

Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
SmartBear had an ALM tool that helped manage project documentation, including Jira-related specifications, test plans, and test cases.
They get into the meeting, understand the problem, and try to provide a solution quickly.
Support should be free, especially for product-related issues.
I would rate UiPath's support neutrally at a five.
I rate ReadyAPI between five to six for scalability due to complexities associated with scripting.
ReadyAPI's performance testing capabilities can impact API scalability assessments.
Proper knowledge of Orchestrator and CI/CD processes makes the product truly scalable.
Scaling with UiPath Test Cloud is supported; they have the infrastructure to scale automation to meet business needs.
Once all configurations and preparations are done, it is very stable.
UiPath Test Suite has matured over the years and is now quite stable.
It is performing better than two to three years back; significant improvements have been made for complete project delivery.
One issue I found with ReadyAPI is related to event listeners compared to JMeter or SoapUI.
I'm considering the use of AWS and its Lambda functionalities prepared by the vendor.
If they could add defect management, it could work independently without needing Jira.
I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely.
UiPath should introduce compatibility so existing processes in Selenium or other tools can work seamlessly with UiPath Test automation.
Currently, we don't extensively use the performance testing due to license costs.
The pricing of ReadyAPI is reasonable, considering its functionality compared to other tools in the market.
Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year.
The pricing of UiPath tends to be on the higher side, which can restrict smaller companies from adopting it.
It also aids in faster feedback to developers, allowing them to implement developments in a sprint without the need for extensive testing afterwards, thus improving our time to market metrics.
I consider ReadyAPI a cost-effective solution because it covers three verticals without needing to purchase separate tools for security, performance, or functional testing.
ReadyAPI is valuable for web service automation and allowing us to generate test cases and automate processes.
The ability of the test suite to automate tests across a wide range of technologies is great since UiPath's background in RPA is specifically designed to automate basically any and all technologies.
Some of the best features I find with UiPath Test Cloud include the creation of end-to-end workflows with API integration.
The most valuable feature of UiPath Test Cloud that I have found is the TestManager dashboard, which integrates with Jira through Planview Tasktop.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| UiPath Test Cloud | 2.3% |
| ReadyAPI | 1.9% |
| Other | 95.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 28 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 4 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 19 |
ReadyAPI stands out for its API testing capabilities and integration with development tools like Jira and Git. Its user-friendly interface and automation with Groovy scripting make it a suitable, efficient choice for developers aiming for seamless project management and test execution.
ReadyAPI presents a comprehensive suite for API testing, supporting functional, performance, and security tasks with minimal coding required. It offers robust integration with tools such as Postman and CI/CD processes, enabling users to manage and automate testing scenarios efficiently. Despite its strengths, users notice limitations in performance and cloud integration, especially in scalability and test management. While it facilitates data-driven testing through Excel and supports on-premise and cloud environments, ReadyAPI could benefit from improved reporting and simpler scripting processes. Its interface and GitHub integration would further enhance its adaptability for larger projects and diverse applications.
What are ReadyAPI's main features?ReadyAPI is principally leveraged by industries that require precise API testing capabilities, spanning functional, performance, and security assessments. Its ease of integrating with CI/CD tools and ability to manage backend APIs make it an ideal choice in sectors that prioritize automation and reliability in testing processes. Companies operating within on-premise and cloud environments benefit from its support for diverse testing needs and scenarios, ensuring improved testing proficiency and response validation.
UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.
UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.
What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.