ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform empowers organizations with application control, selective elevation, and ring-fencing to enhance security and prevent unauthorized access.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform | 1.0% |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | 8.7% |
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 7.4% |
| Other | 82.9% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform vs CrowdStrike Falcon | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform vs Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform vs SentinelOne Singularity Complete | Dec 29, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 4.3 | 7.4% | 97% | 136 interviewsAdd to research |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | 4.1 | 8.7% | 95% | 210 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 30 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 272 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 89 |
| Large Enterprise | 211 |
ThreatLocker provides comprehensive security management using application allowlisting to ensure only approved software operates across servers and workstations. The platform's centralized management simplifies security processes by consolidating multiple tools, and its robust capabilities align with zero-trust strategies by actively blocking unauthorized applications and ensuring compliance. Users note intuitive features such as mobile access, helpful training resources, and responsive support, which effectively reduce operational costs and help desk inquiries. The managed service providers prefer ThreatLocker to maintain network integrity by preventing malicious scripts and unauthorized access attempts. However, users identify room for growth in training and support flexibility, the interface, and certain technical challenges like network saturation from policy updates.
What are the most important features?Organizations utilize ThreatLocker for application allowlisting, ensuring only authorized software operates to prevent unauthorized access efficiently. Deployed across servers and workstations, its features support zero-trust principles and are favored by managed service providers for application management and network integrity.
ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection Platform was previously known as Protect, Allowlisting, Network Control, Ringfencing.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Supervisor, Client Security at a consultancy with 11-50 employees | 4.5 | We have used ThreatLocker for five years, valuing its application control with ringfencing and elevation features. While improvements are interface-related, the return on investment is immense. ThreatLocker surpasses previous solutions in ease of management. |
| Software admin at a mining and metals company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 5.0 | We use ThreatLocker as an endpoint protection platform primarily for elevation control and app management. It's cost-effective, user-friendly, and more reliable than previous solutions, though improved log visualization and permission hierarchy are needed. It saves us significant time and money. |
| System Administrator at NMPP Energy | 4.5 | ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection excels at blocking unauthorized downloads and verifying application safety through its learning capability. It saves time and reduces shadow IT. Improvements in presentation technology and visibility at conferences are needed. |
| Director, Managed Services at a consultancy with 11-50 employees | 4.5 | I chose ThreatLocker for its effective application whitelisting and ringfencing features, despite a steep learning curve. It offers peace of mind for our clients and outperforms competitors by focusing solely on its strengths without overextending. |
| COO at Panda Technology | 5.0 | I deploy ThreatLocker Zero Trust Endpoint Protection for application control, focusing on ring-fencing and elevation control. It empowers users and saves time, though improvements in cloud integrations are needed. The platform provides peace of mind as its main ROI. |
| Technical Engineer at Cloud 1 Solutions | 4.5 | I use ThreatLocker at both a bank and a trucking company to prevent ransomware. It efficiently controls applications, cutting down on security management time. Despite needing more built-in options, its return on investment is significant, making it highly recommendable. |
| Senior System Administrator at Molders Group Limited | 4.0 | I work for an architecture firm, and we use ThreatLocker Protect to block unapproved applications, effectively combating unknown malware. The application whitelisting is user-friendly, but support response and stability need improvement. Our ROI with ThreatLocker is 20%. |
| Information Cybersecurity Technology Specialist at Freez.it | 5.0 | I primarily use ThreatLocker on servers to prevent ransomware, finding it valuable for compliance by allowing only necessary applications. It saves time and costs, performing better than AppLocker as it’s easy to manage and reduces staffing needs. |