IBM DevOps Test UI vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

IBM and UiPath are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. IBM is ranked #26, while UiPath is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.0. IBM holds a 1.6% mindshare in FT, compared to UiPath’s 2.4% mindshare. Additionally, 88% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

IBM DevOps Test UI

Read 8 IBM DevOps Test UI reviews

1,470 Views
1,235 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 27 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

4,321 Views
2,722 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

IBM DevOps Test UI

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between IBM DevOps Test UI and UiPath Test Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed IBM DevOps Test UI vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. UiPath Test Cloud

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 894,738 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

IBM DevOps Test UI

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

26th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (12th)

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (3rd), Mobile App Testing Tools (4th), API Testing Tools (7th), Test Automation Tools (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of IBM DevOps Test UI is 1.6%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 2.4%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
UiPath Test Cloud	2.4%
IBM DevOps Test UI	1.6%
Other	96.0%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Hellen Zhang

Lead Systems Tester at Government of Ontario, Canada

Reliable test automation, and test data creation with efficient support

The solution can be improved by removing the need for object matching in the framework. The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run. The reason is that changes were made to how it works with the browser and the startup takes some time. Adjusting those changes to speed up the load time will improve the solution.

Read full review

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration

I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is compatible with all sorts of Dark Net applications. Its coverage is very good."

"Test automation is most valuable because it saves a lot of time."

"By automating regression test suites using this product, we were able to show time savings of more than 1200 hours in less than ONE year."

"It helps in automation by using better object recognition as compared to other tools in the market."

"Robust API provides quick turnaround for developers to understand and automate functional test case quickly."

"It is 100% compatible with all sorts of database integrations and is compatible with all types of open source TFT-based applications, which makes it a great product to have."

"As it is built on Ellipse/Java and costs less than other tools, it is recommended."

"IBM Rational Functional Tester is very contextual."

More IBM DevOps Test UI pros

"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."

"UiPath Test Suite is user-friendly and operates as a low-code platform."

"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."

"It is a very scalable product."

"Test Manager is helpful for tracking process steps. We can see which step is failing."

"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."

"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."

"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"If in the future there is no support for mobile applications, then we will be using it less."

"The latest version has increased load time before testing can be run."

"It does not fully justify being a paid tool, and it needs improvement."

"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."

"If you look at today's current context, I wouldn't recommend RFT because there are far more advanced solutions and products available."

"If the solution is running on Linux, there are some issues around application compatibility."

"With version 8.5 we faced workspace crash issues frequently."

"The object repository used for identifying objects can be made better. It has been noticed that the RFT tool is unable to identify some objects, due to which we are unable to add them to the object repository."

More IBM DevOps Test UI cons

"The product releases sometimes have issues."

"The pricing isn't as low as other options."

"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."

"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."

"They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules."

"I'd like the solution to be even more automated."

"At FORWARD VI, we see new automations being built around AI and the ability to have developers understand how they can drive some of those AI capabilities with Studio. We are starting to see that. They should also drive that with UiPath Test Suite so that we can not only build that development side faster; we can also develop the tests that go along with it, hopefully automatically."

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing is good but the prices for the products are expensive. A single-user license may go for something like $10,000 to $30,000. There are no additional costs, and support is included within that price."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"It represents good value for the investment."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for UiPath Test Suite?

My use case for this product is specific to a high-profile project within the life sciences domain, where I am involved in the transportation of critical emergency medications that get prescribed a...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText Functional Testing vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 14% of the time

Katalon Studio vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 10% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 9% of the time

Selenium HQ vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing for Developers vs IBM DevOps Test UI

Compared 7% of the time

More IBM DevOps Test UI Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

LEAPWORK vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

April 2026

Download IBM DevOps Test UI product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

April 2026

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

IBM Rational Functional Tester

Test Suite

Overview

IBM DevOps Test UI offers robust automation testing features that support .NET and Java scripting. It integrates with IBM Rational Performance Tester and supports various applications, making regression testing and automation efficient.

IBM DevOps Test UI provides powerful object identification and third-party library integration. It adapts well to automation testing needs and integrates with testing management tools, including compatibility with Siebel, SAP, and more. Users perceive it as easy to implement and highly compatible with technology stacks, enabling enhanced automation efficiency. While improvements are needed in mobile app UI analysis and Linux application compatibility, it remains a strong choice for teams focused on automation testing.

What features make IBM DevOps Test UI stand out?

Support for .NET and Java scripting: Allows efficient script creation for diverse testing scenarios.
Robust object identification: Enhances precision in automation testing.
Integration with third-party libraries: Expands testing capabilities.
UI component tester: Facilitates smooth automation testing adaptation.
Test management tool integration: Works with tools like IBM Rational Performance Tester.
Compatibility with Siebel, SAP, and more: Supports testing across a wide range of applications.

What benefits do users seek in IBM DevOps Test UI?

Efficiency in regression testing: Proven track record of reliability in repetitive testing tasks.
Easy implementation: Simplifies integration into existing processes.
Broad technology compatibility: Supports a variety of testing environments.

IBM DevOps Test UI is employed extensively for website functionality testing and database integration. Entities within banking and telecom sectors frequently use it for test automation and data creation, often pairing it with IBM Rational Functional Tester to effectively meet testing demands.

IBM

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Edumate

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

IBM DevOps Test UI vs. UiPath Test Cloud

April 2026

Free Report: IBM DevOps Test UI vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM DevOps Test UI vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

894,738 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our IBM DevOps Test UI vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.