Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Splunk AppDynamics Logo

Top 10 Splunk AppDynamics Alternatives

Vendor: Splunk
4.1 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
Leave a review

Top Splunk AppDynamics Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Splunk AppDynamics based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dynatrace, Datadog, and Zabbix. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Splunk AppDynamics surpasses its competitors by offering real-time performance monitoring, AI-driven insights, and end-to-end transaction visibility, enabling businesses to optimize application performance and enhance user experience effectively.

Splunk Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Splunk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Dynatrace excels in AI-driven problem detection, valuable for cloud environments. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics offers customizable monitoring with transaction insights. Tech buyers may prefer Dynatrace for AI capabilities, while others choose Splunk AppDynamics for detailed application insights.
Download Dynatrace vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Dynatrace has a competitive setup cost with flexible pricing, while Splunk AppDynamics offers a straightforward but potentially higher initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Dynatrace has a competitive setup cost with flexible pricing, while Splunk AppDynamics offers a straightforward but potentially higher initial expense.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers detailed transaction visibility and excels in Java and .NET environments, ideal for enterprises needing deep diagnostic tools. In comparison, Datadog's ease of use and diverse cloud integrations make it a strong choice for organizations seeking a comprehensive and unified monitoring platform.
Download Datadog vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher setup cost compared to Datadog, which offers a more cost-effective implementation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher setup cost compared to Datadog, which offers a more cost-effective implementation process.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in application performance management with features like stack trace visibility and transaction tracking. In comparison, Zabbix offers open-source flexibility and extensive network monitoring, making it suitable for budget-conscious buyers seeking cost-effective infrastructure monitoring solutions.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. Zabbix Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher initial setup fee, whereas Zabbix offers a more economical setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher initial setup fee, whereas Zabbix offers a more economical setup process.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
AppDynamics excels in comprehensive application performance monitoring with robust real-time analytics. In comparison, New Relic offers ease of use and flexible integration. AppDynamics could be ideal for large enterprises, while New Relic might suit those prioritizing affordability and straightforward deployment.
Download New Relic vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers a lower setup cost compared to New Relic, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. Meanwhile, users noted that New Relic's setup involves higher expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers a lower setup cost compared to New Relic, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. Meanwhile, users noted that New Relic's setup involves higher expenses.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Azure Monitor
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Azure Monitor
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers robust monitoring with in-depth code insights and Java application tracking, ideal for complex troubleshooting. In comparison, Azure Monitor provides seamless Azure integration with centralized log and metric analysis, appealing to Azure-focused companies seeking cost-effective, scalable monitoring solutions.
Download Azure Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a moderate setup cost, while Azure Monitor offers a more economical setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a moderate setup cost, while Azure Monitor offers a more economical setup option.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
AppDynamics excels in detailed transaction tracking and anomaly detection, favored for deep insights. In comparison, Grafana stands out for its integration and visualization strengths, appealing for flexibility and customization. Both offer unique advantages, making them suitable for varied technical needs.
Download Grafana vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics often incurs higher setup costs, while Grafana tends to offer more cost-effective initial deployment options. Their setup cost differences highlight the distinct approaches of these platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics often incurs higher setup costs, while Grafana tends to offer more cost-effective initial deployment options. Their setup cost differences highlight the distinct approaches of these platforms.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides deep diagnostics and intuitive dashboards for complex environments, excelling in transactional awareness and JVM memory monitoring. In comparison, Elastic Observability offers flexibility and cost-effectiveness, appealing to those integrating with the Elastic Stack suite for comprehensive logging and integration capabilities.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves initial setup costs that may impact smaller budgets, while Elastic Observability offers a more cost-efficient startup, distinguishing them through their differing financial entry barriers.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves initial setup costs that may impact smaller budgets, while Elastic Observability offers a more cost-efficient startup, distinguishing them through their differing financial entry barriers.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive performance tracking ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Sentry excels in error management and integration. Tech buyers may prefer AppDynamics for robust monitoring features, while Sentry appeals with its ease of integration and cost-effective debugging solutions.
