OpenText Silk Test vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

OpenText and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. OpenText is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while UiPath is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.9. OpenText holds a 0.9% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

OpenText Silk Test

Read 17 OpenText Silk Test reviews

1,009 Views
605 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 26 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

2,792 Views
2,736 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Test

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 22, 2025

OpenText Silk Test and UiPath Test Cloud are competing in the field of test automation tools. UiPath Test Cloud gains an edge with its advanced features, making it a favored choice despite higher costs.

Features: OpenText Silk Test offers robust scripting capabilities, cross-browser testing, and ease of use for comprehensive test automation. UiPath Test Cloud excels in integration with RPA solutions, extensive automated testing features, and flexibility, making it ideal for cloud environments.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Test could benefit from enhanced cloud integration, more extensive language support, and improved test management capabilities. UiPath Test Cloud requires improvements in deployment speed, a more intuitive interface, and better cost management options for small businesses.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Test offers straightforward deployment suitable for businesses seeking simplicity and accessible customer service. UiPath Test Cloud provides cloud-based deployment with flexibility and scalability, along with comprehensive online resources.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Test typically requires a lower initial investment, which may result in quicker ROI for budget-conscious organizations. UiPath Test Cloud, despite higher setup costs, offers a significant return due to its advanced features and integration capabilities with RPA solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 864,155 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Silk Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

20th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

20th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (8th)

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

2nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (6th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Silk Test is 0.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 4.8%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

SrinivasPakala

Director Consulting Expert at Cgi Deutschland KG

Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available

While we are performance testing the engineering key, we need to come up with load strategies to commence the test. We'll help to monitor the test, and afterward, we'll help to make all the outcomes, and if they are new, we'll do lots and lots of interpretation and analysis across various servers, to look at response times, and impact. For example, whatever the observations we had during the test, we need to implement it. We'll have to help to catch what exactly is the issues were, and we'll help to see how they can be reduced. Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are. The solution needs better monitoring, especially of CPU.

Read full review

Manigandan Rajavelu

Sr software engineer at PricewaterhouseCoopers

Comprehensive, good value for money, and a lot of time savings

I discovered a lot of bugs in UiPath Test Suite. If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it. We want to replace the existing test case, but this functionality is not available. In Test Manager, there are a lot of defects in the ROI report that we provide to the operations team on a monthly basis. It is not very clear and detailed. There is no detailed explanation of every test case. There is only a high-level overview. We cannot download the report from Test Manager. We have to use some other tool, such as Power BI, to view the data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Scripting is the most valuable. We are able to record and then go in and modify the script that it creates. It has a lot of generative scripts."

"The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature."

"The feature I like most is the ease of reporting."

"The statistics that are available are very good."

"The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to."

"A good automation tool that supports SAP functional testing."

"The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities."

"It's easy to automate and accelerate testing."

"It's useful for automating tasks."

"Its automated execution when a different package changes and using different test cases defined in an Excel file are particularly useful."

"The detailed logging is invaluable."

"It is a very scalable product."

"Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package."

"UiPath Test Suite is user-friendly and operates as a low-code platform."

"UiPath Test Cloud definitely helps free up time for other projects for our engineers."

"UiPath Test Cloud has helped automate major applications such as SAP and Oracle, which are significant needle movers, particularly in a project we did where a customer was migrating from on-prem to cloud for SAP, allowing us to regression test hyper-fast while rolling out new modules and automating at the same time."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"The support for automation with iOS applications can be better."

"The pricing could be improved."

"They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration."

"Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are."

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important."

"The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve."

"Could be more user-friendly on the installation and configuration side."

"The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies."

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

"The pricing isn't as low as other options."

"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."

"They could improve the visualization of the product."

"It would be very beneficial to do load testing with Test Suite."

"With Selenium, there is a plugin called Healenium, which helps automatically detect changed properties of objects. With one click, it automatically updates the object repository with the changed properties. I would like UiPath to add that capability."

"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath to test on it, which is inefficient."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

"Its price is a bit high."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Retailer

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Silk Test?

The pricing depends on the license used. The pricing is similar to others in the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Silk Test?

The pricing could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Silk Test?

The product is used for manual, functional, and performance testing. I'm using the tool for loading data into ERP systems.

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules. If they could add defect management, it could work independently wit...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 49% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 13% of the time

Qt Squish vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 13% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 12% of the time

More OpenText Silk Test Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 47% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 15% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test

July 2025

Download OpenText Silk Test product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

July 2025

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test

Test Suite

Overview

SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.

OpenText

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud

July 2025

Free Report: OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

864,155 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.