Parasoft SOAtest Reviews

Parasoft SOAtest streamlines web services and API test automation with minimal coding, providing significant ROI for many users. Some express satisfaction with ROI exceeding 95%, while others mention measurable benefits like time savings and cost-effectiveness. Shortening task completion times remarkably, it contributes positively to code complexity reduction and decreased manual efforts as some express uncertainties regarding long-term profitability and suggest areas for improvement like the addition of a testing metrics system.

Parasoft SOAtest is considered expensive, with a complex licensing model. While users note the cost is higher than some alternatives, it offers significant benefits such as floating licenses and comprehensive support. Companies often need to evaluate its price against the tool’s capabilities in automation and testing. Some organizations prefer it over other options despite the price, finding value in its features and scalability. Pricing involves standard licensing fees, averaging around $5,000 annually.

• "The price is around $5,000 USD."
• "They do have a confusing licensing structure."
• "The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

Parasoft SOAtest is primarily used for automated regression and API testing in environments with SOAP/REST services. It supports languages like Java and JavaScript, offers integration with tools like Jenkins, and handles protocols such as TCP/IP and FTP. Used across various industries, including banking and automotive, it provides service virtualization and supports end-to-end testing. Organizations also utilize it for middleware testing, compliance, message protocols, and transitioning from manual to automated testing.

Parasoft SOAtest's customer service is rated highly, often described as excellent and responsive. Technical support receives mixed feedback, with many experiencing rapid and effective assistance, particularly praising their knowledgeable support staff. However, some mention challenges in complex scenarios and communication issues. Despite occasional delays or region-specific difficulties, overall satisfaction remains positive, with several users giving high ratings for their support experience. Many appreciate the prompt responses, although some note areas for improvement in specific locations and complex queries.

Users found Parasoft SOAtest's initial setup to be straightforward and manageable without requiring specialized skills. The installation process is simple with helpful guidance, though complex infrastructure might increase difficulty. Some faced longer deployment times, especially when integrating with CI/CD tools or custom protocol changes. The setup allows focus on test efforts, offering varying complexity levels in scenario building. Despite potential challenges, users could activate functionalities efficiently with minimal team involvement.

Many users indicate Parasoft SOAtest is scalable with limited issues. Some experience challenges with large test scenarios or when approaching memory limits, but these can often be mitigated through effective design. It's used by diverse teams, from medium to enterprise, with scalability facilitating multiple applications and CI/CD integration. Performance can falter when numerous sessions are active, yet many find it sufficient for their growing organizational needs. Reliability is generally rated positively among users.

Parasoft SOAtest experiences mixed stability feedback. Many users note stable performance, some mention performance issues on low-end systems or with large test cases, and occasional crashes in specific scenarios. Sporadic issues include memory consumption and time-outs, often resolved with Parasoft support. Users rate stability highly, citing minimal bugs or glitches. The platform is reliable for most, with occasional concerns during initial setup or resource-intensive operations. Stability is rated around eight out of ten.