

Control-M and MOVEit compete in the enterprise workflow automation and file transfer category. Based on feature comparisons, Control-M seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive integration capabilities and automation tools, making it more suitable for complex enterprise-level operations.
Features: Control-M offers extensive integration capabilities, cross-platform support, and automation tools, ideal for managing complex workflows and providing comprehensive scheduling and monitoring. MOVEit focuses on secure and reliable file transfers, integrates strong encryption, and efficiently handles large file transfers, with a user-friendly interface.
Room for Improvement: Control-M could improve by enhancing reporting capabilities and real-time analytics, along with better third-party tool integration. MOVEit users desire improved notification systems, additional protocol support, and enhanced dashboard functionality for a more intuitive experience.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M supports on-premises, hybrid, and cloud deployments with substantial customer support, although users mention complex licensing. MOVEit provides flexible deployment models with strong technical support but faces issues with memory leaks and frequent monitoring needs.
Pricing and ROI: Control-M is priced higher due to its enterprise-level features and complex cost structure but users find value in its comprehensive automation and faster issue resolutions. MOVEit is cost-effective, justifying initial costs with ease of use and operational savings due to its focused file transfer functionality.
The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.
You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.
By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.
They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.
The support is accurate, and BMC is always ready to help with queries and complex incidents.
The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.
For the cloud environment, they had taken only 16x5 support, but for the on-premises, they had taken 24x7 support.
Our license doesn't limit our ability to configure Control-M as needed, allowing us to easily create new agents or environments.
I am paying for a top-end tool which rarely experiences issues, with most problems stemming from the applications being managed rather than the tooling itself.
It can absorb more workload wherever needed.
The scalability of MOVEit is not an issue; it scales up easily to handle large volumes of data when customers need to transfer it.
Control-M itself is robust, and it would receive a rating of 10.
The downtime is higher compared to AWS.
The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.
I have not faced any downtime or outages with it anywhere.
The server sometimes becomes unresponsive or crashes, causing MOVEit jobs to fail and generating multiple tickets.
We were hit by malicious malware attacks in the last two years more comparatively.
They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.
We've experienced main problems with MFTE where having one setup means when an error occurs, the entire service goes down.
Documentation should be maintained for all versions since they provided the application.
Improving SharePoint connectivity usage, which has limitations, would open up considerable usage and enhance MOVEit significantly.
If I have to pull a task report for a specific requirement such as its history and task attributes, the report doesn't come in a CSV format, which is consumable.
We would also want to add new capabilities, and incorporating artificial intelligence could be useful as well.
The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.
Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.
Control-M is among the highest-priced solutions in the market.
Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.
The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.
If I have a staff that operates Control-M on Windows Server, they will easily pick it up if they need to run it on Unix or mainframes. It's the same interface, saving time and improving efficiency.
When files are placed in the transfer server, they are completely encrypted, and even administrators with access to the storage service cannot identify files due to different IDs.
MOVEit encryption features protect data during transfer.
The file transfer utility of MOVEit is most user-friendly and easy to understand.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Control-M | 7.1% |
| MOVEit | 7.9% |
| Other | 85.0% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 38 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 23 |
| Large Enterprise | 139 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
Control-M SaaS by BMC is tailored for growing teams, offering essential orchestration for managing hybrid cloud workflows starting at $29,000 annually.
Control-M integrates automation, orchestration, and a user-friendly interface to streamline workflows across banking, DevOps, and cloud environments. Key modules like Managed File Transfer and cross-platform support simplify job monitoring, while Batch Impact Manager enhances scheduling. Despite its capabilities, improvements in output analysis, reporting customization, offline access, and API integration are desired by users.
What are Control-M's key features?Control-M is implemented in industries such as finance and enterprise operations, aiding in automating batch processing across platforms like SAP and Teradata. It integrates with secure file transfers, ERP systems, and databases, whether deployed on-premises or cloud, ensuring seamless operation optimization.
We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.