Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Avo Assure vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 22, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Avo Assure
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
30th
Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools
15th
Ranking in API Testing Tools
15th
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
29th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Regression Testing Tools (16th), AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (32nd)
UiPath Test Cloud
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
3rd
Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools
3rd
Ranking in API Testing Tools
5th
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Avo Assure is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 4.1%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
UiPath Test Cloud4.1%
Avo Assure0.8%
Other95.1%
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Use Avo Assure?
Leave a review
SK
Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration
I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
20%
Healthcare Company
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Insurance Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise19
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?
Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?
I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...
What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?
The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Test Suite
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

CNA Financial, M&T Bank, Voya Financial, Emerson Electric, First Horizon Bank and VFISLK
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, Katalon Studio, UiPath and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: December 2025.
879,422 professionals have used our research since 2012.