No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 18, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaT...
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
7th
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
9th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
28
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath Test Cloud
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
6th
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
5th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (2nd), Mobile App Testing Tools (4th), API Testing Tools (7th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) is 2.6%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 3.4%, down from 5.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
UiPath Test Cloud3.4%
TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest)2.6%
Other94.0%
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

KK
Practice Specialist at a government with 1-10 employees
Cloud-based testing has simplified remote mobile validation and provides flexible device coverage
I was not impressed with how detailed their analytics and logs are from LambdaTest. The solution we were testing is being used because many of us are working from home. It was easy to implement because with a real phone, we have to bring a real phone to each person. Since three years ago, many employees have been working from home, so we were trying to find a solution for this challenge. We had no need to exploit the information for the analytics generated in the background. The purpose was simply to make it easy for our employees to access a phone. The downsides I noticed include that the pricing was very good, but the visual quality of the image sometimes suffers. The contrast on a real iPhone provides better contrast than with the cloud solution. The only aspect that was less favorable than on a real phone was the contrast of the color.
SK
Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration
I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"LambdaTest Selenium Grid has helped us radically reduce the manual testing effort and ensure browser compatibility."
"It's user-friendly and offers valuable features for testing, making it a reliable tool."
"LambdaTest easily integrates with leading project management, bug tracking, and CI-CD tools like Jira, Asana, Jenkins, Circle CI, and more."
"LambdaTest is brilliant."
"Using LambdaTest, we could run all our functionality tests across various browsers, OS, and resolutions."
"It is a scalable solution."
"I am really glad that there are tools like LambdaTest that help freelancers like me to make sure everything is okay before finally making a website live."
"The slow nature of a cloud platform was compensated with parallel testing, and now we are able to finish our testing job faster than it was before COVID."
"We are finding bugs and defects much faster."
"UiPath's most valuable features are reusability and low-code aspects. It works across both desktop and web applications."
"It has reduced all the deployment cycles of the automation solutions by forty percent."
"It is feature-rich. It has more features than other RPA tools."
"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."
"Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package."
"Its automated execution when a different package changes and using different test cases defined in an Excel file are particularly useful."
"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."
 

Cons

"You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only."
"I didn't like the solution's technical support and how they communicated and tried to fix the issues of customers like me."
"The downsides I noticed include that the pricing was very good, but the visual quality of the image sometimes suffers."
"Responsive testing UI is a bit cluttered, whereas the LT browser is much better to use."
"Performing automation testing from UI is a little slow and could be improved."
"Sometimes, when multiple users use the tool simultaneously, it can slow down, affecting efficiency."
"I would like to see all of the features available in the freemium plan so that I can test them."
"Load flow compared to other stacks needs improvement."
"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."
"At FORWARD VI, we see new automations being built around AI and the ability to have developers understand how they can drive some of those AI capabilities with Studio. We are starting to see that. They should also drive that with UiPath Test Suite so that we can not only build that development side faster; we can also develop the tests that go along with it, hopefully automatically."
"The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely."
"They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules."
"Storing the test scripts is what needs to improve in the UiPath Test Suite, as it's currently a challenge to some extent. Maintaining the files is a bit challenging, especially when you need to keep those locally."
"More precise logging would be appreciated."
"We are able to automate most tasks by using UiPath. Its interface is fine. However, its price is a bit high."
"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"LambdaTest is paid per execution."
"It is 60% cheaper and there is no fuss in maintaining the lab, so we have more time to do the testing."
"This is an affordable product."
"The tool is not cheap, but it is not expensive."
"LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."
"The pricing could be made cheaper."
"It is free to start, which means you can actually see how it works and then take the decision to buy."
"It is affordable as compared to similar SaaS solutions."
"Its price is a bit high."
"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."
"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."
"It represents good value for the investment."
"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."
"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."
"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."
"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
899,917 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
8%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Construction Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business10
Midsize Enterprise8
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise19
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?
The pricing of LambdaTest depends on the deal negotiated. It is cost-effective compared to competitors like BrowserStack ( /products/browserstack-reviews ) and Sauce Labs ( /products/sauce-labs-rev...
What needs improvement with LambdaTest?
I was not impressed with how detailed their analytics and logs are from LambdaTest. The solution we were testing is being used because many of us are working from home. It was easy to implement bec...
What is your primary use case for LambdaTest?
I can provide a review for one of the products that I have experience with. The kind of testing tools we use includes a real phone for testing our application, but we were searching for a cloud sol...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?
I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...
What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?
The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...
What is your primary use case for UiPath Test Suite?
My use case for this product is specific to a high-profile project within the life sciences domain, where I am involved in the transportation of critical emergency medications that get prescribed a...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Test Suite
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about TestMu AI (Formerly LambdaTest) vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: May 2026.
899,917 professionals have used our research since 2012.