Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Teradata Logo

Top 10 Teradata Alternatives

Vendor: Teradata
4.1 out of 5
Badge Leader
7,057 followers
Start review

Top Teradata Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Teradata based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Snowflake, Oracle Exadata, and Vertica. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Teradata Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Teradata, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Teradata Logo
Snowflake
4.2 out of 5
Teradata Logo
Snowflake
4.2 out of 5
Teradata's parallel architecture and workload management demonstrate strength in analytics and handling large data sets. In comparison, Snowflake's multi-clustering and scalability enable flexible scaling and ease of use, appealing to varied use cases. Both offer different pricing models impacting cost management and ROI.
Download Snowflake vs. Teradata Report
Teradata involves higher setup costs, making it less appealing for startups, while Snowflake provides a more cost-effective setup, attracting businesses seeking budget-friendly options. The difference in setup expenses highlights a critical factor for cost-conscious enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
Teradata involves higher setup costs, making it less appealing for startups, while Snowflake provides a more cost-effective setup, attracting businesses seeking budget-friendly options. The difference in setup expenses highlights a critical factor for cost-conscious enterprises.
Teradata Logo
Oracle Exadata
4.3 out of 5
Teradata Logo
Oracle Exadata
4.3 out of 5
Oracle Exadata enhances SQL workloads with Smart Scan and Hybrid Columnar Compression, offering simplified setup and dependable support. In comparison, Teradata's Parallel Everything architecture ensures efficient query execution and scalability, excelling in data security and providing extensive analytics features.
Download Oracle Exadata vs. Teradata Report
Teradata's setup cost is significantly higher, reflecting its robust infrastructure, while Oracle Exadata offers a more competitive setup cost, making it an economical choice for organizations with budget constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Teradata's setup cost is significantly higher, reflecting its robust infrastructure, while Oracle Exadata offers a more competitive setup cost, making it an economical choice for organizations with budget constraints.
Teradata Logo
Vertica
4.1 out of 5
Teradata Logo
Vertica
4.1 out of 5
Teradata excels in large-scale analytical management with robust features like real-time processing. In comparison, Vertica uses columnar storage for rapid processing. Teradata faces challenges in pricing and unstructured data support, while Vertica requires improved documentation and tooling, appealing to different tech buyer needs.
Download Teradata vs. Vertica Report
Teradata demands higher setup costs, making it more substantial upfront than Vertica, which offers lower initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Teradata demands higher setup costs, making it more substantial upfront than Vertica, which offers lower initial expenses.
Teradata Logo
Teradata Logo
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions
4.0 out of 5
Teradata excels in pricing and support with rapid query processing, adaptable features, and strong data handling capabilities. In comparison, VMware Tanzu Data Solutions offers a feature-rich platform with open-source flexibility, catering to cost-sensitive environments with integration efficiency and enhanced value for the investment.
Download Teradata vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report
Teradata features a higher setup cost with extensive infrastructure requirements, while VMware Tanzu Data Solutions offers a more cost-effective setup process with flexible deployment options.
View comparison
Pricing
Teradata features a higher setup cost with extensive infrastructure requirements, while VMware Tanzu Data Solutions offers a more cost-effective setup process with flexible deployment options.
Teradata Logo
SAP BW4HANA
3.8 out of 5
Teradata Logo
SAP BW4HANA
3.8 out of 5
Teradata excels in scalability and parallel processing, ideal for handling large data volumes. In comparison, SAP BW4HANA offers deep integration within SAP ecosystems, appealing to SAP-centric enterprises seeking robust data analytics. Each solution targets distinct needs in data processing and integration.
Download SAP BW4HANA vs. Teradata Report
Teradata has a higher setup cost compared to SAP BW4HANA, offering more comprehensive initial support. SAP BW4HANA provides a more budget-friendly setup option for users with limited financial resources.
View comparison
Pricing
Teradata has a higher setup cost compared to SAP BW4HANA, offering more comprehensive initial support. SAP BW4HANA provides a more budget-friendly setup option for users with limited financial resources.
Teradata Logo
Apache Hadoop
3.9 out of 5
Teradata Logo
Apache Hadoop
