CrossBrowserTesting vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

SmartBear and UiPath are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #28, while UiPath is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.8. SmartBear holds a 0.9% mindshare in FT, compared to UiPath’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

CrossBrowserTesting

Read 19 CrossBrowserTesting reviews

529 Views
476 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 26 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

2,844 Views
2,161 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

CrossBrowserTesting

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between CrossBrowserTesting and UiPath Test Cloud based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Functional Testing Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed CrossBrowserTesting vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting vs. UiPath Test Cloud

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,384 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

CrossBrowserTesting

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

28th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (6th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd), API Testing Tools (5th), Test Automation Tools (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of CrossBrowserTesting is 0.9%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 4.1%, up from 2.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

CharlesNetshivhera

Senior DevOps Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Knowledgeable support, scalable, and stable

We use CrossBrowserTesting for testing our web-based applications We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve. I have used CrossBrowserTesting within the past 12 months. CrossBrowserTesting is stable. I have found CrossBrowserTesting to be scalable.…

Read full review

Manigandan Rajavelu

Sr software engineer at PricewaterhouseCoopers

Comprehensive, good value for money, and a lot of time savings

I discovered a lot of bugs in UiPath Test Suite. If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it. We want to replace the existing test case, but this functionality is not available. In Test Manager, there are a lot of defects in the ROI report that we provide to the operations team on a monthly basis. It is not very clear and detailed. There is no detailed explanation of every test case. There is only a high-level overview. We cannot download the report from Test Manager. We have to use some other tool, such as Power BI, to view the data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Selenium Grid allows testing multiple platforms to insure functionality for most users."

"The extensive range of products available to simulate is something I have come to appreciate as it has resulted in an ability to broaden the scope of our tests."

"At the moment, all our deploys depend on results of automation. If the tests are failing, then we know that something is wrong at the early stages of development."

"The ability to replay sessions is valuable for tracking down issues."

"I can run a page through the screenshot tool, then send a URL with the results to my team."

"The features that I find most useful and the ones that I use the most are local site testing, device and browser testing, and screenshots."

"CrossBrowserTesting allows us to test our site with real-world devices in real-world scenarios and find what we're missing."

"With screenshots, I can quickly verify a page looks universally good in minutes."

More CrossBrowserTesting pros

"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."

"What I really like about UiPath Test Suite is its ability to ensure that any changes made do not affect other functionalities."

"In terms of integration with other lifecycle tools and applications, UiPath Test Suite works very well because of the basis of RPA, and how RPA and automation can handle different applications and different areas of expertise."

"UiPath Test Cloud definitely helps free up time for other projects for our engineers."

"The document understanding is good."

"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."

"UiPath Test Cloud has helped automate major applications such as SAP and Oracle, which are significant needle movers, particularly in a project we did where a customer was migrating from on-prem to cloud for SAP, allowing us to regression test hyper-fast while rolling out new modules and automating at the same time."

"We are finding bugs and defects much faster."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"The five minute timeouts can cause irritation if you have just popped away to consult some supporting documentation."

"A problem that we are facing quite often is related to the network connection. Tests can fail if the remote CrossBrowserTesting's VM has connection problems. This happens mostly with browsers of Internet Explorer family which work on Windows OS."

"The speed connection in mobile devices could be improved, because sometimes the load time is uncertain."

"It would be useful if we can run the live-testing test cases on multiple platforms at the same time, instead of waiting for one session to finish."

"We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve."

"A wider range of physical devices with more browser versions in the Selenium Grid would be great to insure users with out-of-date devices are able to interact with our sites."

"Elements of 'real' mobile/tablet testing could be sped up."

"I have experienced some lagging issues, and it does not seem like all of the testing environments are configured the same."

More CrossBrowserTesting cons

"We are able to automate most tasks by using UiPath. Its interface is fine. However, its price is a bit high."

"They could improve the visualization of the product."

"Storing the test scripts is what needs to improve in the UiPath Test Suite, as it's currently a challenge to some extent. Maintaining the files is a bit challenging, especially when you need to keep those locally."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility."

"With Selenium, there is a plugin called Healenium, which helps automatically detect changed properties of objects. With one click, it automatically updates the object repository with the changed properties. I would like UiPath to add that capability."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath to test on it, which is inefficient."

"They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting."

"We have output arguments in the workflow. We can check results only by using those arguments. It would be better to have some more options, such as screen variables. For example, in a workflow, if we want to check if an activity is present inside, we should be able to get the output to UiPath Test Suite through the activity itself. That would be great for testing."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is worth the pricing as the product is supported on multiple platforms and browsers."

"CrossBrowserTesting offered the best value for its price."

"A few intermediary pricing options for small QA teams would be nice, e.g., unlimited screenshots, "as you need it" parallel tests, etc."

"SmartBear offers bundles of products that work together."

"The lowest price point is very reasonable. It is also useful if only one person in the company needs to check on the browser display."

"Its price is a bit high."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

17%

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules. If they could add defect management, it could work independently wit...

See all answers

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 63% of the time

Sauce Labs vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 14% of the time

Bitbar vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 12% of the time

Eggplant Test vs CrossBrowserTesting

Compared 12% of the time

More CrossBrowserTesting Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 47% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 14% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting

August 2025

Download CrossBrowserTesting product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

July 2025

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

No data available

Test Suite

Overview

CrossBrowserTesting is a cloud testing platform that gives instant access to 1500+ different real desktop and mobile browsers for testers, developers, and designers.

Native debugging tools make manual testing easy to inspect and correct HTML, CSS, and JavaScript errors on any browser.
Take automated screenshots across multiple browsers at once, then compare side-by-side against historical test runs.

SmartBear

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Accenture, Sony, Los Angeles Times, ADP, Verizon, T-Mobile, Wistia

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

CrossBrowserTesting vs. UiPath Test Cloud

July 2025

Free Report: CrossBrowserTesting vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about CrossBrowserTesting vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,384 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our CrossBrowserTesting vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.