Control-M vs JSCAPE by Redwood comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Aspera On Demand
Sponsored
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
21st
Average Rating
0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Control-M
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
2nd
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
113
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (3rd), Workload Automation (1st)
JSCAPE by Redwood
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
7th
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2024, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Aspera On Demand is 1.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Control-M is 4.1%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JSCAPE by Redwood is 2.2%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
Unique Categories:
No other categories found
Process Automation
4.4%
Workload Automation
26.9%
No other categories found
 

Featured Reviews

Use Aspera On Demand?
Share your opinion
Nagarajan Sankarammal - PeerSpot reviewer
Jul 20, 2022
A highly capable, feature-rich solution with excellent third-party integrations
The product has improved dramatically over the years; it offers a lot in terms of features and capabilities and integration with third-party tools. A wide range of models available with the product is critical in reducing manual and mundane work such as custom script writing. This saves significant amounts of time and, by association, money for the organization. As a Control-M user for over 15 years, I see it as very straightforward to create, integrate, and automate data pipelines. Even in the beginning, when Control-M was more of a data architecture product, it was easy to pick up. I've seen multiple people adapting very well in terms of adapting and enabling the capabilities of the solution for business; it's straightforward. Ideally, agent lift modes of connectivity would be established on different platforms. We can get applications integrated directly with Control-M. That's a recent feature. There are ready-made platforms and plugins which allow us to see templates for workflow orchestration in third-party and custom in-house applications. It's a straightforward solution, and this is an area where Control-M excels. Our customers are pleased being with Control-M, despite some minor hiccups, which happen with any solution. They have been happy with the product for years, and it's an enterprise-wide batch workflow orchestration tool. That's how it is established in our organization and what our users are satisfied and familiar with. The process execution speed is excellent and has constantly improved over the years. The bottom line is Control-M is a mission-critical solution, it's integral to our organization.
KS
Jan 10, 2024
Provides high availability of clustering and valuable file transfer management features
The initial setup process is easy with the support of a 24-hour backend expert and available demos for installation and configuration. We can also refer to the documentation. It takes two days to complete. The deployment process involves server installation, configuring necessary reports, and publishing the system on the public internet. Initially, we created internal users with LtAP access. It enables control over file upload and download permissions for specific file types. The implementation, accessible through SFTP and HTTPS protocols, works well for secure file transfers. It requires three executives to deploy and one or two to maintain the product.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"BMC does NOT have a great licensing model from my perspective."
"Licensing costs are around $3000 a year."
"The cost is basically $100 a job, give or take."
"BMC's price is based on the number of jobs."
"The pricing of Control-M is reasonable."
"It works on task-based licensing."
"We have a five-year contract with task-based licensing."
"Pricing varies depending on which components and modules you are using."
"The software is expensive compared to other vendors."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
13%
Government
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Educational Organization
6%
Financial Services Firm
29%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
20%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Computer Software Company
10%
Retailer
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful b...
What do you like most about Control-M?
First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?
The license models are quite good. They provided me with clear visibility about the pricing plan. There is a pricing ...
What do you like most about JSCAPE?
The product's most valuable feature is the high availability clustering.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JSCAPE?
I rate the product’s pricing a three out of ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive.
What needs improvement with JSCAPE?
JSCAPE ensures data integrity. You know that the file has been transferred and on which date, as we provide timestamp...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Control M
No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Deluxe Digital Studios, BT, The European Space Agency, GigaScience, Groupe AB
CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
BAE Systems, ABN AMRO, Boeing, Bank of America, Dassault Falcon Jet Corp, Bank of Montreal, General Dynamics, Bank of Taiwan, General Electric, Citibank Canada, Honeywell, CreditSuisse, L-3 Communications, Columbia University, Harvard Medical School, Kaplan Higher Education, Northwest Christian College, Kaiser Permanente, Share Builder, Procter & Gamble, TransUnion, Roche Diagnostics, BASF, 1-800-Contacts, Canon, AMPM, Daimler AG, Coach, Edwards Brothers, USB Financial Services
Find out what your peers are saying about Control-M vs. JSCAPE by Redwood and other solutions. Updated: July 2024.
793,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.