Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Parasoft SOAtest vs UiPath Test Cloud comparison

Parasoft and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Parasoft is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.5, while UiPath is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.9. Parasoft holds a 0.4% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 5.1% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Parasoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of UiPath users who would recommend it.
Parasoft SOAtest
Read 31 Parasoft SOAtest reviews
  • 315 Views
  • 197 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
UiPath Test Cloud
Read 25 UiPath Test Cloud reviews
  • 2,684 Views
  • 1,598 Comparison Views
88% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 19, 2025

Parasoft SOAtest and UiPath Test Cloud are well-regarded in software testing and automation, with UiPath Test Cloud often seen as more cost-effective and efficient due to its RPA capabilities and integration potential.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers rapid setup for functional test scenarios using WSDL or XSD, a comprehensive toolkit for SOAP, REST, and web service testing, and a data-driven testing approach with broad language support. UiPath Test Cloud provides robust RPA features, broad technology integration, automated regression testing capabilities, and support for continuous integration.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest users point to the need for enhanced reporting, a more user-friendly interface, and improved integration and data handling capabilities. UiPath Test Cloud could improve Test Manager functionality, manual testing integration, and cost management features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest is mainly an on-premises solution with effective technical support, although resolving complex issues can be challenging. UiPath Test Cloud offers flexible deployment, including cloud options, with users appreciating its customer and technical support despite the steep learning curve.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest, though costly, is often justified by its robust features, yielding high ROI; however, users seek flexible pricing models. UiPath Test Cloud, while seen as expensive, is valued for its comprehensive cloud-based features. Users desire a more integrated licensing model to manage costs effectively.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. UiPath Test Cloud Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Parasoft SOAtest vs. UiPath Test Cloud
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 850,236 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.4
Parasoft SOAtest enhances API testing efficiency with minimal coding, offering high ROI and simplified complex test creation.
Sentiment score
8.1
UiPath Test Cloud enhances automation efficiency, reduces costs, speeds implementation, and offers high ROI despite initial expenses.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.8
Customer service is effective and quick, though international communication and complex issues occasionally cause delays.
Sentiment score
8.0
UiPath Test Cloud offers responsive, highly-rated customer support through various channels, ensuring effective issue resolution despite extra costs.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report
They get into the meeting, understand the problem, and try to provide a solution quickly.
Support should be free, especially for product-related issues.
For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Parasoft SOAtest is praised for scalability, but faces challenges with large tests and cloud platforms, requiring careful design.
Sentiment score
7.3
UiPath Test Cloud is scalable, excels in regression testing, praised for low-code features, with challenges in integration and cost.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report
Scaling with UiPath Test Cloud is supported; they have the infrastructure to scale automation to meet business needs.
Proper knowledge of Orchestrator and CI/CD processes makes the product truly scalable.
For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Parasoft SOAtest is generally stable with improved reliability since 9.10, and support effectively resolves occasional performance issues.
Sentiment score
7.9
UiPath Test Cloud is stable, highly rated by users, with minor performance issues attributed to external factors, offering effective automation.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report
It is performing better than two to three years back; significant improvements have been made for complete project delivery.
UiPath Test Suite has matured over the years and is now quite stable.
For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report
 

Room For Improvement

Parasoft SOAtest needs UI enhancements, better reporting, improved integration, and documentation, with issues in memory, robustness, and compatibility.
UiPath Test Cloud requires enhancements in mobile automation, integration, usability, pricing, visualization, AI-driven features, and tool compatibility.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report
If they could add defect management, it could work independently without needing Jira.
UiPath should introduce compatibility so existing processes in Selenium or other tools can work seamlessly with UiPath Test automation.
For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report
DW
reviewer2332674 - PeerSpot reviewer
IB
 

Setup Cost

Parasoft SOAtest is costly but valued for its robust automation and features; organizations should evaluate its suitability.
UiPath Test Cloud offers premium features with rigid, costly licensing, yet remains cost-effective compared to consumption-based options.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report
Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced per year.
The pricing of UiPath tends to be on the higher side, which can restrict smaller companies from adopting it.
For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report
DW
reviewer2332674 - PeerSpot reviewer
IB
 

Valuable Features

Parasoft SOAtest streamlines test scenario setup with powerful tools, enhancing customization, scalability, and automation in testing processes.
UiPath Test Cloud offers seamless integration, streamlines workflows, enhances productivity, and provides cost-efficiency with its intuitive interface and features.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
For more quotes and insights, download the Parasoft SOAtest report
The most valuable feature of UiPath Test Cloud that I have found is the TestManager dashboard, which integrates with Jira through Planview Tasktop.
What I really like about UiPath Test Suite is its ability to ensure that any changes made do not affect other functionalities.
For more quotes and insights, download the UiPath Test Cloud report
DW
reviewer2332674 - PeerSpot reviewer
IB
 

