OpenText Silk Test vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.0, while UiPath is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 2.0% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

OpenText Silk Test

Read 17 OpenText Silk Test reviews

3,255 Views
2,181 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 27 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

5,156 Views
3,919 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Test

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 5, 2026

OpenText Silk Test and UiPath Test Cloud are competing products in software testing solutions. Data suggests UiPath Test Cloud has an upper hand due to its superior features.

Features: OpenText Silk Test is known for its robust automation capabilities in regression testing, cross-browser support, and script reusability. UiPath Test Cloud is integrated with UiPath's automation suite, leverages AI-driven analytics, and offers collaboration tools which enhance test management and execution.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Test could improve in integration with broader tools, user interface complexity, and initial setup flexibility. UiPath Test Cloud may benefit from pricing structure optimization, refining mobile testing, and expanding support for non-standard technologies.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: UiPath Test Cloud offers a cloud-based deployment model with flexible scalability and quick setup, supported by responsive customer service. OpenText Silk Test provides both cloud and on-premise options, but often requires more initial configuration, balanced by a dedicated support structure.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Test is seen as cost-effective with attractive initial setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious businesses. UiPath Test Cloud commands a higher price but offers extensive features and quicker time-to-value, justifying the investment with long-term gains.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 914,262 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Silk Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

19th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (9th)

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

6th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (4th), Mobile App Testing Tools (4th), API Testing Tools (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Silk Test is 2.0%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 3.0%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
UiPath Test Cloud	3.0%
OpenText Silk Test	2.0%
Other	95.0%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Jose Alfredo Garcia

Manager of Central Excellence at Alpura

Easy to set up with good documentation and easy management of testing cycles

The solution allows for a complete test cycle. The management of testing cycles are easy. We have good control over test cases. We can capture functional testing very easily. We're actually able to accelerate testing now and have end-to-end cycles for testing. We didn't used to have these capabilities. It's easy to automate and accelerate testing. The product offers very good cross-browser testing capabilities. We can do continuous testing and regression testing.

Read full review

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration

I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature."

"A good automation tool that supports SAP functional testing."

"It drastically reduced our manual regression efforts that is difficult to achieve in Agile model."

"The feature I like most is the ease of reporting."

"SilkTest is best for desktop applications and good for web applications also with the Open agent."

"The Silk4J feature is the solution's most valuable aspect."

"The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to."

"The statistics that are available are very good."

More OpenText Silk Test pros

"The Test Manager, the final stage of the UiPath Test Suite, is its most valuable feature."

"Some of the best features I find with UiPath Test Cloud include the creation of end-to-end workflows with API integration, which was particularly useful for my use case, allowing me to connect APIs seamlessly within the defined workflows in UiPath."

"UiPath Test Cloud definitely helps free up time for other projects for our engineers."

"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."

"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."

"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."

"It's useful for automating tasks."

"We are finding bugs and defects much faster."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"At the moment, when we are trying to use this tool, we are finding quite a few compatibility issues between the tool and the applications on the test. We wouldn't consider it perfectly stable for that reason."

"The browser based testing needs to be improved."

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important."

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help."

"At that time, we never had good technical support in Bangalore."

"They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration."

"I've seen a lot of potential users upset with the SilkTest due to broken installation."

"Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are."

More OpenText Silk Test cons

"More precise logging would be appreciated."

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility."

"Storing the test scripts is what needs to improve in the UiPath Test Suite, as it's currently a challenge to some extent. Maintaining the files is a bit challenging, especially when you need to keep those locally."

"It would be very beneficial to do load testing with Test Suite."

"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."

"The test manager component could be improved."

"The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"Its price is a bit high."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

13%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for UiPath Test Suite?

My use case for this product is specific to a high-profile project within the life sciences domain, where I am involved in the transportation of critical emergency medications that get prescribed a...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 10% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 6% of the time

BlazeMeter vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Silk Test Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

QA Wolf vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Qualibrate vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 2% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test

September 2026

Download OpenText Silk Test product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

August 2026

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test

Test Suite

Overview

OpenText Silk Test is a versatile automated testing tool known for its advanced scripting and recording capabilities in Visual Studio. It offers robust test case management, supporting cross-browser testing and seamless integration with Java and C#, providing a stable environment for automation.

OpenText Silk Test supports GUI object recognition and offers a user-friendly interface that facilitates multi-language support. It enhances test design with its object-oriented approach and integrates performance testing tools for precise data-driven tests. Silk Test excels in browser testing and performance testing across web applications, making it a comprehensive choice for regression testing, SAP automation, and performance analysis.

What are the key features of OpenText Silk Test?

Scripting and Recording Capabilities: Integrates with Visual Studio for efficient script creation.
Cross-Browser Testing: Supports multiple browsers ensuring comprehensive coverage.
GUI Object Recognition: Enhances automation accuracy with reliable object identification.
Multi-Language Support: Facilitates diverse testing environments.
Robust Reporting: Detailed insights into testing processes and outcomes.
SAP Testing Functionality: Optimizes SAP project performance.

What benefits can users expect from OpenText Silk Test?

Enhanced Test Efficiency: Streamlines automation processes for faster results.
Comprehensive Test Management: Manages test cases systematically for improved organization.
Improved Accuracy in Automation: Reduces errors with precise object recognition.
Scalability: Adapts to different project sizes and complexities.
Performance Testing Integration: Identifies and resolves bottlenecks efficiently.

OpenText Silk Test is widely implemented in industries requiring high precision in data handling and performance analysis. It is commonly used in financial services for month-end regression testing and SAP projects for effective automation. Manual, functional, and performance testing in ERP systems further showcases its diverse application in complex business environments.

OpenText

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud

September 2026

Free Report: OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

914,262 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.