Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Splunk AppDynamics Logo

Top 10 Splunk AppDynamics Alternatives

Vendor: Splunk
4.1 out of 5
Badge Leader
6,300 followers
Start review

Top Splunk AppDynamics Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Splunk AppDynamics based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Dynatrace, Datadog, and Zabbix. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Splunk AppDynamics surpasses its competitors by offering real-time monitoring, advanced data analytics, and comprehensive insights, enabling businesses to optimize performance, enhance user experiences, and ensure seamless operations across complex IT landscapes.

Splunk Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Splunk, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Dynatrace
4.4 out of 5
Dynatrace offers user-friendly deployment with AI-driven analytics and efficient customer service, making it ideal for swift integration and insights. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics provides in-depth diagnostics and code-level visibility, appealing to those needing comprehensive application performance monitoring despite higher costs.
Download Dynatrace vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Dynatrace offers an efficient setup process with competitive initial costs, while Splunk AppDynamics may require a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Dynatrace offers an efficient setup process with competitive initial costs, while Splunk AppDynamics may require a higher initial investment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides deep application monitoring and business insights, ideal for enterprises seeking detailed analytics. In comparison, Datadog offers extensive integration and a unified monitoring interface, appealing to businesses favoring ease of use and comprehensive platform coverage across services and applications.
Download Datadog vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs compared to Datadog, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, making Datadog an attractive choice for cost-conscious businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs compared to Datadog, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, making Datadog an attractive choice for cost-conscious businesses.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers advanced performance management features appealing to enterprises needing detailed analytics. In comparison, Zabbix's open-source flexibility attracts budget-conscious organizations emphasizing network monitoring and customization.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. Zabbix Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher initial setup cost, while Zabbix offers a more cost-effective installation option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher initial setup cost, while Zabbix offers a more cost-effective installation option.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics specializes in diagnostics, tracking, and monitoring, excelling in code-level insights, while New Relic focuses on reliable server management and seamless system integration. In comparison, AppDynamics faces setup complexities, whereas New Relic's challenges lie in its pricing models and data privacy concerns.
Download New Relic vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers a lower setup cost compared to New Relic's higher initial investment, highlighting a key difference in pricing strategy for businesses considering these monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers a lower setup cost compared to New Relic's higher initial investment, highlighting a key difference in pricing strategy for businesses considering these monitoring solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
AppDynamics excels at in-depth application performance insights, ideal for proactive risk management. In comparison, Azure Monitor's strength lies in real-time surveillance with seamless Azure integration. Tech buyers benefit from AppDynamics' depth or Azure Monitor's cost-effectiveness and integration flexibility.
Download Azure Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs, whereas Azure Monitor offers a more cost-effective implementation, making Azure Monitor a budget-friendly option compared to Splunk AppDynamics.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves higher setup costs, whereas Azure Monitor offers a more cost-effective implementation, making Azure Monitor a budget-friendly option compared to Splunk AppDynamics.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Grafana
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides comprehensive monitoring and proactive alerting for complex environments. In comparison, Grafana's strength lies in its open-source model and versatile visualization capabilities. A tech buyer may choose AppDynamics for performance insights, while Grafana appeals to those prioritizing cost efficiency.
Download Grafana vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs, while Grafana offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for organizations with limited budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs, while Grafana offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a cost-effective advantage for organizations with limited budgets.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides robust transaction tracking and JVM performance monitoring, capturing deep business insights for effective debugging. In comparison, Elastic Observability excels in integration capabilities and real-time transaction views but lacks some advanced APM features that AppDynamics offers.
Download Elastic Observability vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics features a substantial upfront setup cost, while Elastic Observability offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, highlighting a clear difference in initial financial outlay between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics features a substantial upfront setup cost, while Elastic Observability offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, highlighting a clear difference in initial financial outlay between the two solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Sentry
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers extensive monitoring capabilities, tracking transactions and performance, while providing JVM and hardware monitoring. In comparison, Sentry excels in error tracking and integrations, focusing on performance metrics and error logs. Splunk benefits businesses needing method-level insights, whereas Sentry suits projects seeking cost-effective error tracking.