3.9 out of 5
Teradata offers robust analytics and integration for high-volume data, making it ideal for structured data management. In comparison, Apache Hadoop's open-source flexibility and cost-effective storage appeal to those needing versatility with unstructured data and diverse data formats in distributed environments.
Download Apache Hadoop vs. Teradata Report
Teradata's setup costs are typically higher, with robust built-in features, whereas Apache Hadoop offers a more cost-effective initial setup, geared towards flexible scaling and open-source benefits.
View comparison
Pricing
Teradata's setup costs are typically higher, with robust built-in features, whereas Apache Hadoop offers a more cost-effective initial setup, geared towards flexible scaling and open-source benefits.
Teradata Logo
Teradata Logo
Oracle Database Appliance
4.0 out of 5
Teradata handles large data volumes efficiently with parallel processing, ideal for enterprises with complex needs. In comparison, Oracle Database Appliance offers ease of use and Oracle integration, beneficial for environments needing quick deployment and high integration with Oracle products.
Download Oracle Database Appliance vs. Teradata Report
Teradata's setup cost is often considered higher, focusing on enterprise-level performance, while Oracle Database Appliance offers a more cost-effective setup for smaller to mid-sized businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Teradata's setup cost is often considered higher, focusing on enterprise-level performance, while Oracle Database Appliance offers a more cost-effective setup for smaller to mid-sized businesses.
Teradata Logo
Teradata Logo
IBM Netezza Performance Server
4.0 out of 5
Teradata offers advanced analytics and scalability for complex data environments, attracting businesses with large-scale operations. In comparison, IBM Netezza Performance Server appeals to those seeking high performance with less complexity, offering quick deployment and cost-effective solutions for simpler requirements.
Download IBM Netezza Performance Server vs. Teradata Report
Teradata showcases a higher setup cost, whereas IBM Netezza Performance Server offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Teradata showcases a higher setup cost, whereas IBM Netezza Performance Server offers a more cost-effective initial setup.
Teradata Logo
IBM Db2 Warehouse
3.9 out of 5
Teradata Logo
IBM Db2 Warehouse
3.9 out of 5
Teradata excels in parallel processing and massive dataset handling, while IBM Db2 Warehouse offers reliability and integration ease. In comparison, Teradata's analytics and scalability attract enterprises, whereas IBM Db2's ease of integration and reliability make it appealing for large data environments.
Download IBM Db2 Warehouse vs. Teradata Report
Teradata has a higher setup cost compared to IBM Db2 Warehouse, making Db2 Warehouse a more cost-effective choice for initial deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Teradata has a higher setup cost compared to IBM Db2 Warehouse, making Db2 Warehouse a more cost-effective choice for initial deployment.
Teradata Logo
SAP IQ
4.0 out of 5
Teradata Logo
SAP IQ
4.0 out of 5
SAP IQ's column-based architecture enhances data compression and speed for business intelligence. In comparison, Teradata's parallel processing supports multi-platform data handling. SAP IQ's deployment is on-premises with service challenges, while Teradata offers versatile deployments and better customer support.
Download SAP IQ vs. Teradata Report
SAP IQ has moderate setup costs, while Teradata incurs higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
SAP IQ has moderate setup costs, while Teradata incurs higher initial expenses.
Teradata Logo
Teradata Logo
Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is favored for ease of use and integration with Microsoft tools, offering strong data integrity. In comparison, Teradata excels in scalability and advanced analytics, appealing for handling large data volumes. Each solution provides significant value for tech buyers.
Download Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. Teradata Report
The setup cost for Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is lower than Teradata, offering cost efficiency. Teradata, however, may involve higher initial expenses reflecting its broader feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is lower than Teradata, offering cost efficiency. Teradata, however, may involve higher initial expenses reflecting its broader feature set.
Teradata Logo
Teradata Logo
Oracle Big Data Appliance
4.0 out of 5
Teradata is celebrated for scalability and analytics, offering cost-effective solutions with excellent customer support. In comparison, Oracle Big Data Appliance excels with seamless integration within its ecosystem, providing robust features and strong deployment support, appealing to businesses already using Oracle's infrastructure for long-term value.
Download Oracle Big Data Appliance vs. Teradata Report