Download Sentry vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics may involve higher setup costs, while Sentry is generally more budget-friendly in initial setup expenses, highlighting a key distinction in pricing approaches between these platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics may involve higher setup costs, while Sentry is generally more budget-friendly in initial setup expenses, highlighting a key distinction in pricing approaches between these platforms.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in application performance monitoring, providing detailed diagnostics and JVM metrics. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor focuses on network performance, offering cost-effective and straightforward licensing, making it ideal for businesses needing flexible network solutions with user-defined sensors and quick deployment.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers more budget-friendly implementation, highlighting a key financial consideration for both solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs compared to PRTG Network Monitor, which offers more budget-friendly implementation, highlighting a key financial consideration for both solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Palantir Foundry
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Palantir Foundry
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers enhanced application performance monitoring with features like stack trace visibility and JVM metrics. In comparison, Palantir Foundry emphasizes data integration and governance, catering to organizations seeking comprehensive real-time analytics and data management capabilities for robust, scalable solutions.
Download Palantir Foundry vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Palantir Foundry, which offers a more economical setup pricing structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Palantir Foundry, which offers a more economical setup pricing structure.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Prometheus Group
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Prometheus Group
4.1 out of 5
AppDynamics offers deep insights into application performance and robust support. In comparison, Prometheus, with its strong flexibility and integration, excels in cost-effectiveness and faster deployment. Both suit different needs: AppDynamics for comprehensive features, Prometheus for budget-friendly, adaptable environments.
Download Prometheus Group vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers competitive setup costs, while Prometheus Group presents a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. These differences highlight distinct pricing structures between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers competitive setup costs, while Prometheus Group presents a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. These differences highlight distinct pricing structures between the two solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
AppDynamics offers broad application insights with features like JVM monitoring. In comparison, AWS X-Ray emphasizes infrastructure monitoring with a strong service map. AppDynamics suits diverse deployments, while AWS X-Ray benefits AWS users with scalable, cost-effective solutions.
Download AWS X-Ray vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics generally has a higher setup cost than AWS X-Ray, highlighting a price-conscious choice for users. AWS X-Ray offers a more cost-effective initial setup, making it a budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics generally has a higher setup cost than AWS X-Ray, highlighting a price-conscious choice for users. AWS X-Ray offers a more cost-effective initial setup, making it a budget-friendly option.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels with detailed insights into application performance, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management provides comprehensive IT management solutions. In comparison, Splunk emphasizes real-time data; ServiceNow focuses on discovery and orchestration. Each appeals to buyers seeking specific operational enhancements.
Download ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs, focusing on offering advanced analytics tools, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management provides a more cost-efficient setup, targeting streamlined operation functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs, focusing on offering advanced analytics tools, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management provides a more cost-efficient setup, targeting streamlined operation functionalities.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
AppDynamics offers deep application performance insights, appealing to those requiring detailed monitoring. In comparison, LogicMonitor focuses on infrastructure monitoring, suited for network and server environments. AppDynamics addresses detailed insights, while LogicMonitor provides cost-effective scalability for infrastructure monitoring needs.
Download LogicMonitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to LogicMonitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to LogicMonitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpsRamp
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpsRamp
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics delivers comprehensive features with advanced stack tracing and performance metrics, ideal for detailed application correlations. In comparison, OpsRamp emphasizes affordability and core capabilities, offering a more cloud-focused approach with cost-effective pricing and potential customization improvements.
Download OpsRamp vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs compared to OpsRamp, which offers a more economical setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs compared to OpsRamp, which offers a more economical setup.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic excels in integration flexibility and infrastructure monitoring. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics is preferred for comprehensive application performance insights. ScienceLogic offers detailed infrastructure insights, while Splunk AppDynamics provides robust application-centric capabilities, each catering to distinct business needs based on integration or application performance.
