Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

HeadSpin vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

HeadSpin and UiPath are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. HeadSpin is ranked #32, while UiPath is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8. HeadSpin holds a 0.6% mindshare in FT, compared to UiPath’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of HeadSpin users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.
HeadSpin
Read 6 HeadSpin reviews
  • 691 Views
  • 484 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
UiPath Test Cloud
Read 26 UiPath Test Cloud reviews
  • 2,844 Views
  • 2,161 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between HeadSpin and UiPath Test Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed HeadSpin vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: August 2025).
Buyer's Guide
HeadSpin vs. UiPath Test Cloud
August 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

HeadSpin
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
32nd
Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools
9th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
Mobile APM (7th)
UiPath Test Cloud
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
3rd
Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (6th), API Testing Tools (5th), Test Automation Tools (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of HeadSpin is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 4.1%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Saorabh Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
It fulfills everything from automation to manual performance
The most valuable features of the product are the performance parameters it gives us, as well as the seamless connectivity with our automation suites. I am also pleased with the continuous enhancements made to HeadSpin. There have been many features added since we started using the product, and all of them are useful.
Read full review
Manigandan Rajavelu - PeerSpot reviewer
Comprehensive, good value for money, and a lot of time savings
I discovered a lot of bugs in UiPath Test Suite. If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it. We want to replace the existing test case, but this functionality is not available. In Test Manager, there are a lot of defects in the ROI report that we provide to the operations team on a monthly basis. It is not very clear and detailed. There is no detailed explanation of every test case. There is only a high-level overview. We cannot download the report from Test Manager. We have to use some other tool, such as Power BI, to view the data.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The technical support is really helpful because we can set up direct calls with them if we want to. We can use Zoom or Google Meet to interact with them directly, and if there is an issue in our system, they will help us by reproducing the issue in their machines and trying to figure out a solution. The support is really smooth, and we like that they're very supportive."
"It has an interesting feature called AV box testing. A lot of companies that are in the OTT segment don't really understand what their streaming is like. They can't test for streaming quality. There are restrictions where you cannot simulate live streaming. For example, on Netflix, you can't simulate how a movie is being streamed on a remote device. That's why HeadSpin has got this AV box testing feature. It is a patented feature. They send an AV box to your location, and you can test live streaming, which is something that no other company does."
"The initial setup of HeadSpin was very easy and user-friendly. It was easy to configure and write a script."
"The most valuable feature of HeadSpin it's the integration with other solutions. It is great. I can search for an element or do a quick debugging on the application right on HeadSpin. It's very useful."
"The most valuable features of the product are the performance parameters it gives us."
"The most valuable feature is that this is the first connected intelligence all-in-one platform."
"We also don't develop test robots like typing codes; we program them with drag-and-drop features."
"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."
"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."
"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."
"Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package."
"We are finding bugs and defects much faster."
"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."
"Its automated execution when a different package changes and using different test cases defined in an Excel file are particularly useful."
More UiPath Test Cloud pros
 

