CrossBrowserTesting vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

SmartBear and UiPath are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #28, while UiPath is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.9. SmartBear holds a 0.8% mindshare in FT, compared to UiPath’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

CrossBrowserTesting

Read 19 CrossBrowserTesting reviews

529 Views
305 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 25 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

2,104 Views
1,005 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

CrossBrowserTesting

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CrossBrowserTesting and UiPath Test Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CrossBrowserTesting vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting vs. UiPath Test Cloud

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 859,129 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrossBrowserTesting

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

28th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (6th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (5th), Test Automation Tools (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of CrossBrowserTesting is 0.8%, down from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 4.5%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

CharlesNetshivhera

Senior DevOps Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Knowledgeable support, scalable, and stable

We use CrossBrowserTesting for testing our web-based applications We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve. I have used CrossBrowserTesting within the past 12 months. CrossBrowserTesting is stable. I have found CrossBrowserTesting to be scalable.…

Read full review

Manigandan Rajavelu

Sr software engineer at PricewaterhouseCoopers

Comprehensive, good value for money, and a lot of time savings

I discovered a lot of bugs in UiPath Test Suite. If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it. We want to replace the existing test case, but this functionality is not available. In Test Manager, there are a lot of defects in the ROI report that we provide to the operations team on a monthly basis. It is not very clear and detailed. There is no detailed explanation of every test case. There is only a high-level overview. We cannot download the report from Test Manager. We have to use some other tool, such as Power BI, to view the data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ability to replay sessions is valuable for tracking down issues."

"The ability to choose from many devices is the best feature."

"SmartBear has excellent, informative webinars, so keep an eye out for those."

"At the moment, all our deploys depend on results of automation. If the tests are failing, then we know that something is wrong at the early stages of development."

"The screen shot portal is essential for an easy way to run tests across hundreds of browsers and retrieve screenshots which then indicate success or failure."

"CrossBrowserTesting allows us to test our site with real-world devices in real-world scenarios and find what we're missing."

"I have found CrossBrowserTesting to be scalable."

"Selenium Grid allows testing multiple platforms to insure functionality for most users."

More CrossBrowserTesting pros

"What I really like about UiPath Test Suite is its ability to ensure that any changes made do not affect other functionalities."

"In terms of integration with other lifecycle tools and applications, UiPath Test Suite works very well because of the basis of RPA, and how RPA and automation can handle different applications and different areas of expertise."

"It's useful for automating tasks."

"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."

"The most valuable feature of UiPath Test Cloud that I have found is the TestManager dashboard, which integrates with Jira through Planview Tasktop. This allows us to create different suites in TestManager, schedule them, and integrate them with CI/CD."

"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."

"It is feature-rich. It has more features than other RPA tools."

"The detailed logging is invaluable."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"There should be more detailed training on CrossBrowserTesting."

"This solution would benefit from faster testing and support for more devices."

"A wider range of physical devices with more browser versions in the Selenium Grid would be great to insure users with out-of-date devices are able to interact with our sites."

"The "Getting Started" documentation for Selenium testing could be improved."

"The speed connection in mobile devices could be improved, because sometimes the load time is uncertain."

"Elements of 'real' mobile/tablet testing could be sped up."

"The screenshot tool defaults to a screen layout instead of a full page test. I find it a bit cumbersome that I can't have it run a full screenshot as my default."

"I have had quite a few issues trying to use a virtual machine to test our application on."

More CrossBrowserTesting cons

"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

"UiPath could further enhance its functionality by simplifying the test case creation process within Test Suite."

"With Selenium, there is a plugin called Healenium, which helps automatically detect changed properties of objects. With one click, it automatically updates the object repository with the changed properties. I would like UiPath to add that capability."

"They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting."

"I'd like the solution to be even more automated."

"I don't rate its ability to automate very well."

"We have output arguments in the workflow. We can check results only by using those arguments. It would be better to have some more options, such as screen variables. For example, in a workflow, if we want to check if an activity is present inside, we should be able to get the output to UiPath Test Suite through the activity itself. That would be great for testing."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is worth the pricing as the product is supported on multiple platforms and browsers."

"CrossBrowserTesting offered the best value for its price."

"SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."

"The lowest price point is very reasonable. It is also useful if only one person in the company needs to check on the browser display."

"A few intermediary pricing options for small QA teams would be nice, e.g., unlimited screenshots, "as you need it" parallel tests, etc."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"Its price is a bit high."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

22%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Real Estate/Law Firm

Government

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules. If they could add defect management, it could work independently wit...

See all answers

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 71% of the time

Sauce Labs vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 17% of the time

Bitbar vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 12% of the time

More CrossBrowserTesting Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 45% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 18% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 7% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting

June 2025

Download CrossBrowserTesting product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

May 2025

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Test Suite

Overview

CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.

Native debugging tools make manual testing easy to inspect and correct HTML, CSS, and JavaScript errors on any browser.
Take automated screenshots across multiple browsers at once, then compare side-by-side against historical test runs.

SmartBear

UiPath Test Cloud revolutionizes testing through advanced AI agents, enhancing productivity in software assessment.

UiPath Test Cloud, with its AI-augmented automation, offers testers enterprise-grade capabilities for over 190 technologies. Featuring seamless integration with tools like Orchestrator and CI/CD pipelines, it streamlines testing processes and cuts maintenance costs. While users value its functionalities, the need for enhancements in mobile automation and third-party integration, particularly with Jira, is recognized. Efficient test organization through Test Manager and simplified process management via the cloud are noteworthy. Enhancements in reporting and file management are sought, highlighting areas for development.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Drag-and-Drop Programming: Enables easy test creation with minimal technical knowledge.
Robust Robotic Functionality: Offers reliable automation across a wide array of technologies.
API Integration: Ensures seamless connectivity with existing systems.
Detailed Logging: Provides comprehensive logs for better analysis and debugging.
Test Manager: Organizes tests efficiently and simplifies management.

What benefits should users evaluate in UiPath Test Cloud?

Enhanced Productivity: Accelerates test creation and execution.
Cost Efficiency: Reduces manual effort and maintenance expenses.
Cross-Platform Support: Offers flexibility in testing across different environments.
Improved Quality: Delivers high-quality software with speed and efficiency.

Organizations across industries utilize UiPath Test Cloud for testing types such as origination, smoke, and web application testing. Common implementations include testing in supply chain management, regression testing, and integrating workflows. Teams find it beneficial for ensuring functionality and efficiency in mobile app testing, enabling cross-platform support for RPA and applications like Oracle and SAP.

UiPath

Sample Customers

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting vs. UiPath Test Cloud

June 2025

Free Report: CrossBrowserTesting vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about CrossBrowserTesting vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

859,129 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrossBrowserTesting vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.