AutoSys Workload Automation Reviews

Name: AutoSys Workload Automation
Brand: Broadcom
Rating: 4.2 (81 reviews)

4.2 out of 5

81 reviews
94% willing to recommend

1,738 followers

What is AutoSys Workload Automation?

AutoSys Workload Automation is used by organizations for executing thousands of automations, managing server workloads, scheduling CP jobs, file transfers, enterprise batch scheduling, and ETL processing.

Get the AutoSys Workload Automation Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about AutoSys Workload Automation, Control-M, MuleSoft Anypoint Platform and more!

AutoSys Workload Automation is the #7 ranked solution in top Workload Automation solutions. PeerSpot users give AutoSys Workload Automation an average rating of 8.4 out of 10. AutoSys Workload Automation is most commonly compared to Control-M: AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M. AutoSys Workload Automation is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 83% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 48% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

AutoSys Workload Automation

April 2025

Get the report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Featured AutoSys Workload Automation reviews

Antony Askew

Technical Lead at Natwest

The visibility and control features are somewhat limited. This is a recognized weakness, but thee vendor is currently revamping the user interface to address it. While the current UI is a bit outdated, it's undergoing improvement. AutoSys Workload Automation has some areas for improvement, particularly in housekeeping and product maintenance. These tasks are currently quite manual and labor-intensive for our team. Additionally, the reporting and forecasting functionalities could be more robust. One area for improvement with AutoSys Workload Automation is that it comprises several distinct tools configured to work together. This necessitates familiarity with multiple tools for effective solution management. Consequently, it can sometimes lack a sense of cohesiveness as a unified solution.

Read full review

Muralidhar Burla

Manager at Capgemini

The reporting system, currently, could be better. In the reporting system, currently, if you want to see or generate the job dependency, you can have a flowchart right now that shows job flows. We can see from the job flow in that graphic representation, however, I would like to see them work more on that, maybe, to make it better and more robust. We'd like more details about the job success versus failure. Right now, we just get statistics. We'd like something that generates job names along with the accounting. There also needs to be more customized reporting. It would help a lot. The solution could use more monitoring.

Read full review

Atul Pednekar

Senior Manager at Colgate

Support definitely needs improvement. It's possible they're in some kind of transition so I'd like to give them the benefit of the doubt but it's an issue. The pricing is definitely something they should look at, it's quite expensive. Finally, the latest features like the quick searching or better reporting and analysis of the jobs which are running in, needs to be improved. It's a great product but with the latest feature set there is a large scope for improvement. From a manageability point of view, the easy upgrade should be included and the frequent feature update too. Reporting and notifications need to be improved too, these are important things.

Read full review

AutoSys Workload Automation mindshare

As of April 2025, the mindshare of AutoSys Workload Automation in the Workload Automation category stands at 12.8%, down from 18.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

PeerResearch reports based on AutoSys Workload Automation reviews

Type	Title	Date
Category	Workload Automation	Apr 30, 2025	Download
Product	Reviews, tips, and advice from real users	Apr 30, 2025	Download
Comparison	AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M	Apr 30, 2025	Download
Comparison	AutoSys Workload Automation vs Automic Automation	Apr 30, 2025	Download
Comparison	AutoSys Workload Automation vs Redwood RunMyJobs	Apr 30, 2025	Download

Title	Rating	Mindshare	Recommending
Control-M	4.4	23.1%	98%	121 interviews Add to research
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform	4.0	4.9%	92%	58 interviews Add to research

Valuable Features

Users find AutoSys Workload Automation valuable for its robust scheduling across multiple platforms, allowing centralized management of complex jobs and ensuring reliability. It offers strong security and scalability, enabling integration with various applications. Its user-friendly interface facilitates easy configuration and monitoring of workloads. The software's high stability and low maintenance requirements are appreciated, as well as its predictive analytics and granular security features that support efficient job execution and proactive issue resolution.

"AutoSys significantly reduces manual effort."
"Autosys is one of the oldest products in the market, and it has been around for quite a long time, close to 20 to 25 years."
"The most valuable aspects of AutoSys Workload Automation are its performance, scalability, and ease of getting started for new users."

Room for Improvement

AutoSys Workload Automation requires enhancements in integration capabilities, particularly with cloud platforms, and improved graphical user interface. Users desire more robust reporting and analytics, better job scheduling, and monitoring features. Feedback suggests enhancements in the licensing model, ease of deployment, and agent management. There are also calls for more comprehensive documentation and a unified interface, as well as advancements in automation and predictive analysis features.

"The scalability is poor because I cannot use it for all automation solutions."
"Autosys is still lagging behind some competitive products from a functionality perspective."
"The visibility and control features are somewhat limited."

ROI

AutoSys Workload Automation provided a positive return on investment. Users have expressed satisfaction with the software's ability to efficiently manage and automate workloads, resulting in improved productivity and cost savings.

The solution was praised for its user-friendly interface, robust features, and reliable performance, leading to enhanced efficiency and streamlined processes.

