Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo

Top 10 VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Alternatives

Vendor: VMware
3.9 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
3,145 followers
Start review

Top VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

VMware Carbon Black Endpoint surpasses its competitors by offering advanced threat detection, comprehensive endpoint visibility, and automated response capabilities, ensuring robust security and streamlined management for organizations of all sizes.

VMware Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with VMware, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon features strong EDR with threat intelligence, focusing on swift deployment and minimal system impact. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint emphasizes extensive threat hunting and data analysis, appealing to businesses needing deep insight and comprehensive network threat detection.
Download CrowdStrike Falcon vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
CrowdStrike Falcon typically has a higher initial setup cost, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting their differing approaches to upfront investment.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon typically has a higher initial setup cost, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting their differing approaches to upfront investment.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint
4.1 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in real-time visibility and competitive pricing, making it suitable for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint offers advanced threat intelligence and seamless integration with Microsoft services, making it appealing despite its higher cost.
Download Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which offers a more streamlined and cost-effective initial deployment.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, which offers a more streamlined and cost-effective initial deployment.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
SentinelOne Singularity Complete
4.3 out of 5
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers comprehensive threat detection, AI-powered automation, and robust ransomware protection. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint provides deep application behavior visibility and strong analytics. SentinelOne is noted for ease of deployment and cost efficiency, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint delivers advanced features and substantial ROI.
Download SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers straightforward setup costs clearly defined, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint presents a more complex and potentially fluctuating cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
SentinelOne Singularity Complete offers straightforward setup costs clearly defined, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint presents a more complex and potentially fluctuating cost structure.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers strong threat hunting, real-time monitoring, and automatic remediation, appealing to those with budget constraints and requiring robust customer support. In comparison, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks excels with comprehensive threat intelligence and high-fidelity alerts, attracting buyers seeking advanced features and deeper incident analysis.
Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a straightforward and moderately priced setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks tends to have a higher initial setup cost but offers extensive support.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a straightforward and moderately priced setup cost, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks tends to have a higher initial setup cost but offers extensive support.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Fortinet FortiClient
4.0 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in advanced threat detection with predictive analytics and real-time monitoring. In comparison, Fortinet FortiClient impresses with comprehensive features, including robust malware protection and an integrated VPN. VMware's deployment is straightforward; Fortinet's customer service is highly responsive.
Download Fortinet FortiClient vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which is more budget-friendly. This price difference highlights Fortinet FortiClient's competitive edge in affordability.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Fortinet FortiClient, which is more budget-friendly. This price difference highlights Fortinet FortiClient's competitive edge in affordability.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Cisco Secure Endpoint
4.3 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in detection capabilities and forensic tools, making it a strong choice for thorough threat analysis. In comparison, Cisco Secure Endpoint offers advanced threat hunting and seamless integration with Cisco tools, appealing to those needing versatile features.
Download Cisco Secure Endpoint vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint's setup cost is relatively high, while Cisco Secure Endpoint offers a lower upfront setup cost. This key difference may impact budget-conscious organizations when selecting between these endpoint security solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint's setup cost is relatively high, while Cisco Secure Endpoint offers a lower upfront setup cost. This key difference may impact budget-conscious organizations when selecting between these endpoint security solutions.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Symantec Endpoint Security
3.8 out of 5
Symantec Endpoint Security offers ease of deployment and competitive pricing appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint's advanced threat detection and real-time response justify its higher price. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint provides robust customer support to assist users with complex deployments.
Download Symantec Endpoint Security vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Symantec Endpoint Security setup cost is reported as high, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a relatively lower setup cost by comparison.
View comparison
Pricing
Symantec Endpoint Security setup cost is reported as high, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a relatively lower setup cost by comparison.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
HP Wolf Security
3.9 out of 5
HP Wolf Security excels in threat containment and intuitive management. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers advanced threat detection and response. HP Wolf Security has competitive pricing, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint justifies higher costs with comprehensive features and detailed analytics, appealing to tech buyers with different needs.
Download HP Wolf Security vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
The setup cost for HP Wolf Security is significantly lower, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher initial investment. HP Wolf Security offers a budget-friendly option, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint emphasizes premium features justifying its higher cost.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for HP Wolf Security is significantly lower, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher initial investment. HP Wolf Security offers a budget-friendly option, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint emphasizes premium features justifying its higher cost.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Tanium
3.8 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Tanium
3.8 out of 5
Tanium offers comprehensive features and competitive pricing, including robust asset discovery and real-time data gathering. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in advanced threat detection and integration capabilities. A tech buyer might choose Tanium for budget-friendliness or VMware for superior threat detection.
Download Tanium vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Tanium has a higher setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers a more economical setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Tanium has a higher setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers a more economical setup process.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security