Teradata's setup cost tends to be lower, while Oracle Big Data Appliance often comes with a higher initial investment. Differences in setup costs highlight the varying budget requirements for each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Teradata's setup cost tends to be lower, while Oracle Big Data Appliance often comes with a higher initial investment. Differences in setup costs highlight the varying budget requirements for each solution.
Teradata Logo
Teradata Logo
Microsoft Analytics Platform System
3.3 out of 5
Teradata provides high-performance data warehousing, appealing to those prioritizing processing power. In comparison, Microsoft Analytics Platform System excels in integration with Microsoft solutions, attracting buyers focusing on ecosystem compatibility. Each offers distinct benefits to meet varied organizational needs.
Download Microsoft Analytics Platform System vs. Teradata Report
Teradata setup costs are generally higher due to complex configurations, while Microsoft Analytics Platform System provides a more budget-friendly option with simpler initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Teradata setup costs are generally higher due to complex configurations, while Microsoft Analytics Platform System provides a more budget-friendly option with simpler initial setup.
Teradata Logo
Actian Ingres
4.3 out of 5
Teradata Logo
Actian Ingres
4.3 out of 5
Teradata offers scalable, advanced analytics suitable for enterprise operations, while Actian Ingres is favored for its open-source model and transactional support. In comparison, Actian Ingres provides cost-effective solutions in smaller settings, whereas Teradata's high-performance capabilities cater to large-scale requirements.
Download Actian Ingres vs. Teradata Report
Teradata involves higher setup costs compared to Actian Ingres, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
Teradata involves higher setup costs compared to Actian Ingres, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option.
Teradata Logo
Teradata Logo
IBM Integrated Analytics System
4.0 out of 5
IBM Integrated Analytics System offers ease of integration and cost-effectiveness, appealing for quick value and simpler deployment. In comparison, Teradata attracts those seeking scalability and robust analytical tools, justifying higher costs through long-term returns and comprehensive deployment options for large-scale data processing.
The IBM Integrated Analytics System involves a lower setup cost, while Teradata requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
The IBM Integrated Analytics System involves a lower setup cost, while Teradata requires a higher initial investment.
Teradata Logo
Teradata Logo
Yellowbrick Data Warehouse
1 out of 5
Teradata is known for comprehensive support and competitive pricing, appealing to those prioritizing long-term scalability. In comparison, Yellowbrick offers advanced features and impressive speed, attracting tech buyers who value cutting-edge capabilities and efficient data handling.
Teradata's setup costs are generally perceived as higher due to infrastructure demands, while Yellowbrick Data Warehouse is noted for streamlined and cost-effective setup processes.
View comparison
Pricing
Teradata's setup costs are generally perceived as higher due to infrastructure demands, while Yellowbrick Data Warehouse is noted for streamlined and cost-effective setup processes.
Teradata Logo
Treasure Data
4.5 out of 5
Teradata Logo
Treasure Data
4.5 out of 5
Teradata is favored for its structured deployment model and budget-friendly pricing, appealing to enterprises seeking strong analytics and reliable support. In comparison, Treasure Data attracts companies prioritizing flexibility and advanced integration, offering innovative features that suit businesses focused on rapid setup and enhanced capabilities.
Teradata involves a substantial initial expense, while Treasure Data offers a more budget-friendly setup cost. Teradata's setup cost reflects its premium market position, whereas Treasure Data is favored for its cost-effectiveness.
View comparison
Pricing
Teradata involves a substantial initial expense, while Treasure Data offers a more budget-friendly setup cost. Teradata's setup cost reflects its premium market position, whereas Treasure Data is favored for its cost-effectiveness.
Teradata Logo
WP Bolt
4.0 out of 5
Teradata Logo
WP Bolt
4.0 out of 5
Teradata excels in big data analytics with scalable solutions for enterprise environments. In comparison, WP Bolt focuses on WordPress optimization, targeting improved speed and security. A tech buyer might choose Teradata for large-scale data handling or WP Bolt for streamlined WordPress performance enhancements.
Teradata setup cost is competitive compared to the streamlined setup cost of WP Bolt, which is designed for ease of use.
View comparison
Pricing
Teradata setup cost is competitive compared to the streamlined setup cost of WP Bolt, which is designed for ease of use.

Related categories

Data Warehouse
Relational Databases Tools
Cloud Data Warehouse