OpenText Functional Testing and UiPath Test Cloud are prominent in the test automation category. OpenText offers versatility across technologies and strong integration capabilities, while UiPath stands out with advanced test management and integration with its other products, giving it a competitive edge.
Features:OpenText is known for codeless automation, robust integration with enterprise applications, and accessibility to non-technical users. UiPath Test Cloud provides comprehensive test management tools, orchestration capabilities, and integration with other UiPath products, streamlining automation of complex processes.
Room for Improvement:OpenText users report high licensing costs, heavy CPU usage, and an outdated scripting environment affecting execution speed. UiPath's challenges include high costs, limitations in test manager functionalities, Jira integration issues, and manual testing improvements.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:OpenText is often deployed on-premises, catering to controlled enterprise environments. UiPath provides more flexible deployment options, including on-premises and cloud. Support response times for OpenText are delayed, while UiPath's support, though strong initially, may lack depth in complex issues.
Pricing and ROI:Both OpenText and UiPath are expensive; however, OpenText is seen as comprehensive for legacy system support, potentially offering high ROI in complex environments. UiPath’s pricing is offset by its ease of integration and comprehensive test suite, providing savings in automation timelines and resource costs.
Automation is done very fast, leading to improvements in the QA process and reducing the time needed for test automation.
The development time using UFT can be cut down into half as compared to coding from scratch.
We can easily achieve a return on investment in one, two, or three years.
Support cases are easily created and attended to promptly, depending on urgency.
After creating a ticket, it takes three to five days for them to acknowledge it and then send it to somebody.
The technical support is rated eight out of ten.
They get into the meeting, understand the problem, and try to provide a solution quickly.
Support should be free, especially for product-related issues.
I would rate UiPath's support neutrally at a five.
Running them in parallel allows you to consume multiple runtime licenses and just execute the tests that don't have conflicting priorities and get through a lot of volume much quicker.
The tool can be installed on all computers used by developers or test automation engineers.
Proper knowledge of Orchestrator and CI/CD processes makes the product truly scalable.
Scaling with UiPath Test Cloud is supported; they have the infrastructure to scale automation to meet business needs.
One of the key stability issues was that Windows would consume memory without releasing it, leading to regression testing crashes.
UiPath Test Suite has matured over the years and is now quite stable.
It is performing better than two to three years back; significant improvements have been made for complete project delivery.
Incorporating behavior-driven development tests would enhance the capabilities of UFT One.
If it could move closer to a no-code or low-code solution, it might dominate the market again.
We frequently encountered stability issues when the browser dependency caused Windows to consume memory without releasing it, leading to crashes during regression testing.
If they could add defect management, it could work independently without needing Jira.
UiPath should introduce compatibility so existing processes in Selenium or other tools can work seamlessly with UiPath Test automation.
I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely.
It's cheaper than Tricentis Tosca but more expensive than some others.
The pricing or licensing policy of OpenText is a bit expensive, however, it's one of the best solutions in the market.
There are many open-source tools with no cost, and there are no-code tools that are less expensive than UFT.
Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year.
The pricing of UiPath tends to be on the higher side, which can restrict smaller companies from adopting it.
UFT supports Oracle, SAP, PeopleSoft, and other non-web applications, making automation feasible.
The object repository is one of the best in the market, allowing creation of a repository useful for all tests.
OpenText UFT One offered valuable features by allowing us to build up libraries to streamline repetitive tasks, making scripting much easier.
What I really like about UiPath Test Suite is its ability to ensure that any changes made do not affect other functionalities.
The most valuable feature of UiPath Test Cloud that I have found is the TestManager dashboard, which integrates with Jira through Planview Tasktop.
The ability of the test suite to automate tests across a wide range of technologies is great since UiPath's background in RPA is specifically designed to automate basically any and all technologies.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing | 8.5% |
| UiPath Test Cloud | 3.0% |
| Other | 88.5% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 |
| Large Enterprise | 74 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
OpenText Functional Testing is designed for ease of use, featuring strong object identification, AI capabilities, and multi-platform integration. Its VBScript simplicity and cross-browser, mobile support make it versatile for handling UI and API tests.
OpenText Functional Testing provides a seamless testing experience with powerful automation capabilities. Its integration with technologies like SAP and Oracle, combined with record and playback features, makes it a go-to tool for comprehensive testing environments. Users find value in its flexibility to streamline both UI and API tests. Challenges include high costs and resource usage, and there's a demand for broader programming language support and improved integration with CI/CD pipelines. Enhanced AI functionalities and better documentation are also requested.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing?OpenText Functional Testing is utilized in industries requiring robust testing frameworks like finance and healthcare. Companies automate web, desktop, and API applications, perform functional tests, and handle validations. Its adaptability to integration and broad technology support facilitates diverse testing needs.
UiPath Test Cloud empowers teams with AI-driven testing, enhancing coverage, speed, and accuracy. It shifts focus from manual to scalable quality engineering, enabling accelerated innovation with confidence.
UiPath Test Cloud provides a comprehensive platform for AI-powered software quality assurance. It integrates with services, automates tests across technologies, and manages test cases efficiently. The platform reduces testing costs and maintenance, featuring a drag-and-drop interface and seamless CI/CD integration. Users find its low-code, reusable solutions increase productivity, but note needs for better Test Manager integration and mobile automation capabilities. Challenges with defect management, reporting, and framework compatibility highlight areas for improvement. Enhanced AI-driven features, improved manual test handling, and faster performance would benefit users.
What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?Organizations use UiPath Test Cloud for regression, automation, and integration testing across platforms. It caters to mobile, web, SAP, Oracle, and .NET technologies. Industries like supply chain, finance, HR, and healthcare rely on it to reduce test cycle times and ensure system stability during upgrades, with integrations available for tools such as Studio and Orchestrator.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
