Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Control-M vs MOVEit comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.4
Control-M automates workflows to enhance efficiency, reduce errors and costs, centralize processes, and optimize resource management for better returns.
Sentiment score
4.2
MOVEit delivered substantial first-year returns with immediate cost savings, improved satisfaction, and efficient file management despite minor feature requests.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
Cloud Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
Director of Sales at a tech services company with self employed
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.2
Control-M's support team is praised for responsiveness and expertise, though some users experience delays or need escalation.
Sentiment score
5.4
MOVEit customer service is generally effective with responsive support, though some users note delays and prefer alternative solutions.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
The support is accurate, and BMC is always ready to help with queries and complex incidents.
Solutions Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
Cloud Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
For the cloud environment, they had taken only 16x5 support, but for the on-premises, they had taken 24x7 support.
Project Manager at Cognizant
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
Control-M is scalable and flexible, supporting large enterprises, despite minor cost and cloud integration concerns.
Sentiment score
6.3
MOVEit is highly scalable, efficiently managing growth and large data transfers, with user confidence in its expansion capabilities.
Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.
Control-M System Administrator at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
I am paying for a top-end tool which rarely experiences issues, with most problems stemming from the applications being managed rather than the tooling itself.
Senior Control-M Consultant at Ktsl
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
Cloud/Devops Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees
The scalability of MOVEit is not an issue; it scales up easily to handle large volumes of data when customers need to transfer it.
Support Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Control-M is praised for its stability, reliability, minimal downtime, and exceptional performance, often surpassing other corporate tools.
Sentiment score
6.8
MOVEit is stable with occasional issues during upgrades, but users appreciate its reliability, performance, and response improvements.
Control-M itself is robust, and it would receive a rating of 10.
Technical architect at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
Data scientist at Advarisk
The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.
Associate Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
I have not faced any downtime or outages with it anywhere.
Support Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
The server sometimes becomes unresponsive or crashes, causing MOVEit jobs to fail and generating multiple tickets.
Technical Lead at HCLSoftware
We were hit by malicious malware attacks in the last two years more comparatively.
Project Manager at Cognizant
 

Room For Improvement

Control-M users seek improved analysis, reporting, compatibility, integration, user interface, cloud support, documentation, and cost-effectiveness.
MOVEit needs improved data handling, security, scalability, interface, and support features for better user experience and connectivity.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
Assistant professor at J.P. College of Engineering
We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.
Control-M System Administrator at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.
Sr Manager at Vodafone
Improving SharePoint connectivity usage, which has limitations, would open up considerable usage and enhance MOVEit significantly.
Senior Technical Support Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
If I have to pull a task report for a specific requirement such as its history and task attributes, the report doesn't come in a CSV format, which is consumable.
Project Manager at Cognizant
We would also want to add new capabilities, and incorporating artificial intelligence could be useful as well.
Support Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
 

Setup Cost

Control-M's tiered licensing offers high functionality but can be costly for small businesses, valued by larger organizations.
MOVEit users consider pricing reasonable; additional support incurs extra costs, but the product is viewed as cost-effective.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Associate Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees
Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.
Senior System Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.
Control-M System Administrator at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
 

Valuable Features

Control-M enhances workflow efficiency with cross-platform support, automation, and integration with applications like SAP, Oracle, and cloud services.
MOVEit provides secure, user-friendly file transfer with robust encryption, automation, and monitoring features ensuring data integrity and protection.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
Data scientist at Advarisk
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
Cloud Engineer at a healthcare company with 10,001+ employees
It is easy to integrate Control-M with technologies for data ops or DevOps processes as things change, and it is not complex compared to other workload automation tools available in the market.
architect at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees
When files are placed in the transfer server, they are completely encrypted, and even administrators with access to the storage service cannot identify files due to different IDs.
Senior Technical Support Engineer at a computer software company with 10,001+ employees
MOVEit encryption features protect data during transfer.
Technical Lead at HCLSoftware
The file transfer utility of MOVEit is most user-friendly and easy to understand.
Project Manager at Cognizant
 

Categories and Ranking

Control-M
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
150
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (2nd), Workload Automation (1st)
MOVEit
Ranking in Managed File Transfer (MFT)
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category, the mindshare of Control-M is 4.2%, down from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MOVEit is 7.9%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Managed File Transfer (MFT) Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Control-M4.2%
MOVEit7.9%
Other87.9%
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
 

Featured Reviews

RP
Batch Admin at NBC Universal
Brings data together from multiple platforms and optimizes cross-environment orchestration
The features of Control-M that I like the most include the ability to easily integrate or bring in different platforms into Control-M. For instance, AWS, mainframe, TWS, and something that's running on Autosys can all be brought into Control-M, converted to how Control-M runs it, and then the batch can be executed. This centralizes various applications in Control-M, which doesn't just have to handle batch processes, but also other tasks like reporting on required data. I find this functionality very useful and the setup is impressive, with more advancements yet to come. With Control-M, my company has achieved several measurable improvements since I started. The metrics indicate that the number of failures has dropped, and we have addressed the issue of excessive false alerts that I encountered when I joined. Previously, we received an overwhelming number of alerts daily, but now we manage to maintain that at a normalized level, perhaps around five to fifteen alerts, depending on running core batches and their setup.
Kiran Raju L - PeerSpot reviewer
Project Manager at Cognizant
User adaptability impresses with room for enhanced reporting features
The solution lacks a flow view wherein you will not be able to see the integrated jobs in a flow diagram view. This becomes trickier to understand which flow is failing unless you were part of the design team. Reporting for MOVEit needs a lot more work. For example, if I have to pull a task report for a specific requirement such as its history and task attributes, the report doesn't come in a CSV format, which is consumable. It always comes in a scripted format. When you have to show the report to management, they don't understand the scripted format. They need everything in Excel. The reporting feature needs to work on having it in an Excel format. It has been pretty stable, but we were hit by malicious malware attacks in the last two years more comparatively. Depending upon the type of license that is owned and the support with the license, it is up to par with other leading marketing tools.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Insurance Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Insurance Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business30
Midsize Enterprise15
Large Enterprise123
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise16
 

Questions from the Community

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...
What do you like most about Control-M?
First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?
From what I know about pricing, I would probably put Control-M in the expensive category, but you do pay for what you get; you are paying for a premium product.
What do you like most about MOVEit?
The automation is generally very simple that helps with operational efficiency. Since we mainly created interfaces and scheduled transfers, the tool itself handled the file transfer automation.
What needs improvement with MOVEit?
From the support perspective, the logging system could be improved. When MOVEit jobs fail and vendor support is needed, sometimes vendor contact details are not properly documented. This creates is...
What is your primary use case for MOVEit?
We are from a software organization where we have a US healthcare project. The hospitals use the application for file transfer from one location to another location, transferring banking, financial...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Control M
Ipswitch File Transfer, Ipswitch Managed File Transfer
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

The Bank of East Asia, LINE Bank Taiwan, Coop, Air Europa, Carrefour, Itau Unibanco, Snam, Embraer, ANZ Bank, EDP, Dominio's, Tampa General Hospital, W&W Informatik GmbH, Veterans General, Up Sí Vale, Sky Italia, REWE digital GmbH, Raymond James, Railinc, Navistar, Management Science Associates, Colruyt, CARFAX, Banpara, Aspiag Service, Amadeus, AG Insurance, ING Bank Slaski
Cambridgeshire County Council, Capita Document & Information Services, Enterasys, City of Guelph, Hermes
Find out what your peers are saying about Control-M vs. MOVEit and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.
879,768 professionals have used our research since 2012.