4.1 out of 5
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security offers comprehensive threat detection and easy integration, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels with real-time threat intelligence and scalability. In comparison, Trend Vision One is cost-effective with straightforward deployment, whereas VMware Carbon Black provides detailed forensics and high perceived value despite higher costs.
Download Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, making it a more economical choice in terms of initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Trend Vision One Endpoint Security has a lower setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, making it a more economical choice in terms of initial expenses.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business
4.0 out of 5
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business offers comprehensive malware detection and centralized management, making it cost-effective with quick deployment. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in real-time threat detection and proactive threat hunting, justifying its higher price through advanced features and long-term benefits.
Download Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business highlights a straightforward setup process praised for its minimal cost, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint often encounters higher setup costs as noted by many reviewers.
View comparison
Pricing
Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business highlights a straightforward setup process praised for its minimal cost, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint often encounters higher setup costs as noted by many reviewers.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security
4.0 out of 5
Trellix Endpoint Security excels in pricing and support while offering robust threat detection and policy management. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint provides advanced threat hunting and real-time alerts. Trellix is praised for its efficient deployment, with Carbon Black favored for its integration capabilities and long-term ROI.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Trellix Endpoint Security has a straightforward setup cost, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint may require higher initial investment, highlighting distinct pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Trellix Endpoint Security has a straightforward setup cost, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint may require higher initial investment, highlighting distinct pricing strategies.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Intercept X Endpoint
4.2 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers comprehensive threat detection and proactive threat hunting capabilities. In comparison, Intercept X Endpoint excels with deep learning technology and exploit prevention. Although Intercept X Endpoint tends to impact system performance more, its advanced features and higher ROI often justify the investment.
Download Intercept X Endpoint vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher setup cost than Intercept X Endpoint, which offers more affordable initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher setup cost than Intercept X Endpoint, which offers more affordable initial implementation.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform
4.1 out of 5
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform offers comprehensive malware detection and user-friendly configuration, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in advanced threat detection and robust incident response, attracting those prioritizing superior security features despite higher costs.
Download ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has minimal initial setup costs, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ESET Endpoint Protection Platform has minimal initial setup costs, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher initial investment.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
BigFix
4.3 out of 5
BigFix is valued for efficient patch management, robust support, and cost-effective pricing. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in threat detection, behavioral monitoring, and advanced analytics. A tech buyer prioritizing endpoint management might choose BigFix, whereas security intelligence advocates might prefer VMware Carbon Black Endpoint.
Download BigFix vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
BigFix setup cost is higher but includes comprehensive features, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint setup is more affordable with a focus on essential security tools.
View comparison
Pricing
BigFix setup cost is higher but includes comprehensive features, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint setup is more affordable with a focus on essential security tools.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Check Point Harmony Endpoint
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony Endpoint is praised for proactive threat hunting and robust threat intelligence integration. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint stands out with real-time attack blocking and comprehensive data analytics. A tech buyer might prefer Check Point for cost-effectiveness and VMware Carbon Black for advanced threat prevention.
Download Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is often cited as straightforward and cost-effective, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint tends to incur higher initial setup costs and complexity, reflecting their different approaches to deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony Endpoint's setup cost is often cited as straightforward and cost-effective, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint tends to incur higher initial setup costs and complexity, reflecting their different approaches to deployment.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Cynet
4.4 out of 5
Cynet is known for its ease of use and efficient customer support. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers detailed forensic capabilities and robust protection against advanced persistent threats. Tech buyers may choose Cynet for value and support, while opting for VMware Carbon Black Endpoint for extensive security features.
Download Cynet vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Cynet has a more straightforward setup process, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint involves higher initial costs and complexity. Cynet's quick deployment appeals to those seeking efficiency, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint targets organizations needing extensive configuration capab...
View comparison
Pricing
Cynet has a more straightforward setup process, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint involves higher initial costs and complexity. Cynet's quick deployment appeals to those seeking efficiency, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint targets organizations needing extensive configuration capab...
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS)
3.8 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in threat detection and response capabilities, while Trellix ENS shines with advanced malware protection and efficient system performance. In comparison, VMware offers straightforward deployment, whereas Trellix, with a complex setup, benefits from exceptional customer service. VMware delivers competitive pricing, though Trellix's extensive features justify its higher cost.
Download Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS) vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a lower setup cost compared to Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), making VMware a more cost-effective option initially.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a lower setup cost compared to Trellix Endpoint Security (ENS), making VMware a more cost-effective option initially.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Malwarebytes
4.0 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Malwarebytes
4.0 out of 5

