Parasoft SOAtest vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

Parasoft and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Parasoft is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.7, while UiPath is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. Parasoft holds a 2.1% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 3.5% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 33 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

4,513 Views
1,444 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Cloud

Read 27 UiPath Test Cloud reviews

4,321 Views
3,543 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

UiPath Test Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 5, 2026

Parasoft SOAtest and UiPath Test Cloud are top players in automated testing. While both are recognized for their robust features, UiPath seems to have an advantage due to its extensive integration capabilities and user feedback on value for investment.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest is known for its ability to rapidly set up functional test scenarios, make tests data-driven, and conduct extensive scripting for validation. Moreover, it excels in service virtualization and end-to-end testing. On the other hand, UiPath Test Cloud stands out with its test manager tools, test robots, and smooth CI/CD pipeline integration, offering wide technology support and adaptability.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance user-friendliness, report descriptions, and integration examples. It also faces sporadic usability issues like GUI limitations. UiPath Test Cloud might benefit from improving its test manager, boosting defect reporting capabilities, and leveraging AI for test case creation. Better integration with existing frameworks and efficient test data management are also desired.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest focuses on on-premises deployment, which grants control, although there are regional support variations. UiPath Test Cloud offers more deployment flexibility with on-premises, private, public, and hybrid cloud options. While its customer service is supportive, it sometimes faces difficulties with advanced troubleshooting compared to Parasoft's detailed technical support.

Pricing and ROI: UiPath Test Cloud’s higher cost is justified by its broad automation capabilities and adaptability, making it worthwhile despite the expense. Parasoft SOAtest, although priced high, offers significant ROI through quick test setup and reduced manual effort, proving valuable for enterprises focused on API testing accuracy. Both are seen as strategic investments that align with organizational goals.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. UiPath Test Cloud

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 893,244 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.7

Parasoft SOAtest enhances API testing efficiency and ROI with minimal coding, despite lacking a comprehensive metrics system.

Sentiment score

7.5

UiPath Test Cloud rapidly deploys tests, reducing development time, workforce needs, and costs while offering high returns.

We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Tasks that previously took four or five minutes can now be completed in 20 to 30 seconds with the help of the tool.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

7.7

Customer service is excellent, with fast responses and effective problem resolution, despite challenges with complex issues and regional availability.

Sentiment score

7.2

UiPath Test Cloud support is praised for quick, expert assistance, though some mention concerns over its additional cost.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

They get into the meeting, understand the problem, and try to provide a solution quickly.

reviewer2332674

Application Developer & Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Support should be free, especially for product-related issues.

Ishmeet Bindra

Senior RPA Developer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

I would rate UiPath's support neutrally at a five.

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.0

Parasoft SOAtest scales well with proper licensing, though larger tests and memory management need careful planning in CI/CD contexts.

Sentiment score

7.0

UiPath Test Cloud enhances automation scalability, improving efficiency and workflow management despite integration challenges and local script storage needs.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

Proper knowledge of Orchestrator and CI/CD processes makes the product truly scalable.

Ishmeet Bindra

Senior RPA Developer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Scaling with UiPath Test Cloud is supported; they have the infrastructure to scale automation to meet business needs.

reviewer2332674

Application Developer & Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.0

Parasoft SOAtest is generally stable, but memory consumption can cause occasional issues, especially with complex scenarios on low-end systems.

Sentiment score

7.5

UiPath Test Cloud is generally stable with occasional performance issues, earning user ratings between seven and nine out of ten.

In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

UiPath Test Suite has matured over the years and is now quite stable.

Ishmeet Bindra

Senior RPA Developer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

It is performing better than two to three years back; significant improvements have been made for complete project delivery.

reviewer2332674

Application Developer & Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report

Room For Improvement

Parasoft SOAtest needs better reports, interface, performance, integration, automation, documentation, price, startup time, memory use, and user-friendliness.

Enhancements are needed in mobile automation, integration, reporting, compatibility, and cost-effectiveness for improved UiPath Test Cloud workflows.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.

Nghiêm Phương

CEO at SMOne

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

If they could add defect management, it could work independently without needing Jira.

reviewer2332674

Application Developer & Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely.

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

UiPath should introduce compatibility so existing processes in Selenium or other tools can work seamlessly with UiPath Test automation.

Ishmeet Bindra

Senior RPA Developer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report

Setup Cost

Enterprise buyers find Parasoft SOAtest expensive but worthwhile due to robust features and scalability, despite complex licensing.

UiPath Test Cloud is seen as valuable yet costly, with prices perceived higher than competitors but justified by features.

Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year.

reviewer2332674

Application Developer & Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

The pricing of UiPath tends to be on the higher side, which can restrict smaller companies from adopting it.

Ishmeet Bindra

Senior RPA Developer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report

Valuable Features

Parasoft SOAtest provides rapid functional testing setup, extensive API support, seamless integration, and comprehensive validation tools for scalable end-to-end testing.

UiPath Test Cloud integrates with tools, offers low-code, customized tests, AI features, and saves costs on testing processes.

