• Home
  • Control-M vs. Rundeck

Control-M vs Rundeck comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
BMC Logo

Control-M

Read 110 Control-M reviews
4,668 views|1,673 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
PagerDuty Logo

Rundeck

72 views|60 comparisons
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
Process Automation
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Control-M and Rundeck based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation.
To learn more, read our detailed Process Automation Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
With critical path functionality, we can tell ahead of time if there are problems with a critical job
It has improved our organization a lot. It has helped us control any problems that we have with jobs. We have critical jobs that run and we can... Read more →
Use Rundeck ?
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Compare to other tools Pricing and licensing was more. It should be decrease."
  • "BMC does NOT have a great licensing model from my perspective."
  • "we are more looking for a better cost/license/performance model because BMC, while we could say it's the best, is also the most expensive. That is what we are probably most annoyed with. We are paying something like €1,000,000 over three years for having 4,000 jobs running. That's expensive."
  • "We have account based licensing. There are two or three types of licensing. One of them is based on the number of jobs, so we a license close to 4,000 jobs per day. The cost is based on the different modules, which we buy from them. If we a buy a hardware module, which we are presently using and integrating, that is an additional cost, but I'm not sure of the amount. Each module comes with a different cost."
  • "As we increase the number of tasks or jobs on the system, there are concerns about cost."
  • "We have a five-year contract with task-based licensing."
  • "This product saves hours in a day based on my experience working here versus other companies with manually operations."
  • "It works on task-based licensing."

    • More Control-M Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
    Top Answer:Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and… more »
    What do you like most about Control-M?
    Top Answer:In Helix Control-M, we have the automation API that allows us to customize and do integrations easily in any script, such as Java or Python. It is all integrated within the integration API.
    Read all 70 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?
    Top Answer:It is not bad. The company can afford it, and it pays for itself. We have those jobs running automatically.
    Read all 45 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    4th
    out of 66 in Process Automation
    Views
    4,668
    Comparisons
    1,673
    Reviews
    20
    Average Words per Review
    1,502
    Rating
    9.1
    39th
    out of 66 in Process Automation
    Views
    72
    Comparisons
    60
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Control M
    Learn More
    BMC
    PagerDuty
    Overview

    Control-M simplifies application and data workflow orchestration on premises or as a service. It makes it easy to build, define, schedule, manage, and monitor production workflows, ensuring visibility, reliability, and improving SLAs.

    • Accelerate new business applications into production—by embedding workflow orchestration into your CI/CD pipeline
    • Scale Dev and Ops collaboration, with a Jobs-as-Code approach
    • Simplify workflows across hybrid and multi-cloud environments with AWS, Azure and Google Cloud Platform integrations
    • Deliver data-driven outcomes faster, managing big data workflows in a scalable way
    • Take control of your file transfer operations with integrated, intelligent file movement and visibility

    Rundeck is a powerful tool that efficiently manages and automates tasks and workflows within organizations. It excels in scheduling and executing jobs, managing server configurations, and orchestrating complex processes. Boasting a user-friendly interface and seamless integration with other tools and systems, Rundeck earns high marks for ease of use, flexibility, and automation capabilities. It supports various operating systems and streamlines workflows, saving users time and effort when executing repetitive tasks.

    Sample Customers
    CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
    1. Netflix 2. Airbnb 3. Pinterest 4. Cisco 5. Adobe 6. IBM 7. Salesforce 8. Uber 9. Twitter 10. LinkedIn 11. Dropbox 12. Slack 13. Atlassian 14. GitHub 15. Docker 16. Spotify 17. Hulu 18. Square 19. Etsy 20. Zillow 21. Expedia 22. Groupon 23. Yelp 24. Pandora 25. Zynga 26. Fitbit 27. SurveyMonkey 28. Box 29. GoDaddy 30. Twilio 31. Okta 32. Splunk
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm34%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Retailer9%
    Healthcare Company6%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Computer Software Company13%
    Manufacturing Company7%
    Insurance Company7%
    No Data Available
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business11%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise80%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise76%
    No Data Available
    Buyer's Guide
    Process Automation
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about Camunda, Pega, Appian and others in Process Automation. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Control-M is ranked 4th in Process Automation with 110 reviews while Rundeck is ranked 39th in Process Automation. Control-M is rated 8.8, while Rundeck is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Control-M writes "We have seen quicker file transfers with more visibility and stability". On the other hand, Control-M is most compared with AutoSys Workload Automation, IBM Workload Automation, Rocket Zena, ESP Workload Automation Intelligence and Automic Workload Automation, whereas Rundeck is most compared with .

    See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

    We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.