Control-M excels in automation and scheduling for complex workflows, offering operational efficiency and quick deployment. In comparison, Camunda provides extensive customization and integration through its flexible, open architecture, making it ideal for those valuing feature richness and developer-friendly tools.
Microsoft Configuration Manager helps IT manage PCs and servers, keeping software up-to-date, setting configuration and security policies, and monitoring system status while giving employees access to corporate applications on the devices that they choose. When Configuration Manager is integrated with Microsoft Intune, you can manage corporate-connected PCs and Macs along with cloud-based mobile devices running Windows, iOS, and Android, all from a single management console.
Overall, I think it's fine. It's pretty much in-line because there are ways to offset it with the Office 365 licensing.
The licensing is good because they have various options, depending on what you are looking for.
Overall, I think it's fine. It's pretty much in-line because there are ways to offset it with the Office 365 licensing.
The licensing is good because they have various options, depending on what you are looking for.
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform is a powerful network automation solution that allows organizations to handle every aspect of their application launch process within a single product. It enables users to share their automations so that teams within an organization can collaborate on various projects with ease. Ansible Automation Platform is designed to be used by all employees involved in the network automation process.
The cost is high, but it still works well.
We went with product because we have a subscription for Red Hat.
The cost is high, but it still works well.
We went with product because we have a subscription for Red Hat.
Appian excels with its low-code development, rapid deployment, and easy integration, appealing to users needing quick and simple automation. In comparison, Control-M boasts a rich feature set, comprehensive workload automation, and advanced scheduling for enterprises with complex automation requirements.
Pega BPM excels in process automation with its flexible workflow and case management, ideal for tailored solutions. In comparison, Control-M offers robust job scheduling and workload automation for complex IT environments. A tech buyer might choose Pega BPM for customization and cost-efficiency; conversely, Control-M for enterprise-level automation.
Control-M excels in scheduling and batch processing, providing efficient automation and system integration. In comparison, Mule Anypoint Platform offers superior API-led connectivity and a comprehensive integration toolkit, facilitating seamless data flow between applications. Each solution presents unique advantages depending on specific business needs.
Control-M excels in job scheduling, workload automation, and monitoring, making it ideal for operational flexibility. In comparison, IBM BPM shines in process modeling, automation, and integration, perfect for optimizing complex workflows. Each offers unique advantages catering to different business needs.
Control-M is known for its comprehensive scheduling capabilities, integration with multiple platforms, and real-time monitoring. In comparison, AutoSys Workload Automation offers robust job scheduling, efficient workload processing, and highly customizable job definitions, making it ideal for complex requirements.
A tech buyer might choose Control-M for its comprehensive workload automation capabilities and robust scheduling features. In comparison, SnapLogic is ideal for its powerful data integration capabilities and user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, making it superior for integration-centric use cases.
Comparison of IBM Workload Automation and Control-M
IBM Workload Automation offers predictive analytics and robust scheduling capabilities, making it ideal for cost-conscious buyers. In comparison, Control-M provides extensive integration options and superior job monitoring features, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive functionality and reliability. Both differ in setup complexity and cloud support.
Control-M offers comprehensive features and easy integration capabilities for complex workflows. In comparison, IBM Sterling File Gateway provides robust security and scalability, handling large volumes of data efficiently. Both solutions cater to varying needs in managing file transfers and workflows.
Control-M offers extensive monitoring, flexible scheduling, and robust error handling, with a strong emphasis on reliability. In comparison, AWS Step Functions excels in seamless AWS service integration and scalability, making it a suitable choice for cloud-first organizations with its pay-as-you-go pricing model.
Control-M excels in job scheduling with robust automation and extensive platform integration. In comparison, MOVEit specializes in secure file transfer with strong data compliance and encryption. A tech buyer might choose Control-M for comprehensive enterprise management, while MOVEit is suited for secure, efficient file handling.
Control-M excels in ease of deployment and comprehensive job scheduling across multiple platforms, making it ideal for businesses seeking straightforward implementation. In comparison, OpCon offers robust feature richness and competitive pricing, appealing to those requiring flexibility and budget-friendly options.
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite focuses on integration, offering B2B, EDI, and API management. In comparison, Control-M excels in job scheduling and workload automation. Users may choose SEEBURGER for its diverse integration capabilities, while Control-M is ideal for robust job scheduling and management.
Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct excels in secure point-to-point file transfers and reliability. In comparison, Control-M offers comprehensive workload automation features and extensive compatibility. Tech buyers might choose Sterling Commerce Connect:Direct for its data transmission strengths, while Control-M is ideal for complex automation and flexibility.
