Control-M vs UiPath Orchestrator comparison

BMC and UiPath are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. BMC is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7, while UiPath is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2. BMC holds a 23.1% mindshare in WA, compared to UiPath’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Control-M

Read 121 Control-M reviews

18,934 Views
7,626 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

UiPath Orchestrator

Read 33 UiPath Orchestrator reviews

307 Views
176 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Control-M

UiPath Orchestrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 6, 2025

Control-M and UiPath Orchestrator are key players in the automation and job scheduling market. Control-M holds an advantage in complex environments like banking with its robust cross-platform automation, while UiPath Orchestrator excels in user-friendly cloud-based deployments and centralized management.

Features: Control-M offers extensive cross-platform job scheduling, integration with third-party applications, and a powerful GUI, making it ideal for large, complex environments. UiPath Orchestrator, on the other hand, provides centralized management, easy bot deployment, and efficient scheduling capabilities, catering to organizations requiring seamless automation.

Room for Improvement: Control-M could benefit from streamlining report generation, enhancing offline capabilities, and simplifying its user interface for complex scenarios. UiPath Orchestrator needs to address pricing structure concerns, afford better UI flexibility, and focus on optimizing transaction management within queues.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M's flexibility in deployment options includes on-premises, public, and hybrid clouds, but may be complex and expensive to implement. UiPath Orchestrator offers a user-friendly approach with strong cloud deployment, providing accessible solutions. Both products ensure robust technical support, although Control-M occasionally receives critiques regarding response times.

Pricing and ROI: Control-M's pricing is generally higher with a complex licensing model, yet it delivers substantial ROI for large enterprises due to its comprehensive features. UiPath Orchestrator, though costly, provides competitive pricing especially for cloud solutions and achieves ROI by reducing manual tasks and improving automation efficiencies.

To learn more, read our detailed Control-M vs. UiPath Orchestrator Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Control-M vs. UiPath Orchestrator

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 849,686 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Control-M

Ranking in Workload Automation

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

121

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (4th)

UiPath Orchestrator

Ranking in Workload Automation

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of Control-M is 23.1%, down from 26.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Orchestrator is 0.8%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

Pedro Fuentes

System Engineer at Community Loans of America, Inc.

Cost-effective, excellent support, and centralized access and control

They have a department that handles requests for enhancements. I talked to Control-M guys back in October or November when they had a gathering here in Atlanta. We talked about not being able to go back in history in Helix Control-M for more than two weeks. We submitted a request for enhancement. They told us that they are working on it, and they are thinking of expanding that to 30 days. We would like to see it expand to 90 days, but they are working on it. In Control-M, we were able to go back 180 days, but that was on-prem. The storage of that data was on our own servers. We know that storage is money, and we do not expect them to store that much of the data, but at least 30 to 60 days seem proper.

Read full review

Bantu Kumar

Senior Technical Director at Globant

Improves operational efficiency through its centralized dashboard and asset management

There are overwhelming features added to UiPath Orchestrator, which can lead to complexities. Permissions, roles, and queues sometimes result in conflicts, requiring deeper understanding. I would prefer if the tool was more intuitive, and it is important to maintain simplicity instead of combining multiple functionalities, potentially through different licensing models to restrict features.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Maintaining and monitoring of workloads have been and continue to be the most valuable feature in our environment."

"As soon as you have an issue, a ticket is created and the tech support is quite responsive."

"Before Control-M, we didn't have a centralized view and could not view what happened in the past to determine what will happen in the future. The Gantt view that we have in Control-M is like a project view. It is nice because we sometimes have some application maintenance that we need to do. So, in a single console, we can hold the jobs for the next hour or two. We can release that job when it is finished. This is a really nice feature that we didn't have before. It is something really simple, but we didn't previously have a console where we could say, "For the next two hours, what are the jobs that we will run? And, hold these jobs not to run." This is really important."

"I find it very helpful to be able to keep track of all our help desk tickets."

"There is a batch monitoring tool called Batch Impact Manager, which proactively warns when processing is behind and SLAs are in jeopardy of being missed."

"We are using Control-M for day-to-day operations only. It is helpful for us in our day-to-day operations. It is a key in our financial sector. We are automating via Control-M in our treasury operations, including any evening updates. Control-M makes things easier and faster by helping our treasury operations go without any interruptions."

"The scheduling feature and scheduling tool are the most valuable features. I like the scheduling services that we have in Control-M, which are very beneficial to our organization because they are automating things. There is also less manual work. We can schedule a task without any manual interruptions."

