OpenText Functional Testing Reviews

Name: OpenText Functional Testing
Brand: OpenText
Rating: 4.0 (96 reviews)

Vendor: OpenText

4.0 out of 5

96 reviews
87% willing to recommend

4,376 followers

Start review

What is OpenText Functional Testing?

OpenText Functional Testing provides automated testing with compatibility across technologies, browsers, and platforms. It targets APIs, GUIs, and applications like SAP and Oracle for efficient test automation, emphasizing usability and integration with tools such as Jenkins and ALM.

Get the OpenText Functional Testing Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio and more!

OpenText Functional Testing is the #2 ranked solution in top Functional Testing Tools, #2 ranked solution in top Mobile App Testing Tools, #2 ranked solution in top Regression Testing Tools, #4 ranked solution in top Test Automation Tools, and #7 ranked solution in top API Testing Tools. PeerSpot users give OpenText Functional Testing an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. OpenText Functional Testing is most commonly compared to Tricentis Tosca: OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca. OpenText Functional Testing is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 67% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 17% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing

May 2025

Get the report

Helped 857,688 peers since 2012

Featured OpenText Functional Testing reviews

Badari Mallireddy

QA Automation Architect at Emerson

I have used UFT for web application automation, desktop application automation, and Oracle ERP automation UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use. It requires less coding, has built-in features for API testing, and most importantly, it supports more than just web…

Read full review

Pierre CAHAY

Senior Manager at Deloitte

We use OpenText as an archive server for archiving purposes from SAP, or we use OpenText in the context of vendor invoice management We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years. It depends on the business revenue. The OpenText solution is the best of breed and the…

Read full review

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

The product can integrate with the process or test management tools. If you want to schedule and automate the run, and if a solution is in a certain process with some condition, OpenText UFT One can be set up and be a part of the workflow. Anywhere, if you understand DevSecOps or NetOps concepts, then OpenText UFT One can be used with the DevOps concept as well. I think it's quite easy to use if you know the product's command line in Windows, and it can be enabled by any tool that runs it. Though OpenText UFT One has API indicators, the scripts in Windows can also be helpful. Speaking of the challenges the tool helps users overcome in terms of testing workflows, I can say that the tool can be used for automation and testing purposes, and the benefits of it is that the solution can produce results and execute them in a certain period of time, making it one of the main capabilities of OpenText UFT One and OpenText's process automation and testing functionalities. When it comes to creating scripts, if you are familiar with OpenText UFT One, things will be easy for you. The AI technology that needs to be involved in the tool is to discover the best object on the screen. AI will match what we think is the right thing in the right place. If we click the cancel button, the users should be able to find the cancel button on the screen and then click it. Users should be able to find the object on the screen when they try to click it. Around twenty engineers maintain the tool. I rate the tool a seven out of ten.

Read full review

OpenText Functional Testing mindshare

Product category:

As of June 2025, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing in the Functional Testing Tools category stands at 9.4%, down from 9.6% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

PeerResearch reports based on OpenText Functional Testing reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Functional Testing Tools	Jun 19, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Jun 19, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Functional Testing vs Tricentis Tosca	Jun 19, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud	Jun 19, 2025	Download
Comparison	OpenText Functional Testing vs LambdaTest	Jun 19, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Tricentis Tosca	4.1	19.7%	96%	110 interviews Add to research
Katalon Studio	3.9	N/A	89%	47 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

OpenText Functional Testing provides unparalleled compatibility with diverse platforms and tools, comprehensive support for both API and GUI testing, and efficient automation frameworks like BPT and LeanFT. It excels in object recognition, allowing easy identification and management of elements. The built-in features for database connectivity, Excel integration, and robust reporting are notable. The ability to automate across various environments, including Oracle, SAP, and mobile, enhances testing efficiency and reduces manual efforts.

"OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier."
"UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use."
"UFT provides object identification, which is one of the easiest to use."

Room for Improvement

OpenText Functional Testing requires enhancements in memory management, speed, and browser compatibility. It's challenging for non-technical users, with stability and object recognition concerns. Pricing and support responsiveness could improve. Users report a need for reduced dependency on scripting and better integration with modern programming languages and tools. Enhancing the user interface, increasing AI capabilities, and improving reporting and test execution efficiency would benefit users, who also seek more seamless integration for continuous testing.

"We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing."
"Customer service is a big drawback. From my personal experience, after creating a ticket, it takes three to five days for them to acknowledge it and then send it to somebody."
"UFT still requires some coding."

ROI

OpenText Functional Testing delivers substantial value by significantly enhancing productivity through automation. It speeds up processes, reduces testing time, and cuts maintenance costs by leveraging AI. Automation reduces manual workload and increases testing efficiency. Users experience significant time savings in test creation and execution, with a high return on investment over the long term. The tool supports a wide range of systems, providing an advantage over newer solutions and ensuring a strong return within a few years.

