BizTalk Server vs Control-M comparison

Microsoft and BMC are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Microsoft is ranked #13 with an average rating of 7.0, while BMC is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3. Microsoft holds a 0.8% mindshare in PA, compared to BMC’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of BMC users who would recommend it.

BizTalk Server

Read 15 BizTalk Server reviews

1,198 Views
539 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Control-M

Read 127 Control-M reviews

20,170 Views
3,429 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

BizTalk Server

Control-M

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

BizTalk Server and Control-M compete in the integration solutions category. BizTalk Server has the upper hand in Microsoft-centric environments due to its strong integration capabilities, while Control-M leads in task scheduling and automation for complex operations.

Features: BizTalk Server supports seamless integration within Microsoft ecosystems, durable message handling, and extensive use of various adapters. Control-M excels with powerful scheduling, platform versatility, and advanced automation, providing effective batch processing and scheduling.

Room for Improvement: BizTalk Server could benefit from easier deployment, enhanced cross-platform support, and reduced dependency on specialized expertise. Control-M can improve by lowering initial costs, simplifying advanced customization, and enhancing reporting tools for less technical users.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Control-M offers an easy deployment process with broad customer support, facilitating quicker adoption. BizTalk Server's deployment can be complex and may demand more technical skills despite strong support from Microsoft.

Pricing and ROI: BizTalk Server typically offers a lower setup cost, but ongoing fees like licensing and specialized expertise can add up. Control-M, while having a higher initial investment, often delivers substantial ROI through its potent automation and scheduling features that cut operational costs over time.

To learn more, read our detailed BizTalk Server vs. Control-M Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server vs. Control-M

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 866,561 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

5.5

BizTalk Server offers great ROI for large industries, but smaller businesses might prefer cloud solutions for more flexible options.

Sentiment score

7.1

Control-M boosts efficiency and reduces costs by automating operations, enhancing performance, and delivering swift returns on investment.

Now the direction is to move away from BizTalk Server to IBM WebMethods, which has more features compared to BizTalk Server.

Taqi-Hasan

Senior Application Specialist at Taqa Distribution

For more quotes and insights, download the BizTalk Server report

The main return on investment with Helix Control-M has been a reduction in downtime and minimization of manual interventions, which has improved our operational efficiency.

reviewer2621100

Cloud Engineer at IQVIA

You can run a million batch jobs or tasks at night when all of your highly skilled people are at home sleeping.

reviewer1929963

Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

By implementing automation tools, you can minimize human errors and improve efficiency.

reviewer1207266

Director of Sales at a tech services company with self employed

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

5.2

User experiences vary, with praised documentation, competent engineers, and mix of Microsoft's support and external consulting for assistance.

Sentiment score

7.4

Control-M customer service is praised for efficiency and availability, though technical support experiences mixed reviews and occasional delays.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the BizTalk Server report

They quickly evolve with changing technology trends, easily adopt new features, and incorporate them into the product.

reviewer2746302

architect at kyndryl

The technical support is very polite, helpful, and available 24/7.

reviewer2621100

Cloud Engineer at IQVIA

If something fails at 3 AM in the morning, you need to fix it and get it back up and working really quickly.

reviewer1929963

Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.0

BizTalk Server's scalability receives mixed reviews; some find it expandable, others face issues with increasing message volumes.

Sentiment score

7.6

Control-M is highly scalable, handles diverse applications, but presents occasional scaling challenges and costs, especially with cloud integration.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the BizTalk Server report

It can absorb more workload wherever needed.

reviewer2587689

Cloud/Devops Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

As the workload on Control-M increases, its scalability is much higher.

Ujjwal Sachdeva

Data scientist at Advarisk

I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.

Sham Suresh

Assistant professor at J.P. College of Engineering

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

6.7

BizTalk Server is stable but struggles with large data, losing relevance as users increasingly transition to cloud solutions.

Sentiment score

7.7

Control-M is praised for high stability, efficient task handling, minimal administration, and responsive support, despite occasional connectivity issues.

BizTalk Server's stability rates about eight or nine out of ten.

Dipl.Ing. Johann Pointner

Consultant at EC live! Hans Pointner

BizTalk Server is good for small companies but not for big companies.

Taqi-Hasan

Senior Application Specialist at Taqa Distribution

For more quotes and insights, download the BizTalk Server report

The downtime is higher compared to AWS.

