CrossBrowserTesting provides comprehensive live and automated testing across browsers and devices, helping teams ensure functionality and compatibility through features like record and replay, and real device access.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| CrossBrowserTesting | 1.5% |
| Tricentis Tosca | 10.1% |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 6.8% |
| Other | 81.6% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Functional Testing Tools | May 4, 2026 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | May 4, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | CrossBrowserTesting vs Tricentis Tosca | May 4, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | CrossBrowserTesting vs Worksoft Certify | May 4, 2026 | Download |
| Comparison | CrossBrowserTesting vs OpenText Functional Testing | May 4, 2026 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tricentis Tosca | 4.1 | 10.1% | 96% | 113 interviewsAdd to research |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 4.0 | 6.8% | 87% | 98 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 7 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 19 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 17 |
| Large Enterprise | 30 |
CrossBrowserTesting is a robust tool for quality assurance professionals focusing on cross-browser compatibility and feature validation across multiple devices and operating systems. It assists in detecting platform inconsistencies early by simulating interactions and allows for troubleshooting front-end defects. Whether conducting manual or automated testing via its Selenium portal and API, it proves invaluable for assessing JavaScript performance and resolving browser-specific issues in web and mobile applications. The service is appreciated for responsive support and adaptation to feature requests, though it seeks enhancements in load times and UI streamlining.
What are some key features of CrossBrowserTesting?In industries like e-commerce and SaaS platforms, CrossBrowserTesting is instrumental in providing rigorous testing, allowing companies to enhance user experiences by identifying cross-platform issues. It supports ensuring that applications perform effectively across devices and browsers, which is vital for customer retention and satisfaction.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Senior DevOps Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I use CrossBrowserTesting for web app testing. It's stable, scalable, and has good support and easy setup. Onboarding and cloud conductivity could improve. I rate it 8/10. |
| Quality Assurance Specialist at SelectQuote | 4.5 | I find CrossBrowserTesting essential for validating our marketing websites across devices and browsers, utilizing live testing and screenshots for accurate reporting and user experience. While useful, I encounter lag during virtual real device testing, which could be improved. |
| Web Specialist at Mayo Clinic | 5.0 | I use CBT for essential cross-browser testing of new pages and adaptive layouts. Static screenshots are my most valuable feature, despite a minor default issue. Customer service is amazing, but I recommend starting with a small license. |
| Manager, Web Development at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees | 5.0 | CrossBrowserTesting helps me ensure my site works across real devices and browsers, finding issues before customers do. It's great for local development testing, improving functionality and user experience. I wish testing were faster and more devices were supported. |
| Works at a computer software company with 11-50 employees | 4.0 | We found CrossBrowserTesting very useful for testing across devices and browsers, saving costs on in-house hardware. Its real device sessions and screenshot tests are valuable, though automated testing could be improved. It's better than previous solutions. |
| Software Quality Assurance Engineer | 5.0 | We use this solution for feature validation and regression testing across multiple platforms, finding issues early. Record and Replay is invaluable, but we wish for simultaneous live testing to boost efficiency and more help with automation framework building. |
| Works | 3.5 | I find this solution valuable for testing our application on real devices, saving costs and time. However, I frequently experience freezing and unresponsiveness when using virtual machines and desire a wider selection of available real devices. |
| Works at a computer software company with 51-200 employees | 4.5 | CrossBrowserTesting is great for responsive testing on various browsers, with useful video/screenshot tools. I appreciate the local connection, and customer support promptly resolved the one issue I faced. |
