Control-M vs MOVEit comparison

BMC and Progress Software are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. BMC is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while Progress Software is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. BMC holds a 4.8% mindshare in MFT, compared to Progress Software’s 9.3% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of BMC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Progress Software users who would recommend it.

Control-M

Read 123 Control-M reviews

21,830 Views
1,528 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

MOVEit

Read 14 MOVEit reviews

2,688 Views
2,554 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Control-M

MOVEit

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Control-M and MOVEit are competitors in the realm of enterprise IT solutions, with an emphasis on automation and secure file transfers, respectively. Control-M has the upper hand in terms of extensive integration options and comprehensive scheduling capabilities that serve complex enterprise workflows, whereas MOVEit excels in secure file transfers with robust management features.

Features: Control-M excels with centralized job scheduling, batch monitoring, and automation capabilities. Its valuable add-ons like Forecast and BIM enhance proactive error management and integration with numerous platforms including SAP and VMware. MOVEit, on the other hand, is tailored for secure file transfers, offering extensive logging, file management, and encryption functionalities. These enable detailed auditing and a reliable transfer process.

Room for Improvement: Control-M can improve by enhancing its output analysis with arithmetic capabilities, expanding reporting functionalities, and refining licensing models to reduce costs. Additionally, stronger API integration and improved documentation can aid in better interoperability. MOVEit needs enhancements in real-time monitoring, broader cloud integrations, and optimization for larger file sizes to support multi-user scalability more effectively.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M offers flexibility with on-premises, hybrid cloud, and public cloud deployment options. Customer service is recognized for expertise but noted for response time improvements. MOVEit, primarily on-premises, shares similar customer support concerns. Despite reliable services, there is a need for more responsive and comprehensive support.

Pricing and ROI: Control-M is acknowledged for its high cost, justified by a comprehensive feature set ideal for enterprise-scale operations. Its licensing depends on job or endpoint counts, delivering a strong ROI through automation. MOVEit is viewed as cost-effective, concentrating on secure transfers and minimizing manual interventions. Straightforward pricing with fewer add-ons appeals to businesses focused on specific file transfer needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Control-M vs. MOVEit Report (Updated: May 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Control-M vs. MOVEit

May 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,390 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Control-M

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

123

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (2nd), Workload Automation (1st)

MOVEit

Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Control-M is 4.8%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MOVEit is 9.3%, down from 13.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Managed File Transfer (MFT)

Featured Reviews

Ujjwal Sachdeva

Data scientist at Advarisk

Efficient automation and boosted workflow but needs better integration methods

Control-M is a bit faster compared to other solutions. The job and coding are easier. Also, my DevOps and Ops teams work collaboratively with it, enhancing its efficiency. The workflow is much easier compared to the ACS services we were using. Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.

Read full review

Sumit Mundik

Application Development Senior Analyst at Accenture

Reliable, has a simple GUI, and provides brilliant automation capabilities

It is very easy to configure the setup. MOVEit is a reliable tool. I have not seen as many issues with it as in Globalscape. The tool’s GUI is very simple. I can do anything from the web. I need not log in to the desktop version. The automation capabilities are brilliant. We can create and add any kind of schedule. We can create schedules and have them run on a specific day. For example, we can run the schedule on the third and fourth business days or the first seven business days. We can run schedules for every 10, 15, or 20 minutes. When we pick a file, the tool creates a temporary directory in the MOVEit server. When the file is sent to the destination, it does not store the file inside the system. The moment the files get picked up, the tool delivers them. We did not face many challenges while integrating the tool into our environment. It is a really good product. Even if we face any issues, we can easily resolve them because the errors we see are self-explanatory.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The pressure on our operations and our maintenance has been reduced."

"Before Control-M, we didn't have a centralized view and could not view what happened in the past to determine what will happen in the future. The Gantt view that we have in Control-M is like a project view. It is nice because we sometimes have some application maintenance that we need to do. So, in a single console, we can hold the jobs for the next hour or two. We can release that job when it is finished. This is a really nice feature that we didn't have before. It is something really simple, but we didn't previously have a console where we could say, "For the next two hours, what are the jobs that we will run? And, hold these jobs not to run." This is really important."

"The solution has the power to reduce resources, which is good for business. It is constantly updated to remain compatible with new technologies such as Amazon, Azure, and Google Cloud. It's very easy to take advantage of the compatibilities."

"The initial setup is largely straightforward."

