Panaya Test Dynamix Reviews

Our primary use case is for our process and we have different phases where we do testing and we have what we called IT and BPA testing. So it is a combined group of IT people and business people doing the testing after the setup. We have what we call the UFA, the user acceptance test, so those are done by the users. We put the scenarios upfront and document the scenarios and the test. We can see the percentages of the test done, what has been completed, and if there are problems. And then if there are problems we can rerun the test.

The most valuable feature is the ability to copy the scenarios so that as we do a rollout we can efficiently complete test three and put it somewhere else under a new subsidiary. Then I can redo the same test for other sites we want to implement.

I have been using this solution for test and defect management and testing automation.

We use Panaya with SAP. We are using the SaaS version.

Without Panaya, it will be difficult to manage a large number of test scripts. It can be a mess to manage them in a spreadsheet or a document, and we can easily lose them. Panaya is very useful for being organized and structured in managing test scripts. Without it, we would have difficulties managing scripts in a good and structural way.

It provides us with actionable insights in real-time into every aspect of our project. We can have a very quick view of the test progress in real-time. It is very useful. In one click, we can see some of the KPIs that are available to us in real-time, which is great.

The dashboard's progress overview is very important to challenge people and show them how much we've progressed. It is important to have this KPI and get it in real-time. Its dashboard can highlight what was missing from your change or upgrade process if you have more defects follow-ups.

It gives a good picture of where you are and what you have tested. You have good control of your scope and your progress in the scope. You can show this progress to everybody, and you can challenge them to be on time with Panaya reporting. So, we feel safer with everything in Panaya, but when some people work in Panaya and some don't, it becomes more complex because you have double management. That's our difficulty right now.

With Panaya, people are more autonomous, so we save time. Before Panaya, we needed more people to coordinate tasks and activities. With Panaya, we can bring more autonomy to testers and the team.

Our primary use case of this solution is for reporting and as proof of all the testing that is done.

I like the fact that we have a single platform that provides all the features and where it is possible to have good reporting capabilities as opposed to integrating a few systems in order to achieve some of the functionalities. My biggest concern is always the consolidated view and the reporting that I have available.

The primary user case is test management for user acceptance tests and business process testing. It is also used for test automation with record and play and codeless script editing, e.g., we can replay a test with different data sets.

• It is easy for business users to use who are not familiar with testing tools.
• Provides better monitoring for testing campaigns and business process testing.
• We are able to test more things and be quicker with automatic documentation.