The advantages include the custom tool and the extension tool where you can write scripts in different languages such as Groovy, Java, and Jython.

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.

David-Whitehouse

QA Lead at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool.

Nghiêm Phương

CEO at SMOne

For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report

The ability of the test suite to automate tests across a wide range of technologies is great since UiPath's background in RPA is specifically designed to automate basically any and all technologies.

Cameron Linares

Senior Manager | Robotics & Data Sciences at Viacom Inc.

Some of the best features I find with UiPath Test Cloud include the creation of end-to-end workflows with API integration.

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

The most valuable feature of UiPath Test Cloud that I have found is the TestManager dashboard, which integrates with Jira through Planview Tasktop.

reviewer2332674

Application Developer & Senior Analyst at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

14th

Ranking in API Testing Tools

9th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th)

UiPath Test Cloud

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

6th

Ranking in API Testing Tools

7th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Management Tools (3rd), Mobile App Testing Tools (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 2.1%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 3.5%, down from 5.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
UiPath Test Cloud	3.5%
Parasoft SOAtest	2.1%
Other	94.4%

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions

One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.

Read full review

Swapnil-Kulkarni

Senior Solutions Architect at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Integrates well and supports end-to-end workflows with API integration

I deal with various tools including UiPath Test Cloud, Sauce Labs, Postman, and the latest feature, Copilot, so I use everything. A lot of tools are involved. There is a significant difference between Sauce Labs and UiPath Test Cloud; while Sauce Labs offers automation capabilities, the differentiating factor is test coverage. UiPath Test Cloud hits a higher percentage of test cases per lines of code, which means it may cover 7,000 lines in automated tests from 10,000, as opposed to 3,000-4,000 lines with Sauce Labs in a similar scenario. Sauce Labs is less expensive than some of the other tools, and while UiPath Test Cloud has become much better and easier to use than in the past, Sauce Labs was initially user-friendly, but now UiPath Test Cloud has improved significantly from its earlier, more complicated interface.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

University

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

The speed could be improved. I've noticed that adding more users impacts the speed, although nothing stops entirely. The speed for each transaction might be slower, but I cannot pinpoint exactly wh...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for UiPath Test Suite?

My use case for this product is specific to a high-profile project within the life sciences domain, where I am involved in the transportation of critical emergency medications that get prescribed a...

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 7% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 6% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 4% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

LEAPWORK vs UiPath Test Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

April 2026

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Cloud

April 2026

Download UiPath Test Cloud product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

Test Suite

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest is a robust tool for automating test scenarios, supporting a range of interfaces and protocols, making it ideal for comprehensive service testing. Its adaptability in complex environments provides extensive testing capabilities for UI and API automation.

Parasoft SOAtest offers a comprehensive suite of features designed for the efficient setup of functional tests, emphasizing ease in data-driven scenarios and thorough automation. Supporting key protocols like SOAP and REST, alongside UI recording, it integrates seamlessly with Jenkins and GitHub, adding service virtualization for enhanced end-to-end testing. Users benefit from its extensibility through custom scripts, allowing broad API and web service testing. However, there are challenges in user-friendliness, with the graphical interface requiring improvements. Reporting features need enhanced clarity and customization options. Limited cryptography support and documentation necessitate improvement. Performance issues and high pricing are noted drawbacks, but its use in banking and quality enhancement demonstrates significant potential.

What are the key features of Parasoft SOAtest?

Rapid functional test setup: Streamlines the creation of test scenarios efficiently.
Data-driven testing: Enables easy configuration with different datasets.
Extensive automation: Facilitates comprehensive testing for APIs and UIs.
Protocol support: Integrates SOAP, REST, JSON, SAP RFC functionalities.
Service virtualization: Enhances testing across complex system architectures.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Improved testing efficiency: Reduces manual testing efforts significantly.
Enhanced quality assurance: Elevates application reliability and performance.
Integration capabilities: Coordinates well with Jenkins and GitHub for streamlined processes.
Comprehensive testing: Provides thorough coverage for APIs and web services.

Implementing Parasoft SOAtest in industries like banking allows automation of regression tests for web services in SOA architectures, supporting protocols such as ISO 8583. Companies use it to transition from manual testing to automation, integrating JSON and XML, facilitating improved application quality.

Parasoft

UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.

UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?

Reusability: Enhances efficiency by allowing test components to be reutilized across different scenarios.
Low-Code Design: Simplifies test creation, aiding users with limited coding expertise.
Seamless Integration: Connects smoothly with lifecycle tools like Jenkins, improving workflow efficiency.
Test Manager: Offers a consolidated platform for managing and executing tests, simplifying debugging processes.

What benefits or ROI should users expect when evaluating UiPath Test Cloud?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined workflows reduce execution time and enhance efficiency.
Cost Reduction: Low maintenance demands result in decreased operational costs.
Improved System Resilience: Continuous and expanded test coverage improves overall software robustness.
Accelerated Delivery: By reducing release cycle times, businesses can innovate faster with confidence.

In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest vs. UiPath Test Cloud

April 2026

Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. UiPath Test Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors, best Functional Testing Tools vendors, and best API Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.