Download ScienceLogic vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
ScienceLogic offers lower setup costs, providing a budget-friendly option, whereas Splunk AppDynamics tends to be more expensive in setup, indicating a premium pricing approach.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic offers lower setup costs, providing a budget-friendly option, whereas Splunk AppDynamics tends to be more expensive in setup, indicating a premium pricing approach.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers in-depth code-level insights and transaction correlation, making it ideal for detailed application analysis. In comparison, SolarWinds SAM focuses on server and application monitoring, appealing to those prioritizing infrastructure and hardware insights.
Download SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor, which is more affordable and cost-effective.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor, which is more affordable and cost-effective.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers robust application performance monitoring and comprehensive transactional analysis. In comparison, Cisco Intersight excels in integration for data management and hybrid cloud optimization, making it ideal for broader infrastructure environments while Splunk AppDynamics focuses on application-specific needs.
Download Cisco Intersight vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco Intersight, making it more expensive to implement initially, whereas Cisco Intersight offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Cisco Intersight, making it more expensive to implement initially, whereas Cisco Intersight offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in real-time monitoring, transaction tracking, and database monitoring, appealing to tech buyers needing comprehensive analytics and ease of use. In comparison, ITRS Geneos suits financial sectors with real-time capabilities and customization, ideal for industry-specific applications.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves a significant initial cost, whereas ITRS Geneos offers a more moderate setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves a significant initial cost, whereas ITRS Geneos offers a more moderate setup expense.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
BMC TrueSight Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight Operations Management excels with its integrated platform and comprehensive monitoring services appealing to large enterprises. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics provides robust transaction monitoring and baselines, appealing to organizations seeking application performance insights despite its cost and complexity.
Download BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has lower setup costs, offering a cost-effective deployment, while Splunk AppDynamics includes more comprehensive features at a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has lower setup costs, offering a cost-effective deployment, while Splunk AppDynamics includes more comprehensive features at a higher initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Amazon OpenSearch Service
3.6 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in application performance monitoring with insights to enhance app performance. In comparison, Amazon OpenSearch Service offers scalable search and analytics, enhancing data retrieval efficiency. Buyers may choose Splunk for detailed monitoring and OpenSearch for robust search capabilities.
Download Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Amazon OpenSearch Service, which offers a more budget-friendly initial deployment. Splunk may provide advanced features that justify its cost, while Amazon OpenSearch Service is more accessible for users with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to Amazon OpenSearch Service, which offers a more budget-friendly initial deployment. Splunk may provide advanced features that justify its cost, while Amazon OpenSearch Service is more accessible for users with budget constraints.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides extensive features like stack traces and JVM monitoring, aiding in diagnosing code-level issues and transaction tracking. In comparison, Google Cloud's operations suite excels in cloud visibility and seamless Google Cloud integration, benefiting organizations heavily utilizing Google services.
Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics requires initial setup investment, while Google Cloud's operations suite offers more cost-effective setup options. Splunk's higher upfront costs contrast with Google's affordability in setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics requires initial setup investment, while Google Cloud's operations suite offers more cost-effective setup options. Splunk's higher upfront costs contrast with Google's affordability in setup.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides detailed application monitoring and insights into Java and .NET environments. In comparison, IBM SevOne Network Performance Management excels in network data collection with scalability. Splunk AppDynamics offers versatile deployment, while IBM SevOne provides cost-effective scalability and real-time data access.
Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers a straightforward setup cost, whereas IBM SevOne NPM stands out with its premium initial pricing. This distinction highlights the differing entry cost strategies between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers a straightforward setup cost, whereas IBM SevOne NPM stands out with its premium initial pricing. This distinction highlights the differing entry cost strategies between the two solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers detailed stack tracing, transactional tracking, and real-time diagnostics, suitable for pinpointing code-level issues. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations focuses on insightful application performance management with heatmap features, prioritizing resource optimization and troubleshooting efficiency.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report
Splunk AppDynamics tends to have higher setup costs, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers a more budget-friendly option. This contrast highlights the initial investment disparity between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics tends to have higher setup costs, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers a more budget-friendly option. This contrast highlights the initial investment disparity between the two solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Honeycomb.io
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Honeycomb.io
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive application monitoring and extensive integration options, ideal for complex enterprises. In comparison, Honeycomb.io's focus on distributed tracing and real-time event analysis appeals to those valuing granular insights, efficient deployment, and rapid ROI in microservices environments.