Malwarebytes excels in affordability and ease of use, making it an attractive choice for those prioritizing cost and support. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers advanced features and robust threat response, justifying its higher price and appealing to security-conscious buyers seeking comprehensive protection.

Download Malwarebytes vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Malwarebytes offers a low setup cost, contrasting with VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, which has a higher initial expenditure. Malwarebytes is cost-effective for quick deployment, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint presents a more substantial upfront investment for advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Malwarebytes offers a low setup cost, contrasting with VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, which has a higher initial expenditure. Malwarebytes is cost-effective for quick deployment, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint presents a more substantial upfront investment for advanced features.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response
4.0 out of 5

Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response excels in deployment ease and customer service. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers comprehensive features and high ROI. Tech buyers may prefer Cybereason for user-friendliness, while VMware Carbon Black attracts those valuing advanced analytics and extensive capabilities.

Download Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has a lower initial setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, which is reportedly more complex and expensive to implement for enterprise environments.
View comparison
Pricing
Cybereason Endpoint Detection & Response has a lower initial setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, which is reportedly more complex and expensive to implement for enterprise environments.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Panda Adaptive Defense 360
4.1 out of 5
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 offers advanced threat detection and an easy deployment process. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint provides comprehensive threat hunting and detailed analytics. Panda is cost-effective and straightforward, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is feature-rich and ideal for detailed security needs despite its higher cost.
Download Panda Adaptive Defense 360 vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 has a higher initial setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, making VMware Carbon Black Endpoint a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Panda Adaptive Defense 360 has a higher initial setup cost compared to VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, making VMware Carbon Black Endpoint a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity
4.0 out of 5
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity features advanced machine learning for zero-day threat protection with minimal system impact. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in detailed threat intelligence, offering comprehensive threat reports and extensive investigative depth, making it ideal for businesses needing deep threat analysis and endpoint detection.
Download BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity has a lower setup cost, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher initial investment. While these cost differences are notable, both solutions present distinct offerings in the cybersecurity landscape.
View comparison
Pricing
BlackBerry Cylance Cybersecurity has a lower setup cost, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint requires a higher initial investment. While these cost differences are notable, both solutions present distinct offerings in the cybersecurity landscape.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform
4.6 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers strong detection and threat analysis capabilities due to its cloud-based architecture. In comparison, ThreatLocker focuses on zero-trust security with allowlisting and ring-fencing, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing application control and streamlined management features.
Download ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a straightforward setup process with upfront transparency on costs, while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform offers a competitive pricing model with potentially higher initial setup fees depending on system configurations.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a straightforward setup process with upfront transparency on costs, while ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform offers a competitive pricing model with potentially higher initial setup fees depending on system configurations.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Deep Instinct Prevention Platform
4.3 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in real-time threat detection and extensive integrations. In comparison, Deep Instinct Prevention Platform offers superior speed and accuracy with deep learning algorithms. VMware Carbon Black provides straightforward deployment, while Deep Instinct offers higher ROI despite premium pricing.