"We have a better picture of our auditability. When someone comes to us, and asks for sources, "How did the deltas occur?" We can provide answers quickly, or at least quicker than what we used to. We are actually sure of the information that we provide, where before it was like, "Hmm, I think it comes from over there. Let me double check, but it gets really convoluted over here and I think that is where it comes from." Now, if it is within the Control-M environment, it has a straightforward answer that we can provide with confidence."

"Control-M provides us with a unified view, where we can easily define, orchestrate, and monitor all our application workflows and data pipelines. It also provides the ability to filter. So, if I don't want to see everything, I can also narrow it down or open ViewPoint. This is very important since we have thousands of jobs to monitor. If we did not have this ability, it would be very difficult to see what is going on."

"Control-M has improved application reliability and the SLAs in our company by quite a bit. You can see if problems are coming. If we have an SLA in a couple of hours, we know well before that couple hours if processing is behind, and it allows us to take some preventative action."

"It has absolutely saved us time. It has made us more efficient. As far as the processing between systems, we don't have as many people. They have been able to focus on other efforts, because we have been able to automate more stuff with Control-M."

More Control-M pros

"The convenience of renaming files and using time stamps to segregate them has been very valuable."

"The most valuable feature of MOVEit is the upload speed."

"The renaming and timestamp features are great."

"From an administration standpoint, it's very easy to manage, and I feel pretty confident in the security of the product. From an end-user standpoint also, it's very easy."

"The major advantage is moving files as part of a workflow."

"Offers a large collection of very good path planning algorithms."

"MOVEit's best features were the number of options available, like folder creation, and user-friendliness."

"Especially at the time of monitoring, it's a nice way to take a look at the script and take a look at run time, which gives enough information for the files that are getting picked or not."

More MOVEit pros

Cons

"The infrastructure could be improved."

"There is definitely room for improvement. Version 9.0.20 actually comes with a web-based interface, but there are still a lot of things unavailable with it. There will eventually be more inclusions added into the web interface, but there is still a long way to go."

"The licensing cost can be improved."

"I'm currently working on the SaaS version, but I've also worked on the on-prem versions before. There is a handful of features that haven't been added to the SaaS version, and the BMC knows that. It's a matter of time before they prioritize the missing pieces and bring them into the SaaS version."

"Consider adding a mobile application for remote management."

"After we complete FTP jobs, those FTP jobs will be cleared from the Control-M schedule after the noon refresh. So, I struggle to find out where those jobs are saved. Then, we need to request execution of the FTP jobs again. If there could be an option to show the logs, which have been previously completed, that would help us. I can find all other job logs from the server side, but FTP job logs. Maybe I am missing the feature, or if it is not there, it could be added."

"The MFT applications should have more functionality and flexibility within that tool. Having more flexibility with that tool for handling the one to many or many to one concept. Like being able to take data from one source and push it to many locations or pull data from many locations and bring it back into a single source. That's why we still use our TPS program for the file transfers just because we don't have some of those capabilities available to us within MFT."

"A lot of businesses are using ServiceNow, which is another tool. I would like there to be some integration with ServiceNow or other third-party tools as well as have easily available integrations. Right now, we need to write scripts. Apart from that, if there were some integrations with an ITSM tool, then that would be good. Because at the end of the day, most of our clients are using different ITSM tools. I know that BMC Remedy is easy to integrate with Control-M. However, if there was availability for Jira as well as other ITSM and DevOps tools, that would be a good improvement."

More Control-M cons

"The DR solution (DR recoveries) needs to be enhanced."

"Communication can be improved between the product owners and users."

"If the transfers are more or the file size is big, it takes more time. It doesn't have much capacity to process multiple files at the same time. It can get stuck or take a lot of time to process the files."

"Something that I would like to see is better upgrade support. We had looked at getting help with an upgrade, and to do it after hours, it was going to be $6,000. It only takes 15 minutes to do. It'd be nice if the after-hour support was a little more reasonable."

"Since I have to monitor two times a day, it would be nice if they have script templates."

"It would be beneficial to include a feature that allows you to hide items and not be locked out if someone has made too many password attempts."

"The initial setup is a bit difficult."

"The product must improve its security features."

More MOVEit cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"BMC's price is based on the number of jobs."

"This is an expensive product compared to other solutions, although I think that it is a good one. We are in a good position with licensing, as we can run 10,000 jobs."

"Licensing costs are around $3000 a year."

"Compare to other tools Pricing and licensing was more. It should be decrease."

"Initially, our licensing model was based on the number of jobs per day. That caused some issues because we were restricted to a number. So at our renewal time we said, 'We want to convert from number of jobs to number of endpoints.' That cost us extra money but it gave us additional capabilities, without worrying about the number of jobs."

