Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Inflectra Rapise vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

Inflectra and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Inflectra is ranked #21 with an average rating of 4.0, while UiPath is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.8. Inflectra holds a 0.2% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Inflectra users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.
Inflectra Rapise
Read 7 Inflectra Rapise reviews
  • 459 Views
  • 170 Comparison Views
85% willing to recommend
UiPath Test Cloud
Read 26 UiPath Test Cloud reviews
  • 2,844 Views
  • 2,759 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 22, 2025

Inflectra Rapise and UiPath Test Cloud are automated testing solutions. UiPath Test Cloud appears to have the upper hand due to its robust features and scalability, making it suitable for enterprises needing extensive testing capabilities.

Features: Inflectra Rapise provides comprehensive test management, integration with multiple tools, and cross-browser testing, making it versatile for various testing scenarios. UiPath Test Cloud offers scalability, advanced automation, and seamless integration across technologies, enhancing its appeal for complex enterprise needs.

Room for Improvement: Inflectra Rapise could improve in scalability and advanced automation capabilities to better compete with enterprise demands. Enhancing integration options could also broaden its appeal. UiPath Test Cloud might benefit from focusing on reducing initial setup costs, improving ease of use for new users, and expanding its community support resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Inflectra Rapise offers a straightforward deployment process backed by strong customer service, facilitating a smooth implementation. UiPath Test Cloud also provides easy deployment, emphasizing scalability and robust customer support, making it well-suited for large operations.

Pricing and ROI: Inflectra Rapise is cost-effective with a lower setup cost, appealing to budget-conscious organizations and ensuring a positive ROI. UiPath Test Cloud, while incurring higher initial costs, rewards users with significant ROI through its extensive features and flexibility, making it a preferred choice for enterprises prioritizing feature-rich solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Inflectra Rapise vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: July 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Inflectra Rapise vs. UiPath Test Cloud
July 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Inflectra Rapise
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
21st
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (30th)
UiPath Test Cloud
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
2nd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (3rd), Test Management Tools (6th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Inflectra Rapise is 0.2%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 4.8%, up from 3.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

WIllWorley - PeerSpot reviewer
The tool needs to improve in the areas of security, though it is a versatile product
Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies are still using SAP GUI. Inflectra has no intention of building Rapise in a way that allows it to interact with SAP GUI. Inflectra Rapise has very limited value for the companies I work with because they they still use SAP GUI since their top priority is SAP testing, and they want to get into automation, for which they need a tool that cannot only used to automate processes, but can also do end-to-end testing where you are not only using SAP GUI, but you are using the interface with old legacy systems that are still in use or with today's more modern technologies. In the future, the tool needs to increase its versatility. If I am at a company that uses 23 different technologies, like .NET Visual Basic, Oracle, SQL, or whatever, Inflectra Rapise needs to be made as a product that is an out-of-the-box usable tool for any technology.
Read full review
Manigandan Rajavelu - PeerSpot reviewer
Comprehensive, good value for money, and a lot of time savings
I discovered a lot of bugs in UiPath Test Suite. If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it. We want to replace the existing test case, but this functionality is not available. In Test Manager, there are a lot of defects in the ROI report that we provide to the operations team on a monthly basis. It is not very clear and detailed. There is no detailed explanation of every test case. There is only a high-level overview. We cannot download the report from Test Manager. We have to use some other tool, such as Power BI, to view the data.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility."
"We always use the product for end-to-end automation test cases."
"It's pretty straightforward to set up."
"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."
"Its automated execution when a different package changes and using different test cases defined in an Excel file are particularly useful."
"The detailed logging is invaluable."
"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."
"UiPath Test Cloud has helped automate major applications such as SAP and Oracle, which are significant needle movers, particularly in a project we did where a customer was migrating from on-prem to cloud for SAP, allowing us to regression test hyper-fast while rolling out new modules and automating at the same time."
"Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package."
"The document understanding is good."
"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."
More UiPath Test Cloud pros
 

Cons

"Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability."
"The maintenance is very difficult. We've only been using the platform for three months, so I'm not sure if that will continue, but right now it's an observation I've had."
"It would be good if there could be more integration of Inflectra Rapise, since not all customers use the same tool for test management and automation integration."
"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."
"We are able to automate most tasks by using UiPath. Its interface is fine. However, its price is a bit high."
"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."
"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."
"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."
"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath to test on it, which is inefficient."
"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."
"With Selenium, there is a plugin called Healenium, which helps automatically detect changed properties of objects. With one click, it automatically updates the object repository with the changed properties. I would like UiPath to add that capability."
More UiPath Test Cloud cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay no more than $50 annually for support of each one of the licenses."
"I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing."
"It represents good value for the investment."
"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."
"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."
"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."
"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."
"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."
"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."
"Its price is a bit high."
More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Inflectra Rapise?
The most valuable feature of the solution is its versatility.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Inflectra Rapise?
I rate the product's price an eight on a scale of one to ten, where ten means very good pricing.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Inflectra Rapise?
Inflectra Rapise needs to expand its ability. I spoke with Inflectra's executive account rep on the need to expand the tool's ability. The problem with Inflectra Rapise is that a lot of companies a...
See all answers
What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?
Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?
I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...
See all answers
What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?
It's tough for me to say how UiPath Test Cloud could be improved due to my lack of experience with the other test tools, but I'd venture a guess that there might be better integrations within those...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud
Compared 47% of the time
OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud Logo
OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud
Compared 14% of the time
Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud Logo
Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud
Compared 9% of the time
Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud Logo
Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud
Compared 8% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud
Compared 5% of the time
More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Inflectra Rapise
August 2025
Inflectra Rapise reportDownload Inflectra Rapise product report
Buyer's Guide
UiPath Test Cloud
July 2025
UiPath Test Cloud reportDownload UiPath Test Cloud product report
 

Also Known As

Rapise
Test Suite
 

Overview

Rapise is the most powerful and easy to use test automation tool on the market. It allows you to quickly and easily automate the testing of your web, mobile and desktop applications. Why spend hours manually regression testing your applications when you can have Rapise do it for you?
Inflectra

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?
  • Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
  • Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
  • Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
  • Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.
What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?
  • Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
  • Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
  • Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
  • Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath
 

Sample Customers

- Soflab - RegEd - Intel - US Government
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Inflectra Rapise vs. UiPath Test Cloud
July 2025
Free Report: Inflectra Rapise vs. UiPath Test Cloud
Find out what your peers are saying about Inflectra Rapise vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Inflectra Rapise vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.