Parasoft SOAtest and UiPath Test Cloud are both strong contenders in the software testing arena. Parasoft SOAtest holds an advantage with its comprehensive API testing capabilities and protocol support, while UiPath Test Cloud stands out for its seamless automation integrations and flexible functionalities.
Features: Parasoft SOAtest provides robust API testing tools, multiple language support, and extensive data source options. The platform integrates well with continuous testing environments, offering various built-in tools. UiPath Test Cloud employs a simple, low-code automation approach, making it user-friendly for non-technical users. It provides broad support for different lifecycle tools, appealing to a wide range of business needs.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest's interface can be difficult to navigate, and its report generation could be more user-friendly. It may face challenges with certain integrations and handling large datasets. UiPath Test Cloud could enhance its test management features and improve manual testing integration. Users have noted issues with its pricing model and compatibility with some external systems.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest is often deployed on-premises and is known for excellent customer service, although its integration can be complex. UiPath Test Cloud offers versatile deployment in public and hybrid clouds and is recognized for its strong support. However, documentation and complex issue resolution could be improved.
Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is considered expensive due to its comprehensive features, with users recommending a thorough evaluation of its licensing. Despite the costs, it offers high ROI through effective test automation. UiPath Test Cloud is acknowledged for its premium pricing, which may be less accessible for smaller companies. Nonetheless, its extensive automation features are valued for delivering significant operational efficiencies.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
They get into the meeting, understand the problem, and try to provide a solution quickly.
Support should be free, especially for product-related issues.
Scaling with UiPath Test Cloud is supported; they have the infrastructure to scale automation to meet business needs.
Proper knowledge of Orchestrator and CI/CD processes makes the product truly scalable.
It is performing better than two to three years back; significant improvements have been made for complete project delivery.
UiPath Test Suite has matured over the years and is now quite stable.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.
If they could add defect management, it could work independently without needing Jira.
UiPath should introduce compatibility so existing processes in Selenium or other tools can work seamlessly with UiPath Test automation.
There might be better integrations within those test softwares with tools such as Jira and Atlassian, and potentially better test case management.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year.
The pricing of UiPath tends to be on the higher side, which can restrict smaller companies from adopting it.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool.
The ability of the test suite to automate tests across a wide range of technologies is great since UiPath's background in RPA is specifically designed to automate basically any and all technologies.
What I really like about UiPath Test Suite is its ability to ensure that any changes made do not affect other functionalities.
The most valuable feature of UiPath Test Cloud that I have found is the TestManager dashboard, which integrates with Jira through Planview Tasktop.
Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).
SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.
UiPath Test Cloud enhances test automation through agentic testing, integrating AI with human efforts for comprehensive quality assurance. It supports seamless integration with diverse tools, offering easy debugging and reduced maintenance costs with its low-code design and automation capabilities.
UiPath Test Cloud offers a unified platform facilitating automation and regression testing across applications like web frameworks and supply chain systems. Its intuitive interface integrates with tools such as Jenkins, allowing efficient workflows. While tackling mobile and automation challenges, it demands improvements in manual testing options and third-party integrations. Enhancements in file management, AI integration, and reporting are necessary for optimal performance.
What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?In industries like supply chain management and vendor systems, UiPath Test Cloud is implemented to ensure software stability post-updates, assisting in workflows and data handling. It supports communication with vendors while reducing time to market, even amid current challenges in mobile automation and third-party tool integration.
We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
