CrossBrowserTesting vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

SmartBear and UiPath are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #28, while UiPath is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8. SmartBear holds a 1.0% mindshare in FT, compared to UiPath’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

CrossBrowserTesting

Read 19 CrossBrowserTesting reviews

550 Views
495 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 27 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

2,872 Views
2,183 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

CrossBrowserTesting

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CrossBrowserTesting and UiPath Test Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CrossBrowserTesting vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting vs. UiPath Test Cloud

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,202 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrossBrowserTesting

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

28th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (5th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (6th), Test Automation Tools (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of CrossBrowserTesting is 1.0%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 3.7%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
UiPath Test Cloud	3.7%
CrossBrowserTesting	1.0%
Other	95.3%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

CharlesNetshivhera

Senior DevOps Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Knowledgeable support, scalable, and stable

We use CrossBrowserTesting for testing our web-based applications We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve. I have used CrossBrowserTesting within the past 12 months. CrossBrowserTesting is stable. I have found CrossBrowserTesting to be scalable.…

Read full review

Manigandan Rajavelu

Sr software engineer at PricewaterhouseCoopers

Comprehensive, good value for money, and a lot of time savings

I discovered a lot of bugs in UiPath Test Suite. If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it. We want to replace the existing test case, but this functionality is not available. In Test Manager, there are a lot of defects in the ROI report that we provide to the operations team on a monthly basis. It is not very clear and detailed. There is no detailed explanation of every test case. There is only a high-level overview. We cannot download the report from Test Manager. We have to use some other tool, such as Power BI, to view the data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When developing new pages that have questionable functionality or coding, we will often use CBT to test it in a browser. CBT works with our testing environment and development site."

"Each new session started with the live testing feature allows for a cleared browser and new experience to be able to not only see these attributes on the page clearly but also pass clean data."

"CrossBrowserTesting allows us to test our site with real-world devices in real-world scenarios and find what we're missing."

"CBT has made it easier to troubleshoot issues across devices when we do not have actual access to those specific devices. I even opt for CBT sometimes when we do have access to the device just because it is easier."

"I am able to continuously test my new releases across browser versions without issues."

"The ability to choose from many devices is the best feature."

"The features that I find most useful and the ones that I use the most are local site testing, device and browser testing, and screenshots."

"It has increased the speed of our regression testing."

More CrossBrowserTesting pros

"It's useful for automating tasks."

"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."

"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."

"Test Manager is helpful for tracking process steps. We can see which step is failing."

"We also don't develop test robots like typing codes; we program them with drag-and-drop features."

"What I really like about UiPath Test Suite is its ability to ensure that any changes made do not affect other functionalities."

"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."

"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"The five minute timeouts can cause irritation if you have just popped away to consult some supporting documentation."

"A problem that we are facing quite often is related to the network connection. Tests can fail if the remote CrossBrowserTesting's VM has connection problems. This happens mostly with browsers of Internet Explorer family which work on Windows OS."

"There should be more detailed training on CrossBrowserTesting."

"This solution would benefit from faster testing and support for more devices."

"The "Getting Started" documentation for Selenium testing could be improved."

"Being able to test on real devices via the virtual connection is wonderful, but it can cause some lag and load time issues while testing."

"The speed connection in mobile devices could be improved, because sometimes the load time is uncertain."

"We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve."

More CrossBrowserTesting cons

"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."

"I'd like the solution to be even more automated."

"Accessing the full functionality of the Test Suite manager, including the dashboard, requires a tenant license."

"The product releases sometimes have issues."

"UiPath could further enhance its functionality by simplifying the test case creation process within Test Suite."

"The initial setup of UiPath Test Cloud is a mixed bag; while setting up the tool is easy, building the tests is always tedious."

"They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules."

"The test manager component could be improved."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"A few intermediary pricing options for small QA teams would be nice, e.g., unlimited screenshots, "as you need it" parallel tests, etc."

"It is worth the pricing as the product is supported on multiple platforms and browsers."

"CrossBrowserTesting offered the best value for its price."

"The lowest price point is very reasonable. It is also useful if only one person in the company needs to check on the browser display."

"SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"Its price is a bit high."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	10

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...

See all answers

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 73% of the time

Sauce Labs vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 14% of the time

Eggplant Test vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 14% of the time

More CrossBrowserTesting Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 46% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 13% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting

October 2025

Download CrossBrowserTesting product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

September 2025

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Test Suite

Overview

CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.

Native debugging tools make manual testing easy to inspect and correct HTML, CSS, and JavaScript errors on any browser.
Take automated screenshots across multiple browsers at once, then compare side-by-side against historical test runs.

SmartBear

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting vs. UiPath Test Cloud

September 2025

Free Report: CrossBrowserTesting vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about CrossBrowserTesting vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,202 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrossBrowserTesting vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.