Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Telerik Test Studio Logo

Telerik Test Studio Reviews

4.0 out of 5

What is Telerik Test Studio?

Featured Telerik Test Studio reviews

Telerik Test Studio mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of Telerik Test Studio in the Functional Testing Tools category stands at 1.7%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Telerik Test Studio1.7%
Tricentis Tosca12.0%
BrowserStack6.8%
Other79.5%
Functional Testing Tools
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 27, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
17%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
10%
University
9%
Marketing Services Firm
5%
Government
5%
Construction Company
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Retailer
4%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
3%
Hospitality Company
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Educational Organization
2%
Insurance Company
2%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Logistics Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Consumer Goods Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
 
Telerik Test Studio Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Manager Project Management at Capgemini4.5Our company uses Telerik Test Studio for performance and automation testing in healthcare products. It's effective but has compatibility issues outside Microsoft Edge, requiring more scripting. Users need technical skills; some prefer Microsoft for familiarity and simpler compliance.
Senior Quality Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees4.0I used Telerik Test Studio for automating UI test cases. It identifies elements well, but the UI is not user-friendly and tests occasionally fail. I find SmartBear TestComplete faster and better in terms of UI and overall features.
Sr Test Lead4.0I used Telerik Test Studio primarily for UI automation and API calls in payroll applications. It was user-friendly for a first-timer like me, though Excel validation posed challenges. The record-and-play feature and PDF validation were particularly valuable.
Senior Software Engineer at Xylem3.5We use this solution for UI/functional test automation. It's stable, scalable, and has good customer service. The object repository is valuable, but I wish it supported multiple file type selections and was less expensive. I rate it 7/10.
System Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees4.0I've used this stable solution for three years. I value its interface, font, and size, and found setup easy. However, I find customization challenging and wish the charts were more detailed. Overall, I recommend it.