Pricing

OpenText Functional Testing is perceived as expensive by many enterprise users, with licensing costs often highlighted as a significant factor. Companies report a variety of licensing options, such as seat and concurrent licenses, with seat licenses approximately costing $10,000 and concurrent licenses about $17,000 annually, including maintenance. Despite the price, users frequently acknowledge the comprehensive functionality that supports both legacy and modern applications. However, the complex licensing model remains a challenge for some organizations.

"The tool's price is high."
"OpenText UFT One is a very expensive solution."
"We have ALM licensing, and the tool is free of cost."

Popular Use Cases

OpenText Functional Testing is primarily utilized for API testing, automating end-to-end functional, regression, and integration tests across web and desktop applications. It enhances automation efficiencies for web, mobile, mainframe, and backend processes, accommodating complex testing scenarios. The tool is chosen for its ability to automate tasks, manage testing prerequisites, and support data-driven testing approaches. It is deployed in on-premises environments and is valued for addressing complex and varied testing needs.

Service and Support

Feedback indicates mixed experiences with OpenText Functional Testing services. Some users find the customer service prompt and helpful, while others experience delays in ticket acknowledgment. Technical support is generally helpful, though availability of knowledgeable personnel can be inconsistent. Support ratings vary widely, often reflecting factors like the complexity of issues or the support contract type. Some prefer partners for faster service due to slow resolution times directly from OpenText.

Deployment

Users generally found OpenText Functional Testing's initial setup to be straightforward and user-friendly. Some encountered challenges related to object repository management, custom libraries, and integration with Quality Center. Technical expertise facilitated a smoother process, while others required IT assistance for licensing and server configurations. Implementation involved a mix of straightforward installation with auto-configuration features, although occasional complexity arose from specific technical requirements or missing components needing updates.

Scalability

Organizations find OpenText Functional Testing scalable, especially with good planning and licensing. While many experience smooth scaling, some encounter issues with browser support and execution speed as tests grow. Costs and licenses affect the ability to scale widely. Effective test design greatly enhances scalability despite these challenges. Enterprises recognize it as robust. Integrating with third-party tools like ALM Octane and Jenkins often helps in scaling automation efforts efficiently.

Stability

OpenText Functional Testing's stability varies. Some users report no issues, while others encounter frequent crashes and freezing, often linked to limited system resources. Factors like updates and server configurations affect consistency. More robust hardware tends to reduce problems. Instances of unexpected behavior occur during automation, especially with newer or lesser-used features. The application sometimes struggles with object identification, impacting reliability for certain users. Generally, the experiences with the application's stability are mixed.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our OpenText Functional Testing Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers

By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Energy/Utilities Company

Healthcare Company

Retailer

Insurance Company

Construction Company

Educational Organization

Real Estate/Law Firm

Non Profit

Consumer Goods Company

Comms Service Provider

Transportation Company

University

Media Company

Legal Firm

Wholesaler/Distributor

Outsourcing Company

Performing Arts

Engineering Company

Pharma/Biotech Company

Hospitality Company

Recreational Facilities/Services Company

Compare OpenText Functional Testing with alternative products

Learn more about OpenText Functional Testing

OpenText Functional Testing offers wide-ranging automation capabilities for functional and regression testing, API testing, and automation across web, desktop, and mainframe applications. It supports script recording and object identification, appealing to less technical users. Despite its advantages, it grapples with memory issues, stability concerns, and a challenging scripting environment. Its VBScript reliance limits flexibility, generating demand for enhanced language support and speed improvement. Users appreciate its role in continuous integration and deployment processes, managing test data efficiently, and reducing manual testing efforts.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?

Multiplatform Compatibility: Works seamlessly across technologies, browsers, and platforms.
Automation Span: Provides automation for APIs, GUIs, SAP, and Oracle applications.
Intuitive Design: Object identification and recording simplify usage for all coding levels.
Integration Capabilities: Interfaces with tools like Jenkins and ALM for streamlined testing.
Built-in Frameworks: Offers frameworks like BPT for accelerated test development.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Reduced Manual Testing: Minimizes the effort required for manual testing tasks.
Time Efficiency: Accelerates testing processes with user-friendly features.
Seamless Integration: Integrates with CI/CD tools, enhancing operational productivity.
Comprehensive Coverage: Automates test cases involving multiple scenarios effectively.

In industries like finance and healthcare, OpenText Functional Testing is leveraged for end-to-end automation, ensuring streamlined processes and accuracy in testing. Many companies utilize it for efficient test data management and integrating testing within continuous integration/deployment operations.

OpenText Functional Testing was previously known as Micro Focus UFT One, Micro Focus UFT (QTP), QTP, Quick Test Pro.