SaltStack is an intelligent IT automation platform that can manage, secure, and optimize any infrastructure—on-prem, in the cloud, or at the edge. It’s built on a unique and powerful event-driven automation engine that detects events in any system and reacts intelligently to them, making it an extremely effective solution for managing large, complex environments. And with the newly launched SecOps offering, SaltStack can detect security vulnerabilities and non-compliant, mis-configured systems. As soon as an issue is detected, this powerful automation helps you and your team remediate it, keeping your infrastructure securely configured, compliant, and up-to-date.
So much can be done with the Open Source side, and especially for smaller shops. I personally think the pricing for Enterprise is hard to justify.
The pricing for this solution is roughly 20% lower than the competitive products in the market.
So much can be done with the Open Source side, and especially for smaller shops. I personally think the pricing for Enterprise is hard to justify.
The pricing for this solution is roughly 20% lower than the competitive products in the market.
Control-M excels with its robust scheduling, extensive integrations, and comprehensive reporting tools. In comparison, Tidal by Redwood offers flexibility, cloud-native options, and ease of use. Tech buyers might favor Control-M for feature breadth or Tidal for adaptability and modern deployment models.
Control-M excels in robust scheduling and extensive reporting features, appealing to those prioritizing detailed management and customer support. In comparison, ServiceNow Orchestration offers seamless integration and a broader feature set, attracting users needing flexibility despite higher costs.
Control-M focuses on comprehensive workflow automation, making it ideal for complex operations requiring extensive scheduling capabilities. In comparison, Fortra's GoAnywhere MFT specializes in managed file transfers, with strong security and compliance features, catering to secure data exchange needs.
Control-M excels with powerful scheduling capabilities, easy automation, and straightforward deployment. In comparison, ActiveBatch by Redwood stands out for advanced automation and extensive features. Control-M offers cost-effectiveness while ActiveBatch may appeal to those needing specialized automation despite higher costs.
BladeLogic Server Automation allows you to quickly and securely provision, configure, patch, and maintain physical, virtual, and cloud servers.
Licensing is a bit pricey. Be mindful about the components that you need and buy as appropriate.
We're looking at less than $100,000 USD for this solution.
Licensing is a bit pricey. Be mindful about the components that you need and buy as appropriate.
We're looking at less than $100,000 USD for this solution.
BMC Control-M offers comprehensive workload automation with extensive scheduling and system integration capabilities. In comparison, Control-M Managed File Transfer specializes in secure file transfers with strong compliance support. Tech buyers might choose Control-M for automation needs or opt for Managed File Transfer for dedicated file management.
Control-M excels with robust scheduling, seamless integration, and reliable performance, making it ideal for businesses needing advanced automation features. In comparison, Stonebranch offers a flexible architecture with real-time tracking and user-friendly design, appealing to those favoring customization and quick deployment.
Control-M offers robust scheduling, integration, and security features, ideal for large enterprises. In comparison, Rocket Zena stands out for its simplicity, agility, and scalability, suitable for organizations needing straightforward, flexible solutions. Control-M's extensive features justify its higher cost over Rocket Zena's lower upfront expenses.
vCenter Orchestrator is budget-friendly and ideal for automating tasks in VMware environments. In comparison, Control-M offers extensive scheduling and diverse platform support. Its higher cost is justified by its robust job-monitoring features, making it suited for comprehensive automation needs.
Control-M offers robust customer support, comprehensive scheduling, and excellent deployment services. In comparison, ESP Workload Automation Intelligence excels in predictive analytics, advanced automation features, and competitive pricing. A tech buyer might choose Control-M for reliability and long-term value, while ESP offers modern features.
Control-M offers extensive integration capabilities and flexibility, excelling in support and deployment. In comparison, Redwood RunMyJobs is noted for its user friendliness and cost-effective pricing, providing a higher ROI. Each solution caters differently depending on specific needs and budget considerations.
Control-M stands out with comprehensive scheduling, dependency management, and enterprise-grade integration. In comparison, VisualCron offers versatile task automation and user-friendly deployment. Control-M is suited for enterprise functionalities, whereas VisualCron appeals to cost-effectiveness and ease of use.
Control-M offers efficient workflow management and easy deployment with strong customer service. In comparison, OpenText Operations Orchestration provides extensive automation capabilities and flexibility, though with more complex deployment and higher costs. Each solution excels in distinct areas, catering to different operational needs.
