cost structures.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Cynet is known for its ease of use and efficient customer support. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers detailed forensic capabilities and robust protection against advanced persistent threats. Tech buyers may choose Cynet for value and support, while opting for VMware Carbon Black Endpoint for extensive security features.
Download Cynet vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Cynet has a more straightforward setup process, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint involves higher initial costs and complexity. Cynet's quick deployment appeals to those seeking efficiency, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint targets organizations needing extensive configuration capab...
View comparison
Pricing
Cynet has a more straightforward setup process, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint involves higher initial costs and complexity. Cynet's quick deployment appeals to those seeking efficiency, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint targets organizations needing extensive configuration capab...
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers comprehensive threat detection and proactive threat hunting capabilities. In comparison, Intercept X Endpoint excels with deep learning technology and exploit prevention. Although Intercept X Endpoint tends to impact system performance more, its advanced features and higher ROI often justify the investment.
Download Intercept X Endpoint vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher setup cost than Intercept X Endpoint, which offers more affordable initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher setup cost than Intercept X Endpoint, which offers more affordable initial implementation.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
WatchGuard EPDR
4.2 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers comprehensive threat detection and real-time analytics, appealing to those needing robust security. In comparison, WatchGuard EPDR's integration of EPP and EDR capabilities and ease of use make it attractive for tech buyers seeking a seamless deployment and efficient user experience.
Download VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs. WatchGuard EPDR Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint's setup cost is noted for its complexity, while WatchGuard EPDR is recognized for its straightforward installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint's setup cost is noted for its complexity, while WatchGuard EPDR is recognized for its straightforward installation process.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR
4.2 out of 5
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR is cost-efficient and user-friendly, ideal for straightforward deployment. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers advanced features for proactive threat hunting, making it suitable for comprehensive security needs despite higher costs. Bitdefender provides competitive pricing, while VMware delivers long-term investment value.
Download Bitdefender GravityZone EDR vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has lower setup costs compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint.
View comparison
Pricing
Bitdefender GravityZone EDR has lower setup costs compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
USM Anywhere
4.2 out of 5
USM Anywhere is favored for comprehensive threat detection, correlation, and log management, with straightforward deployment and strong customer support. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in advanced threat hunting, EDR capabilities, and automated responses, offering superior features and higher perceived value despite higher costs.
Download USM Anywhere vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
USM Anywhere's setup cost is praised for being clear and predictable, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint's setup cost receives mixed reviews highlighting potential complexities.
View comparison
Pricing
USM Anywhere's setup cost is praised for being clear and predictable, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint's setup cost receives mixed reviews highlighting potential complexities.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in detection capabilities and forensic tools, making it a strong choice for thorough threat analysis. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint offers advanced threat hunting and seamless integration with Cisco tools, appealing to those needing versatile features.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint's setup cost is relatively high, while Cisco Secure Endpoint offers a lower upfront setup cost. This key difference may impact budget-conscious organizations when selecting between these endpoint security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint's setup cost is relatively high, while Cisco Secure Endpoint offers a lower upfront setup cost. This key difference may impact budget-conscious organizations when selecting between these endpoint security solutions.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform
4.6 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black offers robust threat detection with behavioral monitoring. In comparison, ThreatLocker emphasizes zero trust with allow-listing and Ringfencing. Buyers might choose VMware for its extensive features, while ThreatLocker appeals with competitive pricing and effective reduction of attack surfaces.
Download ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has moderate setup costs, while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform offers a low-cost setup, making the latter potentially more appealing for budget-conscious users seeking effective cybersecurity solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has moderate setup costs, while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Platform offers a low-cost setup, making the latter potentially more appealing for budget-conscious users seeking effective cybersecurity solutions.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Microsoft Defender for Business
3.8 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black offers advanced threat hunting, detailed behavioral monitoring, and deep SIEM integration. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Business excels in seamless integration within Microsoft 365, providing comprehensive detection and response capabilities for users within the Microsoft ecosystem despite some detection challenges.
Download Microsoft Defender for Business vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a significant initial setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Business offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it a cost-effective alternative for small businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a significant initial setup cost, while Microsoft Defender for Business offers a more budget-friendly setup, making it a cost-effective alternative for small businesses.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Digital Guardian
3.4 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Digital Guardian
3.4 out of 5
Digital Guardian and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint are robust endpoint protection solutions with distinct strengths. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in feature offerings and usability. A tech buyer might prefer Digital Guardian for its pricing and support, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is worth the investment for advanced threat detection capabilities.
Download Digital Guardian vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Digital Guardian has a higher setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, which is often praised for its more affordable implementation expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Digital Guardian has a higher setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, which is often praised for its more affordable implementation expenses.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint emphasizes comprehensive threat detection and incident response with seamless integration into existing security tools. In comparison, NetWitness NDR focuses on network detection with granular traffic analysis, offering extensive visibility. A tech buyer might opt for VMware for its user-friendly deployment and Carbon Black’s flexible pricing model. Alternatively, they could select NetWitness for its in-depth network insights despite the complex setup process.
Download NetWitness NDR vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
For VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, the setup cost is reported to be high but manageable, while NetWitness NDR users report relatively higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
For VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, the setup cost is reported to be high but manageable, while NetWitness NDR users report relatively higher setup expenses.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Malwarebytes Teams
4.0 out of 5
Malwarebytes Teams offers straightforward threat detection ideal for ease of use and rapid response. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint provides advanced behavioral analysis, justifying its higher cost with premium capabilities and in-depth threat analysis. Malwarebytes and Carbon Black each cater to different integration needs.
Download Malwarebytes Teams vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Malwarebytes Teams offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint may involve a higher initial expense due to its advanced installation requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Malwarebytes Teams offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint may involve a higher initial expense due to its advanced installation requirements.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager
4.1 out of 5
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager emphasizes robust privilege management and application control, crucial for security. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint focuses on advanced threat detection using behavioral analysis. Both offer flexibility and strong ROI, appealing to organizations with varying priorities.
Download CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager offers a moderate setup cost, providing a straightforward onboarding process, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher investment, which could be justified by its extensive security features and advanced customization options.
View comparison
Pricing
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager offers a moderate setup cost, providing a straightforward onboarding process, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher investment, which could be justified by its extensive security features and advanced customization options.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Morphisec
4.6 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in threat detection, offering advanced insights and extensive reporting. In comparison, Morphisec is valued for its lightweight impact and ease of use. VMware is preferred for its detailed insights, while Morphisec appeals for its minimal system overhead and prevention-first approach.
Download Morphisec vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Morphisec. The significant price difference highlights the affordability of Morphisec over VMware Carbon Black Endpoint.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Morphisec. The significant price difference highlights the affordability of Morphisec over VMware Carbon Black Endpoint.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
3.9 out of 5