Download Sentry vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost, focusing on comprehensive features, while Sentry offers a more cost-effective setup without compromising essential functionality, highlighting the significant difference in initial financial investment required for these platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost, focusing on comprehensive features, while Sentry offers a more cost-effective setup without compromising essential functionality, highlighting the significant difference in initial financial investment required for these platforms.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides robust application performance management with deep insights into complex environments. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor delivers rapid deployment and scalability in network monitoring. Tech buyers might choose AppDynamics for comprehensive analytics or PRTG for effective infrastructure monitoring.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more economical setup, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more economical setup, highlighting a significant cost difference between the two solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Palantir Foundry
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Palantir Foundry
3.8 out of 5
AppDynamics provides detailed application performance insights, focusing on diagnostics and transaction tracking. In comparison, Palantir Foundry offers strong data management and integration capabilities. Tech buyers may choose AppDynamics for deep performance monitoring or Palantir Foundry for comprehensive data handling and visualization.
Download Palantir Foundry vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics often includes a complex setup cost, while Palantir Foundry is known for its high initial investment. The key distinction is Splunk's detailed configuration requirements compared to Palantir's substantial financial commitment upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics often includes a complex setup cost, while Palantir Foundry is known for its high initial investment. The key distinction is Splunk's detailed configuration requirements compared to Palantir's substantial financial commitment upfront.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Prometheus Group
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Prometheus Group
4.1 out of 5
AppDynamics offers robust application performance insights, ideal for detailed troubleshooting. In comparison, Prometheus excels in cost-effective metric collection, particularly for Kubernetes environments. AppDynamics appeals to enterprises with comprehensive support, while Prometheus attracts cost-conscious buyers seeking flexible open-source monitoring.
Download Prometheus Group vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics incurs higher setup costs compared to Prometheus Group, making it a less budget-friendly option.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics incurs higher setup costs compared to Prometheus Group, making it a less budget-friendly option.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
AWS X-Ray
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics delivers extensive insights suitable for enterprises seeking robust monitoring capabilities and detailed analytics. In comparison, AWS X-Ray offers cost-effective deployment with strong AWS integration, appealing to businesses prioritizing efficiency and affordability in distributed application monitoring.
Download AWS X-Ray vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers competitive setup costs, contrasting sharply with the more budget-friendly setup of AWS X-Ray.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers competitive setup costs, contrasting sharply with the more budget-friendly setup of AWS X-Ray.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
AppDynamics excels in stack trace visibility and transaction tracking, aiding performance optimization. In comparison, ServiceNow IT Operations Management prioritizes integration and orchestration, enhancing IT ecosystem efficiency. AppDynamics focuses on detailed application monitoring, while ServiceNow offers comprehensive service mapping and automation for enterprise management.
Download ServiceNow IT Operations Management vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk offers a high initial setup cost, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management provides a more cost-effective setup. This significant difference impacts the overall affordability and budgeting considerations for organizations choosing between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk offers a high initial setup cost, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management provides a more cost-effective setup. This significant difference impacts the overall affordability and budgeting considerations for organizations choosing between the two solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive monitoring with detailed insights into application performance. In comparison, LogicMonitor is recognized for its ease of use and customizable dashboards, providing a user-friendly interface. Splunk AppDynamics is costly, while LogicMonitor is considered affordable and cost-effective.
Download LogicMonitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has higher setup costs compared to LogicMonitor, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has higher setup costs compared to LogicMonitor, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides detailed diagnostics and real-time performance analytics, ideal for high-scale operations. In comparison, SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor is known for server and infrastructure monitoring with competitive pricing, appealing to midsize enterprises seeking straightforward initial setups.
Download SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has higher setup costs, while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor offers a more affordable setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has higher setup costs, while SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor offers a more affordable setup.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic offers a customizable multi-tenant platform with strong AWS integration and automation efficiencies. In comparison, AppDynamics focuses on detailed transaction monitoring and real-time performance insights, appealing for complex issues. ScienceLogic is noted for flexible pricing, while AppDynamics delivers significant value despite higher costs.
Download ScienceLogic vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
ScienceLogic's setup cost offers a competitive price point, while Splunk AppDynamics tends to have a higher initial investment. Pricing differences stem from varying features and capabilities offered by each platform during implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic's setup cost offers a competitive price point, while Splunk AppDynamics tends to have a higher initial investment. Pricing differences stem from varying features and capabilities offered by each platform during implementation.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpsRamp
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpsRamp
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides extensive application monitoring, making it suitable for complex environments needing deep insights. In comparison, OpsRamp focuses on cloud management, offering cost-effective solutions for smaller to mid-sized organizations prioritizing affordability over detailed application performance monitoring.