Download Deep Instinct Prevention Platform vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers a lower initial setup cost, whereas Deep Instinct Prevention Platform requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers a lower initial setup cost, whereas Deep Instinct Prevention Platform requires a higher initial investment.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Webroot Business Endpoint Protection
3.9 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has higher user satisfaction for pricing and support, with comprehensive threat analytics and response capabilities. In comparison, Webroot Business Endpoint Protection offers rapid scans and real-time threat intelligence in a lightweight design. Webroot's fast ROI is appreciated, while VMware provides extensive threat detection.
Download VMware Carbon Black Endpoint vs. Webroot Business Endpoint Protection Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, which offers a more affordable setup.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Webroot Business Endpoint Protection, which offers a more affordable setup.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
NetWitness NDR
4.0 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint emphasizes comprehensive threat detection and incident response with seamless integration into existing security tools. In comparison, NetWitness NDR focuses on network detection with granular traffic analysis, offering extensive visibility. A tech buyer might opt for VMware for its user-friendly deployment and Carbon Black’s flexible pricing model. Alternatively, they could select NetWitness for its in-depth network insights despite the complex setup process.
Download NetWitness NDR vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
For VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, the setup cost is reported to be high but manageable, while NetWitness NDR users report relatively higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
For VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, the setup cost is reported to be high but manageable, while NetWitness NDR users report relatively higher setup expenses.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Sophos EPP Suite
4.1 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Sophos EPP Suite
4.1 out of 5
Sophos EPP Suite is valued for its robust anti-malware and ransomware protection, presenting a straightforward deployment process but requiring better integration. In comparison, VMware Carbon Black Endpoint offers superior threat detection and detailed insights, though it entails a complex setup. Sophos is competitively priced, while VMware's advanced analytics justify its higher cost.
Download Sophos EPP Suite vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
Sophos EPP Suite setup cost is relatively affordable, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint often involves higher initial investments for setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Sophos EPP Suite setup cost is relatively affordable, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint often involves higher initial investments for setup.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Jamf Protect
4.7 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Jamf Protect
4.7 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint provides robust threat detection and comprehensive response measures suitable for diverse IT environments. In comparison, Jamf Protect offers deep integration with Apple's ecosystem, delivering efficient malware detection and seamless experiences for macOS-focused organizations.
Download Jamf Protect vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint setup costs are considered high, whereas Jamf Protect's setup costs are seen as moderate. VMware Carbon Black offers more robust features, while Jamf Protect stands out for its user-friendly interface.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint setup costs are considered high, whereas Jamf Protect's setup costs are seen as moderate. VMware Carbon Black offers more robust features, while Jamf Protect stands out for its user-friendly interface.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection
3.7 out of 5
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint excels in threat detection and reporting. In comparison, Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection offers hypervisor-level monitoring and security. VMware requires performance and navigation improvements, while Bitdefender needs better scalability and integration. VMware's easy deployment contrasts with Bitdefender's complexity and slower support.
Download Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Report
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection, which offers more cost-effective implementation. Differences in pricing signify varied approaches to budget allocation.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint has a higher setup cost compared to Bitdefender Hypervisor Introspection, which offers more cost-effective implementation. Differences in pricing signify varied approaches to budget allocation.
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
VMware Carbon Black Endpoint Logo
Carbonite Endpoint
1 out of 5

Carbonite Endpoint protection safeguards the data that resides on your organization’s computers, laptops, tablets and smartphones. Using file-level backup with patented global deduplication, Carbonite gives you the tools to manage bandwidth and accelerate data recovery speeds on distributed networks.

View comparison

Related categories

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
Ransomware Protection