Control-M and JAMS compete in the enterprise scheduling and workload automation category. Control-M has the upper hand due to its extensive integration capabilities and cross-platform scheduling, making it ideal for complex environments.
Features: Control-M excels with extensive integration capabilities across platforms and applications, supports automated error handling, and offers robust modules for cross-platform scheduling. JAMS is known for its user-friendly scheduling capabilities, PowerShell scripting integrations, and intuitive scheduling features, which are appealing for enterprises prioritizing ease of use.
Room for Improvement: Control-M could improve its reporting tools to be more customizable and user-friendly without external tools, along with enhancing dynamic reporting integration. JAMS could benefit from a more robust web-based client, detailed exception handling, and a global search function to enhance user satisfaction.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M and JAMS are deployable in various environments like on-premises and clouds. Control-M's deployment is effective but can be complex, often requiring support. JAMS is versatile in scaling and easier to deploy. Both provide robust customer support; however, Control-M's users mention a need for streamlined issue resolution, while JAMS receives praise for its comprehensive support, despite some navigation issues in its knowledge base.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M's pricing is relatively high, attributed to its extensive capabilities suitable for large enterprises seeking robust functionality, often justifying the cost through enhanced efficiency. Its licensing, typically based on job count, can become expensive but offers significant ROI. Conversely, JAMS provides competitive pricing attractive to smaller enterprises requiring cost-effective solutions, offering a simpler licensing model without numerous additional costs while balancing functionality and cost-effectiveness for extensive job processing environments.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
It has reduced the total cost of ownership by 30% to 40%.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
If something fails at 3 AM in the morning, you need to fix it and get it back up and working really quickly.
The immediate acknowledgment and solutions provided by BMC's support team make it stand out compared to other tools.
Their response is prompt, exemplifying how support should be.
They are very quick to respond depending on the issue's severity.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
As the workload on Control-M increases, its scalability is much higher.
I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.
We might be underutilizing it, but as more jobs require processing, additional servers would be necessary.
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.
The stability of the Helix Control-M solution is good.
We experience periods of major incidents annually due to capacity constraints, which result in job failures.
Being on the new version, there's been zero downtime.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
There should be an automation system for developers to set it up more easily and quickly.
What they've done about scheduling, other people are still trying to figure out.
Another area for improvement would be the addition of source control for jobs internally, as this feature would solve several problems for me.
A major improvement would be the integration of AI to help us accomplish various tasks.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Pricing is generally affordable, though some features cost a bit more.
The best cell phone will always be more expensive.
The price is fair considering the functionality and importance of the tool, although the increase did unsettle our management.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
Control-M provides workflow orchestration, including scheduling, deploying, managing, and monitoring workflows.
This efficient feature has been invaluable, enabling us to streamline our workflow and enhance productivity.
The most valuable feature of JAMS is its user-friendly interface, especially after upgrading from version six to seven.
Control-M is used for enterprise workload automation, orchestrating finance, retail, healthcare, and supply chain processes. It handles batch job scheduling, managed file transfers, cloud integrations, and compliance auditing across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.
Organizations leverage Control-M to efficiently monitor and manage business-critical processes like payroll, HR, SAP, Informatica, and database tasks. It enhances visibility, security, and error resolution. Automating and optimizing workflows in data centers, AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform, Control-M supports diverse technological environments. The platform's robust capabilities make it suitable for effective centralized management of applications and data pipelines, ensuring enhanced collaboration and scalability.
What are Control-M's most important features?Control-M is implemented in industries like finance to handle payroll and HR tasks, in retail for inventory management and supply chain processes, and in healthcare for compliance auditing and patient data processing. Organizations benefit from streamlined workflows and automated processes across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, ensuring efficient and secure operations.
JAMS offers efficient automation and scheduling with strong capabilities in planning, dependency management, and multi-platform support. Its intuitive interface and robust tools assist in managing complex workflows for enhanced resource allocation.
JAMS stands out for its blend of automation and scheduling capabilities, making it suitable for handling complex workflows across platforms. Its features such as batch scheduling, natural language scheduling, and interactive agents promote seamless integration with other tools like PowerShell. The focus on metrics and notifications ensures users are informed about operational efficiency enhancements. While JAMS is effective in many areas, users report a need for improved simulation for termination processes and a more intuitive client setup. They see potential in enhanced search functions, better exception handling, and greater transparency in custom execution. The current setup challenges like disappearing options and mobile accessibility can affect user satisfaction. Including a fully web-based client and improving documentation could add value.
What are JAMS' key features?
What benefits should users consider?
Organizations using JAMS for workflow and batch job automation leverage its capabilities for SSIS, SQL procedures, and Python scripts. JAMS supports file automation and managed file transfers across environments like AWS and Azure. Users employ JAMS for data management, reporting, and integration tasks, including handling holiday-aware scheduling for improved task coordination.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