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response excels in deployment ease and customer service. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers comprehensive features and high ROI. Tech buyers may prefer Cybereason for user-friendliness, while VMware Carbon Black attracts those valuing advanced analytics and extensive capabilities.

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has a lower initial setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, which is reportedly more complex and expensive to implement for enterprise environments.
View comparison
Pricing
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has a lower initial setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, which is reportedly more complex and expensive to implement for enterprise environments.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Logpoint
3.8 out of 5
Logpoint's centralized log management and compliance reporting are compelling, with favorable pricing. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint's extensive threat detection and response capabilities cater to comprehensive protection needs. Logpoint's simpler deployment contrasts with VMware's more complex but higher-value feature set.
Download Logpoint vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Logpoint has a low initial setup cost, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher setup investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Logpoint has a low initial setup cost, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher setup investment.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Fidelis Elevate
4.2 out of 5
Fidelis Elevate excels with comprehensive threat detection and insightful network visibility, offering benefits in support and pricing. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is noted for advanced analytics and superior automated responses, providing strong prevention techniques and deep threat visibility.
Download Fidelis Elevate vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Fidelis Elevate has a higher setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, favoring organizations with greater initial investment capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
Fidelis Elevate has a higher setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, favoring organizations with greater initial investment capabilities.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
4.0 out of 5
BlackBerry Cylance, with AI-driven minimal CPU usage, excels in blocking zero-day threats. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black supports deep threat analysis and live response capabilities. A tech buyer might choose Cylance for efficiency, while Carbon Black offers extensive threat visibility.
Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity has a straightforward setup process, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint involves a complex installation. Users often highlight these differences when considering the setup cost and initial deployment efforts involved.
View comparison
Pricing
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity has a straightforward setup process, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint involves a complex installation. Users often highlight these differences when considering the setup cost and initial deployment efforts involved.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​
3.9 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers AI-driven threat detection and deep VMware integration for enhanced security. In comparison, OpenText Core Endpoint Protection provides comprehensive security, emphasizing cost-effectiveness and ease of use, making it attractive for those seeking affordable, efficient endpoint solutions.
Download OpenText Core Endpoint Protection​ vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to OpenText Core Endpoint Protection, but it offers more advanced security features.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to OpenText Core Endpoint Protection, but it offers more advanced security features.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Kaspersky Next EDR Expert
4.1 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in threat hunting with cloud deployment, offering heuristic analysis for proactive prevention. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response focuses on machine learning for advanced detection with integrated analytics, appealing to those prioritizing endpoint protection and budget-sensitive pricing.
Download Kaspersky Next EDR Expert vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint setup cost is competitive with advanced features included, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has a more straightforward setup cost, appealing to businesses seeking cost efficiency without compromising quality.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint setup cost is competitive with advanced features included, whereas Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert has a more straightforward setup cost, appealing to businesses seeking cost efficiency without compromising quality.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Sophos Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Sophos Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
Sophos Endpoint is known for its ease of use with strong antivirus features and ransomware protection. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels with behavior-based threat detection and advanced analytics, offering more detailed insights for proactive threat management.
Download Sophos Endpoint vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Sophos Endpoint setup cost is lower, providing a budget-friendly option, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its robust security features.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos Endpoint setup cost is lower, providing a budget-friendly option, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its robust security features.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
ServiceNow Security Operations
4.0 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers advanced threat detection and cloud-based management which suits businesses needing robust security. In comparison, ServiceNow Security Operations integrates well with ITSM services, providing a comprehensive service management approach suitable for organizations seeking detailed operational and vulnerability response integration.
