Tricentis qTest Reviews

Name: Tricentis qTest
Brand: Tricentis
Rating: 4 (16 reviews)

4.2 out of 5

16 reviews
100% willing to recommend

499 followers

What is Tricentis qTest?

Tricentis is the global leader in enterprise continuous testing, widely credited for reinventing software testing for DevOps, cloud, and enterprise applications. The Tricentis AI-based, continuous testing platform provides a new and fundamentally different way to perform software testing. An approach that’s totally automated, fully codeless, and intelligently driven by AI. It addresses both agile development and complex enterprise apps, enabling enterprises to accelerate their digital transformation by dramatically increasing software release speed, reducing costs, and improving software quality.

Get the Tricentis qTest Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis qTest, Tricentis Tosca, SmartBear TestComplete and more!

Tricentis qTest is the #6 ranked solution in top Quality Management Tools. PeerSpot users give Tricentis qTest an average rating of 8.4 out of 10. Tricentis qTest is most commonly compared to Tricentis Tosca: Tricentis qTest vs Tricentis Tosca. Tricentis qTest is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 70% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 14% of all views.

Helped 801,314 peers since 2012

Featured reviews

Sudipto Dey

Technical Lead at Linde

The support for Tricentis qTest has room for improvement. The response could be better. There's a feature I want to document on the Tricentis Idea Portal for Tricentis qTest, which I hope to see in the next version of the tool. It's a feature available in Micro Focus where you execute a test, and then on a spec level, you mark it as pass or fail. Then at the overall level, Micro Focus will automatically mark the test as a pass if all steps passed or failed, even if one step failed. However, here in Tricentis qTest, you still need to mark the overall level of the test cases. It's not automated, unlike what you have in Micro Focus. If Tricentis adds that feature in Tricentis qTest, it will make life easier for testers.

Read full review

SamuLehikoinen

Partner Manager at Agiilit Oy

The user interface has a somewhat outdated design, which is certainly an area that could be improved. Some of the modules appear to be loosely connected, but despite these aspects, our overall experience with the tool was positive. When you begin integrating your testing tools with qTest, the available examples may not be very clear, and I believe this is an area that could be enhanced, particularly in terms of providing clearer integration guidance. While the tool's integration with various testing tools is impressive, there is room for improvement in showcasing more cases and benefits, especially through additional videos and documentation.

Read full review

Anuj-Kataria

QA Manager at Next Solutions

Our company still hasn't found a way to mark in Tricentis qTest using APIs when our automation strips run, which is a process that, if introduced in the future, can probably improve the tool. The aforementioned process happens in other tools like Azure DevOps, Zephyr, or Xray but not in Tricentis qTest. In the future, an automated test suite, triggering functionality in the test suite, and execution of automated tests, which could be marked in Tricentis qTest, would be a great addition to the tool. Tricentis qTest's technical support team needs to improve its ability to respond to queries from users.

Read full review

Tricentis qTest mindshare

As of September 2024, the mindshare of Tricentis qTest in the Test Management Tools category stands at 13.1%, up from 9.9% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools

Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

"I found the reporting aspect to be the most valuable as it provided a comprehensive overview of the efforts needed and the workload for individual tests."
"UI and UX are pretty easy to understand without much of a problem."
"What I found most valuable in Tricentis qTest is that it doesn't require installation. You use it through the URL.It also has an excellent reporting feature."

Room for Improvement

"The user interface has a somewhat outdated design, which is certainly an area that could be improved."
"Tricentis qTest's technical support team needs to improve its ability to respond to queries from users."
"The support for Tricentis qTest has room for improvement. The response could be better."

Pricing

"Based on whatever I heard, I can say that Tricentis qTest is a little costlier than other test management tools, like Jira, Zephyr, or Xray."
"For me, pricing for Tricentis qTest is moderate, so that's a five out of ten. It's more affordable than my company's previous solution, which was Micro Focus ALM."
"We signed for a year and I believe we paid $24,000 for Flood, Manager, and the qTest Insights. We paid an extra for $4,000 for the migration support."

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our Tricentis qTest Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.