Ujjwal Sachdeva

Data scientist at Advarisk

The testing and development phases need to be more rigorous before releasing patches.

reviewer2518842

Associate Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Once properly implemented, the system becomes very stable, which is one of its strongest attributes.

reviewer1207266

Director of Sales at a tech services company with self employed

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

Room For Improvement

BizTalk Server needs better debugging, deployment, scalability, cloud integration, JSON support, API management, and task management to stay competitive.

Control-M needs better reporting, integration, cost efficiency, UI, offline features, compatibility, and support for new tech and automation.

BizTalk Server needs improvements, especially because we use it for EDI messaging, and it would be very useful to have enhanced tracking capabilities for message tracking and archiving of messages.

Dipl.Ing. Johann Pointner

Consultant at EC live! Hans Pointner

For more quotes and insights, download the BizTalk Server report

They could provide more documentation and tutorials to make the initial setup easier to understand.

Sham Suresh

Assistant professor at J.P. College of Engineering

There should be an automation system for developers to set it up more easily and quickly.

Ujjwal Sachdeva

Data scientist at Advarisk

What they've done about scheduling, other people are still trying to figure out.

reviewer1929963

Account Executive at a computer software company with 51-200 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

Setup Cost

BizTalk Server offers flexible deployment but can be costly compared to Azure, with users favoring cloud solutions for efficiency.

Control-M's task-based pricing can be costly, with complex licensing; CPU options might be more economical for enterprises.

The only thing I heard is that it's not inexpensive.

Dipl.Ing. Johann Pointner

Consultant at EC live! Hans Pointner

For more quotes and insights, download the BizTalk Server report

The licensing cost is very high, and they often consider switching to IBM Workload Scheduler or other options.

reviewer2518842

Associate Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Control-M tends to be more expensive compared to other solutions, but users get great value from it.

Mark_Francome

Senior System Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Pricing is generally affordable, though some features cost a bit more.

reviewer2587689

Cloud/Devops Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

Valuable Features

BizTalk Server excels in seamless integrations, data processing, and reliability with its workflows, adapters, and low-code configurations.

Control-M enhances operational efficiency with automation, cross-platform integration, user-friendly interface, robust monitoring, and streamlined workflow orchestration.

BizTalk Server offers workflow functionality that I find very effective for process automation.

Dipl.Ing. Johann Pointner

Consultant at EC live! Hans Pointner

For more quotes and insights, download the BizTalk Server report

Automation is more advanced, deployment is fast, and version control has been simplified.

Ujjwal Sachdeva

Data scientist at Advarisk

The user interface is comprehensive and lets me view all my jobs on one page, monitor everything, and access the job history.

reviewer2621100

Cloud Engineer at IQVIA

It is easy to integrate Control-M with technologies for data ops or DevOps processes as things change, and it is not complex compared to other workload automation tools available in the market.

reviewer2746302

architect at kyndryl

For more quotes and insights, download the Control-M report

Categories and Ranking

BizTalk Server

Ranking in Process Automation

13th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (8th)

Control-M

Ranking in Process Automation

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

127

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (3rd), Workload Automation (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of BizTalk Server is 0.8%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Control-M is 4.6%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Control-M	4.6%
BizTalk Server	0.8%
Other	94.6%

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Vignesh Kumar Sekar

Senior Analyst at Sword Group

Enables message routing and provides a secure way to communicate between two systems

The AS2 communication protocol is one of the most advanced processes. It enables a handshake with the source and target systems using certificates. It is the most secure way of communicating between two systems. It is an advantage. We can do a lot of message routing. If we want to handle large data, we can put the data into different patterns to process it. We can do it through sequential convoy or parallel convoy orchestration. BizTalk comes with SQL Server. We can load temporary data in the database and use the batch process from BizTalk. It is an added advantage. Creating agreements is a manual job, but it's quite easy in BizTalk. Even a fresh college graduate can configure AS2 certificates and partner profiles and communicate with other systems. It is easy.

Read full review

Mark_Francome

Senior System Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Easily connects to different platforms and ties everything together in a centralized screen

Areas of Control-M that have room for improvement include the reporting feature. The reporting on Control-M hasn't changed much over the years, although it is in a different internal format. It used to be Crystal Reports, and now they've upgraded that. It would be better if that was really flexible where you could define your own reports. You can customize it a little bit, but when people come in with complex questions, you should be able to use that tool and access anything in the database. Control-M has two internal databases that are core to the product. You can go in and do your own SQL queries against the database, but this reporting tool should really be able to do everything that you can do with SQL, and give you good information. Instead, you end up having to export to spreadsheets and then change and update them. It can be very labor-intensive to get this information out. Other than the reporting, they've addressed most things over the years. Control-M is a tool that's been around for more than 30 years, so they have actually fixed most issues that you would encounter. They have a request for enhancement process that most users have sent requests to, but it doesn't move very quickly. The other challenge is they're supporting so many different platforms; BMC just wants it to be a trouble-free release. When users request new features, such as improved reporting, BMC's priority remains maintaining a clean-running system.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

866,561 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	24
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	108

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BizTalk Server?

