Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Appian vs Control-M comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Appian
Ranking in Process Automation
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
58
Ranking in other categories
Business Process Management (BPM) (6th), Rapid Application Development Software (6th), Low-Code Development Platforms (5th), Process Mining (6th)
Control-M
Ranking in Process Automation
2nd
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
114
Ranking in other categories
Managed File Transfer (MFT) (3rd), Workload Automation (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2024, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Appian is 10.7%, down from 10.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Control-M is 4.2%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Process Automation
 

Featured Reviews

PP
Nov 21, 2023
Fast to build simple to medium complexity solutions
Process Automation and Forms Digitisation, implementation of organisational wide processes rather than use of COTS Appian was not selected by any of the organisations I've worked with to date for production use. Form building capabilities and well thought out process modelling are key points to…
AF
Aug 5, 2024
We can automate and orchestrate thousands of jobs
Our organization works with the cloud and databases. Our primary use case for Control-M is automating orchestration and scheduling jobs across the cloud and on-prem. We use it to monitor and report on jobs. We also use the index to integrate with the cloud service. It leverages our ability to…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Since implementing we have had a faster time to solution, with fewer resources needed."
"It's a stable product."
"Technical support is helpful."
"Process culture is making noise inside the organization because now, everybody knows that their time is being monitored."
"Appian also has very flexible local integration."
"What stands out are the speed of the product, the quick, easy development, and visual diagramming."
"The agile manner that we require to create our workflows. This is probably the most critical part of our solution and the time it takes to start processing the solution."
"The most valuable features are the low coding and low code data."
"Ability to handle files remotely through the advanced file transfer feature."
"The multiple scheduling options allow you to do anything you want, whenever you want, and however you want. You can easily be in control when things happen."
"Technical support is very helpful and available 24/7."
"The solution has the power to reduce resources, which is good for business. It is constantly updated to remain compatible with new technologies such as Amazon, Azure, and Google Cloud. It's very easy to take advantage of the compatibilities."
"We can tie together all the workloads across the estate and make the whole process reactive to events."
"It has certainly helped speed things up."
"I find it very helpful to be able to keep track of all our help desk tickets."
"Control-M has enabled true enterprise batch automation, which combined with the other BMC Control products on our mainframe platform, allows us to run a 24/7 site with the lights out."
 

Cons

"Appian could include other applications that we could reuse for other customers, CRM for example."
"The reporting is not as good as in similar products. They could also improve the dashboards."
"We would like to have more granular control for interface styling."
"Sometimes, clients expect us to implement ERP using Appian, which is very complicated. In such cases, I don't believe that Appian is a good tool for that."
"​Appian is easy to set up, but JBoss is complex. JBoss is the application server for running Appian."
"We have clients that want to use Office 365, Microsoft Analytics, and Power Apps. Appian just isn't the same as using something specifically designed to cater to the Microsoft Suite."
"It is also not easy to learn. Training tutorials could be improved."
"We'd like improved functionality for testing new devices."
"I've never been very successful when researching ways to utilize Batch Impact Manager. It's a tool to set up dummy jobs in your job flow and it's supposed to come back to you and say, 'Okay, for this job flow, you are 50 percent complete at a certain point in time'...I would like things like Batch Impact Manager to be a little more user-friendly, out-of-the-box."
"The high availability that comes from BMC with its supplied Postgres database is very limited. Even using your customer-supplied Postgres database is problematic. We have engaged with them regarding this, but it is difficult. My company doesn't want to do this and BMC doesn't want to do that. We just need to find some middle ground to get the proper high availability. We're also moving away, like the rest of the world, from the more expensive offerings, like Oracle. We are trying to use Postgres, which is free. The stability is good. It is just that the high availability configuration is not ideal. It could be better."
"There is definitely room for improvement. Version 9.0.20 actually comes with a web-based interface, but there are still a lot of things unavailable with it. There will eventually be more inclusions added into the web interface, but there is still a long way to go."
"I would like to see more audit report templates added, and perhaps more customizability in terms of reporting."
"They can improve their interface."
"There's a lot of room for improvement and I think it can be more user-friendly."
"I'm currently working on the SaaS version, but I've also worked on the on-prem versions before. There is a handful of features that haven't been added to the SaaS version, and the BMC knows that. It's a matter of time before they prioritize the missing pieces and bring them into the SaaS version."
"Some of the features are not available. We were about to deploy the REST API, but we had some challenges. We had to use a third-party application. So, it should be improved in terms of integrating REST API jobs. That was something that was lacking. The customer was not that happy in terms of getting the desired output. So, we had to use a third-party application called Hangfire. We would like to have more videos on REST API integration, and we would like to have easy integration with the Control-M application through the REST API."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost is a bit higher than other low-code competitors, OutSystems and Mendix. The price needs to be more competitive."
"It is fully managed, and I don't believe there are any additional expenses."
"BPM done right is a huge value proposition for almost any company, and with Appian's low code rapid development model, the ROI can be huge, while the break-even point should be accelerated tremendously."
"The price of the solution is reasonable and is paid annually. The price of the solution depends on how many users use the solution. It can range from $50,000 to $200,000. For example, for 20,000 users the price can be approximately $200,000."
"The price of this solution is a little high here in Mongolia."
"It's good value for the price."
"If you're doing an enterprise-wide digital transformation, Appian is worthwhile, but not for just one or two use cases because the license costs are higher."
"The license is not very cheap. It's on the expensive side."
"Licensing costs are around $3000 a year."
"The cost of the hardware is high. Because you need to license each job, it is costly."
"Compare to other tools Pricing and licensing was more. It should be decrease."
"Pricing can be steep, but you get what you pay for."
"As we increase the number of tasks or jobs on the system, there are concerns about cost."
"There are two different types of licenses available. The first is based on the number of jobs that we run per day, and the other is based on the number of agents that we install. My current project has a contract for five years."
"BMC's price is based on the number of jobs."
"This product saves hours in a day based on my experience working here versus other companies with manually operations."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.
801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
27%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
11%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
28%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?
Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...
Is Appian a suitable solution for beginners who have no additional preparation?
Appian is actually pretty big on educating its users, including with courses that reward you with certifications. There is a whole section on their company’s website where you can check out the edu...
Is it easy to set up Appian or did you have to resort to professional help?
We had some issues when we were setting up Appian. It was quite surprising, since this is a low-code tool which, in its essence, means it is meant for business users and inexperienced beginners. So...
How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...
What do you like most about Control-M?
First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?
The product price is reasonable. I rate the pricing an eight.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Appian BPM, Appian AnyWhere, Appian Enterprise BPMS
Control M
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hansard Global plc, Punch Taverns, Pirelli, Crawford & Company, EDP Renewables, Queensland Government Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning (, Bank of Tennessee
CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
Find out what your peers are saying about Appian vs. Control-M and other solutions. Updated: September 2024.
801,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.