Download OpsRamp vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics typically incurs higher setup costs, whereas OpsRamp offers a more economical setup. The cost disparity highlights the affordability advantage of OpsRamp compared to the potentially greater initial investment required for Splunk AppDynamics.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically incurs higher setup costs, whereas OpsRamp offers a more economical setup. The cost disparity highlights the affordability advantage of OpsRamp compared to the potentially greater initial investment required for Splunk AppDynamics.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in comprehensive monitoring with detailed diagnostics and business transaction tracking, making it ideal for application performance enhancements. In comparison, Cisco Intersight excels in integrating with data center components, offering competitive pricing for robust hybrid cloud and infrastructure management.
Download Cisco Intersight vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics requires significant initial setup costs, while Cisco Intersight offers a more streamlined setup process with lower upfront fees, highlighting differences in initial investment for users.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics requires significant initial setup costs, while Cisco Intersight offers a more streamlined setup process with lower upfront fees, highlighting differences in initial investment for users.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers versatile monitoring with stack trace and JVM features, ideal for diverse application layers. In comparison, ITRS Geneos excels in real-time monitoring, specifically tailored for financial services, providing customizable dashboards and robust system integration.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics features a straightforward setup process with minimal cost, while ITRS Geneos offers a more complex setup, leading to higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics features a straightforward setup process with minimal cost, while ITRS Geneos offers a more complex setup, leading to higher initial expenses.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
BMC TrueSight Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight Operations Management provides integrated monitoring and robust event management across diverse assets. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics excels in application performance monitoring with detailed transactional insights and superior analytics. BMC simplifies resource management, while AppDynamics offers advanced performance analytics with cloud flexibility.
Download BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
BMC TrueSight Operations Management typically involves higher setup costs, whereas Splunk AppDynamics offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. BMC TrueSight provides robust features justifying its cost, whereas Splunk AppDynamics presents a compelling option for cost-conscious ...
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight Operations Management typically involves higher setup costs, whereas Splunk AppDynamics offers a more budget-friendly initial investment. BMC TrueSight provides robust features justifying its cost, whereas Splunk AppDynamics presents a compelling option for cost-conscious ...
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in detailed application performance monitoring with stack traces and JVM metrics. In comparison, Google Cloud's operations suite offers integrated cloud service monitoring and logging. AppDynamics provides granular insights, whereas Google Cloud excels in seamless ecosystem integration at a typically lower cost.
Download Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs, whereas Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting distinct pricing approaches.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves higher setup costs, whereas Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting distinct pricing approaches.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Honeycomb.io
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Honeycomb.io
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive application monitoring and extensive integration options, ideal for complex enterprises. In comparison, Honeycomb.io's focus on distributed tracing and real-time event analysis appeals to those valuing granular insights, efficient deployment, and rapid ROI in microservices environments.
Download Honeycomb.io vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher setup cost than Honeycomb.io, which offers a more budget-friendly deployment option. Honeycomb.io provides a cost-effective alternative with pricing that is generally more accessible for smaller operations compared to Splunk AppDynamics.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher setup cost than Honeycomb.io, which offers a more budget-friendly deployment option. Honeycomb.io provides a cost-effective alternative with pricing that is generally more accessible for smaller operations compared to Splunk AppDynamics.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in application performance monitoring, ideal for businesses needing transaction diagnostics and real-time alerts. In comparison, IBM SevOne NPM focuses on network metrics, offering integration with multiple devices, suitable for users prioritizing network visibility and flexible cost management.
Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a straightforward setup cost, whereas IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) offers flexible pricing options.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a straightforward setup cost, whereas IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) offers flexible pricing options.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
4.0 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics is favored for comprehensive monitoring and ease of diagnosis from code-level to business transactions. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations excels in stack visibility and cloud integration, offering benefits for environments leveraging VMware’s ecosystem, despite its setup complexity and cost considerations.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report
Splunk AppDynamics presents a relatively moderate setup cost with broad analytic capabilities, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers a higher initial expense with robust management features, making the pricing structure a key differentiator.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics presents a relatively moderate setup cost with broad analytic capabilities, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers a higher initial expense with robust management features, making the pricing structure a key differentiator.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
WhatsUp Gold attracts budget-conscious buyers with its straightforward deployment and customer support, emphasizing simplicity in network monitoring. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics justifies its higher cost with advanced features and complex configurations, appealing to those seeking in-depth application performance insights.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. WhatsUp Gold Report
WhatsUp Gold requires a lower initial setup cost, whereas Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher investment for setup.