Download Honeycomb.io vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher setup cost than Honeycomb.io, which offers a more budget-friendly deployment option. Honeycomb.io provides a cost-effective alternative with pricing that is generally more accessible for smaller operations compared to Splunk AppDynamics.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher setup cost than Honeycomb.io, which offers a more budget-friendly deployment option. Honeycomb.io provides a cost-effective alternative with pricing that is generally more accessible for smaller operations compared to Splunk AppDynamics.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
WhatsUp Gold attracts budget-conscious buyers with its competitive pricing and straightforward deployment. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics offers extensive features and analytics, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive application performance management and is supported by robust customer service for complex implementations.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. WhatsUp Gold Report
WhatsUp Gold offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Splunk AppDynamics involves more complex, higher expense installation, highlighting a contrast in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
WhatsUp Gold offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Splunk AppDynamics involves more complex, higher expense installation, highlighting a contrast in initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Coralogix
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Coralogix
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics delivers extensive application performance monitoring with features like transaction tracking and code-level insights. In comparison, Coralogix excels in log analytics and offers a more cost-effective solution, though with fewer application monitoring features, appealing to budget-conscious buyers.
Download Coralogix vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs, while Coralogix offers a more economical setup option, highlighting a notable difference in initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs, while Coralogix offers a more economical setup option, highlighting a notable difference in initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
BigPanda
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
BigPanda
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in analytics and performance monitoring, ideal for identifying performance hotspots. In comparison, BigPanda integrates multiple monitoring sources, excelling in alert management. Tech buyers may prefer Splunk for deep analytics or choose BigPanda for centralized alert management affordability.
Download BigPanda vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers a high setup cost, while BigPanda presents a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers a high setup cost, while BigPanda presents a more affordable initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Instana Dynamic APM
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers robust diagnostics and transaction tracking for performance insights, appealing to those needing extensive analytics. In comparison, Instana Dynamic APM focuses on ease of use and integration with auto-discovery, preferred for detailed behavior metrics.
Download Instana Dynamic APM vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers a competitive setup cost, whereas Instana Dynamic APM tends to be more costly upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers a competitive setup cost, whereas Instana Dynamic APM tends to be more costly upfront.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance
4.4 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in application-level insights, including stack trace analysis and JVM metrics, perfect for performance debugging. In comparison, Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance emphasizes network diagnostics and load monitoring, appealing to those prioritizing network performance over application monitoring insights.
Download Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves a considerable initial setup cost contrasted with Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance, which requires a minimal setup investment. The differences in setup costs highlight the contrasting pricing strategies of these two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves a considerable initial setup cost contrasted with Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance, which requires a minimal setup investment. The differences in setup costs highlight the contrasting pricing strategies of these two solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenTelemetry
1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenTelemetry
1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers extensive integrations and predictive analytics, making it suitable for enterprises wanting immediate function. In comparison, OpenTelemetry provides open-source flexibility and cost efficiency, appealing to those needing a customizable, vendor-neutral observability solution for diverse environments.
Splunk AppDynamics has a competitive setup cost, while OpenTelemetry offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a competitive setup cost, while OpenTelemetry offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Moogsoft
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Moogsoft
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in automated monitoring and AI analytics, suitable for enterprises seeking comprehensive functionality. In comparison, Moogsoft focuses on noise reduction and cost-effective incident management, appealing to budget-conscious enterprises with its flexible pricing and streamlined integration for AI-based operations.