Download ServiceNow Security Operations vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a moderate setup cost compared to ServiceNow Security Operations, which requires a higher initial investment. The significant cost discrepancy may influence budget-conscious decisions in selecting between the two platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a moderate setup cost compared to ServiceNow Security Operations, which requires a higher initial investment. The significant cost discrepancy may influence budget-conscious decisions in selecting between the two platforms.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform
4.3 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in real-time threat detection and extensive integrations. In comparison, Deep Instinct Prevention Platform offers superior speed and accuracy with deep learning algorithms. VMware Carbon Black provides straightforward deployment, while Deep Instinct offers higher ROI despite premium pricing.
Download Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers a lower initial setup cost, whereas Deep Instinct Prevention Platform requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers a lower initial setup cost, whereas Deep Instinct Prevention Platform requires a higher initial investment.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Heimdal Endpoint Security
4.5 out of 5
Heimdal Endpoint Security enhances threat detection, integrating smoothly with existing systems. Users value its real-time monitoring and ransomware protection capabilities. There is room for improvement in customization options and reporting features, ensuring it meets diverse user requirements efficiently.
View comparison
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Coro
1 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Coro
1 out of 5
Coro boosts efficiency with its security and compliance features. Its simple integration makes it a preferred option for businesses. Users appreciate its user-friendly design. However, some find that advanced customization options could enhance the experience, and timely updates are welcome for better performance.
View comparison
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Avast Business Hub
4.1 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Avast Business Hub
4.1 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers advanced threat detection and robust malware analysis. In comparison, Avast Business Hub provides intuitive tools for centralized management and easy deployment, making it ideal for small businesses. A tech buyer might choose VMware for comprehensive features or Avast for simplicity and affordability.
Download Avast Business Hub vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has variable setup costs depending on deployment size, while Avast Business Hub offers a simpler, flat-rate setup fee.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has variable setup costs depending on deployment size, while Avast Business Hub offers a simpler, flat-rate setup fee.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
3.8 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in support and pricing satisfaction, while Trellix EDR offers a robust feature set with comprehensive threat analysis and detailed reporting. In comparison, Trellix users benefit from advanced analytics and integration but face a steeper learning curve during deployment.
Download Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a moderate setup cost, whereas Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a moderate setup cost, whereas Trellix Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) has a higher initial investment.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
SonicWall Capture Client
4.0 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in advanced threat detection and response capabilities. In comparison, SonicWall Capture Client is noted for its comprehensive network protection. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers real-time analytics and proactive threat mitigation, whereas SonicWall Capture Client integrates seamlessly with SonicWall’s network security suite.
Download SonicWall Capture Client vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a significant initial setup cost, while SonicWall Capture Client offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a significant initial setup cost, while SonicWall Capture Client offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager
4.2 out of 5

Ivanti offers cost-effectiveness and straightforward deployment, appealing to budget-conscious buyers and those needing responsive support. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black stands out with advanced threat detection and analytics, attracting buyers interested in superior performance despite higher costs and a complex setup.

Download Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has a higher setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint. The former is known for its robust features, while the latter boasts a more user-friendly setup experience.
View comparison
Pricing
Ivanti Endpoint Security for Endpoint Manager has a higher setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint. The former is known for its robust features, while the latter boasts a more user-friendly setup experience.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum
4.2 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in advanced threat detection with behavior analysis and real-time monitoring. In comparison, Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum focuses on precision in malware detection and automated response, making it suitable for budget-conscious companies seeking cost-effective comprehensive threat management.
Download Kaspersky Next EDR Optimum vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint incurs a higher setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers a more affordable setup option, highlighting significant pricing contrasts in their initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint incurs a higher setup cost, while Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum offers a more affordable setup option, highlighting significant pricing contrasts in their initial implementation.

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Ransomware Protection