

Control-M and UiPath Orchestrator compete in the automation software category. Control-M appears advantageous for its robust enterprise-focused automation and scheduling, while UiPath Orchestrator is preferable in environments prioritizing user-friendliness and rapid integration.
Features: Control-M stands out for its extensive automation capabilities, seamless platform integration, and strong scheduling features. UiPath Orchestrator excels in centralized bot management, user-friendly interfaces, and flexible deployment options.
Room for Improvement: Control-M requires better reporting tools, enhanced output analysis, and more cost-effective licensing. UiPath Orchestrator could improve its UI for user-friendliness, streamline process automation, and enhance exception handling.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M supports multiple deployment models providing flexibility but faces installation complexity with inconsistent support. UiPath Orchestrator is praised for easy cloud and on-premises deployment and efficient support.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M, with its extensive features and task-based licensing, suits large enterprises despite high costs, achieving ROI through automation. UiPath Orchestrator offers competitive pricing, with cloud versions offering cost efficiencies and ROI from productivity improvements.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
The impact of UiPath Orchestrator's analytics on the decision-making process is important because it shortens the decision-making time, which helps customers.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The support is accurate, and BMC is always ready to help with queries and complex incidents.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
Their support teams are not sufficiently qualified to support us in our needs.
It's on the better side, but still has room for improvement in the speed of response.
Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
As the workload on Control-M increases, its scalability is much higher.
The solution's flexibility in integration and scheduling across different environments suggests good scalability.
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.
Once properly implemented, the system becomes very stable, which is one of its strongest attributes.
The solution is stable and integrated well with other systems.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.
Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.
I would prefer if the tool was more intuitive and it is important to maintain simplicity instead of combining multiple functionalities, potentially through different licensing models to restrict features.
I am interested in seeing more features like document understanding and AI integration.
The major issue is with the application according to the new version of the UI.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.
Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.
The pricing of UiPath Orchestrator is a bit high.
Regarding licensing costs and setup costs, the pricing is on the higher side compared to other RPA solutions that are entering the market, which are much cheaper, and sometimes we cannot retain customers because of this.
It would be beneficial for UiPath to further refine pricing, setup costs, and licensing by making their tool more intuitive and simplifying complex functionalities.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
It is easy to integrate Control-M with technologies for data ops or DevOps processes as things change, and it is not complex compared to other workload automation tools available in the market.
The centralized nature of UiPath Orchestrator provides a seamless experience for managing automation processes.
We use UiPath Orchestrator to connect with different applications, extract and analyze data by specific criteria, and send emails.
UiPath Orchestrator is considered the brain of the system.


| Product | Market Share (%) | 
|---|---|
| Control-M | 18.9% | 
| UiPath Orchestrator | 1.0% | 
| Other | 80.1% | 


| Company Size | Count | 
|---|---|
| Small Business | 26 | 
| Midsize Enterprise | 13 | 
| Large Enterprise | 114 | 
| Company Size | Count | 
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 | 
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 | 
| Large Enterprise | 20 | 








Control-M by BMC is engineered to manage hybrid cloud workflows, offering orchestration capabilities starting at $29,000 annually. Aimed at helping growing teams, it efficiently supports cross-environment scheduling and automation needs.
Control-M offers robust cross-platform scheduling, automation, and integration with applications such as SAP and Informatica. Users appreciate its ease of use with a graphical interface, centralized management, and monitoring capabilities. Advanced features, including Managed File Transfer, automated error handling, and real-time alerts, enhance productivity. The ability to unify workflows and support diverse environments makes Control-M a trusted tool in many sectors. While improvements in reporting flexibility and API integration with tools like ServiceNow are needed, addressing performance issues during upgrades could enhance its value. Offering improved support for new technologies and cloud environments is beneficial, with cost-effectiveness being a consideration.
What are the key features of Control-M?Control-M is leveraged in industries like finance for enterprise scheduling and data management, supporting mainframe, Linux, Unix, Windows, and cloud platforms. It contributes to workflow orchestration and workload automation, improving operational efficiency and enhancing IT infrastructure across those environments.
UiPath Orchestrator offers a centralized platform for managing robotic process automation tasks, featuring advanced scheduling, integration capabilities, and robust monitoring to enhance workflow efficiency across environments.
UiPath Orchestrator provides a comprehensive suite of tools for automating workflows, centralizing data management, and ensuring security compliance. Known for its ease of use, it helps businesses schedule robots, handle reports, and monitor logs centrally. It facilitates task deployment across diverse environments, simplifies document understanding, process automation, and provides insights into bot activities. While installation and complexity are areas for improvement, Orchestrator remains integral in sectors like finance, telecom, and healthcare.
What features does UiPath Orchestrator provide?Organizations leverage UiPath Orchestrator for automating workflows such as website processes and supply chain management. In industries like finance and healthcare, it is used for provisioning and data entry. It provides a framework to configure machines, create templates, and manage resources, driving efficiency and innovation.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.