"It works on task-based licensing."

"One of the restrictions that we had was with some of the licensing, and not having any insight on the financials part of the product. I don't know what the licensing on the product is, but we don't have an unlimited enterprise license. So, there might be a limitation on either the cost of the licensing or the number of seats."

"There are human costs in addition to the standard pricing and licensing of this solution."

More Control-M pricing and cost advice

"I haven't really priced out many other products like this, but I feel it's reasonable. Their upgrade support after hours was going to be $6,000. I just made the decision to wing it and just do it during business hours and call support if there was a problem."

"It's cost-effective."

"Technical support is only available with a paid license."

"When compared to other products I've used, I believe MoveIt is worth the money someone might pay to use it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,390 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

27%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about Control-M?

First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?

Its cost can be more competitive. One of the main things customers look at is the cost. It's not affordable. The cost is very high, according to my customers. The licensing cost is very high, and t...

See all answers

What do you like most about MOVEit?

The automation is generally very simple that helps with operational efficiency. Since we mainly created interfaces and scheduled transfers, the tool itself handled the file transfer automation.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MOVEit?

The product must improve its security features. Recently, there have been multiple attacks on the solution. It has ruined the reputation of clients who use the solution. The vendor must ensure that...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for MOVEit?

We can use the product to transfer files. I work for a bank. The files we transfer have PGP encryption by default. The data we send or receive is encrypted, ensuring that there is no data breach.

See all answers

Comparisons

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 14% of the time

Automic Automation vs Control-M

Compared 8% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Control-M

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 6% of the time

Stonebranch vs Control-M

Compared 5% of the time

More Control-M Competitors

JSCAPE by Redwood vs MOVEit

Compared 18% of the time

IBM Sterling File Gateway vs MOVEit

Compared 13% of the time

GoAnywhere MFT vs MOVEit

Compared 12% of the time

BMC Control-M Managed File Transfer vs MOVEit

Compared 5% of the time

WS_FTP Server vs MOVEit

Compared 5% of the time

More MOVEit Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Control-M

July 2025

Download Control-M product report

Buyer's Guide

MOVEit

June 2025

Download MOVEit product report

Also Known As

Control M

Ipswitch File Transfer, Ipswitch Managed File Transfer

Interactive Demo

BMC

Demo not available

Progress Software

Overview

Control-M by BMC offers orchestration for hybrid cloud workflows, starting at $29,000 annually. It's designed for teams managing dependencies efficiently with automation and scheduling capabilities.

Control-M is known for its automation, integration, and scheduling capabilities. It provides a user-friendly GUI for seamless third-party application integration and robust file transfer capabilities. Role-based administration features, self-service portals, and the ability to handle complex workflows enhance operational efficiency. Its control modules enable diverse integrations, while forecasting, monitoring, and alerting functionalities improve reliability and adaptability across platforms, making it essential for orchestrating tasks efficiently.

What are Control-M's key features?

User-Friendly GUI: Offers intuitive interface for easy navigation.
Seamless Third-Party Integration: Facilitates smooth interaction with other tools.
Robust File Transfer: Ensures reliable and secure data movement.
Role-Based Administration: Enhances security and access control.
Self-Service Portal: Enables users to manage tasks independently.
Forecasting and Monitoring: Provides predictive insights for better planning.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Operational Efficiency: Streamlines processes and reduces manual tasks.
Improved Reliability: Minimizes errors with automated workflows.
Real-Time Insights: Offers visibility into job performance and system status.
Scalability: Adapts to growing business needs.
Integration Flexibility: Supports diverse applications and environments.

Control-M is vital in industries like financial services, data management, and IT operations. It automates batch processing, job automation, and file transfers, supporting applications such as SAP, Oracle, and Informatica. This enhances transparency, reduces errors, and provides insights into job performance and system status.

BMC

Ipswitch Managed File Transfer is an automated file transfer system to manage, view, and control all file transfer services. You will always know where your files are with predictable and secure delivery, extensive reporting, and easy integration with existing systems.

Progress Software

Sample Customers

CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc

Cambridgeshire County Council, Capita Document & Information Services, Enterasys, City of Guelph, Hermes

Buyer's Guide

Control-M vs. MOVEit

May 2025

Free Report: Control-M vs. MOVEit

Find out what your peers are saying about Control-M vs. MOVEit and other solutions. Updated: May 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,390 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Control-M vs. MOVEit report.

See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.