Top 10 Microsoft System Center Alternatives

3.9 out of 5

20 reviews
85% willing to recommend

Top Microsoft System Center Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft System Center based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Veeam Data Platform, IBM BPM, and VMware Aria Operations for Applications. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Microsoft System Center surpasses its competitors by offering robust automation, integrated monitoring, and seamless virtualization management capabilities, ensuring efficient data center operations and enhancing IT infrastructure security seamless with its user-friendly interface and comprehensive tools.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Veeam Data Platform

4.3 out of 5

Veeam Data Platform

4.3 out of 5

Microsoft System Center excels in integration within Microsoft ecosystems, making it ideal for Windows environments. In comparison, Veeam Data Platform offers exceptional backup and recovery for virtual environments. Buyers may choose Microsoft for integration or Veeam for robust backup features.

Download Microsoft System Center vs. Veeam Data Platform Report

Pricing

Microsoft System Center offers a low initial setup cost, making it attractive for budget-conscious companies, while Veeam Data Platform, although slightly higher in setup expenses, provides comprehensive data protection features.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM BPM

3.9 out of 5

IBM BPM

3.9 out of 5

IBM BPM offers comprehensive process management tools for complex business automation and adaptability. In comparison, Microsoft System Center provides ease of integration within the Microsoft ecosystem, enhancing administrative tasks and maintaining strong system monitoring—ideal for Windows-oriented environments.

Download IBM BPM vs. Microsoft System Center Report

Pricing

IBM BPM typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Microsoft System Center, which offers a more budget-friendly initial installation.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM BPM typically incurs higher setup costs compared to Microsoft System Center, which offers a more budget-friendly initial installation.

VMware Aria Operations for Applications

4.0 out of 5

VMware Aria Operations for Applications

4.0 out of 5

Microsoft System Center integrates well with Windows, offering automation and management capabilities but struggles with third-party integrations. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Applications excels in multi-environment monitoring, particularly in cloud and hybrid, offering strong virtualization and container support for complex deployments.

Download Microsoft System Center vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report

Pricing

Microsoft System Center setup cost is competitive, offering more affordability, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications presents higher initial expenses with additional features.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft System Center setup cost is competitive, offering more affordability, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications presents higher initial expenses with additional features.

Zenoss Cloud

4.2 out of 5

Zenoss Cloud

4.2 out of 5

Zenoss Cloud appeals to modern environments with cloud-native deployment and predictive analytics. In comparison, Microsoft System Center integrates deeply with Microsoft solutions, favoring enterprises reliant on this ecosystem. This makes Zenoss Cloud ideal for hybrid IT, while Microsoft System Center serves Microsoft-centric environments.

Download Microsoft System Center vs. Zenoss Cloud Report

Pricing

Zenoss Cloud offers a lower setup cost compared to Microsoft System Center, making it more cost-effective for initial deployment. In contrast, Microsoft System Center may have higher setup costs, which could impact upfront budget planning.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle SOA Suite

4.0 out of 5

Oracle SOA Suite

4.0 out of 5

Oracle SOA Suite excels in integration with its extensive adapters and support for service virtualization, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Microsoft System Center is praised for managing Windows environments easily and offering strong compatibility with Microsoft products, suitable for simpler setups.

Download Microsoft System Center vs. Oracle SOA Suite Report

Pricing

Oracle SOA Suite's setup cost is generally higher compared to Microsoft System Center, which offers a more budget-friendly initial cost.

View comparison

Pricing

Oracle SOA Suite's setup cost is generally higher compared to Microsoft System Center, which offers a more budget-friendly initial cost.

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

4.3 out of 5

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform

4.3 out of 5

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform offers competitive pricing and straightforward deployment with responsive support, appealing to budget-conscious businesses. In comparison, Microsoft System Center excels in comprehensive features and infrastructure management, perfect for enterprises seeking robust automation and extensive management capabilities despite higher initial costs.

Download JBoss Enterprise Application Platform vs. Microsoft System Center Report

Pricing

JBoss Enterprise Application Platform has a straightforward setup cost, while Microsoft System Center's setup is more complex, potentially leading to additional expenses. Users should weigh these differences when considering deployment strategies.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Application Infrastructure

Cloud Monitoring Software

Backup and Recovery