Nintex Process Platform and Control-M compete in the workflow automation and orchestration category. While both are strong contenders, Nintex leads in ease of use due to its low-code capabilities, while Control-M excels in robust scheduling and complex integrations for larger enterprises.
Features: Nintex Process Platform features low-code development for rapid workflow creation, strong Microsoft SharePoint integration, and user-friendly drag-and-drop interface, enhancing its versatility in various business processes. Control-M offers robust scheduling features, cross-platform support, and extensive application integration capabilities, allowing detailed monitoring and workflow orchestration across a range of enterprise environments.
Room for Improvement: Nintex Process Platform needs improvements in performance optimization, broader integration beyond SharePoint, and enhanced mobile compatibility. Control-M faces challenges in improving user interface intuitiveness, modernizing reporting, and simplifying its documentation and support structures for emerging technologies.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex Process Platform supports flexible deployment models across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid setups. However, there are mixed reviews on the quality and response time of its technical support. Control-M offers diverse deployment options catering to hybrid and traditional setups, though new users may find its configurations complex. Its customer service is usually knowledgeable, but integrating into existing infrastructure can be challenging.
Pricing and ROI: Nintex Process Platform is considered expensive due to its complex licensing structure, with costs being a concern for smaller enterprises. However, the benefits in time savings and handling complex process automations often lead to positive ROI. Control-M's pricing is usage-based, which can seem costly but is justified by its extensive feature set. Larger organizations find value in its capabilities despite the high cost, while its scalability promises efficient resource utilization, potentially deterring smaller enterprises from adopting it.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
It has reduced the total cost of ownership by 30% to 40%.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
If something fails at 3 AM in the morning, you need to fix it and get it back up and working really quickly.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
As the workload on Control-M increases, its scalability is much higher.
I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.
The stability of the Helix Control-M solution is good.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
There should be an automation system for developers to set it up more easily and quickly.
What they've done about scheduling, other people are still trying to figure out.
Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Pricing is generally affordable, though some features cost a bit more.
The best cell phone will always be more expensive.
Nintex Process Platform is expensive.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
It is easy to integrate Control-M with technologies for data ops or DevOps processes as things change, and it is not complex compared to other workload automation tools available in the market.
My team and I created a demo using Nintex, focusing on getting emails, reading, writing, and managing attachments.
Control-M by BMC offers orchestration for hybrid cloud workflows, starting at $29,000 annually. It's designed for teams managing dependencies efficiently with automation and scheduling capabilities.
Control-M is known for its automation, integration, and scheduling capabilities. It provides a user-friendly GUI for seamless third-party application integration and robust file transfer capabilities. Role-based administration features, self-service portals, and the ability to handle complex workflows enhance operational efficiency. Its control modules enable diverse integrations, while forecasting, monitoring, and alerting functionalities improve reliability and adaptability across platforms, making it essential for orchestrating tasks efficiently.
What are Control-M's key features?Control-M is vital in industries like financial services, data management, and IT operations. It automates batch processing, job automation, and file transfers, supporting applications such as SAP, Oracle, and Informatica. This enhances transparency, reduces errors, and provides insights into job performance and system status.
Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.
Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.
What are some key features?Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.
We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