Download Moogsoft vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics typically has a higher setup cost compared to Moogsoft, making Moogsoft more appealing for those with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically has a higher setup cost compared to Moogsoft, making Moogsoft more appealing for those with budget constraints.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Alluvio Aternity
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Alluvio Aternity
4.2 out of 5
Alluvio Aternity excels in proactive application monitoring and extensive data visibility. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics offers robust business transaction monitoring. A tech buyer might prefer Aternity for desktop health insights, while AppDynamics could be ideal for transaction-heavy environments.
Download Alluvio Aternity vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Alluvio Aternity offers a straightforward setup with predictable costs, whereas Splunk AppDynamics involves more complex setup procedures, potentially affecting cost variance.
View comparison
Pricing
Alluvio Aternity offers a straightforward setup with predictable costs, whereas Splunk AppDynamics involves more complex setup procedures, potentially affecting cost variance.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in comprehensive application performance monitoring and diagnostics. In comparison, Catchpoint focuses on synthetic monitoring and customer service. Splunk AppDynamics offers deployment flexibility, while Catchpoint targets enterprise clients with competitive pricing. Potential users consider cost-effectiveness and specific monitoring needs when choosing.
Download Catchpoint vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has higher setup costs, while Catchpoint offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has higher setup costs, while Catchpoint offers a more budget-friendly initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
eG Enterprise offers comprehensive monitoring with full visibility and proactive diagnostics, excelling in cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics provides deep-dive diagnostics and valuable business insights but is perceived as more costly, with advanced real-time performance monitoring benefits.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. eG Enterprise Report
eG Enterprise has a straightforward setup cost appeal, while Splunk AppDynamics requires a more substantial investment, highlighting their distinct pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
eG Enterprise has a straightforward setup cost appeal, while Splunk AppDynamics requires a more substantial investment, highlighting their distinct pricing strategies.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
FortiMonitor
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
FortiMonitor
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in analytics and application performance, appealing to organizations with complex application environments. In comparison, FortiMonitor's network monitoring and integration capabilities attract those seeking seamless connections in intricate networks, offering efficient and flexible solutions.
Download FortiMonitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs compared to FortiMonitor, which offers a more affordable initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs compared to FortiMonitor, which offers a more affordable initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenText SiteScope
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenText SiteScope
3.9 out of 5
OpenText SiteScope offers flexible, agentless monitoring across environments and excels in multi-platform insights. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics provides advanced application performance monitoring and diagnostics for comprehensive application health views. Buyers may prefer OpenText for pricing and support, while Splunk offers deeper post-setup insights.
Download OpenText SiteScope vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
OpenText SiteScope offers competitive setup costs, whereas Splunk AppDynamics may require a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText SiteScope offers competitive setup costs, whereas Splunk AppDynamics may require a higher initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Zenoss Cloud offers competitive pricing and seamless infrastructure integration, appealing to those seeking efficient monitoring and fast deployment. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics provides advanced analytics and comprehensive performance management, attracting tech buyers needing deeper insights and extensive functionality despite higher costs.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. Zenoss Cloud Report
Zenoss Cloud has a lower setup cost while Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Zenoss Cloud has a lower setup cost while Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management
4.0 out of 5
Broadcom DX excels in in-depth transaction tracing and comprehensive monitoring across various environments. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics provides an exceptional AppMap feature and real-time analysis, offering more versatile cloud deployment, making each ideal for different monitoring needs.
Download Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management has a higher setup cost compared to Splunk AppDynamics. The notable distinction lies in the initial pricing structure, making Splunk AppDynamics potentially more appealing for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management has a higher setup cost compared to Splunk AppDynamics. The notable distinction lies in the initial pricing structure, making Splunk AppDynamics potentially more appealing for budget-conscious users.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ManageEngine Applications Manager
3.8 out of 5
ManageEngine Applications Manager is cost-effective with simple deployment, appealing to budget-conscious IT teams. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics offers advanced features, analytics, and extensive support, attracting those needing deeper insights and functionality despite higher costs and more complex setup.