Cons

"HeadSpin needs to improve the hardware. With the mobile, the battery life reduces and must be continuously charged."
"Support and pricing could be improved."
"HeadSpin could improve on the user interface because it is very poor. The checks that are done on the iOS devices are very difficult, but for Android, it runs great. For all iOS devices, the user interface and how it interacts with the device are very poor."
"If you want to do some testing or check the devices manually or check the application in a particular device manually, it is really laggy. That's a disappointment because sometimes we would like to do manual testing when our local devices are not available."
"They should automate their onboarding. A lot of things are still manual. They can create a video assistant or something like that to completely automate the entire process."
"Sometimes, devices go offline and some features are not functioning on some devices, specifically on iOS."
"With Selenium, there is a plugin called Healenium, which helps automatically detect changed properties of objects. With one click, it automatically updates the object repository with the changed properties. I would like UiPath to add that capability."
"UiPath could further enhance its functionality by simplifying the test case creation process within Test Suite."
"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."
"I don't rate its ability to automate very well."
"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."
"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."
"More precise logging would be appreciated."
"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."
More UiPath Test Cloud cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's not cheap, but there are a few different packages and different prices for enterprises with different product versions."
"It has a yearly license. There is no other option. It is expensive. There are a lot of other cheaper players in the market, but it is like a Mercedes. You pay an extra premium for it, but you get the benefits. I would love to see them come up with project-based costing. Companies that are low on funds or new-age can do with pricing that is easily digestible. They can give them a pricing model for three months. They can provide a startup package."
"We have a yearly license for 16 devices."
"I believe the licensing cost is cheap because it's a total solution, hardware, license and software."
"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."
"It represents good value for the investment."
"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."
"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."
"Its price is a bit high."
"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."
"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."
"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."
More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Healthcare Company
7%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?
Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?
I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...
See all answers
What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?
They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules. If they could add defect management, it could work independently wit...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Perfecto vs HeadSpin Logo
Perfecto vs HeadSpin
Compared 53% of the time
BrowserStack vs HeadSpin Logo
BrowserStack vs HeadSpin
Compared 47% of the time
More HeadSpin Competitors
Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud
Compared 47% of the time
OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud Logo
OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud
Compared 14% of the time
Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud Logo
Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud
Compared 9% of the time
Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud Logo
Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud
Compared 8% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud
Compared 5% of the time
More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
HeadSpin
August 2025
HeadSpin reportDownload HeadSpin product report
Buyer's Guide
UiPath Test Cloud
July 2025
UiPath Test Cloud reportDownload UiPath Test Cloud product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Test Suite
 

Overview

Headspin is a data science-driven Mobile APM platform that leverages an AI platform to combine global device infrastructure, test automation, machine learning-driven performance, and quality of experience analytics. HeadSpin was founded to answer the demand for a global testing, performance monitoring, and quality of experience (QoE) management platform to assist businesses in ensuring optimal digital experiences across mobile, audio, online, and video delivery channels.

Headspin facilitates seamless collaboration between product managers, SREs, developers, QA/release engineers, and support staff to:

  • Quicken development times using intelligent automation in test and production.
  • Optimize digital performance across devices, networks, and apps.
  • Automate insights discovery with practical, context-aware AI and analytics.

Headspin Features

Headspin has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

  • Global device infrastructure allows end-to-end monitoring and testing with thousands of devices in numerous locations on real carrier and WiFi networks around the world. SDK is not required.
  • Test automation and APIs integrate into CI/CD workflows to enable functional and performance testing pre and post release. Support for all testing frameworks.
  • Performance, QoE, and machine learning automatically expose issues and points to underlying root causes across all layers of the stack, from quantifying audio/video quality of experience to code and packet visibility.
  • Insights-to-actions delivers regression and aggregation insights throughout the digital experience lifecycle. These insights take you from planning and development to troubleticketing and operations. Trending, alerts, and analytics.

More features include:

  • Hosted Device Cloud
  • On-prem Device Appliance
  • Performance & Experience Analytics
  • Professional Services & Support
  • Education, Certification & Training

Headspin Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing Headspin. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

  • Use data science to identify problems and root cause analysis
  • Empower QA and DevOps teams with data science insights and test automation
  • Global teams can work together using remote access
  • Capture performance and UX issues

Reviews from Real Users

Headspin stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Some of these include its easy setup, scalability, and robust customer support. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:

Abhishek M., Associate Vice President at Onnivation, notes, “A lot of companies that are using other solutions do not get access to the kind of metrics that HeadSpin captures…HeadSpin is highly advanced. It has got all the performance structures to provide visibility into how my app is performing in the real world. It also helps to identify the gaps.”

Shiba S., Automation Engineer at GlobalLogic India, writes, “The technical support is really helpful because we can set up direct calls with them if we want to…They support multiple devices. Plus, they support distribution testing.”

HeadSpin

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?
  • Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
  • Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
  • Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
  • Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.
What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?
  • Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
  • Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
  • Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
  • Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath
 

Sample Customers

Zynga, Tinder, Pinterest, Akamai, Microsoft, Airbnb, Jam City, TMobile, Mozilla, CNN, Cognizant, Yahoo!, ebay, Quora, Walmart, Kohls, Telstra
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
HeadSpin vs. UiPath Test Cloud
August 2025
Free Report: HeadSpin vs. UiPath Test Cloud
Find out what your peers are saying about HeadSpin vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: August 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our HeadSpin vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.