We performed a comparison between CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager and VMware Carbon Black Endpoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It offers great performance."
"Users can scale the solution."
"The product is stable."
"What sets CyberArk apart is its continuous innovation, staying ahead of the competition."
"The most valuable feature is that their database is completely encrypted and protected with multiple layers."
"We were able to reduce the number of privileged accounts by 50%, which helped to simplify our privileged access management environment."
"The most valuable feature is that it does lifecycle management and that it will change to whatever the end target is."
"I am impressed with the product's seamless integration. The PAM wallet and enterprise password wallet are good also good."
"The solution has a very nice API on the back end for remoting into a system and executing scripts or utilizing self automation."
"It is a stable solution...The initial setup of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint was easy."
"The solution is very useful and easy to handle. You don't need much intervention with this product."
"I like the historical features, interface, and integration."
"The solution is stable."
"There's lots of very useful documentation online to help troubleshoot and learn about the product."
"The product's most valuable feature is its ability to be fully integrated with the VMware environment."
"The product enables device controls, helping us protect the devices and prevent data leakages."
"The product needs a streamlined user interface; improvements to the user interface can enhance user experience and make the solution more intuitive to navigate."
"We have had some major issues with the tool, but we have worked with the R&D teams and we have worked with support. There is room for improvement, especially on response times. But they're working on it and they're doing the best they can."
"The product's threat protection and defense capabilities need enhancement."
"Technical support is slow to respond when we run into issues."
"CyberArk is a pretty heavy solution."
"The solution can be complex to use at times."
"The installation process is pretty difficult."
"The solution's pricing could be better."
"In our company, we also wanted to have network detection, like a host-based IDS on VMware Carbon Black Endpoint, but we did not get it."
"A search bar in the investigation page and some AI-related tasks like outgoing alerts, or recent tactics that are being used in the market, must be embedded in the tool so that it's easier to find alerts."
"The tech support communicates, but it's just not with movement."
"The pricing could be more reasonable."
"The EDR portion could be better. I'm not a big fan, but it works."
"The product's stability could be improved."
"This solution works well but needs lots of tuning and optimization."
"There are many different controls that are needed to be put into place for upgrading that makes it difficult. Having to re-engineer your IT infrastructure to match their software, as opposed to having it integrate and work independently causes difficulties. When there is an update to any software everyone has to be involved."
More CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager Pricing and Cost Advice →
CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is ranked 6th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 26 reviews while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is ranked 17th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 61 reviews. CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is rated 8.0, while VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager writes "Offers integrated solutions and expands its capabilities through strategic acquisitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Carbon Black Endpoint writes "Centralization via the cloud allows us to protect and control people working from home". CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, BeyondTrust Endpoint Privilege Management, CrowdStrike Falcon, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, whereas VMware Carbon Black Endpoint is most compared with CrowdStrike Falcon, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, Trend Micro Deep Security, SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Kaspersky Endpoint Security for Business. See our CyberArk Endpoint Privilege Manager vs. VMware Carbon Black Endpoint report.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.