Top 10 UiPath Test Cloud Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

25 reviews
88% willing to recommend

Top UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to UiPath Test Cloud based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, and OpenText UFT One. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. UiPath Test Cloud surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration with UiPath's ecosystem, ensuring scalable automated testing, real-time analytics, and enhanced test management, which boosts efficiency and accelerates software delivery in dynamic business environments.

UiPath Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with UiPath, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Tricentis Tosca

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis Tosca

4.1 out of 5

Tricentis Tosca excels with scriptless automation and broad technology support, ideal for non-technical users. In comparison, UiPath Test Suite offers robust process automation and strong integration capabilities, attracting business users seeking a user-friendly interface and comprehensive testing solutions.

Download Tricentis Tosca vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report

Pricing

Tricentis Tosca offers a fixed setup cost, while UiPath Test Cloud has a variable setup cost. This distinction highlights the differing pricing strategies of the two solutions, catering to varied organizational budgetary preferences.

View comparison

Pricing

Katalon Studio

3.9 out of 5

Katalon Studio

3.9 out of 5

Katalon Studio offers flexibility and integration for scalable testing in diverse scenarios. In comparison, UiPath Test Cloud provides advanced RPA integration and broad technology coverage, appealing particularly to organizations needing seamless automation and superior functionality, despite its higher cost.

Download Katalon Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report

Pricing

Katalon Studio's setup cost is cost-efficient, while UiPath Test Cloud presents a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Katalon Studio's setup cost is cost-efficient, while UiPath Test Cloud presents a higher initial investment.

OpenText UFT One

4.0 out of 5

OpenText UFT One

4.0 out of 5

OpenText UFT One supports diverse testing with advanced features and broad compatibility. In comparison, UiPath Test Cloud integrates RPA within its ecosystem for business process automation. Both solutions cater to different needs, with UFT One focusing on compatibility and UiPath offering cloud scalability.

Download OpenText UFT One vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report

Pricing

OpenText UFT One involves a high setup cost, while UiPath Test Cloud offers a more economical setup option.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText UFT One involves a high setup cost, while UiPath Test Cloud offers a more economical setup option.

SmartBear TestComplete

3.8 out of 5

SmartBear TestComplete

3.8 out of 5

SmartBear TestComplete offers features suited for script creation and debugging, ideal for tech buyers prioritizing flexibility and integration. In comparison, UiPath Test Cloud excels in ease of use for non-coders and broad automation capabilities, appealing to enterprises needing extensive technology compatibility.

Download SmartBear TestComplete vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report

Pricing

SmartBear TestComplete offers an upfront setup cost while UiPath Test Cloud presents a flexible pricing structure. The distinct difference in cost approach makes each solution unique for different organizations.

View comparison

Pricing

Eggplant Test

4.0 out of 5

Eggplant Test

4.0 out of 5

Eggplant Test excels in object recognition and omniplatform versatility for automation across systems. In comparison, UiPath Test Cloud offers extensive integration capabilities and lifecycle tool compatibility. Eggplant supports significant savings on testing time, whereas UiPath is favored for comprehensive features and flexible deployment options.

Download Eggplant Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report

Pricing

Eggplant Test involves higher initial setup costs, whereas UiPath Test Cloud offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

View comparison

Pricing

Eggplant Test involves higher initial setup costs, whereas UiPath Test Cloud offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

Worksoft Certify

4.2 out of 5

Worksoft Certify

4.2 out of 5

Worksoft Certify offers script-free automation with strong SAP support, ideal for SAP and Oracle applications. In comparison, UiPath Test Cloud excels in low-code design and wide integration, appealing to enterprises needing versatility across various technologies.

Download UiPath Test Cloud vs. Worksoft Certify Report

Pricing

Worksoft Certify requires a substantial setup cost, whereas UiPath Test Cloud offers a more budget-friendly setup. This difference highlights a key consideration for businesses evaluating their software testing solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Ranorex Studio

4.0 out of 5

Ranorex Studio

4.0 out of 5

Ranorex Studio excels in creating test scripts with ease and supports integration with Jenkins and JIRA. In comparison, UiPath Test Cloud offers flexibility in deployment and seamless integration, making it ideal for organizations seeking diverse technological capabilities and lifecycle tool integration.

Download Ranorex Studio vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report

Pricing

Ranorex Studio setup costs generally provide value for small to medium teams while UiPath Test Cloud advises scalable pricing advantageous for large businesses needing extensive automation capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

Testim

4.6 out of 5

Testim

4.6 out of 5

Testim offers AI-driven testing tools that streamline test creation, appealing to cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, UiPath Test Cloud provides extensive integrations and analytics for comprehensive testing needs, ideal for enterprises seeking robust automation across diverse environments.

Download Testim vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report

Pricing

Testim offers a straightforward setup cost, making it accessible for quick testing implementations, while UiPath Test Cloud presents a more complex setup cost structure aimed at larger enterprises, highlighting distinct differences in target audiences and scalability.

View comparison

Pricing

Qt Squish

4.4 out of 5

Qt Squish

4.4 out of 5

Qt Squish excels in robust GUI testing for various technologies, offering strong integration with Qt applications and platform support. In comparison, UiPath Test Cloud supports business processes and integrates well with lifecycle tools, ideal for automation and comprehensive technology coverage.

Download Qt Squish vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report

Pricing

Qt Squish involves a significant setup cost, while UiPath Test Cloud offers a more affordable entry point.

View comparison

Pricing

Qt Squish involves a significant setup cost, while UiPath Test Cloud offers a more affordable entry point.

OpenText UFT Developer

3.7 out of 5

OpenText UFT Developer

3.7 out of 5

OpenText UFT Developer excels with its flexibility and complex algorithm support, appealing to those valuing integration with development tools. In comparison, UiPath Test Cloud impresses with robust automation and ease of use, appealing to those seeking productivity and diverse technology integration.

Download OpenText UFT Developer vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report

Pricing

OpenText UFT Developer has a moderate setup cost, integrating seamlessly into existing systems, while UiPath Test Cloud offers a higher setup cost with extensive features included.

View comparison

Pricing

OpenText UFT Developer has a moderate setup cost, integrating seamlessly into existing systems, while UiPath Test Cloud offers a higher setup cost with extensive features included.

Show 4 more products

Related categories

Test Automation Tools

Functional Testing Tools

Test Management Tools