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
19th
Ranking in API Testing Tools
11th
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
19th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
31
Ranking in other categories
Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (27th)
UiPath Test Cloud
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
3rd
Ranking in API Testing Tools
6th
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
25
Ranking in other categories
Test Management Tools (6th), Mobile App Testing Tools (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 0.4%, down from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Cloud is 5.1%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Ajit Kumar Rout - PeerSpot reviewer
Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved
In general, this is a hassle free, user friendly tool and it doesn't require much knowledge if you're using the manual testing. Automated testing is also good but requires some knowledge in that field. It has some great features. It's a good tool compared to some of the other paid tools; input and output can be stored before extension and there is also a verification assessment that can be implemented by using some different methodologies inside the tool. If the licensing cost is suitable then I recommend this solution. If you have automation people with in-depth knowledge in coding that will be helpful. I rate this solution a seven out of 10.
Read full review
Deborah Yarosh - PeerSpot reviewer
Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement
UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment. The QA Manager needs to track which tests have been completed, the success rate, and other relevant information. The ability to have manual tests show up in multiple projects is a requirement that is not easily done in Test Suite. We have submitted the following enhancements request to UiPath and are waiting for them to address these issues before migrating our manual testing to the UiPath Test Suite platform. * Ability to import manual test cases from an Excel Spreadsheet. * Ability to create release folders and have manual tests under the folders (sub-folders are also needed). * Ability to copy tests between projects (manual and automated). * Ability to execute manual test cases in any order and skip tests if needed. * Ability to assign and see who has been assigned to test cases – need to know who created the test case and who executed the test case as they could be different people. * Ability for the QA manager to see which test cases have been run and which haven’t as well as which ones were successful, and which weren’t. * Ability for the QA manager to track defect cycles for a particular release. * Improving Search functionality – must enter the exact test case name in current search functionality. * Ability to extract key data for artifacts for Release Management or Audit* Test Set or Individual Cases, * Include Test Results (passed / failed), * Include how many iterations a test case went through until it passed.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
24%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Computer Software Company
11%
University
5%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?
Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro. The new management does not want subscription tools around, aiming for scripted tests us...
See all answers
What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?
One area that could use improvement is the cryptography capabilities in Parasoft SOAtest. It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our ow...
See all answers
What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?
Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?
I consider it expensive. I would rate it a seven out of ten for pricing. It's priced per license on an annual basis. Our customers usually pay around 30K to 35K for five licenses, which is priced p...
See all answers
What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?
They can improve the dashboard by adding some widgets for reporting. Also, currently, they don't have defect management modules. If they could add defect management, it could work independently wit...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 23% of the time
Postman vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
Postman vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 21% of the time
Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 13% of the time
Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 8% of the time
ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest Logo
ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest
Compared 8% of the time
More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors
Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud Logo
Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Cloud
Compared 44% of the time
OpenText UFT One vs UiPath Test Cloud Logo
OpenText UFT One vs UiPath Test Cloud
Compared 19% of the time
Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud Logo
Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Cloud
Compared 10% of the time
SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud Logo
SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Cloud
Compared 7% of the time
Worksoft Certify vs UiPath Test Cloud Logo
Worksoft Certify vs UiPath Test Cloud
Compared 6% of the time
More UiPath Test Cloud Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Parasoft SOAtest
April 2025
Parasoft SOAtest reportDownload Parasoft SOAtest product report
Buyer's Guide
UiPath Test Cloud
April 2025
UiPath Test Cloud reportDownload UiPath Test Cloud product report
 

Also Known As

SOAtest
Test Suite
 

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

UiPath Test Cloud revolutionizes testing through advanced AI agents, enhancing productivity in software assessment.

UiPath Test Cloud, with its AI-augmented automation, offers testers enterprise-grade capabilities for over 190 technologies. Featuring seamless integration with tools like Orchestrator and CI/CD pipelines, it streamlines testing processes and cuts maintenance costs. While users value its functionalities, the need for enhancements in mobile automation and third-party integration, particularly with Jira, is recognized. Efficient test organization through Test Manager and simplified process management via the cloud are noteworthy. Enhancements in reporting and file management are sought, highlighting areas for development.

What are the key features of UiPath Test Cloud?
  • Drag-and-Drop Programming: Enables easy test creation with minimal technical knowledge.
  • Robust Robotic Functionality: Offers reliable automation across a wide array of technologies.
  • API Integration: Ensures seamless connectivity with existing systems.
  • Detailed Logging: Provides comprehensive logs for better analysis and debugging.
  • Test Manager: Organizes tests efficiently and simplifies management.
What benefits should users evaluate in UiPath Test Cloud?
  • Enhanced Productivity: Accelerates test creation and execution.
  • Cost Efficiency: Reduces manual effort and maintenance expenses.
  • Cross-Platform Support: Offers flexibility in testing across different environments.
  • Improved Quality: Delivers high-quality software with speed and efficiency.

Organizations across industries utilize UiPath Test Cloud for testing types such as origination, smoke, and web application testing. Common implementations include testing in supply chain management, regression testing, and integrating workflows. Teams find it beneficial for ensuring functionality and efficiency in mobile app testing, enabling cross-platform support for RPA and applications like Oracle and SAP.

UiPath
 

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Parasoft SOAtest vs. UiPath Test Cloud
April 2025
Free Report: Parasoft SOAtest vs. UiPath Test Cloud
Find out what your peers are saying about Parasoft SOAtest vs. UiPath Test Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
850,236 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Parasoft SOAtest vs. UiPath Test Cloud report.
See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors, best Functional Testing Tools vendors, and best API Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.