View comparison
Pricing
WhatsUp Gold requires a lower initial setup cost, whereas Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher investment for setup.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Amazon OpenSearch Service
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in analytics and monitoring, offering robust performance management with notable customer support. In comparison, Amazon OpenSearch Service provides scalable solutions and seamless AWS integration, appealing to those valuing extensive features and data visualization aligned with AWS infrastructure.
Download Amazon OpenSearch Service vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics requires a significant initial investment for setup, while Amazon OpenSearch Service offers a more cost-effective setup process. These distinct approaches to setup cost may influence organizations based on their budgetary constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics requires a significant initial investment for setup, while Amazon OpenSearch Service offers a more cost-effective setup process. These distinct approaches to setup cost may influence organizations based on their budgetary constraints.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
BigPanda
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
BigPanda
3.8 out of 5
AppDynamics excels in application insights, offering strong performance monitoring, while BigPanda focuses on efficient incident management. In comparison, BigPanda provides competitive pricing with alert correlation, whereas AppDynamics offers robust diagnostics despite complex licensing. Each suits different tech buyer needs.
Download BigPanda vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher initial investment for setup, while BigPanda offers a more budget-friendly setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics requires a higher initial investment for setup, while BigPanda offers a more budget-friendly setup cost.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Coralogix
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Coralogix
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in comprehensive APM capabilities, appealing to enterprises needing deep visibility. In comparison, Coralogix focuses on cost-effective log management with AI insights, attracting businesses seeking efficient deployment and streamlined analysis for enhanced operational efficiency.
Download Coralogix vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics requires a significant setup cost, whereas Coralogix offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, highlighting a key pricing difference.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics requires a significant setup cost, whereas Coralogix offers a more budget-friendly initial setup, highlighting a key pricing difference.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Instana Dynamic APM
3.8 out of 5
AppDynamics emphasizes transaction tracking and monitoring, beneficial for comprehensive application insights. In comparison, Instana highlights real-time updates and user-friendly interfaces, appealing for simplicity. AppDynamics faces pricing and UI complexity, while Instana presents budget-friendly options with straightforward deployment.
Download Instana Dynamic APM vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics presents a moderate setup cost, suitable for varied business sizes, while Instana Dynamic APM offers a streamlined setup often preferred for enterprises seeking rapid implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics presents a moderate setup cost, suitable for varied business sizes, while Instana Dynamic APM offers a streamlined setup often preferred for enterprises seeking rapid implementation.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance
4.4 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers detailed application insights and flexible deployment options, appealing to buyers needing comprehensive monitoring. In comparison, Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance focuses on network reliability and cost-effectiveness, ideal for those prioritizing connectivity assurance and moderate pricing in their technology investment.
Download Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics setup cost is generally competitive with transparent options, while Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance often features lower initial setup fees with a focus on cost-efficiency.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics setup cost is generally competitive with transparent options, while Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance often features lower initial setup fees with a focus on cost-efficiency.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Moogsoft
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Moogsoft
3.8 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in transaction monitoring and performance insights, ideal for complex setups. In comparison, Moogsoft integrates efficiently, focusing on event correlation and AI-driven noise reduction, appealing to those seeking operational insights with a more straightforward pricing approach.
Download Moogsoft vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics incurs higher initial setup costs, while Moogsoft offers a more budget-friendly option. Users report that Splunk AppDynamics delivers a comprehensive setup, contrasting with Moogsoft's quicker, cost-effective deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics incurs higher initial setup costs, while Moogsoft offers a more budget-friendly option. Users report that Splunk AppDynamics delivers a comprehensive setup, contrasting with Moogsoft's quicker, cost-effective deployment.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Alluvio Aternity
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Alluvio Aternity
4.2 out of 5
Alluvio Aternity excels in user-level data correlation and granularity. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics differentiates complex transactions effectively. Aternity's competitive pricing appeals to cost-conscious buyers, while AppDynamics suits enterprises seeking in-depth transaction insights at a higher investment level.
Download Alluvio Aternity vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Alluvio Aternity offers competitive setup costs compared to Splunk AppDynamics, which has higher initial charges. While Alluvio provides more cost-effective entry, Splunk offers expanded capabilities with its premium pricing model.