Pricing

Enterprise buyers evaluating AutoSys Workload Automation often find its pricing and cost structure a key consideration. Experiences highlight that while the solution is sometimes perceived as costly, its powerful features, such as unlimited monitoring instances and scalability, may offset higher costs. The pricing model includes annual licenses, with server setup as a one-time fee and ongoing AMC. Companies should assess licensing needs, especially for distributed agents, to optimize costs and accommodate growth.

"The return on investment would be very high because doing things manually without this product would be extremely expensive."
"We paid to use the solution monthly."
"I don't have information on the exact licensing cost of AutoSys Workload Automation because that's managed by the tools and financing teams. For agents, it's close to $4,00, but for the server setup, it's usually a one-time license initially, and it's AMC which is paid every year and comes close to $8,000 to $10,000."

Popular Use Cases

Enterprises use AutoSys Workload Automation primarily for cross-platform job scheduling and workload automation, integrating mainframe and distributed environments. It manages batch processes, supports enterprise scheduling, and facilitates file transfers. Companies rely on it for running various jobs, including financial transactions and IT processes. Its robust functionality ensures timely job completion, meeting service levels, and providing alerts for job failures. Organizations benefit from its stability and reliability in diverse business units and geographical locations.

Service and Support

AutoSys Workload Automation customer service and support are highly regarded, with many users praising the knowledgeable and responsive technical assistance. The support team is available during deployments and handles technical issues effectively, often resolving queries quickly. There are dedicated support resources for complex situations, enabling efficient problem-solving. Although there are variations in initial response quality, many find CA's support reliable and substantial, maintaining strong communication with users. However, some users note a decline post-Broadcom acquisition.

Deployment

Initial setup experiences with AutoSys Workload Automation varied. Some found it straightforward and quick, while others encountered complexity due to technical requirements and version migrations. Support from CA and experienced users eased the process. Features like High Availability and security needed careful consideration. Familiarity with similar systems aided understanding, and some utilized external assistance. Planning and environment factors influenced complexity levels, but once procedures were established, it became manageable.

Scalability

AutoSys Workload Automation is highly adaptable, managing extensive job volumes across various environments effectively. Users report it efficiently handles numerous simultaneous tasks without performance issues. It integrates well with existing systems, facilitating organization-wide deployment. Users consistently express confidence in its ability to scale further, accommodating substantial growth. It allows for seamless integration of additional components and handles cross-platform tasks efficiently, with support for expanding infrastructure needs. It rates highly for adaptability in diverse operational contexts.

Stability

AutoSys Workload Automation is praised for its stability, being highly reliable with minimal downtimes. Users report a consistently stable performance, even under infrastructure challenges, and appreciate its ability to manage failovers effectively. Despite occasional minor bugs and infrastructure-related issues, it remains largely dependable. Many users emphasize no significant crashes or persistent bugs, highlighting its robustness and performance. Frequent upgrades have enhanced its stability, earning high ratings for its reliability and consistent uptime.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our AutoSys Workload Automation Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers

By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

48%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Retailer

Government

Healthcare Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Media Company

University

Educational Organization

Real Estate/Law Firm

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Wholesaler/Distributor

Hospitality Company

Non Profit

Consumer Goods Company

Outsourcing Company

Legal Firm

Logistics Company

Performing Arts

Pharma/Biotech Company

Transportation Company

Compare AutoSys Workload Automation with alternative products

Learn more about AutoSys Workload Automation

Organizations leverage AutoSys Workload Automation for running extensive workloads day and night, particularly important for banks, insurance clients, and enterprises needing robust job scheduling and file transfer processes. It is crucial for managing cross-functional dependencies with 24/7 automated triggers, batch processing, and centralized business process control, ensuring seamless operations across various servers and environments.

What are the most important features?

Easy Configuration: Simplifies initial setup and updates.
SAP Integration: Seamlessly integrates with SAP environments.
Minimal Maintenance: Requires less frequent updates and interventions.
Scalability: Scales to accommodate growing business needs.
Speed and Stability: Ensures high performance and reliable operations.
User-friendly Interface: Enhances user experience and efficiency.
Real-time Batch Processing View: Provides instant insights into batch jobs.
Compatibility: Works well with various software systems.
Robustness: Delivers consistent, reliable performance.
Easy Setup: Simplifies deployment process.
File Transfer Protocol: Facilitates smooth and secure file transfers.
File Watcher: Monitors and manages file changes effectively.
Performance and Upgrades: Ensures improved performance and simplified upgrades.

What are the benefits or ROI items to consider?

Improved Efficiencies: Reduces manual intervention and automates repetitive tasks.
Cost Savings: Optimizes resource usage and reduces operational costs.
Enhanced Reliability: Decreases downtime with robust performance.
Better Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems.
24/7 Operations: Ensures uninterrupted business processes.
Scalable Solutions: Adapts to growing business needs.
Advanced Scheduling: Provides comprehensive job scheduling options.

AutoSys Workload Automation is widely implemented in banking for day and night operations, insurance client environments for reliable support, and enterprises for automated file transfers and robust job scheduling. Organizations centralize business processes and manage cross-functional dependencies effectively with its 24/7 automated triggers, supporting diverse industry needs through scalable and reliable performance.

AutoSys Workload Automation was previously known as CA Workload Automation, CA Workload Automation AE .