Parasoft SOAtest vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

Parasoft and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Parasoft is ranked #15 with an average rating of 8.7, while UiPath is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.0. Parasoft holds a 1.1% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 4.3% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

2,160 Views
475 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 27 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

2,989 Views
2,780 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 28, 2025

Parasoft SOAtest and UiPath Test Cloud are competitors in the testing solutions category. Users generally prefer UiPath Test Cloud for its flexibility and enhanced feature set, despite its higher price.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers comprehensive functionalities for creating and managing testing scenarios, supporting multiple scripting languages and data sources, and enabling virtualization. It specializes in testing REST and SOAP services with easy automation setup. UiPath Test Cloud provides a user-friendly approach, emphasizing rapid implementation across various technologies and enhancing testing efficiency through integration with continuous testing tools.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could benefit from a more user-friendly interface and improved reporting capabilities. Test case management and workspace stability are noted concerns. UiPath Test Cloud could enhance integration complexities and test case management while improving dashboard visibility and third-party tool integration. The tools' handling of complex scenarios also has room for refinement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest operates primarily on-premises, which may restrict flexibility compared to UiPath Test Cloud’s cloud deployment options on public and hybrid clouds. Parasoft’s customer service is rated highly for its knowledgeable support. UiPath Test Cloud offers robust customer support, though some users suggest improvements in technical support precision and availability.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is priced annually and is considered costly, but it offers significant value for specialized API testing solutions. UiPath Test Cloud, despite its higher price, is perceived as providing good value due to its extensive features like document understanding and AI integration, although its licensing style might be complex for smaller companies.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. UiPath Test Cloud

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 879,310 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.7

Parasoft SOAtest enhances API testing efficiency and ROI with minimal coding, despite lacking a comprehensive metrics system.

Sentiment score

7.5

UiPath Test Cloud rapidly deploys tests, reducing development time, workforce needs, and costs while offering high returns.

We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Tasks that previously took four or five minutes can now be completed in 20 to 30 seconds with the help of the tool.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.7

Customer service is excellent, with fast responses and effective problem resolution, despite challenges with complex issues and regional availability.

Sentiment score

7.2

UiPath Test Cloud support is praised for quick, expert assistance, though some mention concerns over its additional cost.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

They get into the meeting, understand the problem, and try to provide a solution quickly.

reviewer2332674

Application Developer & Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Support should be free, especially for product-related issues.

Ishmeet Bindra

Senior RPA Developer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

I would rate UiPath's support neutrally at a five.

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.0

Parasoft SOAtest scales well with proper licensing, though larger tests and memory management need careful planning in CI/CD contexts.

Sentiment score

7.0

UiPath Test Cloud enhances automation scalability, improving efficiency and workflow management despite integration challenges and local script storage needs.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

Proper knowledge of Orchestrator and CI/CD processes makes the product truly scalable.

Ishmeet Bindra

Senior RPA Developer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Scaling with UiPath Test Cloud is supported; they have the infrastructure to scale automation to meet business needs.

reviewer2332674

Application Developer & Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.0

Parasoft SOAtest is generally stable, but memory consumption can cause occasional issues, especially with complex scenarios on low-end systems.

Sentiment score

7.5

UiPath Test Cloud is generally stable with occasional performance issues, earning user ratings between seven and nine out of ten.

In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

UiPath Test Suite has matured over the years and is now quite stable.

Ishmeet Bindra

Senior RPA Developer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

It is performing better than two to three years back; significant improvements have been made for complete project delivery.

reviewer2332674

Application Developer & Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report

Room For Improvement

Parasoft SOAtest needs better reports, interface, performance, integration, automation, documentation, price, startup time, memory use, and user-friendliness.

Enhancements are needed in mobile automation, integration, reporting, compatibility, and cost-effectiveness for improved UiPath Test Cloud workflows.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.

Nghiêm Phương

CEO at SMOne

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

If they could add defect management, it could work independently without needing Jira.

reviewer2332674

Application Developer & Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely.

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

UiPath should introduce compatibility so existing processes in Selenium or other tools can work seamlessly with UiPath Test automation.

Ishmeet Bindra

Senior RPA Developer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers find Parasoft SOAtest expensive but worthwhile due to robust features and scalability, despite complex licensing.

UiPath Test Cloud is seen as valuable yet costly, with prices perceived higher than competitors but justified by features.

Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year.

reviewer2332674

Application Developer & Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The pricing of UiPath tends to be on the higher side, which can restrict smaller companies from adopting it.

Ishmeet Bindra

Senior RPA Developer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report

Valuable Features

Parasoft SOAtest provides rapid functional testing setup, extensive API support, seamless integration, and comprehensive validation tools for scalable end-to-end testing.

UiPath Test Cloud integrates with tools, offers low-code, customized tests, AI features, and saves costs on testing processes.

The advantages include the custom tool and the extension tool where you can write scripts in different languages such as Groovy, Java, and Jython.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool.

Nghiêm Phương

CEO at SMOne

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

The ability of the test suite to automate tests across a wide range of technologies is great since UiPath's background in RPA is specifically designed to automate basically any and all technologies.

Cameron Linares

Senior Manager | Robotics & Data Sciences at Viacom Inc.

Some of the best features I find with UiPath Test Cloud include the creation of end-to-end workflows with API integration.

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

The most valuable feature of UiPath Test Cloud that I have found is the TestManager dashboard, which integrates with Jira through Planview Tasktop.

reviewer2332674

Application Developer & Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

16th

Ranking in API Testing Tools

10th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th)

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

3rd

Ranking in API Testing Tools

5th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (6th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 1.1%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 4.3%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
UiPath Test Cloud	4.3%
Parasoft SOAtest	1.1%
Other	94.6%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions

One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.

Read full review

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration

I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 15% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 14% of the time

Coverity Static vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 7% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 36% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 8% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

December 2025

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

December 2025

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

Test Suite

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. UiPath Test Cloud

December 2025

Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

879,310 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors, best Functional Testing Tools vendors, and best API Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.