OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Download the complete report

Helped 920,939 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

12th

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (11th), API Testing Tools (11th), Test Automation Tools (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 2.0%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 1.8%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
UiPath Test Cloud	1.8%
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	2.0%
Other	96.2%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Cameron Linares

Senior Manager | Robotics & Data Sciences at Viacom Inc.

Efficient application testing with reduced maintenance, though integration enhancements are needed

The best features I've seen with UiPath Test Cloud so far come down to test case management, tracking, and the ability to see results, but I'll be honest, the main feature I enjoy the most is the cost. The ability of the test suite to automate tests across a wide range of technologies is great since UiPath's background in RPA is specifically designed to automate basically any and all technologies. UiPath Test Cloud has certainly helped me reduce maintenance. While I don't have a good calculation on the exact time saved, I can tell you it helps with maintenance significantly. It absolutely frees up staff time for other projects by quickly identifying and classifying issues instead of going through a manual triage process. The total cost of testing is indeed reduced with UiPath Test Cloud, probably targeting around a 25% to 30% reduction in cost, typically ending up closer to 15% to 20% for larger implementations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"The ideas and possibilities that this tool has are incredibly useful."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"The main benefit is that you can get a very quick idea regarding the performance of your application, and it also helps you discover hidden pain points that you would not have found without using this tool."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

"We evaluated other mobile testing solutions and found this to be superior to all of them."

"This is a solution that's easy to use and it also gives us the possibility to use real devices connected either on the Mobile Center server or on our own computers and it works with both iOS and Android devices."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."

"Its automated execution when a different package changes and using different test cases defined in an Excel file are particularly useful."

"Test Manager is helpful for tracking process steps. We can see which step is failing."

"In terms of integration with other lifecycle tools and applications, UiPath Test Suite works very well because of the basis of RPA, and how RPA and automation can handle different applications and different areas of expertise."

"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."

"What I like most about UiPath Test Suite is that it's straightforward, and any user who knows how to use the UiPath Studio can learn how to create a test script in as fast as thirty minutes. There's nothing new you must learn to use UiPath Test Suite because it only has three sections: Given, Then, and When."

"We are finding bugs and defects much faster."

"The Test Manager, the final stage of the UiPath Test Suite, is its most valuable feature."

More UiPath Test Cloud pros

Cons

"However, it is still a young product that is improving leaps and bounds each release."

"Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on."

"I don't think the product as it is right now is going to sell itself, but it's really what are the next steps."

"Deployment was an issue. Each time we set it up and deployed, it failed and we had to relaunch it again."

"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."

"With versions prior to 2.0 I found that configuration was trickier than it should be, particularly with aspects such as NV."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"I think the interface is not very good and I have used other solutions that are easier to learn."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath to test on it, which is inefficient."

"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."

"We are able to automate most tasks by using UiPath. Its interface is fine. However, its price is a bit high."

"At FORWARD VI, we see new automations being built around AI and the ability to have developers understand how they can drive some of those AI capabilities with Studio. We are starting to see that. They should also drive that with UiPath Test Suite so that we can not only build that development side faster; we can also develop the tests that go along with it, hopefully automatically."

"UiPath could further enhance its functionality by simplifying the test case creation process within Test Suite."

"They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility."

"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."

More UiPath Test Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product could be more affordable."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"Its price is a bit high."

"It represents good value for the investment."

More UiPath Test Cloud pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...

What is your primary use case for UiPath Test Suite?

My use case for this product is specific to a high-profile project within the life sciences domain, where I am involved in the transportation of critical emergency medications that get prescribed a...

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Comparisons

Compared 9% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

QA Wolf vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

algoQA vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

UiPath Test Cloud

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

Test Suite

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web streamlines testing with automation, Jira and Azure DevOps integration, and real device support, improving deployment flexibility and testing efficiency.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web provides robust automation features, enhancing efficiency through seamless integration with platforms like Jira and Azure DevOps. Users can manage devices for mobile testing with ease, while enjoying comprehensive testing scenarios supported by UFT integration. The lab's features also automate phishing triage and help make informed decisions, facilitating faster application delivery and reducing manual efforts. Users face challenges in device scaling, cloud collaboration, and seek improvements in AI integration and UI accessibility, with interest in expanded support for diverse applications and centralized hosting.

What important features does OpenText Functional Testing Lab offer?

Automation Features: Streamlines testing processes with automation.
Integration with Jira and Azure DevOps: Ensures smooth workflow integration.
Real Device Management: Supports real devices for accurate testing.
UFT Integration: Enriches testing scenarios with comprehensive tools.
Phishing Triage Automation: Enhances decision-making efficiency.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Faster Application Delivery: Reduces time-to-market through reduced manual testing.
Enhanced Testing Efficiency: Increases productivity with automation.
Seamless Integration: Ensures cohesive workflows with third-party tools.
Comprehensive Testing Scenarios: Provides flexible deployment options.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab is integral to optimizing software development life cycles across industries, including financial services and system integration. It's used for automating repetitive tasks and performing functional and performance testing in CI/CD pipelines, supporting applications in mobile, web, SAP, and Salesforce environments.

OpenText

UiPath Test Cloud empowers teams with AI-driven testing, enhancing coverage, speed, and accuracy. It shifts focus from manual to scalable quality engineering, enabling accelerated innovation with confidence.

UiPath Test Cloud provides a comprehensive platform for AI-powered software quality assurance. It integrates with services, automates tests across technologies, and manages test cases efficiently. The platform reduces testing costs and maintenance, featuring a drag-and-drop interface and seamless CI/CD integration. Users find its low-code, reusable solutions increase productivity, but note needs for better Test Manager integration and mobile automation capabilities. Challenges with defect management, reporting, and framework compatibility highlight areas for improvement. Enhanced AI-driven features, improved manual test handling, and faster performance would benefit users.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Seamless Integration: Connects easily with technologies and services for comprehensive automation.
Cost Efficiency: Significantly reduces testing costs and maintenance.
Drag-and-Drop Interface: Simplifies test creation and management.
Comprehensive Automation: Facilitates extensive test coverage across platforms.
Low-Code Features: Enhances productivity through reusable components and solutions.
API Support: Provides robust support for comprehensive testing scenarios.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlines workflows through automation.
Accelerated Release Cycles: Shortens timeframes with efficient test management.
Improved System Resilience: Enhances software stability and reliability.
Enhanced Test Coverage: Broadens testing scope for better quality assurance.
Continuous Testing Capabilities: Enables seamless integration with CI/CD for ongoing testing efforts.

Organizations use UiPath Test Cloud for regression, automation, and integration testing across platforms. It caters to mobile, web, SAP, Oracle, and .NET technologies. Industries like supply chain, finance, HR, and healthcare rely on it to reduce test cycle times and ensure system stability during upgrades, with integrations available for tools such as Studio and Orchestrator.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Information Not Available

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. UiPath Test Cloud