The tool's most valuable feature is its integration with the banks. Its messaging and routing capabilities are good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BizTalk Server?

Biztalk server doesn't have API management so that our exposed can be protected against the SQL injection, DOS attacks. However, this is available in IBM WebMethods. The positive impact of BizTalk ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering BizTalk Server?

For BizTalk Server's monitoring and alerting tools, we are using a BizTalk 360 monitoring tool. BizTalk 360 is a product that helps us in getting the insight of API response and number of API calls...

See all answers

How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?

Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful because nothing gets left unattended since it is all visible in one place, and th...

See all answers

What do you like most about Control-M?

First of all, the shift from manual to automation has been valuable. We have a tool that can automate.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Control-M?

Its cost can be more competitive. One of the main things customers look at is the cost. It's not affordable. The cost is very high, according to my customers. The licensing cost is very high, and t...

See all answers

Comparisons

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite vs BizTalk Server

Compared 16% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs BizTalk Server

Compared 16% of the time

Camunda vs BizTalk Server

Compared 13% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs BizTalk Server

Compared 10% of the time

IBM B2B Integrator vs BizTalk Server

Compared 7% of the time

More BizTalk Server Competitors

AutoSys Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 13% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Control-M

Compared 8% of the time

Automic Automation vs Control-M

Compared 8% of the time

IBM Workload Automation vs Control-M

Compared 6% of the time

Stonebranch vs Control-M

Compared 4% of the time

More Control-M Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server

August 2025

Download BizTalk Server product report

Buyer's Guide

Control-M

August 2025

Download Control-M product report

Also Known As

No data available

Control M

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

Microsoft

BMC

Overview

Connects systems both inside and across organizations, exchange data and orchestrate business processes across multiple systems.

Microsoft

Control-M by BMC is engineered to manage hybrid cloud workflows, offering orchestration capabilities starting at $29,000 annually. Aimed at helping growing teams, it efficiently supports cross-environment scheduling and automation needs.

Control-M offers robust cross-platform scheduling, automation, and integration with applications such as SAP and Informatica. Users appreciate its ease of use with a graphical interface, centralized management, and monitoring capabilities. Advanced features, including Managed File Transfer, automated error handling, and real-time alerts, enhance productivity. The ability to unify workflows and support diverse environments makes Control-M a trusted tool in many sectors. While improvements in reporting flexibility and API integration with tools like ServiceNow are needed, addressing performance issues during upgrades could enhance its value. Offering improved support for new technologies and cloud environments is beneficial, with cost-effectiveness being a consideration.

What are the key features of Control-M?

Cross-Platform Scheduling: Facilitates seamless task management across various OS environments.
Automation: Provides efficient workflow automation for complex processes.
Third-Party Integration: Ensures smooth integration with applications like SAP and Informatica.
Graphical Interface: Simplifies job management and monitoring with user-friendly design.
Managed File Transfer: Enhances data transfer processes with structured handling.
Real-Time Alerts: Offers notifications for immediate response to workflow issues.

What benefits should organizations expect from Control-M?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines operations and reduces manual workload.
Enhanced Productivity: Automation and monitoring features boost operational output.
Improved Compliance: Supports SLA achievement and regulatory requirements.
Operational Agility: Provides flexible and adaptable task management across platforms.

Control-M is leveraged in industries like finance for enterprise scheduling and data management, supporting mainframe, Linux, Unix, Windows, and cloud platforms. It contributes to workflow orchestration and workload automation, improving operational efficiency and enhancing IT infrastructure across those environments.

BMC

Sample Customers

Centrebet, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, QualCare, Wªrth Handelsges.m.b.H, DTEK, Allscripts, United BioSource, Hogg Robinson

CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc

Buyer's Guide

BizTalk Server vs. Control-M

July 2025

Free Report: BizTalk Server vs. Control-M

Find out what your peers are saying about BizTalk Server vs. Control-M and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

866,561 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BizTalk Server vs. Control-M report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.