View comparison
Pricing
Alluvio Aternity offers competitive setup costs compared to Splunk AppDynamics, which has higher initial charges. While Alluvio provides more cost-effective entry, Splunk offers expanded capabilities with its premium pricing model.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenTelemetry
1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenTelemetry
1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers advanced performance insights and strong customer support, appealing to those seeking extensive analytics and personalized assistance. In comparison, OpenTelemetry provides flexibility and cost-effectiveness, attracting developers with its open-source integration and community-focused resources.
Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher initial setup cost, while OpenTelemetry offers a lower cost option, highlighting a budget-friendly alternative for implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher initial setup cost, while OpenTelemetry offers a lower cost option, highlighting a budget-friendly alternative for implementation.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.4 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
LiveAction LiveNX
3.4 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers detailed application-level insights with monitoring features like stack trace visibility and transaction tracking, appealing for comprehensive performance analysis. In comparison, LiveAction LiveNX emphasizes network optimization with real-time monitoring and visual analytics for network-focused insights and performance improvements.
Download LiveAction LiveNX vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves a higher initial setup cost, while LiveAction LiveNX offers a more economical setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically involves a higher initial setup cost, while LiveAction LiveNX offers a more economical setup.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
vRealize Network Insight
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics excels in application performance insights with advanced monitoring, appealing to those focusing on application performance metrics. In comparison, vRealize Network Insight's strength lies in network flow analytics, ideal for evaluating and optimizing network infrastructures and planning firewall rules effectively.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. vRealize Network Insight Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to vRealize Network Insight.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost compared to vRealize Network Insight.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Catchpoint excels in synthetic monitoring with global tracking capabilities. In comparison, AppDynamics offers deep application tracking with minimal overhead. Catchpoint's deployment focuses on public cloud while AppDynamics supports diverse environments. Catchpoint's pricing clarity contrasts with AppDynamics' feature-rich, higher-priced offerings promising strong ROI.
Download Catchpoint vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics setup cost is viewed as substantial, while Catchpoint is noted for its more manageable setup cost. These differences highlight the varying budget implications between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics setup cost is viewed as substantial, while Catchpoint is noted for its more manageable setup cost. These differences highlight the varying budget implications between the two solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
eG Enterprise excels in end-to-end monitoring across the OSI model with features like auto-configuration, ideal for Citrix environments. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics offers strong application performance monitoring with advanced transaction tracking, preferred for those needing deeper analytics and performance optimization.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. eG Enterprise Report
eG Enterprise often receives positive feedback for its low setup costs, while Splunk AppDynamics is frequently noted for higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
eG Enterprise often receives positive feedback for its low setup costs, while Splunk AppDynamics is frequently noted for higher initial expenses.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
FortiMonitor
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
FortiMonitor
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics offers powerful application performance monitoring and cloud integration, appealing to businesses needing deep IT insights. In comparison, FortiMonitor emphasizes comprehensive network monitoring with strong security, attracting organizations focused on efficient network infrastructure management.
Download FortiMonitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics offers competitive setup costs, whereas FortiMonitor provides a more economical initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in the upfront pricing models between these monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics offers competitive setup costs, whereas FortiMonitor provides a more economical initial investment, highlighting a significant difference in the upfront pricing models between these monitoring solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenText SiteScope
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OpenText SiteScope
3.9 out of 5
OpenText SiteScope emphasizes agentless monitoring and affordability, appealing to those focusing on infrastructure needs. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics targets advanced application performance management, attracting buyers prioritizing deep analytics and seamless DevOps integration despite higher costs.
Download OpenText SiteScope vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
OpenText SiteScope has a straightforward setup cost, while Splunk AppDynamics may involve higher initial expenses. Differences in pricing highlight distinct approaches to cost management in these solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText SiteScope has a straightforward setup cost, while Splunk AppDynamics may involve higher initial expenses. Differences in pricing highlight distinct approaches to cost management in these solutions.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ManageEngine Applications Manager
3.8 out of 5
ManageEngine Applications Manager appeals with affordability and ease of deployment, offering essential performance monitoring. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics attracts tech buyers with extensive features and advanced analytics, despite a higher cost and complex deployment, justified by significant ROI through comprehensive monitoring capabilities.
