VisualCron offers task automation through a visual interface, eliminating the need for programming skills. With capabilities like alerting and variable usage, users benefit from integration with databases, timely task execution, and cross-platform operations.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| VisualCron | 1.3% |
| Control-M | 19.1% |
| AutoSys Workload Automation | 10.2% |
| Other | 69.4% |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UiPath Platform | 4.4 | N/A | 98% | 842 interviewsAdd to research |
| Control-M | 4.3 | 19.1% | 98% | 127 interviewsAdd to research |
Users appreciate VisualCron for its ability to handle complex scheduling and task automation with features like event-based triggers, job variables, and conditional task execution. It supports integration with various databases and platforms such as AWS and Azure, enhancing connectivity and workflow automation. Users highlight ease of use, efficient error handling, valuable logging features, and strong post-sales support. VisualCron's user-friendly interface simplifies managing jobs without needing extensive programming skills.
VisualCron needs better error responses for web requests, improved documentation, and a more user-friendly interface. Enhancing the mail trigger conditions and expanding audit logs are also suggested. Strengthening security for job visibility and modification and adding CI/CD support, GitHub features, and a community forum would be helpful. Moving away from SQLCE and XML configuration files, along with providing quick-response technical support, are additional areas for improvement.
ROI from VisualCron is reported as 95 percent, described as very high by others. VisualCron provided a return in one month. ROI is seen as incalculable by some, as it prevented countless development projects and eliminated numerous manual tasks in daily activities.
Enterprise buyers found VisualCron's pricing, licensing, and setup costs fair and straightforward. They noted its yearly licensing model and affordability, with typical costs around €800 per server per year. Users appreciated the simplicity of having different license sizes and the recommendation for multiple instances for load distribution. VisualCron's setup is easy with good documentation. Licensing isn't overly complex with unnecessary options, making it manageable for enterprise use.
Primary use case of VisualCron includes task scheduling, file transfers, data management, automating encryption, triggering applications, email notifications, FTP file replacements, and integration as a middleware solution. It simplifies processes like CI/CD pipelines, SQL jobs, and API calls. Utilized by IT departments for business automation, it eliminates manual tasks, enhances communication, and efficiently handles job management, making everyday tasks more manageable and automatic.
VisualCron's customer care is praised for its fast, detailed, and knowledgeable assistance, especially from Michael and Henrik. Most responses are quick, though some users noted slow reply times via ticketing or email. Their team handles bug fixes and enhancements promptly. Both the technical team's availability and the active user community forum are highly valued. Ratings vary from four to five out of five. Some users solve issues internally and rarely need external help. The support team is kind and highly competent.
Users found VisualCron's initial setup straightforward and easy, particularly with support. Some noted it was as simple as installation and basic configuration. However, others mentioned it required a technical person due to manual configurations and complexity. Documentation was considered insufficient, but community support was helpful. Setup ratings varied between three to four out of five. One user mentioned a 45-day trial setup took five to ten minutes.
Users express mixed opinions about VisualCron's scalability. Some experienced good performance without issues as usage increased, noting the ability to host instances on various servers. Others believe VisualCron scales well but mention potential performance degradation requiring more hardware resources. Several users highlight its capability to handle numerous applications, while some are uncertain about scalability but acknowledge it can be installed on different machines. The general sentiment about VisualCron's scalability is positive, though concerns exist.
Users rate VisualCron highly for stability, with many experiencing stable performance over several years. They note it is solid and provides comfort with its logging and communication features. Issues are rare but not absent, with occasional unexplained stops reported. Overall, VisualCron has been described as rock-solid, with a couple of instances mentioned where it locked up. Generally, users are satisfied with its stability and rate it positively.
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 4 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 143 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 65 |
| Large Enterprise | 165 |
VisualCron empowers users by simplifying complex workflows. It allows seamless task automation through features like interactive scheduling and role-based operations. Users appreciate its integration capabilities, replacing multiple tools with a comprehensive automation solution. The support system ensures quick assistance, making it a reliable choice for workflow visualization and task execution. However, areas like error handling and interface design require enhancements for improved user experience.
What are the key features of VisualCron?Organizations leverage VisualCron in industries like finance and logistics to automate tasks such as encryption and secure file transfers. It's also integral in managing data operations, facilitating communications between systems, and executing SQL jobs, enhancing operational efficiency across sectors.
7 Eleven, ABB Sécheron SA, Adobe Systems Incorporated, Amazon Europe Core, Apple, Assa Abloy, Aston Martin, Banco Santander, BMW (Australia)
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Lead - Database Administrator at SMART ENERGY SYSTEMS LLC | 4.0 | I use VisualCron for automation tasks like connecting to FileZilla and SQL Server easily. It minimizes manual scripting by storing credentials but lacks a community forum. Previously, I used Control-M, but VisualCron's user-friendly Microsoft interface was quick to learn. |
| Group Data Architect at Arrow Global Ltd | 4.0 | I use VisualCron for job scheduling; its most valuable features include scheduling interactive jobs with interdependencies and running PowerShell commands. However, the command console is somewhat difficult to understand and could be improved. |
| Software Development Consultant at a comms service provider with 1-10 employees | 4.0 | No summary available |
| IT Application Project Manager at a non-profit with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.5 | No summary available |
| Software Engineer | 3.5 | No summary available |
| IT Manager at a financial services firm with 11-50 employees | 4.5 | We mainly use VisualCron for reporting purposes. The product integrates easily with our existing Windows systems and runs smoothly. However, the documentation is somewhat lacking and could be improved to better support users. |
| Sr. IT ERP Specialist at a pharma/biotech company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 5.0 | No summary available |
| Product Owner Insight & Analytics Platform at Otto (GmbH & Co KG) | 5.0 | No summary available |