Download ManageEngine Applications Manager vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
ManageEngine Applications Manager tends to have a lower setup cost, while Splunk AppDynamics is noted for its higher initial investment, highlighting a stark contrast in pricing for these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Applications Manager tends to have a lower setup cost, while Splunk AppDynamics is noted for its higher initial investment, highlighting a stark contrast in pricing for these solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OmniPeek
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OmniPeek
3.9 out of 5
AppDynamics provides end-to-end application performance monitoring, offering comprehensive insights valuable for troubleshooting and optimization. In comparison, OmniPeek excels in real-time network analysis with strong packet capturing capabilities, appealing to buyers prioritizing network diagnostics and analysis.
Download OmniPeek vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers a low setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while OmniPeek comes with a higher setup cost, reflecting its premium features.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers a low setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while OmniPeek comes with a higher setup cost, reflecting its premium features.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in integration and application performance monitoring, offering detailed transaction tracking. In comparison, ExtraHop Reveal(x) delivers real-time network monitoring and advanced traffic analysis, appealing to those needing superior network visibility, fast deployment, and robust threat detection.
Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs, while ExtraHop Reveal(x) often offers a more budget-friendly initial setup for IT Operations.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs, while ExtraHop Reveal(x) often offers a more budget-friendly initial setup for IT Operations.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
SolarWinds AppOptics
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in code-level diagnostics and APM features, ideal for enterprises needing detailed transaction tracking. In comparison, SolarWinds AppOptics emphasizes network visibility and ease of use, appealing to organizations seeking quick server insights and a cost-effective performance monitoring solution.
Download SolarWinds AppOptics vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs, while SolarWinds AppOptics offers a more affordable entry point.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs, while SolarWinds AppOptics offers a more affordable entry point.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Apache SkyWalking
1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers advanced analytics and extensive monitoring features, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive insights. In comparison, Apache SkyWalking's lightweight architecture and open-source flexibility make it attractive to organizations prioritizing cost efficiency in large-scale, cloud-native environments.
Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher setup cost, which contrasts with the more budget-friendly initial investment required for Apache SkyWalking.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher setup cost, which contrasts with the more budget-friendly initial investment required for Apache SkyWalking.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Alluvio AppResponse
4.3 out of 5
Alluvio AppResponse attracts those valuing network traffic analysis with simpler deployment and support. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics appeals through its advanced anomaly detection and broader application management. Buyers may favor Alluvio for cost-effectiveness or Splunk for comprehensive monitoring despite higher costs.
Download Alluvio AppResponse vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Alluvio AppResponse offers competitive setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious businesses, while Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher initial investment, highlighting their focus on comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Alluvio AppResponse offers competitive setup costs, appealing to budget-conscious businesses, while Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher initial investment, highlighting their focus on comprehensive features.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Apica
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Apica
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics is ideal for real-time transaction tracking and performance analytics, appealing to those needing automatic baselining and business transaction monitoring. In comparison, Apica's strength lies in its user interaction simulation and flexible integration, offering cost-effective monitoring with comprehensive alert frameworks.
Download Apica vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics incurs a significant initial investment for setup, whereas Apica offers a lower startup cost. These differing pricing structures highlight contrasting strategies for customer acquisition and resource allocation.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics incurs a significant initial investment for setup, whereas Apica offers a lower startup cost. These differing pricing structures highlight contrasting strategies for customer acquisition and resource allocation.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Stackify
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Stackify
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in analytical capabilities and complex enterprise integration. In comparison, Stackify offers ease of use and deployment flexibility. Splunk AppDynamics is ideal for data-driven environments, while Stackify appeals to budget-conscious buyers needing straightforward, cost-effective solutions.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. Stackify Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers a more complex setup process, while Stackify tends to have a more straightforward setup cost and process, highlighting a significant difference in initial deployment approaches between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers a more complex setup process, while Stackify tends to have a more straightforward setup cost and process, highlighting a significant difference in initial deployment approaches between the two solutions.

Related categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
IT Operations Analytics