Download ManageEngine Applications Manager vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers a cost-effective setup compared to Splunk AppDynamics, which tends to have a higher upfront expense. Splunk AppDynamics invests more in advanced features, impacting its initial cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers a cost-effective setup compared to Splunk AppDynamics, which tends to have a higher upfront expense. Splunk AppDynamics invests more in advanced features, impacting its initial cost structure.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management
4.0 out of 5
Broadcom DX excels in customization, integration, and comprehensive Java and .NET monitoring, appealing to users seeking detailed transaction tracing. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics offers deep analysis, robust flow visualizations, and intuitive configuration, making it ideal for diverse technology monitoring and user interaction insights.
Download Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk AppDynamics, which is notable for those prioritizing out-of-the-box cost-effectiveness during implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Broadcom DX Application Performance Management has a lower setup cost compared to Splunk AppDynamics, which is notable for those prioritizing out-of-the-box cost-effectiveness during implementation.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Zenoss Cloud emphasizes cost-effectiveness with strong infrastructure management and real-time analytics, appealing to those seeking easy integration. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics provides advanced application monitoring and AI insights, attracting tech buyers valuing comprehensive features despite higher initial investment.
Download Splunk AppDynamics vs. Zenoss Cloud Report
Zenoss Cloud offers a cost-effective setup with minimal initial expenses, while Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher initial investment for advanced features, highlighting a key difference in their pricing approaches.
View comparison
Pricing
Zenoss Cloud offers a cost-effective setup with minimal initial expenses, while Splunk AppDynamics involves a higher initial investment for advanced features, highlighting a key difference in their pricing approaches.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OmniPeek
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
OmniPeek
3.9 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics appeals to businesses needing comprehensive analytics and visualizations for diverse IT environments. In comparison, OmniPeek is ideal for those seeking detailed network packet analysis. AppDynamics suits broader IT monitoring, while OmniPeek targets specific network diagnostics with economical pricing.
Download OmniPeek vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a lower setup cost, while OmniPeek requires a higher initial investment. This price difference makes Splunk AppDynamics more accessible for budget-conscious users compared to OmniPeek.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a lower setup cost, while OmniPeek requires a higher initial investment. This price difference makes Splunk AppDynamics more accessible for budget-conscious users compared to OmniPeek.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations
4.3 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides excellent application performance monitoring and deep-dive analytics, ideal for detailed insights. In comparison, ExtraHop Reveal(x) delivers robust real-time network intelligence and security analytics, appealing to organizations prioritizing immediate insights and enhanced security capabilities.
Download ExtraHop Reveal(x) for IT Operations vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics often involves higher setup costs compared to ExtraHop Reveal(x), which is noted for its cost-effective deployment in IT Operations.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics often involves higher setup costs compared to ExtraHop Reveal(x), which is noted for its cost-effective deployment in IT Operations.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
SolarWinds AppOptics
3.9 out of 5
SolarWinds AppOptics offers centralized visibility and traditional monitoring, making it ideal for simpler network environments. In comparison, AppDynamics excels in complex environments with advanced transaction tracking and deep dive capabilities, appealing to buyers who need in-depth application performance analysis and troubleshooting.
Download SolarWinds AppOptics vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a significant initial setup cost, while SolarWinds AppOptics offers a more budget-friendly pricing model contrasted by its simpler installation process.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a significant initial setup cost, while SolarWinds AppOptics offers a more budget-friendly pricing model contrasted by its simpler installation process.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Apache SkyWalking
1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides advanced analytics and real-time monitoring, appealing to enterprises needing comprehensive support and integration. In comparison, Apache SkyWalking offers cost-effective, flexible deployment through its open-source model, attracting those valuing customization and budget-friendly solutions over structured services.
Splunk AppDynamics typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Apache SkyWalking, which is often seen as more budget-friendly due to its open-source nature.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Apache SkyWalking, which is often seen as more budget-friendly due to its open-source nature.
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Alluvio AppResponse
4.3 out of 5
Alluvio AppResponse offers cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment, with strengths in network diagnostics. In comparison, Splunk AppDynamics, favored for its extensive features in application insights, provides a comprehensive monitoring solution despite a more complex setup and higher price point.
Download Alluvio AppResponse vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Alluvio AppResponse's setup cost is competitive with streamlined integration, whereas Splunk AppDynamics presents a more robust setup process often leading to higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Alluvio AppResponse's setup cost is competitive with streamlined integration, whereas Splunk AppDynamics presents a more robust setup process often leading to higher initial expenses.

Related categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
IT Operations Analytics