"Its compatibility with the new technologies and platforms, like the Google Cloud or Amazon, is the most valuable. Its console allows us to view the duration and execution of a process. It is also very easy to use and easy to implement."

More Control-M pros

"UiPath has one of the strongest community setups."

"I like UiPath Orchestrator's screen capture feature."

"The product has been pretty amazing at deploying, scheduling, and running automated bots."

"The response time and support quality are good."

"The solution is easy to use."

"UiPath Orchestrator improves operational efficiency through its centralized dashboard and asset management."

"It was very simple to use and allowed us to easily record and manage activities."

"UiPath Orchestrator is a user-friendly solution."

More UiPath Orchestrator pros

Cons

"Control-M could benefit from incorporating AI features for better job scheduling."

"The licensing cost can be improved."

"The history module only contains a maximum of 10 days, but we would like to have access to more. For example, it would be helpful to have 30 days or two months of history available."

"The reporting functionality needs a lot of work. We have faced problems with different versions where we run the right report, but it gives us blank entries. Then, when we run the same report again, it gives the correct data."

"The downtime is higher compared to AWS."

"It is a very strong product, but the reporting could be better."

"They really need to work on improving the web interface, as there are still a lot of bugs... In general, they need to do a lot of work on shoring up their testing and quality assurance. A lot of bugs seem to make it into the product."

"The performance could be better. Control-M Enterprise Manager tends to slow the system down even on a server with a six-core processor and 32 gigabytes RAM. The console is Java-based, so maybe OpenJDK 16 or 17 would be a performance improvement."

More Control-M cons

"The vendor should provide free certification to their partners."

"I am interested in seeing more features like document understanding and AI integration."

"It takes us time to understand the process before we can publish it. Its pricing needs to be lower, and there needs to be a centralized dashboard."

"The installation of the product on an on-premises version can take a long time and may involve some troubleshooting procedures to be followed."

"I am interested in seeing more features like document understanding and AI integration."

"One area for improvement in UiPath Orchestrator is enhancing automation for exceptional cases."

"The major issue is with the application according to the new version of the UI."

"The product must conduct more promotional activities and webinars."

More UiPath Orchestrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have account based licensing. There are two or three types of licensing. One of them is based on the number of jobs, so we a license close to 4,000 jobs per day. The cost is based on the different modules, which we buy from them. If we a buy a hardware module, which we are presently using and integrating, that is an additional cost, but I'm not sure of the amount. Each module comes with a different cost."

"For the tooling that you get, the licensing is acceptable. It has competitive pricing, especially with all the value that you get out of it. There are additional costs with some of the additional modules, but they are all electives. Out of the box, you get the standard Control-M experience and the standard license. They're not forcing some of the modules on you. If you decide that you do need them, you can always purchase those separately."

"The annual licensing within BMC Control-M is on a per task basis. Three- and five-year contracts are also offered. The customer usually buys a bundle of tasks, e.g., 5,000 tasks, then my team configures Control-M for their usage."

"The product price is reasonable. I rate the pricing an eight."

"Pricing varies depending on which components and modules you are using."

"Pricing is generally affordable, though some features cost a bit more."

"This product saves hours in a day based on my experience working here versus other companies with manually operations."

"The pricing of Control-M is reasonable."

More Control-M pricing and cost advice

"The product is quite expensive."

"The pricing seems reasonable based on project requirements."

"UiPath Orchestrator's price is reasonable. We pay around 40k USD. Its licensing costs are yearly."

"The product is expensive."

"The solution's price is high. We have subscribed to 15 licenses which are paid on a yearly basis. We don't pay any additional costs for support and maintenance."

"The solution is very expensive. Compared to Microsoft, another tool that is much cheaper than the tool, it does not have the same features that UiPath Orchestrator has. The most valuable feature in my platform is the queue items in UiPath Orchestrator to evaluate the products using this feature."

"The tool's licensing cost is high. I rate the tool an eight or nine on a scale from one to ten, where ten means expensive."

"The pricing is reasonable and competitive."

More UiPath Orchestrator pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

28%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about Control-M?

First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?

It is a little bit expensive.

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Orchestrator?

Using UiPath Orchestrator, we can deploy tasks across different environments, including virtual machines, for both attended and unattended processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Orchestrator?

The pricing of UiPath Orchestrator is a bit high. However, we can compete with that, though if they decrease the prices, it would lead to better market penetration.

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Orchestrator?

I would like to see high availability over two sites, with a main site and a disaster recovery working as an active-active solution, which is not currently supported.