Control-M excels in workflow automation, scalability, and reliability in complex environments. In comparison, Fortra's JAMS offers flexibility and extensive integration options. Control-M suits large enterprises, while Fortra's JAMS is adaptable for diverse use cases, balancing cost and features effectively.
Control-M excels with broad integration capabilities and robust scheduling features. In comparison, CA 7 Workload Automation Intelligence, with predictive analytics and real-time workload balancing, offers advanced analytics. Control-M ensures smoother deployment, while CA 7 provides competitive pricing and valuable analytics for optimization.
Control-M offers exceptional scheduling, automation, and integration features. In comparison, CA XCOM Data Transport excels in reliable and secure data transfer with broad platform support. Control-M's strength lies in detailed job tracking while CA XCOM emphasizes data integrity and performance.
Control-M excels in reliable job scheduling and automated workflows, offering better pricing and support. In comparison, Fortra's Globalscape Managed File Transfer stands out for its strong security features and ease of integration, justified by its premium price due to robust security.
BizTalk Server excels in seamless Microsoft integration and robust message mapping, appealing to enterprises within the Microsoft ecosystem. In comparison, Control-M offers versatile application support and advanced scheduling, making it ideal for businesses needing comprehensive automation and integration capabilities.
Control-M excels in comprehensive automation and robust integration options, making it ideal for feature-rich operations. In comparison, AppWorx Workload Automation offers flexibility and cost-effectiveness, appealing to cost-conscious buyers needing scalable solutions in complex enterprise environments.
Control-M is favored for its comprehensive scheduling capabilities and competitive pricing. In comparison, HCL Workload Automation stands out with its advanced features and scalability, suitable for complex enterprise environments despite higher initial setup costs, delivering high ROI and robust support.
Control-M excels in customer support and provides extensive job scheduling and platform compatibility, appealing to those needing robust integration. In comparison, Dollar Universe Workload Automation offers cost-effective flexibility, making it ideal for bespoke environments with tight budgets, despite needing better user guidance and support.
BMC TrueSight Orchestration excels in automation and IT service management integration, ideal for organizations seeking robust automation. In comparison, Control-M offers comprehensive job scheduling and workflow automation, suited for complex environments with its extensive feature set and smoother deployment process.
Control-M excels in comprehensive job scheduling and workflow automation, suited for managing complex job environments. In comparison, JSCAPE by Redwood stands out for managed file transfer capabilities and seamless integration, ideal for extensive file exchanges. Choose based on specific needs in scheduling or file transfers.
Control-M excels with its comprehensive scheduling capabilities, advanced automation, and extensive integrations. In comparison, Rocket Zeke offers robust security, flexible workflow definitions, and user-friendly interfaces. Both solutions have unique strengths appealing to various technical requirements and preferences.
Control-M is preferred for its robust workflow automation and integration capabilities, along with straightforward deployment and responsive customer support. In comparison, Automic Automation Intelligence offers innovative predictive analytics and advanced monitoring, complemented by competitive pricing and significant ROI, making it a strong value proposition.
OpenText Cloud Service Automation provides open, heterogeneous, extensible enterprise-grade cloud service lifecycle management to design and orchestrate full stack services. CSA embraces existing automation assets with an enhanced orchestration engine, which provides IT with an informed, transparent delivery of secure compliant services for the hybrid cloud.
OpenText Cloud Service Automation's pricing is average.
OpenText Cloud Service Automation's pricing is average.
Control-M offers strong job scheduling and seamless platform integration, appealing due to its cost-effectiveness and responsive customer support. In comparison, ESP dSeries Workload Automation shines with its flexibility in managing complex workflows and robust monitoring, though it involves higher setup costs and complexity.
Deliver apps at pace with agile development and let customer satisfaction soar.
We increased our quality and reduced our time costs.
I can save time and money more quickly.
We increased our quality and reduced our time costs.
I can save time and money more quickly.
Control-M offers advanced scheduling and extensive integration options, ideal for complex enterprise needs. In comparison, Axway Automator is praised for its simplicity and ease of use. Control-M excels in feature set and customer service, while Axway is cost-effective with straightforward deployment.
Control-M offers vast automation capabilities and integration across systems, ideal for enhancing workflow efficiency. In comparison, BMC Compuware ThruPut Manager optimizes batch job processing in mainframe environments, suitable for specialized tasks. Control-M excels in ROI despite high costs, while ThruPut Manager ensures cost-effective deployment.
Control-M excels in job scheduling, workload automation, integration, and provides extensive on-premise features. In comparison, Oracle Process Cloud Service offers flexibility, scalability, cloud-native capabilities, and competitive pricing, making it an appealing choice for modern, adaptable deployments.