See all answers

Comparisons

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 16% of the time

Automic Automation vs Control-M

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 7% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Control-M

Compared 6% of the time

Stonebranch vs Control-M

Compared 5% of the time

More Control-M Competitors

Automic Automation vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 45% of the time

JAMS vs UiPath Orchestrator

Compared 19% of the time

More UiPath Orchestrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Control-M

April 2025

Download Control-M product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Orchestrator

April 2025

Download UiPath Orchestrator product report

Also Known As

Control M

No data available

Overview

Control-M is used for enterprise workload automation, orchestrating finance, retail, healthcare, and supply chain processes. It handles batch job scheduling, managed file transfers, cloud integrations, and compliance auditing across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments.

Organizations leverage Control-M to efficiently monitor and manage business-critical processes like payroll, HR, SAP, Informatica, and database tasks. It enhances visibility, security, and error resolution. Automating and optimizing workflows in data centers, AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud Platform, Control-M supports diverse technological environments. The platform's robust capabilities make it suitable for effective centralized management of applications and data pipelines, ensuring enhanced collaboration and scalability.

What are Control-M's most important features?

Integration capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with various systems
Automation API: Facilitates automation through APIs
Managed File Transfer: Simplifies secure file transfers
GUI console: Intuitive graphical user interface
Role-based administration: Provides access control
Single-pane view: Centralized monitoring dashboard
Scheduling options: Flexible job scheduling
Workflow orchestration: Coordinates complex workflows
Reporting: Generates insightful reports
Monitoring: Tracks and manages tasks
Forecasting: Predicts future workloads
Self-service portal: Empowers users with self-service tools
Plugins: Extends functionality through additional plugins

What are the benefits or ROI of using Control-M?

Enhanced visibility: Centralized view of all processes
Ease of use: User-friendly interface
Error reduction: Minimizes manual errors
Improved collaboration: Facilitates teamwork
Scalability: Supports growth and scale
Support: Comprehensive customer support

Control-M is implemented in industries like finance to handle payroll and HR tasks, in retail for inventory management and supply chain processes, and in healthcare for compliance auditing and patient data processing. Organizations benefit from streamlined workflows and automated processes across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments, ensuring efficient and secure operations.

BMC

UiPath Orchestrator automates website processes, manages supply chains, handles log-ins, and processes invoices efficiently. It's a comprehensive tool for generating reports, managing RPA workflows, scheduling robots, and ensuring task accuracy, making it indispensable for organizations aiming to optimize automation.

UiPath Orchestrator stands out for its user-friendly interface, centralized data collection, and robust security measures. Its intuitive design, combined with a comprehensive view of bot activity, makes it highly appreciated among users. With asset encryption, AI-integrated functionalities, and role-based access control, organizations find it reduces the need for extensive technical knowledge, thereby enhancing automation efficiency. It also excels in asset and queue management, logging capabilities, and scheduling functions, contributing significantly to streamlined operational processes.

What are the most important features of UiPath Orchestrator?

Centralized data collection: Provides a unified view of all automation activities
Robust security measures: Includes asset encryption and role-based access control
Scheduling functions: Allows efficient planning and execution of automated tasks
Asset and queue management: Enhances organization in handling automation assets
Logging capabilities: Tracks activities for better oversight and troubleshooting
AI-integrated functionalities: Improves accuracy and efficiency in automation

What benefits should users look for in reviews when evaluating UiPath Orchestrator?

Market visibility: Increased exposure and promotional activities
Code management: Improved management capabilities for Studio
Support response: Faster and more efficient support services
Credential vault: Enhanced flexibility in handling transactional items
AI capabilities: Advanced features at competitive pricing
Documentation: Clearer guidelines for transitioning setups
Integration: Better integration with reporting tools and comprehensive dashboards
Licensing: Streamlined processes for managing licenses
Monitoring: Centralized triggers for better process monitoring

UiPath Orchestrator sees wide application across industries such as manufacturing, finance, and healthcare. In manufacturing, it streamlines supply chain processes and automates inventory management. Finance companies use it for processing invoices and managing compliance, while the healthcare sector benefits from automating patient data handling and optimizing appointment scheduling. Each industry leverages the platform\'s extensive capabilities to enhance operational efficiency and accuracy.

UiPath

Sample Customers

CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Control-M vs. UiPath Orchestrator

April 2025

Free Report: Control-M vs. UiPath Orchestrator

Find out what your peers are saying about Control-M vs. UiPath Orchestrator and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

849,686 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Control-M vs. UiPath Orchestrator report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.